The Despenser Reredos in Saint Luke’s Chapel in Norwich Cathedral (Photograph: Wikipedia/CCL)
Patrick Comerford
When we were staying in Norwich last month, I visited Norwich Cathedral once again, and still managed to miss one of the great mediaeval treasures of the cathedral – the Despenser Reredos above the altar in Saint Luke’s Chapel.
When I visited Norwich Cathedral last year, the Despenser Reredos was covered in Lenten array, so that perhaps explains why I missed seeing it once again last month, not just once, but twice.
However, I managed to see a number of other mediaeval treasures this time round, including: the reredos in the Chapel of Saint Saviour, made with panels recovered from old mediaeval rood screens; the Adoration of the Magi by Martin Schwarz in the Jesus Chapel; and the old baptismal font and the statue of Saint Felix in Saint Luke’s Chapel; as well as another modern treasure in Saint Luke’s Chapel – the Hanging Chrismatory.
Norwich Cathedral is best known for its two-storey cloisters (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Norwich Cathedral is best known for its two-storey cloisters. But the Despenser Reredos, dating from ca 1380, is one of the cathedral’s greatest treasures, its most important work of art and the only surviving mediaeval English altarpiece with scenes of Christ’s Passion.
The Despenser Reredos, also known as the Despenser Retable, was saved from destruction over the centuries because it was hidden as the underside of a table until 1847. It depicts five scenes from the life of Christ: his scourging at the pillar, Christ carrying his cross, the Crucifixion, the Resurrection and the Ascension. The scenes are painted in vivid colours on wood, and are surrounded by a rectangular frame.
The original reredos may have been located at the High Altar originally. It was probably commissioned in 1382 by Henry le Despenser, the Bishop of Norwich, after the defeat of the Peasants’ Revolt at the Battle of North Walsham in 1381. Heraldic shields around the frame may represent the families involved in suppressing the Peasants’ Revolt in East Anglia, or who contributed to the cost of producing the piece.
An alternative theory suggests it was commissioned to mark the visit to Norwich by King Richard II and his queen Anne of Bohemia in 1383.
Albert Way, a local historian, and the art historian Matthew Digby Wyatt believed the altarpiece came from Italy. However, its origins remain uncertain. At first, experts thought it was of Italian or German origin, but later specialists believed it was influenced by French or Bohemian craftsmen. The English antiquarian William Henry St John Hope in 1898 described it as an example of ‘genuine English art’, and suggested it had been made in Norwich, was commissioned by Bishop Despenser at the time of the Peasants’ Revolt.
The panels are similar to those in another church in Norwich, Saint Michael-at-Plea, but experts have not been able to conclude from this that it was made locally. The historian David King concludes that the origin of the reredos cannot be ascertained by the style of the panels. On the other hand, the mediaeval art historian Pamela Tudor-Craig wrote that there is evidence that the reredos was ‘executed by local craftsmen’.
The mediaevalist Sarah Beckwith has argued that the commission was directly related to the insurrection in the manner of an object lesson, suggesting that ‘the peasants who had dared, albeit abortively, to contest their ordained position in the social hierarchy and whose revolutionary gestures were based on an identification with Christ, are once again shown a story, a story they already know very well.’
Early morning at Norwich Cathedral (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
During the English Civil war, many religious works of art were kept secret to save them from the Puritan armies and the reredos was removed, turned upside down and used as a tabletop, with the paintings concealed underneath. The upper part, including part of the central figure of Jesus, was sawn off by carpenters who made the table top, and the four corners were cut out to allow table legs to be inserted.
The converted table was kept for years in an upper room, with the altarpiece paintings hidden underneath. The reredos remained lost until 1847, when it was accidentally rediscovered, supposedly when someone dropped something that rolled underneath the table. After its discovery, the reredos was displayed in a glass case in the south ambulatory.
The panels and frame and the vibrant colours were restored by Pauline Plummer in 1958, and since then the reredos has been used once again as an altarpiece in Saint Luke’s Chapel.
The reredos in Saint Saviour’s Chapel is made with panels recovered from mediaeval rood screens (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Another reredos in Norwich Cathedral is to be seen in Saint Saviour’s Chapel, the chapel of the Royal Norfolk Regiment and Royal Anglian Regiment. This memorial space at the east end of the cathedral is on the site of the 13th century Lady Chapel that was demolished in the late 16th century.
