Saint Edmund’s Church in Maids Moreton, Buckinghamshire, dates from the late 14th century but probably stands on the site of an earlier Anglo-Saxon church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
I was in Maids Moreton, on the edges of Buckingham, earlier last week, looking for the Old Rectory as part of my continuing research into the work of the Stony Stratford architect Edward Swinfen Harris (1841-1924).
Maids Moreton is a pretty Buckinghamshire village that retains its rural and rustic charms despite its proximity to Buckingham, with many timber framed houses and thatched cottages in the village. But the oldest building in Maids Moreton is the Parish Church of Saint Edmund, said to date from the late 14th century but probably standing on the site of an earlier Anglo-Saxon church.
Saint Edmund’s is dedicated to the ninth century Anglo-Saxon King Edmund who was martyred and beheaded by the Danes in Essex in the year 869. He is buried at Bury St Edmunds and Saint Edmund and Saint Edward the Confessor were the patron saints of mediaeval England until they were replaced by Saint George in the 15th century. Saint Edmund’s Day is later next week, on 20 November.
A modern portrait of Saint Edmund, king and martyr, in Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Saint Edmund’s Church is a simple structure with a chancel, nave and tower, north and south porches and a south vestry that was extended in 1882. It is of exceptional quality in the Perpendicular style, a uniquely English variation of Gothic architecture that emphasises verticality, light and proportion. This is seen in the large windows with vertical mullions that continue downwards to stone seats. The most notable feature of the church are the four fan vaults that are contemporary with the building and among the earliest to be seen today.
The church was entirely rebuilt ca 1450, and later legends and local lore associate the founding or re-founding of the church with two women who became known as the Maids of Moreton. They were said to have been daughters of the last Thomas Pever, who died in 1429, and are said to give Maids Moreton its name.
The legend and its dating is further confused by a stone slab, originally in the centre of the nave and now under a section of the floor that can be lifted. It has the outline of the brasses of two women dated to ca 1380-1420. They too have been identified with the two women said to have given Maids Moreton its name.
Inside Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, looking towards the chancel and the east end (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
A late 12th century font and some 12th century moulded stones, reused in the rear arches of the windows of the north porch, are parts of an earlier church, and the list of rectors of the parish begins in 1241 with one Robert.
The windows throughout the church, with their tracery of vertical mullions and horizontal transoms, are the most obvious feature in the Perpendicular style. The original oak roofs of the nave and chancel remain. All the vaults in Saint Edmund’s are of an early design and construction, similar to the cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral, with the ribs doubling and re-doubling in number as the cone expands.
These architectural details suggest Saint Edmund’s Church was completed before 1400, and the unusually large number of stone seats, especially in the chancel, suggest it may have been intended for a singing school.
The chancel, the oldest part of Saint Edmund’s Church, may have been built before the Black Death in 14th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The chancel is the oldest part of the church and may have been built before the Black Death in 14th century, with the nave and tower built after that. The chancel roof is of two bays, the carved boss at the centre of the tie-beam shows Christ in Majesty sitting on a throne holding the world in his left hand while his right hand is raised in blessing.
The east window has a three-centred arch that is flat at the top rather than pointed in the Gothic tradition. Pieces of mediaeval glass at the top of the window indicate it originally depicted the Tree of Jesse, illustrating the genealogy of Jesus through King David.
The stained glass in the east window is the work of Percy Charles Haydon Bacon (1860-1935), who founded the firm of Percy Bacon & Brothers in 1892. He also made windows in Saint James the Great Church, Hanslope, and Saint Simon and Saint Jude Church, Castlethorpe.
The window by Percy Charles Haydon Bacon was installed in 1898 to mark Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee the previous year. It shows five major events in the life of Christ: the Nativity; the Baptism of Christ in the Jordan by Saint John the Baptist; the Crucifixion; the Resurrection or Noli Me Tangere; and the Ascension, though with only two of the disciples, Saint Peter and Saint John.
The east window by Percy Charles Haydon Bacon was installed in 1898 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The altar or communion table replaced the pre-Reformation stone altar that may once have held relics of Saint Edmund, and a later Reformation-era table. The carved oak Jacobean table is dated 1623 and the carvings include dragons with grape vines emerging from their mouths, symbols of the Holy Spirit and the fruit of the Spirits, a rose and thistle symbolising the united crowns of England and Scotland, various faces and shields with the name of the donor John More, the donor, and the coat of arms of the More family.
