Cambridge Memorial Church or Cambridge Unitarian Church on the corner of Emmanuel Road and Victoria Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
During my visits to Cambridge last week, on my way to and from the High Leigh Conference Centre in Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire, one of the many churches I have went to see was Cambridge Memorial Church or Cambridge Unitarian Church on Emmanuel Road.
The church was built on the corner of Emmanuel Road and Victoria Street almost 100 years ago in 1928. It faces across the open green space of Christ’s Pieces, and is a short walk from Emmanuel College and Drummer Street Bus Station.
Cambridge Unitarians describe themselves as ‘a friendly, active and growing congregation based in the heart of Cambridge.’ They gather for Sunday Services and a range of other events and activities. They are especially focussed on social justice, LGBT+ equality and community work.
The poet John Milton (1608-1674), who studied at Christ’s College, is sometimes cites among influential people in Cambridge who held Unitarian views, although this is a simplification of Milton’s views. Similarly, Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is often cited as an early Unitarian in Cambridge, although he kept private many of his theological opinions and remained a nominal Anglican.
The Revd William Whiston (1667-1752), who succeeded Isaac Newton as Lucasian Professor of Mathematics, was deprived of his university offices because of his Unitarian views, and became a Baptist
The Revd Theophilus Lindsey (1723-1808) was a Fellow of Saint John’s College and later Vicar of Catterick. He was strongly influenced by Whiston and resigned his parish in 1774 to become minister of the first openly Unitarian congregation in England at Essex Street in London.
The Revd William Frend (1757-1841), a mathematician and Fellow of Jesus College, resigned his living as Vicar of Madingley in 1787 and became a Unitarian. He was part of a circle of leading intellectual dissenters in Cambridge that included George Dyer, Benjamin Flower, Robert Hall and Robert Tyrwhitt and Robert Robinson.
The bell on the Unitarian Church in Canbridge (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
It seems there was no organised, formal Unitarian presence in Cambridge before 1875-1876. However, FJM Stratton (1881-1960), the church’s first chair, claimed the congregation began to meet in the ‘smoky atmosphere’ of a billiard room in Green Street. He traced the Unitarian Church in Cambridge back to a congregation was formed in 1680 and that met in a chapel in Green Street until 1818, when the lease of the building came to an end.
Cambridge Nonconformists were the heirs of the mid-17th century Puritans. They included the Baptists at Saint Andrew’s Street and the Cambridge Great Meeting at Hog Hill or Hog Hill Independent Church, which began in 1687 and became Emmanuel Congregational Chapel in 1790 and later Emmanuel United Reformed Church on Trumpington Street, but closed in 2017.
The other nonconformist congregations in Cambridge included the congregation of the old meeting house on the north side of Green Street, which began meeting in 1669 in the home of Elizabeth Petit.
Green Street runs from Trinity College to Sidney Street, with the east end facing onto Sidney Sussex College (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Green Street runs from Trinity College to Sidney Street, with the east end facing onto Sidney Sussex College. The returns of Nonconformist conventicles in Cambridge in 1680 record one that met at ‘Widow Elizabeth Petit’s house in Green Street.’ At the time, it was the only important nonconformist congregation in Cambridge then possessed, and had about 100 ‘hearers’.
The early ministers included the Revd Samuel Corbyn, a former chaplain of Trinity College who was ejected from Trinity and Clare in 1662 under the Act of Uniformity, Joseph Oddy and Francis Holcroft.
This congregation built a meeting house or chapel in 1688 on the site of Nos 3, 4 and 5 Green Street, on the north side of the street, immediately behind the present Sainsbury supermarket on Sidney Street.
After the Toleration Act, a Congregational Church was established in Green Street, with a settled meeting house. This chapel or meeting house was some distance back from the street, and was accessible only through a narrow passage between two houses. Such secluded situations were preferred by the early nonconformists, offering security against mob violence.
The early ministers also included Thomas Taylor, formerly of Gonville Caius College, who had led a small congregation in Bury St Edmund’s. He was ‘silenced’ after the Act of Uniformity in 1662 and was jailed for nonconformity. However, he held no endowed benefice, and so is not counted among the 2,000 ministers who were ‘ejected.’
After the Toleration Act, Taylor became the pastor of the Green Street congregation. He seems to have been a moderate Calvinist. He was described in 1692 as ‘a judicious and faithful minister who hath witnessed a good confession, and that in bonds, for the commandments of God.’