The architect Sir Charles Nicholson (1867-1949) designed Saint Saviour’s Chapel in 1930-1932. The reredos in the chapel is made with panels recovered from old mediaeval rood screens.
Nicholson’s other work on Anglican cathedrals includes the west front of Saint Anne’s Cathedral, Belfast, where he was the cathedral architect in 1924-1948), additions to Chelmsford Cathedral, and the reconstruction of Portsmouth Cathedral. His internal restorations were carried out at Brecon, Carlisle, Exeter, Leicester, Lichfield, Lincoln, Llandaff, Manchester, Salisbury, Wakefield, Wells and Winchester.
Martin Schwarz’s ‘Adoration of the Magi’ … a late mediaeval painting in the Jesus Chapel (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Martin Schwarz’s ‘Adoration of the Magi’ is a late mediaeval painting in the Jesus Chapel. The painting may have been created in the late 15th or early 16th century as part of a triptych and shows the three Magi brining their gifts to the Christ Child. The figures may have been modelled on contemporary merchants and noblemen who commissioned the work, while the gifts of the Magi are depicted as intricate gold and silver pieces.
Modern wooden panels on either side of the painting quote Latin texts from the Epiphany service: Omnes de saba venient (‘They will all come from the East’, Isaiah 60: 6) … the passage continues: ‘They shall bring gold and frankincense, and shall proclaim the praise of the Lord; and Omnis Terra Adoret Te (‘All the earth worships you’, Psalm 66: 4).
The Hanging Chrismatory in Saint Luke’s Chapel was designed by Henry Freeland and Rupert Harris (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Saint Luke’s Chapel, where the Despenser Reredos now stands behind the altar, was formerly dedicated to Saint John the Baptist, and has served as the parish church of Saint-Mary-in-the-Marsh since the 16th century.
The 15th century baptismal font in Saint Luke’s Chapel is a Seven Sacrament font, although the details and figures are difficult to make out due to the destructive and damage actions of iconoclasts and neglect over the centuries.
The Hanging Chrismatory in Saint Luke’s Chapel hangs directly above the baptismal font. It is a silver-gilt and glass vessel that holds the three holy oils and designed by Henry Freeland, the cathedral architect, and Rupert Harris, a conservator and restorer. Norwich Cathedral is believed to be unique in having the oils suspended in the manner of a ‘hanging pyx’ for the Blessed Sacrament.
Each vessel has its own distinctive marking that indicates the oil’s particular use:
IO, Oleum Infirmorum: the oil for anointing the sick and the dying. This oil is used to invoke God’s healing of body, mind and spirit.
OC, Oleum Catechumenorum: the oil for signing with the cross at Baptism. This oil is used immediately after Baptism to invoke God’s protection and to affirm our belonging to Christ.
SC, Sacrum Chrisma: the oil of chrism. This oil is used immediately after Baptism, at Confirmation, at the ordination of priests and at the consecration of bishops, to invoke God’s blessing on our life and work as faithful disciples in God’s kingdom.
The stone effigy outside Saint Luke’s Chapel is now said to represent Saint Felix, who brought Christianity to East Anglia (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
A stone effigy on the wall just outside Saint Luke’s Chapel was originally thought to depict Bishop Herbert de Lonsinga, the founder of the cathedral. But experts now suggest although it was commissioned by Bishop Herbert de Lonsinga it represents Saint Felix, who is said to have brought Christianity to East Anglia.
Saint Felix was the first bishop of the Kingdom of the East Angles when England was divided into several kingdoms. He is credited with introducing Christianity to the East Angles and so freeing ‘the whole kingdom from long-standing evil and unhappiness’, according to the Venerable Bede in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People.
Initially, the statue stood in a niche outside the bishop’s door in the north transept, and was brought to its present location in 1969.
Lent begins next week on Ash Wednesday, and the Despenser Reredos will be covered in Lenten array again until Easter. It may be some time before I have another opportunity to see the most important work of art in Norwich Cathedral and the only surviving mediaeval English altarpiece.
Saint Saviour’s Chapel was designed by the architect Sir Charles Nicholson in 1930-1932 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
▼
10 February 2026
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2026:
8, Tuesday 10 February 2026
Classical masks on sale near the Acropolis in Athens … the word ‘hypocrite’ comes from the Greek word for an actor who masked or hid his face (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar. This week began with the Second Sunday before Lent (8 February 2026), and Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent are just over a week away (18 February 2025).
The calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Scholastica (ca 543), sister of Saint Benedict, Abbess of Plombariola. Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘There are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles’ (Mark 7: 4) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Mark 7: 1-13 (NRSVA):
1 Now when the Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem gathered around him, 2 they noticed that some of his disciples were eating with defiled hands, that is, without washing them. 3 (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they thoroughly wash their hands, thus observing the tradition of the elders; 4 and they do not eat anything from the market unless they wash it; and there are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles). 5 So the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, ‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ 6 He said to them, ‘Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written,
“This people honours me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me;
7 in vain do they worship me,
teaching human precepts as doctrines.”
8 You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.’
9 Then he said to them, ‘You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition! 10 For Moses said, “Honour your father and your mother”; and, “Whoever speaks evil of father or mother must surely die.” 11 But you say that if anyone tells father or mother, “Whatever support you might have had from me is Corban” (that is, an offering to God) – 12 then you no longer permit doing anything for a father or mother, 13 thus making void the word of God through your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many things like this.’
‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ (Mark 7: 5) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
Sometimes our comfortable differences can trip us up in ways that surprise or even embarrass us.
I was talking to a priest colleague, who is not from these islands, who once told me how, within weeks, he came a cropper in a new parish. He comes from a society and a culture where people speak openly and directly. He regards this as a mark of efficiency and a sign of his honesty.
But when he arrived in that new parish, this did not go down well at all.
When he told parishioners what he wanted to do, he thought he was being frank, honest and direct.
But his parishioners immediately saw him as abrupt, abrasive and rude.
In his next parish, he knew he needed to be a little less direct and a lot more diplomatic.
We all know what diplomats mean when they say talks have been frank and honest: bruising encounters with no one behaving in what we might call a civilised manner, or behaving towards each other like Christians.
We respond instinctively as if we expect to be treated politely and that others expect us to treat them politely too.
I offer two examples of how I think England and Ireland are unique in this respect. In other countries, when people pay for a service, they feel that they are doing someone a favour, giving them their custom and their money, and so walk away when the transaction is complete. It is a bonus for them if the person at the till says as they leave, ‘Thank you.’
But here, on these islands, we respond differently: when we pay in a shop or café, or get off a bus or train, it is we, the paying customers, who say ‘Thank You!’
Or again: How often have I asked someone for information that I know or expect them to have – looking for directions on the street, or asking for information at an airport or a train station.
And every now and then we meet someone who is curmudgeonly, who got out on the wrong side of the bed, or is just downright rude. And they answer brusquely, ‘I don’t know,’ or ‘Look at the timetable.’
And what do I say in reply? I say, ‘Thank You!’ Or I do the apologising.
I am just too Anglo-Saxon with my manners for my own good at times. I put on a polite mask, and I put up.
And sometimes we confuse those good manners with the answer we expect to that perennial question, ‘What Would Jesus Do?’
Well, look at what Jesus does over in our Gospel readings over these two weeks, and we’re in for something of a shocker.
Over these two weeks, we are going to come across what appear to be interesting, front-parlour meetings with Jesus. But that’s because English is such a polite language, and the translators add their own polite priorities and good manners to how they translate what Jesus says in the original and very direct Greek into palatable, modern English.
In today’s reading, we hear what sounds like Jesus being very rude to some very religious people, who come with real doubts and with polite questions.
How does he respond? He calls them hypocrites.
And to add to that, in the reading on Thursday, Jesus goes on to compare a woman who comes to him in distress with dogs, and he seems to call her daughter what amounts to – in the original Greek – a ‘little bitch’ (Mark 7: 24-30, 12 February 2026).
Then in the reading on Friday, he meets a man who is deaf and dumb – and he sticks his fingers in his ears and spits on him (Mark 7: 31-37, 13 February 2026).
Hypocrites, dogs, little bitches, poking at someone, spitting at them. Now, imagine if I responded in any one of these ways to someone who gives me a curt answer when I try to find my way through a busy train station or a crowded airport, or if they responded to me like that!
In today’s reading, the Pharisees come to Jesus with a genuine question that arises from rules they apply in their religious life, and rules that are radical, reforming, and easy for us to identify with when the reasons behind them are explained.
We need to keep in mind that the Pharisees are very religious, pious and good people. Too often we forget that Saint Paul boasts he is a Pharisee, that among the different Jewish groups of the day the Pharisees are the closest in tradition and practice to Jesus, and that Pharisaic Judaism is the spiritual ancestor of all modern forms of Judaism today.