The sedilia on the south side of the chancel has an elaborately carved canopy above the seats for the priest, deacon and subdeacon. The canopy is of chalk, and probably dates from the late 15th century. The painting behind is of uncertain date. It showed the Last Supper, and was defaced probably by Cromwellian soldiers.
The sedilia on the south side of the chancel with its elaborately carved canopy (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The door on the north side of the chancel is made of wide vertical planks, mostly elm, and may have been made hastily to replace a door that Cromwellian soldiers broke through.
An elaborate monument in a recess in the centre of the north wall of the chancel commemorates Penelope Bate and her husband Edward Bate, the son of George Bate, who was the physician to Charles I, Oliver Cromwell and Charles II.
The lectern, now in the chancel, has an oak base and support, with an oak carving of an eagle. It was donated by Eliza Nickols of Oxford, in 1933, in memory of her mother, who was born in Maids Moreton.
The oak chancel screen dates from the 15th century. When Hugh Harrison, a consultant conservationist, examined the screen in 2012, he found convincing evidence that it was no later than the 15th century and had always been in its location. He said ‘the screen is one of the most complete, least altered or damaged mediaeval screens that I have ever seen.’
He found signs of the original red and green polychrome decoration. On top of the screen, at either end of the chancel arch, are two blackened oak figures with shields displaying the hammer and nails of the crucifixion. They may have been corbel fronts or bosses from an old roof.
The oak chancel screen dates from the 15th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The nave is divided into four bays by the spacing of the roof trusses. In each of the first, second and fourth bays on either side is a tall, finely-proportioned window of three transomed lights, cinquefoiled in both stages, with vertical tracery in a two-centred head.
In the third bay on either side are the north and south doorways, each set in a recess of the same character as those in the chancel, and rising to the same height as the heads of the windows.
The nave roof has four bays with carved bosses and a carved with a figure of Christ in Judgment sitting on a rainbow. The roof was renovated in 1882, overlaid with new timbers and reroofed.
The pulpit was presented by Bishop Edmund Harold Browne in memory of his parents (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The pulpit has carved oak rails in the Gothic style. It was presented by Edmund Harold Browne (1811-1891), Bishop of Ely, Bishop of Winchester and Norrisian Professor of Divinity at Cambridge, in memory of his parents, who lived at Moreton House and are buried by the church tower.
On the wall behind the pulpit, an 18th century tablet recalls Penelope Packe (1699-1718), a granddaughter of Edward Bate, who is commemorated on the north wall in the chancel, and the first wife of Richard Verney (1693-1752), 13th Lord Willoughby de Broke; she died when she was only 18.
The remains of a piscina – a drain used in rinsing the Communion vessels – in the south-east corner of the nave indicate an altar was originally in that place. The side chapel may have been the Lady Chapel, with a niche in the corner and a peculiar squint or hagiascope, that provided a view of the High Altar, so that the elevation at the two celebrations could take place at the same time.
The font is from the earlier church and may date from the 1140s or 1150s (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The font, which is from the earlier church, is of late Norman character, and has a large circular bowl resting on a large octagonal base and stem. The bowl is decorated with a series of six ornamented and beaded semi-circles, each enclosing a large acanthus leaf, with smaller leaves in the intermediate spaces. The bowl is believed to have been made in the workshop at Saint Peter’s in Northampton in the 1140s or 1150s.
Above the north door is a 17th century painted inscription with the arms of the Peyvre family, commemorating the Maids of Moreton, the legendary founders of the church.
An early Victorian bread basket on the wall near the north door was once used to hold bread distributed to the poor of the parish after evensong in winter. The bread was paid for through a bequest from of John Snart who died in 1743. The basket was rediscovered in the attic of the Old Rectory in 1904. The loaves were last distributed in 1970.
The north porch has embattled parapets, winged cherubim and a fan-vaulted ceiling (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The north porch with its vaulted ceiling and early 17th century outer double door (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
An early 17th century double door in the outer entrance of the north porch is set in a frame with a balustered fanlight in the head, bearing the date 1637 and a shield with the heraldic arms of the Pever family.