He described the Green Street congregation as ‘small’ in 1693. It was outnumbered by the Great Meeting in Hog Hill, where the minister was the Revd Joseph Hussey. That congregation was Presbyterian in origin, but in 1694 Hussey induced it to begin to follow Congregational usages, and in 1696 it drew up a ‘church covenant’ for its members.
With these innovations, some members left and joined the Green Street chapel. When these newcomers persuaded Taylor’s church to induce it to cease being Congregational, some of the older members seceded to Hussey’s church. But, in reality, both the Congregationalists and Presbyterians in Cambridge, were close to each other.
At the funeral of Francis Holcroft, an ejected Fellow of Clare known as ‘the Apostle of Cambridgeshire,’ the preface to his funeral sermon was signed jointly by Taylor as the minister of the Congregationalists and by Joseph Hussey as minister of the Presbyterians.
The Revd Thomas Leavesley was a minister in Cambridge in 1697, probably as a colleague to the aged Taylor. Taylor died in 1700, aged 75, and was buried in the meeting house. He was succeeded by James Peirce, who also became a trustee of the Hog-hill Chapel so he must have been already settled In Cambridge. He was a Congregationalist by origin, but was ordained by Presbyterian ministers.
Peirce became friendly with the mathematician Whiston and the two became the most prominent Arians of their generation. When Peirce came to Cambridge, he found the congregation in Green Street ‘a discontented people.’ By 1708, he had settle as minister at Newbury. Later, he was at the centre of the dispute at Salters' Hall that led to the beginnings of Unitarianism in England.
The Green Street chapel was immediately behind the present Sainsbury supermarket (left) on Sidney Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
It seems it was difficult to find a successor to Peirce, and by 1715 Hussey bitterly claims that the Green Street Chapel had 20 ministers in the 15 years. In that year, the Green Street congregation had some 300 people associated with it, while. Hussey’s had 1,100.
The pastor in Green Street in 1715 was the Revd John Cumming, an Irish-born Presbyterian who was ordained in Scotland. He moved to London in 1716. George Wightwick then became the pastor, but he moved to Colchester in 1720.
Hussey had left Cambridge in 1720, and the Green Street congregation, still numbered 300 in 1721 when the Revd James Duchal (1697-1761), an Irish-born Presbyterian, was invited to the pulpit. Duchal left Cambridge in 1730 and became a minister in Antrim and Dublin, where he was a key figure in the development of the Non-Subscribing Presbyterians or Unitarians in Ireland. In later life, he described his time in Cambridge as the ‘most delightful’ part of his career.
Duchal was succeeded by John Notcutt, who left soon after 1740. By then, the Green Street congregation was the most important dissenting presence in Cambridge. But it soon went into decline under Notcutt’s successors, a minister named Marshall in 1743, the Revd Richard Jones in 1750, and the Revd Samuel Henley in 1762.
Henley joined the Church of England in 1769. When he left, the Green Street chapel closed for about two years. The Revd John Robotham, who came in 1772, was ‘nearly, if not quite, a Socinian’ or Unitarian. His congregation dwindled rapidly, he left about 1778, the meeting house was closed once again, and the Presbyterian congregation disappeared. Some of the members joined the Independents at Hog Hill, while others joined the Baptists in St Andrew’s Street.
New life came with the ‘Evangelical Revival’ and the preaching of George Whitefield and John Wesley. During this revival, John Stittle (1727-1813) was converted under the preaching of the eccentric John Berridge of Everton, a friend of Wesley. Stittle became a preacher and the Green Street Meeting House reopened as a Congregational chapel in 1781 with Stittle as its pastor.
John Stittle is referred to as Stettle by Byron in 1811 in his ‘Hints from Horace.’ He was married four times, and survived his fourth wife. He said that if he had known that he should survive her so many years he would have married a fifth one.
Stittle could read but not write, and many stories are told of his eccentric ministry his running battles with undergraduates, who would come to ridicule him. On one occasion, he invited an undergraduate who had been insulting him to return home and share his supper, after which the student stayed on for family worship. This led the undergraduate to consider religion seriously and eventually to become a preacher himself.
