Pavlos Beach in Platanias, east of Rethymnon … but where does the beach start and where does it end? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
As meteorologists calculate the seasons, we have come to the end of summer this evening, and autumn begins tomorrow.
TS Eliot’s ‘East Coker,’ the second of his Four Quartets, ends with the words: ‘In my end is my beginning.’
But it opens with the lines:
In my beginning is my end. In succession
Houses rise and fall, crumble, are extended,
Are removed, destroyed, restored, or in their place
Is an open field, or a factory, or a by-pass.
Old stone to new building, old timber to new fires,
Old fires to ashes, and ashes to the earth
Which is already flesh, fur and faeces,
Bone of man and beast, cornstalk and leaf.
Houses live and die: there is a time for building
And a time for living and for generation …
In my beginning is my end. Now the light falls
Across the open field, leaving the deep lane …
…
Wait for the early owl.
In the opening verses of the Book of Revelation, Saint John is in a cave in Patmos when he hears the words: ‘I am the Alpha and the Omega’, says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty, Ἐγώ εἰμι τὸ Ἄλφα καὶ τὸ Ὦ, λέγει κύριος ὁ θεός, ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος, ὁ παντοκράτωρ (Revelation 1: 8).
How do we begin our beginnings?
In Alice in Wonderland (Chapter 12), the White Rabbit put on his spectacles.
‘Where shall I begin, please your Majesty?’ he asked.
‘Begin at the beginning,’ the King said gravely, ‘and go on till you come to the end: then stop.’
Where are our beginnings?
And where are our ends?
‘Αρχή Ακτής, Beginning of the Beach’ … a sign at Pavlos Beach in Platanias, east of Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
There is a signboard with two notices at the same place at the entrance to or exit from the beach at Platanias, east of Rethymnon, where I have spent weeks on end over the years.
On one side, the sign reads: Αρχή Ακτής, Beginning of the Beach.
On the other side, the sign reads: Τέλος Ακτής, End of the Beach.
The Greek Ακτής (aktís) on that sign on the beach in Platanias might be translated more literally as ‘Shore’ rather than ‘Beach’, and perhaps the word Παραλία is used more often for beach in Greek
In some ways, those signs also came to symbolise my regular visits to Rethymnon since the 1980s, the beginning and the end of holidays in a part of Greece that is now so like to me.
Each day usually includes a stroll by the town beach beside the old Venetian harbour, or along the long stretch of white sands along the shore at Platanias, enjoying the sunshine, the blue skies and the deep blue sea. And so it was when I returned to Rethymnon – and to Pavlos Beach in Platanias – three months ago.
The Greek word αρχή (archí) on that beach sign in Platanias means not just start but head or chief – the beginning or source or first authority in something. It gives us many word in Greek that easy to understand in English, such as αποξαρχής (apoxarchís, ‘from the beginning’) and αρχέτυπο (archétypo, ‘archetype’).
It is also related to many words we are familiar with in the English language, such as:
• archaeology (αρχαιολογία), first used in English in 1782 for talking scientifically about our beginnings;
• archipelago (αρχιπέλαγος, archipelagos), or the chief sea, or head of the sea;
• architect (αρχιτέκτονας, architektonas), the chief builder or chief carpenter, and first used in English in the 1560s for master builder or director of works.
The Greek word τέλος (telos) on that beach sign in Platanias is also familiar in the English language in words such as:
• telescope (τηλεσκόπος, teleskópos), meaning seeing to the end or far-seeing, from the Greek words τῆλε (têle, afar) and σκοπέω (skopéō I look at). In a similar way, a bishop is an ἐπίσκοπος (epískopos) or overseer, someone who looks over or after the people.
• telephone (τηλέφωνο, telephono), sound or words from the end or from afar, from the Ancient Greek words τῆλε (têle, afar) and φωνή (phōnḗ, voice or sound).
• telegram (τηλεγράφημα, telegráphima): the suffix comes from the ancient Greek -γραμμα (-gramma), from γράμμα (grámma, written character, letter, that which is drawn), and from γράφω (gráphō, to scratch, to scrape, to graze).
‘Τέλος Ακτής, End of the Beach’ … the other side of the sign at Pavlos Beach in Platanias, east of Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Reading signs in another country and another language requires more than literal translations.
The hundreds of nails stuck into one old poles in Crete may mystify many a first-time visitor to Crete. But they remain from old notices pinned or nailed to any available space as soon as someone dies, but removed after the funeral.
Death, denial and a white seashore are images that remind me of the poem ‘Denial’ (Άρνηση) by Giorgos Seferis (1900-1971), first published in 1931 in his collection Turning Point (Στροφή, Strophe).