The porch has embattled parapets, winged figures representing cherubim, and a handsome fan-vaulted ceiling.
The design and execution of the vault is almost identical to the cloister of Gloucester Cathedral. In the rear arches of the windows are some 12th century moulded stones, probably re-used from the original church.
The south porch is smaller and less elaborate than the north porch (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The south porch is smaller and less elaborate than that the north porch – it is without buttresses and has a plain parapet in place of battlements. The roof is fan-vaulted and the internal door was installed during restoration work in the 1880s.
The west doorway has an elaborate canopy and the west window has remains of 15th century glass (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The west doorway has an elaborate canopy, supported by two richly panelled cones of fan vaulting. The west window has remains of 15th century glass. At the top corners of the tower are winged figures identical to those on the north porch.
The tower has a ring of six bells that are regularly rung. The bellringers’ gallery was built as a memorial to the dead of World War II. On the south wall of the gallery hangs the old south door with musket-ball holes made by Roundhead troops in 1642.
The Uthwatt family commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris to rebuild the Old Rectory (1878-1879) beside Saint Edmund’s Church. A major, but sympathetic, restoration of the church was undertaken in 1882-1887. At the time, the Rector of Maids Moreton was the Revd Bolton Waller Johnstone (1823-1903). His parents, the Revd John Beresford Johnstone and Elizabeth Waller of Castletown Park, Co Limerick, were married in Saint Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick, and he was born in Kilkenny and educated at Trinity College Dublin.
Inside Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, looking towards the west end from the chancel (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The church was reordered in 2015 when the chancel was cleared of accumulated furnishings and a level oak floor and a kitchen and toilet were added under the bellringers’ gallery.
The North Buckingham Parish is in the Diocese of Oxford and includes the villages of Akeley, Leckhampstead, Lillingstone Dayrell, Lillingstone Lovell and Maids Moreton and their churches, as well as part of the town of Buckingham.
The Revd Hans Taling is the Rector and the Revd Cathy Pearce is the Associate Priest.
The windows, with their tracery of vertical mullions and horizontal transoms, are the most obvious feature in the Perpendicular style (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
• The Sunday services in Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, at at 10:30, with Holy Communion on the second and fourth Sundays. Tn addition there are services at 8 am on the first and third Sundays and at 6 pm on the fourth Sunday.
The east end and chancel window of Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
09 November 2025
Daily prayer in the Kingdom Season:
9, Sunday 9 November 2025,
III before Advent, Remembrance Sunday
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. In the Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Later this morning, I hope to sing with the choir at the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, and in the afternoon I plan to attend the Remembrance Sunday commemorations at the War Memorial on Horsefair Green.
Meanwhile, before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The war memorial in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Luke 20: 27-38 (NRSVA):
27 Some Sadducees, those who say there is no resurrection, came to him 28 and asked him a question, ‘Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies, leaving a wife but no children, the man shall marry the widow and raise up children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers; the first married, and died childless; 30 then the second 31 and the third married her, and so in the same way all seven died childless. 32 Finally the woman also died. 33 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.’
34 Jesus said to them, ‘Those who belong to this age marry and are given in marriage; 35 but those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 36 Indeed they cannot die any more, because they are like angels and are children of God, being children of the resurrection. 37 And the fact that the dead are raised Moses himself showed, in the story about the bush, where he speaks of the Lord as the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. 38 Now he is God not of the dead, but of the living; for to him all of them are alive.’
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Tavern at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
When I was younger, much younger, I remember leafing through the pages of the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of Ireland during what I must have then thought were boring sermons.
Did you ever do that?
What did you come across?
Some things were undoubtedly more boring than any sermon, such as the list of sermons in the ‘Second Book of Homilies,’ listed in Article 35 of the 39 Articles.
But perhaps the most unusual thing I remember finding in the ‘old’ Book of Common Prayer was the ‘Table of Kindred and Affinity.’
It seeks to list ‘whosoever are related are forbidden by the Church … to marry together.’
The table – which is not there any more – ruled, for example, that a man may not marry his mother, his sister, his daughter, or numerous other relatives, and neither may a woman marry her uncle, nephew, grandparent or grandchild. That all makes common sense.
But it goes into obsessive detail with some surprising prohibitions. For example, a man may not marry his wife’s father’s mother or his daughter’s son’s wife.