Stittle was a high Calvinist and rejected all water baptism, either of infants or adults. and attracted some of Charles Simeon’s congregation from Holy Trinity Church in the Market Square. When Simeon later heard that Stittle was in financial difficulty, he sent him a regular allowance with a note thanking him ‘for shepherding my stray sheep’. When Stittle died at the age of 85 in 1813, he was buried in the Green Street Meeting House, by then known as ‘Stittle’s Chapel’.
Stittle’s successor in 1815 was a Mr Popplewell. When the lease of the old building expired in 1818, the owner refused to renew it. The congregation split, with some members moving to a building on the opposite, south side of Green Street and a group of Stittle’s followers renting the original meeting house in their place. Those divisions within Presbyterian, Independents or Congregationalists and Baptists are a constant feature in nonconformist history in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Stittle’s former meeting house was hired in 1819 by a small and newly formed group of Calvinistic Baptists. By 1820 they built a new chapel on Fitzroy Street, on land that was part of a piece called, ‘The Garden of Eden.’ The name ‘Eden’ was given to their new chapel. When Green Street was rebuilt in 1826 and the old chapel was pulled down, Stittle’s grave was opened, and he was reburied at Eden Chapel.
So two groups emerged eventually from the remaining congregation from Green Street Chapel: one group went on to become Eden Baptist Church; the other led to what in time became a Unitarian congregation in Cambridge. The irony is not lost on many that one of most conservative and closed evangelical churches in Cambridge and the most theologically liberal church in Cambridge both trace their origins to the same Green Street Meeting House.
The present Unitarian congregation in Cambridge traces its roots to the congregation in Green Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The present Unitarian congregation in Cambridge traces its roots to a congregation that met from 1875 or 1876 onwards in the Green Street Billiard Room. But a formal, explicitly Unitarian, congregation was not formded in Cambridge until 1904 following a series of lectures on ‘The Historical Jesus and the Theological Christ’ by the Unitarian scholar and lecturer in Comparative Religion at the University of Oxford, Revd Joseph Estlin Carpenter (1844-1927), principal of Manchester College (now Manchester Harris College), Oxford.
The congregation’s first chair was FJM Stratton (1881-1960), who was the Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Cambridge from 1928 to 1947. The new congregation met in Stratton’s rooms on Downing Street. The present church hall was built in 1923 and it was used as the church until the present church on Emmanuel Road was built in 1927-1928.
Both the hall and the church were designed by Ronald Potter Jones (1876-1965). In his design of the church, Jones was inspired by Sir Christopher Wren’s chapel at Pembroke College. He also designed the Unitarian chapel in West Kirby (1928), and adapted the Westgate Chapel at Lewes in 1913.
Jones was a pupil in Liverpool of Thomas Worthington and his son Sir Percy Worthington, who designed many Unitarian chapels and Manchester Harris College in Oxford. Jones was no admirer of Victorian Gothic, and his work is an attractive example of the neoclassical style. His interiors in Cambridge and West Kirby are similar in their restrained yet rich design and woodwork.
The cost of building borne by MGW Brown, a local business figure in memory of his daughter Millicent. A Latin memorial in the chapel is based on 18th century memorial in Toxteth.
Gandhi (1869-1948) visited the church in 1931 to speak to the Indian Community Association in the hall.
An important figure in the church in the 1960s and 1970s was Arnold McNair (1885-1975), Lord McNair of Gleniffer, who was President of the congregation. He was Professor of Law at Cambridge, Vice-Chancellor of Liverpool University, President of the International Court of Justice and first president of the European Court of Human Rights.
Ronald Potter Jones designed both the hall and the church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Cambridge Unitarian Church describes itself as a ‘Non-Prophet Organisation.’ The church, and its hall, common room, kitchen and office are home to a modern, progressive and free-thinking community that says: ‘Here there is only one orthodoxy, namely, a love of truth that is a sincere desire to understand how the world is and our place in it.’
The Revd Andrew James Brown has been the minister since 2000. He was born in 1965 in Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire, and originally trained as a musician at Colchester Institute where he studied double-bass. He later studied theology at Harris Manchester College, Oxford, and Jewish-Christian Relations through the Woolf Institute, where he has been a tutor and researcher in the Centre for Public Education.
Sunday services are held between 10:30 and 11:40. Communion is celebrated three times a year, on Christmas Eve, Good Friday and Pentecost/Whitsunday.