Seferis received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1963. After the colonels’ coup in 1967, however, he went into voluntary seclusion and many of his poems were banned, including the musical versions written and arranged by the composer Mikis Theodorakis.
‘Denial’ came to be the anthem of resistance to the colonel and was sung by the enormous crowds lining the streets of Athens at the poet’s funeral in September 1971. He had become a popular hero for his resistance to the regime.
Άρνηση
Στο περιγιάλι το κρυφό κι άσπρο σαν περιστέρι διψάσαμε το μεσημέρι· μα το νερό γλυφό.
Πάνω στην άμμο την ξανθή γράψαμε τ' όνομά της· ωραία που φύσηξεν ο μπάτης και σβήστηκε η γραφή.
Mε τι καρδιά, με τι πνοή, τι πόθους και τι πάθος, πήραμε τη ζωή μας· λάθος! κι αλλάξαμε ζωή.
‘Denial’ (translated by Edmund Keeley and Phillip Sherrard)
On the secret seashore
white like a pigeon
we thirsted at noon;
but the water was brackish.
On the golden sand
we wrote her name;
but the sea-breeze blew
and the writing vanished.
With what spirit, what heart,
what desire and passion
we lived our life; a mistake!
So we changed our life.
Previous word: 45, democracy, δημοκρατία
Next word: 47, apocalypse, ἀποκάλυψις
Nails remaining from old death notices on the hill leading from Platanias up to Tsesmes (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Previous words in this series:
1, Neologism, Νεολογισμός.
2, Welcoming the stranger, Φιλοξενία.
3, Bread, Ψωμί.
4, Wine, Οίνος and Κρασί.
5, Yogurt, Γιαούρτι.
6, Orthodoxy, Ορθοδοξία.
7, Sea, Θᾰ́λᾰσσᾰ.
8,Theology, Θεολογία.
9, Icon, Εἰκών.
10, Philosophy, Φιλοσοφία.
11, Chaos, Χάος.
12, Liturgy, Λειτουργία.
13, Greeks, Ἕλληνες or Ρωμαίοι.
14, Mañana, Αύριο.
15, Europe, Εὐρώπη.
16, Architecture, Αρχιτεκτονική.
17, The missing words.
18, Theatre, θέατρον, and Drama, Δρᾶμα.
19, Pharmacy, Φᾰρμᾰκείᾱ.
20, Rhapsody, Ραψῳδός.
21, Holocaust, Ολοκαύτωμα.
22, Hygiene, Υγιεινή.
23, Laconic, Λακωνικός.
24, Telephone, Τηλέφωνο.
25, Asthma, Ασθμα.
26, Synagogue, Συναγωγή.
27, Diaspora, Διασπορά.
28, School, Σχολείο.
29, Muse, Μούσα.
30, Monastery, Μοναστήρι.
31, Olympian, Ολύμπιος.
32, Hypocrite, Υποκριτής.
33, Genocide, Γενοκτονία.
34, Cinema, Κινημα.
35, autopsy and biopsy
36, Exodus, ἔξοδος
37, Bishop, ἐπίσκοπος
38, Socratic, Σωκρατικὸς
39, Odyssey, Ὀδύσσεια
40, Practice, πρᾶξις
41, Idiotic, Ιδιωτικός
42, Pentecost, Πεντηκοστή
43, Apostrophe, ἀποστροφή
44, catastrophe, καταστροφή
45, democracy, δημοκρατία
31 August 2024
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2024:
113, Saturday 31 August 2024
‘Loadsamoney’ was a catchphrase of comedian Harry Enfield … but is a load of money worth stashing away? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and tomorrow is the Fourteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIV, 1 September 2024). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (31 August) remembers Saint Aidan (651), Bishop of Lindisfarne, Missionary.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
Talents and drachmai … old coins outside an antique shop in Rethymnon in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 25: 14-30 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 14 ‘For it is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them; 15 to one he gave five talents,[a] to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 The one who had received the five talents went off at once and traded with them, and made five more talents. 17 In the same way, the one who had the two talents made two more talents. 18 But the one who had received the one talent went off and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money. 19 After a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. 20 Then the one who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five more talents, saying, “Master, you handed over to me five talents; see, I have made five more talents.” 21 His master said to him, “Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” 22 And the one with the two talents also came forward, saying, “Master, you handed over to me two talents; see, I have made two more talents.” 23 His master said to him, “Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” 24 Then the one who had received the one talent also came forward, saying, “Master, I knew that you were a harsh man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed; 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.” 26 But his master replied, “You wicked and lazy slave! You knew, did you, that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I did not scatter? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to the one with the ten talents. 29 For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away. 30 As for this worthless slave, throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth”.’