The Pharisees looked at the demands the religious law of the Book of Leviticus made on the priests in the Temple. This priestly class included some of Jesus’ own family, such as Zechariah, the father of Saint John the Baptist.
Purity and cleanliness were part of their role in the Temple. Before they ate or handled any sacred food, they had to wash their hands thoroughly. But these rules only applied when they were on the rota for priestly duties in the Temple. They took it in turn, and outside that turn, those rules did not apply. Nor did they apply to the people in general, the average, everyday Jew on the street or at home.
But after the people return from exile in Babylon to Jerusalem, the Pharisees see the whole people as a royal people, a holy priesthood. And to make the people conscious of how holy the whole nation is, they suggest people should take on those priestly practices, to show they are holy.
In time, this becomes so accepted that people who do not bother washing their hands ritually before they eat are seen as being hypocrites if, at the same time, they are supposed to be holy and religious people.
The word hypocrite comes from classical Greek drama. This word ὑποκριτής (hypokrités) was used for an actor who on stage puts on a mask and speaks the words of someone else. The actor with the mask could have subtitles with a disclaimer: ‘These are not my words, I am only using the words of Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes … or one of the other great playwrights.’
So, a hypocrite was an actor, a pretender, a dissembler, a hypocrite puts on a mask and says something that represents someone else’s ideas, but that he does not necessarily believe himself.
Jesus is saying that the Pharisees are using someone else’s words but do not necessarily understand why those rules and regulations came about.
It is not that washing my hands before I eat is a bad idea, or that I am a hypocrite if I do so. If I habitually fail to wash my hands before I eat, I am going to get sick, quickly and often.
But if I forget why I have to wash my hands, I am a hypocrite if I then expect others to do so. And sometimes we leave ourselves in danger of going hungry if we insist on washing our hands before we eat: the facilities to wash my hands properly are not always to hand conveniently on a long train journey or a long flight.
The Pharisees had their own rituals, and I would be silly to think that only they had these problems. We all have our own rituals associated with eating and cleanliness.
It is said one of the principal causes of domestic arguments in the kitchen is about what way to stack the dishwasher, and how to empty it. Should the knives stand up or down? Which sides do you place the glasses and the cups on? Do you rinse the plates before they go in?
To tell the truth, it probably does not matter. But it is still irritating to open the dishwasher and to find someone else has packed it.
The level of questioning from the Pharisees is about a ritual that is probably more important than how you and I stack the dishwasher. And the level of response from Jesus is not as rude as we might first think.
But when he says the Pharisees are hypocrites, Jesus is challenging them to drop the mask and to own the words they speak and to own the reasons for those rituals.
Can you imagine how much more positively people at large would view the churches if every parish and church put as much care into seeing that our children are not abused or infected with racism or discrimination or hatred as much as we put into seeing that the cups are clean for the tea and coffee after church, or as much as we attend to the cleanliness of the sacred vessels used for the Eucharist or Holy Communion?
If we are worried about how clean the patten and chalice are at Holy Communion, how clean the church is, how clean the coffee cup is when it comes out of the dishwasher, how much more should be worried about how clean the Church is as an institution, how worthy it is to be called – for us to be called – the Body of Christ.
How we stack the dishwasher can be a domestic ritual of cleanliness … and the cause of many domestic arguments (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 10 February 2026):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is: ‘Safe Routes’ (pp 26-27). This theme was introduced on Sunday with a Programme Update by Bradon Muilenburg, Anglican Refugee Support Lead.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Tuesday 10 February 2026) invites us to pray:
Guard the children and parents separated across the English Channel. Shine your light on them, especially those waiting to be reunited safely.
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty God,
you have created the heavens and the earth
and made us in your own image:
teach us to discern your hand in all your works
and your likeness in all your children;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who with you and the Holy Spirit reigns supreme over all things,
now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God our creator,
by your gift
the tree of life was set at the heart of the earthly paradise,
and the bread of life at the heart of your Church:
may we who have been nourished at your table on earth
be transformed by the glory of the Saviour’s cross
and enjoy the delights of eternity;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
Almighty God,
give us reverence for all creation
and respect for every person,
that we may mirror your likeness
in Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
A classical Greek mask in a museum in Naxos in Sicily … the word ‘hypocrite’ comes from the Greek word for an actor who masked or hid his face as he said someone else’s words (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar. This week began with the Second Sunday before Lent (8 February 2026), and Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent are just over a week away (18 February 2025).
The calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Scholastica (ca 543), sister of Saint Benedict, Abbess of Plombariola. Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘There are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles’ (Mark 7: 4) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Mark 7: 1-13 (NRSVA):
1 Now when the Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem gathered around him, 2 they noticed that some of his disciples were eating with defiled hands, that is, without washing them. 3 (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they thoroughly wash their hands, thus observing the tradition of the elders; 4 and they do not eat anything from the market unless they wash it; and there are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles). 5 So the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, ‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ 6 He said to them, ‘Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written,
“This people honours me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me;
7 in vain do they worship me,
teaching human precepts as doctrines.”
8 You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.’
9 Then he said to them, ‘You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition! 10 For Moses said, “Honour your father and your mother”; and, “Whoever speaks evil of father or mother must surely die.” 11 But you say that if anyone tells father or mother, “Whatever support you might have had from me is Corban” (that is, an offering to God) – 12 then you no longer permit doing anything for a father or mother, 13 thus making void the word of God through your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many things like this.’
‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ (Mark 7: 5) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
Sometimes our comfortable differences can trip us up in ways that surprise or even embarrass us.
I was talking to a priest colleague, who is not from these islands, who once told me how, within weeks, he came a cropper in a new parish. He comes from a society and a culture where people speak openly and directly. He regards this as a mark of efficiency and a sign of his honesty.
But when he arrived in that new parish, this did not go down well at all.
When he told parishioners what he wanted to do, he thought he was being frank, honest and direct.
But his parishioners immediately saw him as abrupt, abrasive and rude.
In his next parish, he knew he needed to be a little less direct and a lot more diplomatic.
We all know what diplomats mean when they say talks have been frank and honest: bruising encounters with no one behaving in what we might call a civilised manner, or behaving towards each other like Christians.
We respond instinctively as if we expect to be treated politely and that others expect us to treat them politely too.
I offer two examples of how I think England and Ireland are unique in this respect. In other countries, when people pay for a service, they feel that they are doing someone a favour, giving them their custom and their money, and so walk away when the transaction is complete. It is a bonus for them if the person at the till says as they leave, ‘Thank you.’
But here, on these islands, we respond differently: when we pay in a shop or café, or get off a bus or train, it is we, the paying customers, who say ‘Thank You!’
Or again: How often have I asked someone for information that I know or expect them to have – looking for directions on the street, or asking for information at an airport or a train station.
And every now and then we meet someone who is curmudgeonly, who got out on the wrong side of the bed, or is just downright rude. And they answer brusquely, ‘I don’t know,’ or ‘Look at the timetable.’
And what do I say in reply? I say, ‘Thank You!’ Or I do the apologising.
I am just too Anglo-Saxon with my manners for my own good at times. I put on a polite mask, and I put up.
And sometimes we confuse those good manners with the answer we expect to that perennial question, ‘What Would Jesus Do?’
Well, look at what Jesus does over in our Gospel readings over these two weeks, and we’re in for something of a shocker.
Over these two weeks, we are going to come across what appear to be interesting, front-parlour meetings with Jesus. But that’s because English is such a polite language, and the translators add their own polite priorities and good manners to how they translate what Jesus says in the original and very direct Greek into palatable, modern English.
In today’s reading, we hear what sounds like Jesus being very rude to some very religious people, who come with real doubts and with polite questions.
How does he respond? He calls them hypocrites.
And to add to that, in the reading on Thursday, Jesus goes on to compare a woman who comes to him in distress with dogs, and he seems to call her daughter what amounts to – in the original Greek – a ‘little bitch’ (Mark 7: 24-30, 12 February 2026).
Then in the reading on Friday, he meets a man who is deaf and dumb – and he sticks his fingers in his ears and spits on him (Mark 7: 31-37, 13 February 2026).
Hypocrites, dogs, little bitches, poking at someone, spitting at them. Now, imagine if I responded in any one of these ways to someone who gives me a curt answer when I try to find my way through a busy train station or a crowded airport, or if they responded to me like that!
In today’s reading, the Pharisees come to Jesus with a genuine question that arises from rules they apply in their religious life, and rules that are radical, reforming, and easy for us to identify with when the reasons behind them are explained.
We need to keep in mind that the Pharisees are very religious, pious and good people. Too often we forget that Saint Paul boasts he is a Pharisee, that among the different Jewish groups of the day the Pharisees are the closest in tradition and practice to Jesus, and that Pharisaic Judaism is the spiritual ancestor of all modern forms of Judaism today.