The Unitarian Church on Emmanuel Road, Cambridge, faces onto the open green space of Christ’s Pieces (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
16 July 2024
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2024:
68, Tuesday 16 July 2024
The Crying women of Sidon … a sarcophagus from Sidon now in the Istanbul Archaeological Museum
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church and this week began with the Seventh Sunday after Trinity (Trinity VII). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (16 July) remembers Saint Osmund (1099), Bishop of Salisbury.
I am back in Stony Stratford after a day visiting Tamworth and Lichfield yesterday. Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite Woman … a modern icon by Brother Robert Lentz, OFM
Matthew 11: 20-24 (NRSVA):
20 Then he began to reproach the cities in which most of his deeds of power had been done, because they did not repent. 21 ‘Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. 22 But I tell you, on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. 23 And you, Capernaum,
will you be exalted to heaven?
No, you will be brought down to Hades.
For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24 But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.’
Iokasti, a restaurant in Koutouloufari in Crete … are there comparisons between Iocasta and her daughter in ‘The Phoenician Women’ and the Greek-speaking Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite woman in Tyre and Sidon? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
This morning’s reflection:
This morning’s Gospel reading seems to threaten judgement and doom for two pairs of cities – Chorazin and Bethsaida, and Tyre and Sidon – and links Capernaum with Hades, but not Sodom with Gomorrah.
But what deeds of power are going to be done in Tyre and Sidon? What signs of the day of judgement are going to be seen in Tyre and Sidon?
Perhaps this passage should not be read without also skipping forward a few chapters to Matthew 15: 21–28:
21 Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. 22 Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ 23 But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ 24 He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ 25 But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ 26 He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ 27 She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’ 28 Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly.
One of the first decisions of Jesus on that visit to Tyre and Sidon is hear the cry for mercy from a Canaanite or Syro-Phoenician woman, to heal her daughter, and to commend their faith. The outsiders are counted in, and judgement is experienced as love and mercy, compassion and inclusion.
Can you recall a moment, a place, or an occasion when you felt rejected? To be rejected I do not need to be an outsider. We can be rejected by our own brothers or sisters, by those who live around us, by those who share our religious or cultural values.
We can be rejected because of our lifestyle, our family background, our ethnic or religious backgrounds, our personal habits, our family circumstances, our sexuality, or marital status or lack of marital status … the list is endless.
Can you think of how you feel when you are made to feel rejected, an outsider, sent away?
And, have you found yourself blaming yourself rather than those who reject or marginalise you?
If so, then you know what it is like to become a double victim: a victim of the prejudices of others, and a victim of the perceptions that are projected onto you.
The disciples reject the Canaanite woman who is pleading for mercy, seeing her as unclean and an outsider, and bring judgement down on this woman and her daughter in Tyre and Sidon.
Having heard the Pharisees suggest Jesus should reject them, they now say to Jesus, ‘send her away’ (verse 23).
But there is a paradox in their rejection of her, for they use a word (ἀπόλυσον, apoluson) that also means to set free, to let go, to give liberty to, to release.
The same verb is used to set a debtor free of debts, or to allow a woman to divorce her husband, setting her free from the bonds that tie husband and wife. In wanting to be free from her demanding calls, they – ironically – call for mother and daughter to be freed from their torments.
In our feelings of rejection and marginalisation, how do we find acceptance, liberation, and a place in God’s unfolding plan for his people, for all people, God’s future for us?
The disciples want to turn her away. They see her as a pest, a nuisance, a pushy woman, breaking into their closed space, their private area.
Christ and the Disciples are in the coastal area of Tyre and Sidon, an area of small villages, perhaps looking for a quiet break for a few days. But if they are planning to get away for a few quiet days, those plans are frustrated when this woman arrives with her pressing demands.
This is foreign territory, inhabited by Canaanites or Phoenicians, who were culturally Hellenised and mainly Greek-speaking. It is also the territory associated with Elijah, who raised the widow’s child from death (I Kings 17: 9-24) and who ‘was markedly open to foreigners.’
So, Christ could expect to find himself among a large number of Greek-speaking ‘Gentiles.’ Would the Disciples expect him to behave like Elijah and break all the rules in being open to them, taking miraculous care of a lone mother and her child?
In the classical world, Phoenician women were pushy women. About 400 years earlier, the great Greek playwright Euripides wrote his tragic play The Phoenician Women (Φοίνισσαι, Phoenissae).
The title of the play, The Phoenician Women, refers to the Greek chorus, which is composed of Phoenician women on their way to Delphi and who are trapped in Thebes by war.