I can still recall how my mind boggled at the thought of the need for such rules. What was life like back in the 16th century if the Church felt it needed to specify such prohibitions? And how many women had the opportunity even to contemplate marrying their deceased granddaughter’s husband?
At least six of the 25 relationships that are expressly prohibited from developing into marriage involve no genetic link at all. Yet the list did not prohibit marriages between first cousins. So some of the inconsistencies are striking, to say the least.
Some of the rules make sense: when extended families were the norm, and often lived under the same roof, these rules warned against exploitative relationships within family circles. They helped to prevent secret affairs that might have continued in the hope of their eventual ratification with marriage. And they clearly delineated family structures in ways that were important when it came to inheriting land and property and keeping them within the family.
But it could all have been, and was, dealt with anyway, through legislation and law.
What was something like that doing in a prayer book, in the Book of Common Prayer, in the first place?
I think it had less to do with morality and more to do with the Church needing to bolster long-held prejudices by cloaking them in statements that were good in part but in sum amounted to bad law and bad theology.
When the men who drew up this table in the Church, and the men who handed it down to Anglicans unquestioned for centuries, were getting their minds around some very peculiar relationships, did any one of them ever think about asking a woman, ‘What do you think about these obscure and arcane rules and regulations?’
Is the Church not doing the very same today, with the way it tries to rule about who can and who cannot get married in church today?
As the Church distances itself from marriages that are actually allowed in law today, who among senior decision-makers actually takes the time to ask the women and men who are refused Church marriages, ‘Would you like to be married in Church?’
For example, when Lyra McKee was murdered in Derry in 2019 Church leaders were right to rush to condemn her brutal murder. It was so fitting that she received a dignified funeral in a Church of Ireland cathedral, Saint Anne’s Cathedral, Belfast, later that month. But had the bishops and priests who condemned her murder and were supportive of her funeral instead offered her the marriage she had looked forward to, they would have been severely disciplined by Church authorities.
And, as they were disciplined, I imagine, no-one would have asked Lyra McKee what she wanted, what she needed, what she had hoped for.
I think her plight would have been similar to the plight of the woman who is at the centre of the debate in this morning’s Gospel reading (Luke 20: 27-38).
Her plight was probably not plucked from thin air, not concocted in the narrow imaginations of the Sadducees, the prominent group of ruling priests in the Temple, who use her dilemma to try to paint Jesus into a corner.
They are not interested in her plight.
They are not interested in her dilemma.
They are not interested in the fact that a widow in that society who fails to remarry is left without financial means of support, is left in poverty, may even be forced into prostitution.
Who ever asked this woman what she would like?
Who ever asked her how she would like to end up in this life … never mind in the next life?
And just as they had no real interest in life after death for this widow, they had no interest in life before death for her.
If they had, they would have asked her how she felt not about eternal life but about her life in the here and now … how did she feel after the death of her husband and her husbands … how did she feel about being traded as a commodity to protect men’s property interests … how did they die … did they die in war …?
On Remembrance Sunday each year, I wonder how many men bothered to ask my grandmother how she felt when her husband, my grandfather, returned from Thessaloniki in the middle of World War I, suffering from malaria, malaria that would eventually take him to an early grave.
She was so distressed that the age she gave for him on his gravestone is 49 … not the age he was when he died in 1921 (which was 53), but the age he was in 1916, when he returned from the war in Greece.
Perhaps, in this very sad mistake, she was saying the war had killed her husband.
She lived as widow for another 27 years, bringing up six children, two stepchildren and the four children of her marriage. Who ever asked her what she felt about life-before-death, never mind life-after-death?
If we fail to listen to the plight of the victims of war, then war creeps up on us suddenly. And then we ask: ‘Why did no-one tell us.’
World War I was supposed to be the war to end all wars. That promise was betrayed, for my grandmother, for all the men who are named on the war memorials in our churches, for their widows, mothers, sisters, daughters, for all who loved them, for all who continue to love them and to cherish their memories.
Wars continue to be waged in Ukraine and Russia … in Israel, Gaza and Palestine … in Sudan … in central Africa …in the caves and mountains of Afghanistan.
And when the war widows and refugees arrive in Britain or Ireland, they must wonder, in some places, whether we truly believe that love is at the heart of the Christian way of life.