The Pharisees looked at the demands the religious law of the Book of Leviticus made on the priests in the Temple. This priestly class included some of Jesus’ own family, such as Zechariah, the father of Saint John the Baptist.
Purity and cleanliness were part of their role in the Temple. Before they ate or handled any sacred food, they had to wash their hands thoroughly. But these rules only applied when they were on the rota for priestly duties in the Temple. They took it in turn, and outside that turn, those rules did not apply. Nor did they apply to the people in general, the average, everyday Jew on the street or at home.
But after the people return from exile in Babylon to Jerusalem, the Pharisees see the whole people as a royal people, a holy priesthood. And to make the people conscious of how holy the whole nation is, they suggest people should take on those priestly practices, to show they are holy.
In time, this becomes so accepted that people who do not bother washing their hands ritually before they eat are seen as being hypocrites if, at the same time, they are supposed to be holy and religious people.
The word hypocrite comes from classical Greek drama. This word ὑποκριτής (hypokrités) was used for an actor who on stage puts on a mask and speaks the words of someone else. The actor with the mask could have subtitles with a disclaimer: ‘These are not my words, I am only using the words of Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes … or one of the other great playwrights.’
So, a hypocrite was an actor, a pretender, a dissembler, a hypocrite puts on a mask and says something that represents someone else’s ideas, but that he does not necessarily believe himself.
Jesus is saying that the Pharisees are using someone else’s words but do not necessarily understand why those rules and regulations came about.
It is not that washing my hands before I eat is a bad idea, or that I am a hypocrite if I do so. If I habitually fail to wash my hands before I eat, I am going to get sick, quickly and often.
But if I forget why I have to wash my hands, I am a hypocrite if I then expect others to do so. And sometimes we leave ourselves in danger of going hungry if we insist on washing our hands before we eat: the facilities to wash my hands properly are not always to hand conveniently on a long train journey or a long flight.
The Pharisees had their own rituals, and I would be silly to think that only they had these problems. We all have our own rituals associated with eating and cleanliness.
It is said one of the principal causes of domestic arguments in the kitchen is about what way to stack the dishwasher, and how to empty it. Should the knives stand up or down? Which sides do you place the glasses and the cups on? Do you rinse the plates before they go in?
To tell the truth, it probably does not matter. But it is still irritating to open the dishwasher and to find someone else has packed it.
The level of questioning from the Pharisees is about a ritual that is probably more important than how you and I stack the dishwasher. And the level of response from Jesus is not as rude as we might first think.
But when he says the Pharisees are hypocrites, Jesus is challenging them to drop the mask and to own the words they speak and to own the reasons for those rituals.
Can you imagine how much more positively people at large would view the churches if every parish and church put as much care into seeing that our children are not abused or infected with racism or discrimination or hatred as much as we put into seeing that the cups are clean for the tea and coffee after church, or as much as we attend to the cleanliness of the sacred vessels used for the Eucharist or Holy Communion?
If we are worried about how clean the patten and chalice are at Holy Communion, how clean the church is, how clean the coffee cup is when it comes out of the dishwasher, how much more should be worried about how clean the Church is as an institution, how worthy it is to be called – for us to be called – the Body of Christ.
How we stack the dishwasher can be a domestic ritual of cleanliness … and the cause of many domestic arguments (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 10 February 2026):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is: ‘Safe Routes’ (pp 26-27). This theme was introduced on Sunday with a Programme Update by Bradon Muilenburg, Anglican Refugee Support Lead.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Tuesday 10 February 2026) invites us to pray:
Guard the children and parents separated across the English Channel. Shine your light on them, especially those waiting to be reunited safely.
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty God,
you have created the heavens and the earth
and made us in your own image:
teach us to discern your hand in all your works
and your likeness in all your children;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who with you and the Holy Spirit reigns supreme over all things,
now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God our creator,
by your gift
the tree of life was set at the heart of the earthly paradise,
and the bread of life at the heart of your Church:
may we who have been nourished at your table on earth
be transformed by the glory of the Saviour’s cross
and enjoy the delights of eternity;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
Almighty God,
give us reverence for all creation
and respect for every person,
that we may mirror your likeness
in Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
A classical Greek mask in a museum in Naxos in Sicily … the word ‘hypocrite’ comes from the Greek word for an actor who masked or hid his face as he said someone else’s words (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org