The two key women in the play are Jocasta and her daughter Antigone, who have survived against all odds. They challenge the accepted concepts in Classical times of fate and free-will.
In the face of death, they refuse to accept what others see as their destiny, they refuse to be pushed aside, marginalised and dismissed as the men around then compete for power.
So, in Christ’s time, educated people could expect a Phoenician woman and her daughter to be pushy in the face of what appears to be a cruel fate, even if this involves confronting successful or ambitious men: they are prepared to stand up to kings and rulers, prepared to challenge them, and prepared to risk judgement that means rejection and exile.
Faced with her daughter’s needs, this woman ignores the disciples: she is direct and aggressive in demanding healing and justice. And in demanding justice and healing for her daughter, she is, of course, demanding these for herself too.
Nothing is said about the response of the disciples to the woman. They had been trying to push her away, despite her crying, her tears, her distress, her plight over her daughter.
Perhaps nothing is said about the response of the disciples … because we are the disciples. How do you and I respond to encounters like this?
As a social response, for example, we might consider that the confrontation is an illustration of how we might respond to the needs of strangers and foreigners.
Do we find them pushy and demanding?
How do we respond when the foreign woman in our society wants the same treatment in hospital for her child as a child born here?
How do we respond when foreigners who are more open and joyful in conversation, appear to be encroaching on our privacy on the bus, on the street or in a shop?
Are we like the Disciples, and want to send them away? Or are we like Jesus, and engage in conversation with them?
Do we think we have some privileges that should not be shared with the outsider and the stranger?
How do we respond to people who are pushy and continue to demand care for their children in the face of society’s decision to say no?
The parents who want teaching support for children with learning disabilities, the parents who want to know why children’s hospitals are so badly funded that they have to raise funds with charity events while their children wait for treatment.
But this Gospel story also raises questions at a personal, spiritual level too, when it comes to matters of faith.
How many people do you know who give up when they turn to God in prayer and find those who are supposed to represent Jesus appear to turn them away?
How many times have I dismissed the needs and prayers of others because they appear to be outside the community of faith as I understand it?
This woman is insistent, she is persistent; she refuses to accept what other people regard as her fate and destiny.
In the end, she receives the mercy and help she asks for, and much, much more … she is commended in front of the disciples for her faith, and her daughter is healed instantly.
We do not have to accept misery and rejection, especially when others see them as our fate or our destiny. And, in simple prayers, we may find more in the answer than we ever ask for.
‘What overwhelms us?’
‘What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
These questions were put to us some years by Bishop Margaret Vertue of the Diocese of False Bay in South Africa, at the USPG conference in High Leigh.
Bishop Margaret, who is the second woman to become a bishop in Africa, was leading that morning’s Bible study in 2017 on Matthew 11: 20-24.
She challenged us to think of how we respond in love and not in judgement. And, drawing on the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse, she asked: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
To illustrate how we might respond in love and not in judgement, she shared ‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda, with music by Giles Lamb. This short film from Purplefeather illustrates the power of words to radically change our message and our effect upon the world.
She challenged us that morning to consider our own contexts and to discuss: ‘What overwhelms us? What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
And she asked, in the words of the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda / Purplefeather, music by Giles Lamb
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 16 July 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Advocacy, human, environmental and territorial rights programme in Brazil.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday by the Revd Dr Rodrigo Espiúca dos Anjos Siqueira, Diocesan Officer for human, environmental and territorial rights in the Anglican Diocese of Brasilia.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Tuesday 16 July 2024) invites us to pray:
Let us pray for the protection and safeguarding of God´s creation, especially for traditional communities and indigenous peoples who suffer violence and persecution and are deprived of their ancestors’ lands.
The Collect:
Lord of all power and might,
the author and giver of all good things:
graft in our hearts the love of your name,
increase in us true religion,
nourish us with all goodness,
and of your great mercy keep us in the same;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
Lord God, whose Son is the true vine and the source of life,
ever giving himself that the world may live:
may we so receive within ourselves
the power of his death and passion
that, in his saving cup,
we may share his glory and be made perfect in his love;
for he is alive and reigns, now and for ever.
Additional Collect:
Generous God,
you give us gifts and make them grow:
though our faith is small as mustard seed,
make it grow to your glory
and the flourishing of your kingdom;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
The Theatre of Dionysus, beneath the slopes of the Acropolis in Athens … plays by the great playwrights, Euripides, Aeschylus and Sophocles were first performed there (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church and this week began with the Seventh Sunday after Trinity (Trinity VII). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (16 July) remembers Saint Osmund (1099), Bishop of Salisbury.