The Sadducees in this morning’s reading do not believe in the afterlife anyway, so any answer Jesus gives is going to be ridiculed.
This woman, unnamed, is made an object by the people who come to Jesus with their silly questions. But none among them is truly concerned about her plight.
Her only role is to meet the obscure obligations set out in the arcane interpretations of the marriage code that make her an object. She has no name, no home; her only function is to serve the needs of men, to continue the family name and line, so that the family lands and wealth are not estranged.
But instead of dealing with trifling arguments that do not matter, Jesus avoids the debate and tells us three very straight truths:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of true relationships.
Of course, we do not yet live in the fullness of God’s kingdom. People still marry, people still vote and run in elections, people still invest and spend money. When we do those things, they have most value when they reflect the values of God’s kingdom.
When they do not reflect kingdom values, they become debased and lose value, significance and meaning. It is easy to understand that in terms of the political, social and economic difficulties we face. It is more difficult to say that in terms of relationships and marriages.
How we inhabit the political and economic structures of this age can become a sign of our dwelling in God’s kingdom … if we live with those structures so that we give priority, not to our own self-interest and gain, but to the concerns and needs of the poor, the outcast and the marginalised.
If we live our committed relationships in this life with integrity and honesty and self-sacrifice, they can become signs of how we live our risen lives in the age to come.
And in the great working out of God’s great eternal plans, these are the three eternal truths that matter most:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of meaningful relationships, with God and with others.
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday):
The theme this week (9 to 15 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Hope for the Future’ (pp 54-55). This theme is introduced today with Reflections from Laura D’Henin-Ivers, Chief Executive Officer at Hope for the Future:
Read and meditate on Psalm 24.
On 10 November, COP30 begins in Brazil, marking a crucial moment in our collective journey to care for God’s creation. Climate change threatens the most vulnerable, from communities facing rising seas to farmers enduring droughts. As Christians, we are called to pray and act, advocating for justice and sustainability.
Faith calls us to action – just as prophets spoke against injustice, so must we raise our voices for the earth. Stewardship is a sacred trust. Through advocacy, sustainable living, and hope, we embody our love for God and neighbour.
At Hope for the Future, we believe in collaboration with decisionmakers for bold climate action. Faith communities hold a unique role, as trusted institutions, vital parts of local and national societal fabric, and moral guides. When we speak up for climate justice, we amplify our message, making it harder for leaders to ignore. Rooted in shared values, faith-driven advocacy builds meaningful change.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday) invites us to pray by reflecting on these words: ‘For I know that my Redeemer lives, and that at the last he will stand upon the earth’ (Job 19: 25).
The prayer diary yesterday invited us to pray: Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
A wilted poppy in the mud in a field in Comberford, Staffordshire (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God of peace,
whose Son Jesus Christ proclaimed the kingdom
and restored the broken to wholeness of life:
look with compassion on the anguish of the world,
and by your healing power
make whole both people and nations;
through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Additional Collect:
God, our refuge and strength,
bring near the day when wars shall cease
and poverty and pain shall end,
that earth may know the peace of heaven
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Peeparations in Stony Stratford and Old Stratford for Remembrance Sunday (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. In the Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Later this morning, I hope to sing with the choir at the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, and in the afternoon I plan to attend the Remembrance Sunday commemorations at the War Memorial on Horsefair Green.
Meanwhile, before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The war memorial in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Luke 20: 27-38 (NRSVA):
27 Some Sadducees, those who say there is no resurrection, came to him 28 and asked him a question, ‘Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies, leaving a wife but no children, the man shall marry the widow and raise up children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers; the first married, and died childless; 30 then the second 31 and the third married her, and so in the same way all seven died childless. 32 Finally the woman also died. 33 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.’
34 Jesus said to them, ‘Those who belong to this age marry and are given in marriage; 35 but those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 36 Indeed they cannot die any more, because they are like angels and are children of God, being children of the resurrection. 37 And the fact that the dead are raised Moses himself showed, in the story about the bush, where he speaks of the Lord as the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. 38 Now he is God not of the dead, but of the living; for to him all of them are alive.’
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Tavern at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
When I was younger, much younger, I remember leafing through the pages of the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of Ireland during what I must have then thought were boring sermons.