I am back in Stony Stratford after a day visiting Tamworth and Lichfield yesterday. Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite Woman … a modern icon by Brother Robert Lentz, OFM
Matthew 11: 20-24 (NRSVA):
20 Then he began to reproach the cities in which most of his deeds of power had been done, because they did not repent. 21 ‘Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. 22 But I tell you, on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. 23 And you, Capernaum,
will you be exalted to heaven?
No, you will be brought down to Hades.
For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24 But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.’
Iokasti, a restaurant in Koutouloufari in Crete … are there comparisons between Iocasta and her daughter in ‘The Phoenician Women’ and the Greek-speaking Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite woman in Tyre and Sidon? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
This morning’s reflection:
This morning’s Gospel reading seems to threaten judgement and doom for two pairs of cities – Chorazin and Bethsaida, and Tyre and Sidon – and links Capernaum with Hades, but not Sodom with Gomorrah.
But what deeds of power are going to be done in Tyre and Sidon? What signs of the day of judgement are going to be seen in Tyre and Sidon?
Perhaps this passage should not be read without also skipping forward a few chapters to Matthew 15: 21–28:
21 Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. 22 Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ 23 But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ 24 He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ 25 But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ 26 He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ 27 She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’ 28 Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly.
One of the first decisions of Jesus on that visit to Tyre and Sidon is hear the cry for mercy from a Canaanite or Syro-Phoenician woman, to heal her daughter, and to commend their faith. The outsiders are counted in, and judgement is experienced as love and mercy, compassion and inclusion.
Can you recall a moment, a place, or an occasion when you felt rejected? To be rejected I do not need to be an outsider. We can be rejected by our own brothers or sisters, by those who live around us, by those who share our religious or cultural values.
We can be rejected because of our lifestyle, our family background, our ethnic or religious backgrounds, our personal habits, our family circumstances, our sexuality, or marital status or lack of marital status … the list is endless.
Can you think of how you feel when you are made to feel rejected, an outsider, sent away?
And, have you found yourself blaming yourself rather than those who reject or marginalise you?
If so, then you know what it is like to become a double victim: a victim of the prejudices of others, and a victim of the perceptions that are projected onto you.
The disciples reject the Canaanite woman who is pleading for mercy, seeing her as unclean and an outsider, and bring judgement down on this woman and her daughter in Tyre and Sidon.
Having heard the Pharisees suggest Jesus should reject them, they now say to Jesus, ‘send her away’ (verse 23).
But there is a paradox in their rejection of her, for they use a word (ἀπόλυσον, apoluson) that also means to set free, to let go, to give liberty to, to release.
The same verb is used to set a debtor free of debts, or to allow a woman to divorce her husband, setting her free from the bonds that tie husband and wife. In wanting to be free from her demanding calls, they – ironically – call for mother and daughter to be freed from their torments.
In our feelings of rejection and marginalisation, how do we find acceptance, liberation, and a place in God’s unfolding plan for his people, for all people, God’s future for us?
The disciples want to turn her away. They see her as a pest, a nuisance, a pushy woman, breaking into their closed space, their private area.
Christ and the Disciples are in the coastal area of Tyre and Sidon, an area of small villages, perhaps looking for a quiet break for a few days. But if they are planning to get away for a few quiet days, those plans are frustrated when this woman arrives with her pressing demands.
This is foreign territory, inhabited by Canaanites or Phoenicians, who were culturally Hellenised and mainly Greek-speaking. It is also the territory associated with Elijah, who raised the widow’s child from death (I Kings 17: 9-24) and who ‘was markedly open to foreigners.’
So, Christ could expect to find himself among a large number of Greek-speaking ‘Gentiles.’ Would the Disciples expect him to behave like Elijah and break all the rules in being open to them, taking miraculous care of a lone mother and her child?
In the classical world, Phoenician women were pushy women. About 400 years earlier, the great Greek playwright Euripides wrote his tragic play The Phoenician Women (Φοίνισσαι, Phoenissae).
The title of the play, The Phoenician Women, refers to the Greek chorus, which is composed of Phoenician women on their way to Delphi and who are trapped in Thebes by war.