Did you ever do that?
What did you come across?
Some things were undoubtedly more boring than any sermon, such as the list of sermons in the ‘Second Book of Homilies,’ listed in Article 35 of the 39 Articles.
But perhaps the most unusual thing I remember finding in the ‘old’ Book of Common Prayer was the ‘Table of Kindred and Affinity.’
It seeks to list ‘whosoever are related are forbidden by the Church … to marry together.’
The table – which is not there any more – ruled, for example, that a man may not marry his mother, his sister, his daughter, or numerous other relatives, and neither may a woman marry her uncle, nephew, grandparent or grandchild. That all makes common sense.
But it goes into obsessive detail with some surprising prohibitions. For example, a man may not marry his wife’s father’s mother or his daughter’s son’s wife.
I can still recall how my mind boggled at the thought of the need for such rules. What was life like back in the 16th century if the Church felt it needed to specify such prohibitions? And how many women had the opportunity even to contemplate marrying their deceased granddaughter’s husband?
At least six of the 25 relationships that are expressly prohibited from developing into marriage involve no genetic link at all. Yet the list did not prohibit marriages between first cousins. So some of the inconsistencies are striking, to say the least.
Some of the rules make sense: when extended families were the norm, and often lived under the same roof, these rules warned against exploitative relationships within family circles. They helped to prevent secret affairs that might have continued in the hope of their eventual ratification with marriage. And they clearly delineated family structures in ways that were important when it came to inheriting land and property and keeping them within the family.
But it could all have been, and was, dealt with anyway, through legislation and law.
What was something like that doing in a prayer book, in the Book of Common Prayer, in the first place?
I think it had less to do with morality and more to do with the Church needing to bolster long-held prejudices by cloaking them in statements that were good in part but in sum amounted to bad law and bad theology.
When the men who drew up this table in the Church, and the men who handed it down to Anglicans unquestioned for centuries, were getting their minds around some very peculiar relationships, did any one of them ever think about asking a woman, ‘What do you think about these obscure and arcane rules and regulations?’
Is the Church not doing the very same today, with the way it tries to rule about who can and who cannot get married in church today?
As the Church distances itself from marriages that are actually allowed in law today, who among senior decision-makers actually takes the time to ask the women and men who are refused Church marriages, ‘Would you like to be married in Church?’
For example, when Lyra McKee was murdered in Derry in 2019 Church leaders were right to rush to condemn her brutal murder. It was so fitting that she received a dignified funeral in a Church of Ireland cathedral, Saint Anne’s Cathedral, Belfast, later that month. But had the bishops and priests who condemned her murder and were supportive of her funeral instead offered her the marriage she had looked forward to, they would have been severely disciplined by Church authorities.
And, as they were disciplined, I imagine, no-one would have asked Lyra McKee what she wanted, what she needed, what she had hoped for.
I think her plight would have been similar to the plight of the woman who is at the centre of the debate in this morning’s Gospel reading (Luke 20: 27-38).
Her plight was probably not plucked from thin air, not concocted in the narrow imaginations of the Sadducees, the prominent group of ruling priests in the Temple, who use her dilemma to try to paint Jesus into a corner.
They are not interested in her plight.
They are not interested in her dilemma.
They are not interested in the fact that a widow in that society who fails to remarry is left without financial means of support, is left in poverty, may even be forced into prostitution.
Who ever asked this woman what she would like?
Who ever asked her how she would like to end up in this life … never mind in the next life?
And just as they had no real interest in life after death for this widow, they had no interest in life before death for her.
If they had, they would have asked her how she felt not about eternal life but about her life in the here and now … how did she feel after the death of her husband and her husbands … how did she feel about being traded as a commodity to protect men’s property interests … how did they die … did they die in war …?
On Remembrance Sunday each year, I wonder how many men bothered to ask my grandmother how she felt when her husband, my grandfather, returned from Thessaloniki in the middle of World War I, suffering from malaria, malaria that would eventually take him to an early grave.
She was so distressed that the age she gave for him on his gravestone is 49 … not the age he was when he died in 1921 (which was 53), but the age he was in 1916, when he returned from the war in Greece.
Perhaps, in this very sad mistake, she was saying the war had killed her husband.