The two key women in the play are Jocasta and her daughter Antigone, who have survived against all odds. They challenge the accepted concepts in Classical times of fate and free-will.
In the face of death, they refuse to accept what others see as their destiny, they refuse to be pushed aside, marginalised and dismissed as the men around then compete for power.
So, in Christ’s time, educated people could expect a Phoenician woman and her daughter to be pushy in the face of what appears to be a cruel fate, even if this involves confronting successful or ambitious men: they are prepared to stand up to kings and rulers, prepared to challenge them, and prepared to risk judgement that means rejection and exile.
Faced with her daughter’s needs, this woman ignores the disciples: she is direct and aggressive in demanding healing and justice. And in demanding justice and healing for her daughter, she is, of course, demanding these for herself too.
Nothing is said about the response of the disciples to the woman. They had been trying to push her away, despite her crying, her tears, her distress, her plight over her daughter.
Perhaps nothing is said about the response of the disciples … because we are the disciples. How do you and I respond to encounters like this?
As a social response, for example, we might consider that the confrontation is an illustration of how we might respond to the needs of strangers and foreigners.
Do we find them pushy and demanding?
How do we respond when the foreign woman in our society wants the same treatment in hospital for her child as a child born here?
How do we respond when foreigners who are more open and joyful in conversation, appear to be encroaching on our privacy on the bus, on the street or in a shop?
Are we like the Disciples, and want to send them away? Or are we like Jesus, and engage in conversation with them?
Do we think we have some privileges that should not be shared with the outsider and the stranger?
How do we respond to people who are pushy and continue to demand care for their children in the face of society’s decision to say no?
The parents who want teaching support for children with learning disabilities, the parents who want to know why children’s hospitals are so badly funded that they have to raise funds with charity events while their children wait for treatment.
But this Gospel story also raises questions at a personal, spiritual level too, when it comes to matters of faith.
How many people do you know who give up when they turn to God in prayer and find those who are supposed to represent Jesus appear to turn them away?
How many times have I dismissed the needs and prayers of others because they appear to be outside the community of faith as I understand it?
This woman is insistent, she is persistent; she refuses to accept what other people regard as her fate and destiny.
In the end, she receives the mercy and help she asks for, and much, much more … she is commended in front of the disciples for her faith, and her daughter is healed instantly.
We do not have to accept misery and rejection, especially when others see them as our fate or our destiny. And, in simple prayers, we may find more in the answer than we ever ask for.
‘What overwhelms us?’
‘What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
These questions were put to us some years by Bishop Margaret Vertue of the Diocese of False Bay in South Africa, at the USPG conference in High Leigh.
Bishop Margaret, who is the second woman to become a bishop in Africa, was leading that morning’s Bible study in 2017 on Matthew 11: 20-24.
She challenged us to think of how we respond in love and not in judgement. And, drawing on the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse, she asked: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
To illustrate how we might respond in love and not in judgement, she shared ‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda, with music by Giles Lamb. This short film from Purplefeather illustrates the power of words to radically change our message and our effect upon the world.
She challenged us that morning to consider our own contexts and to discuss: ‘What overwhelms us? What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
And she asked, in the words of the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda / Purplefeather, music by Giles Lamb
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 16 July 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Advocacy, human, environmental and territorial rights programme in Brazil.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday by the Revd Dr Rodrigo Espiúca dos Anjos Siqueira, Diocesan Officer for human, environmental and territorial rights in the Anglican Diocese of Brasilia.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Tuesday 16 July 2024) invites us to pray:
Let us pray for the protection and safeguarding of God´s creation, especially for traditional communities and indigenous peoples who suffer violence and persecution and are deprived of their ancestors’ lands.
The Collect:
Lord of all power and might,
the author and giver of all good things:
graft in our hearts the love of your name,
increase in us true religion,
nourish us with all goodness,
and of your great mercy keep us in the same;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
Lord God, whose Son is the true vine and the source of life,
ever giving himself that the world may live:
may we so receive within ourselves
the power of his death and passion
that, in his saving cup,
we may share his glory and be made perfect in his love;
for he is alive and reigns, now and for ever.
Additional Collect:
Generous God,
you give us gifts and make them grow:
though our faith is small as mustard seed,
make it grow to your glory
and the flourishing of your kingdom;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
The Theatre of Dionysus, beneath the slopes of the Acropolis in Athens … plays by the great playwrights, Euripides, Aeschylus and Sophocles were first performed there (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)