She lived as widow for another 27 years, bringing up six children, two stepchildren and the four children of her marriage. Who ever asked her what she felt about life-before-death, never mind life-after-death?
If we fail to listen to the plight of the victims of war, then war creeps up on us suddenly. And then we ask: ‘Why did no-one tell us.’
World War I was supposed to be the war to end all wars. That promise was betrayed, for my grandmother, for all the men who are named on the war memorials in our churches, for their widows, mothers, sisters, daughters, for all who loved them, for all who continue to love them and to cherish their memories.
Wars continue to be waged in Ukraine and Russia … in Israel, Gaza and Palestine … in Sudan … in central Africa …in the caves and mountains of Afghanistan.
And when the war widows and refugees arrive in Britain or Ireland, they must wonder, in some places, whether we truly believe that love is at the heart of the Christian way of life.
The Sadducees in this morning’s reading do not believe in the afterlife anyway, so any answer Jesus gives is going to be ridiculed.
This woman, unnamed, is made an object by the people who come to Jesus with their silly questions. But none among them is truly concerned about her plight.
Her only role is to meet the obscure obligations set out in the arcane interpretations of the marriage code that make her an object. She has no name, no home; her only function is to serve the needs of men, to continue the family name and line, so that the family lands and wealth are not estranged.
But instead of dealing with trifling arguments that do not matter, Jesus avoids the debate and tells us three very straight truths:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of true relationships.
Of course, we do not yet live in the fullness of God’s kingdom. People still marry, people still vote and run in elections, people still invest and spend money. When we do those things, they have most value when they reflect the values of God’s kingdom.
When they do not reflect kingdom values, they become debased and lose value, significance and meaning. It is easy to understand that in terms of the political, social and economic difficulties we face. It is more difficult to say that in terms of relationships and marriages.
How we inhabit the political and economic structures of this age can become a sign of our dwelling in God’s kingdom … if we live with those structures so that we give priority, not to our own self-interest and gain, but to the concerns and needs of the poor, the outcast and the marginalised.
If we live our committed relationships in this life with integrity and honesty and self-sacrifice, they can become signs of how we live our risen lives in the age to come.
And in the great working out of God’s great eternal plans, these are the three eternal truths that matter most:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of meaningful relationships, with God and with others.
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday):
The theme this week (9 to 15 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Hope for the Future’ (pp 54-55). This theme is introduced today with Reflections from Laura D’Henin-Ivers, Chief Executive Officer at Hope for the Future:
Read and meditate on Psalm 24.
On 10 November, COP30 begins in Brazil, marking a crucial moment in our collective journey to care for God’s creation. Climate change threatens the most vulnerable, from communities facing rising seas to farmers enduring droughts. As Christians, we are called to pray and act, advocating for justice and sustainability.
Faith calls us to action – just as prophets spoke against injustice, so must we raise our voices for the earth. Stewardship is a sacred trust. Through advocacy, sustainable living, and hope, we embody our love for God and neighbour.
At Hope for the Future, we believe in collaboration with decisionmakers for bold climate action. Faith communities hold a unique role, as trusted institutions, vital parts of local and national societal fabric, and moral guides. When we speak up for climate justice, we amplify our message, making it harder for leaders to ignore. Rooted in shared values, faith-driven advocacy builds meaningful change.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday) invites us to pray by reflecting on these words: ‘For I know that my Redeemer lives, and that at the last he will stand upon the earth’ (Job 19: 25).
The prayer diary yesterday invited us to pray: Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
A wilted poppy in the mud in a field in Comberford, Staffordshire (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God of peace,
whose Son Jesus Christ proclaimed the kingdom
and restored the broken to wholeness of life:
look with compassion on the anguish of the world,
and by your healing power
make whole both people and nations;
through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Additional Collect:
God, our refuge and strength,
bring near the day when wars shall cease
and poverty and pain shall end,
that earth may know the peace of heaven
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Peeparations in Stony Stratford and Old Stratford for Remembrance Sunday (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Comberford,
Crete 2025,
Environment,
Greece 2025,
Kingdom Season,
Marriage,
Mission,
Old Stratford,
Prayer,
Remembrance Day,
Rethymnon,
Saint Luke's Gospel,
Stony Stratford,
USPG,
War and peace
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


