Is the parable less about talents and money and more about those who are exploited in the world by others and who are left destitute? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
The catchphrase ‘Loadsamoney’ and the character to go with it were part of the comedy sketches created by the English comedian Harry Enfield on Channel 4 in the 1980s.
‘Loadsamoney’ was an obnoxious Cockney plasterer who constantly boasted about how much money he had to throw away. The character took on a life of his own and adapted the song ‘Money, Money,’ from the musical Cabaret, for a hit single in 1988 and a sell-out live tour.
That year, the Labour leader, Neil Kinnock, used the catchphrase to criticise the policies of the Conservative government of the day and journalists began to refer to the ‘loadsamoney mentality’ and the ‘loadsamoney economy.’
On the other hand, we all know people who are reluctant to flash their cash and who would prefer to stash their cash. We have all heard of people who kept their savings in a mattress, thinking it was safer there than in the bank.
They may never have realised how right they might have been about the banks. But leaving your money under the mattress is not going to put it to work. And, these days, putting my money on deposit in the bank may cost me money rather than earning it. With low deposit rates and taxation at source, you may end up collecting less than you had when you first opened that savings account.
But piling up your money has its risks too. At a time of rapid inflation in war-time Greece and Germany, people who saved their money as banknotes found it quickly depreciated in value. I have enough 5 million drachmai notes to make my two sons multi-millionaires. Sad to say, those notes date from the 1940s and the only value they have today is mere curiosity value.
Saving them in the bank, or piling them up under the mattress would have earned nothing for their original owners.
And yet, I am aware of how many people in this parish are feeling the financial pinch created by the fiscal policies over the past 14 years by the previous government. Yet the cost of living seems to continue to rise.
This morning’s parable is set in the realm of finance. Before leaving on a journey, a master entrusts his servants (that word deacon again) with his money, each according to his ability.
A talent (τάλαντον, tálanton) was a lot of money – enough to make any one of those slaves a millionaire, and enough to make them fret and worry about the enormity with which he had been entrusted.
One source says a talent was the equivalent of more than 15 years’ wages for a labourer. Another suggests a talent was worth the equivalent of 7,300 denarii. With one denarius equal to a day’s pay, a talent would work out at more than 26 years’ wages. So a talent was extremely valuable, and the slave who was given five talents was given 85 to 130 years’ wages, vastly more than he could ever imagine earning in lifetime.
Earlier in this Gospel, we have come across another parable of talents, when a servant who is forgiven a debt of 10,000 talents refuses to forgive another servant who owes him only 100 denarii (Matthew 18: 23-35).
Two servants invest the money they have been entrusted with and earn more, but the third simply buries it.
When the master returns, he praises the investors. He says they will be made responsible for many things, and will enter into the joy of their master.
But the third slave, admitting that he was afraid of his master’s wrath, simply returns the original sum. The master chastises him for his wickedness and laziness. He loses not only what he has been given but is also condemned to outer darkness.
What would have happened to the two investors who took risks with vast sums of money had they lost everything?
There was an old maxim that you ‘must speculate to accumulate.’ But every investor knows there are risks, and the greater the risk the higher the interest rates that are promised.
What if they had overstepped their master’s expectations in the risks they had taken?
What if this bondholder had been burned because of the folly of two of his risk-takers, and only one had been a careful steward? After all, there is a rabbinical maxim that commends burying money to protect it.
If this parable is about the kingdom of heaven, if the master stands for God and the servants for different kinds of people, what lesson does it teach us?
Does God reward us for our works but behave like a stern judge when we keep faith without taking risks?
Will we be judged by our work?
Will failure to use what God gives us result in punishment and our separation from God?
Of course, we cannot imagine that the two slaves who traded with their talents and produced a profit were engaged in reckless trading and speculation, still less in reckless gambling.
What was the third slave doing with his time after he buried his talent? Was he doing any other work on behalf of the master? Is he chided for his refusal to invest or speculate, or for his refusal to work, his laziness?
In this, did he show disdain for his master?
Is my relationship with God one of trust and gratitude? Or do I fear God to the point of thinking of God as the source of injustice?
What talents and gifts has God entrusted me with?
Are they mine? Or are they God’s?
Am I using or investing them to my fullest ability?
‘To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability’ (Matthew 25: 15) … old coins in a table top in the bar at the Hedgehog Vintage Inn in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Saturday 31 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), has been the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Saturday 31 August 2024, International Day for people of African Descent) invites us to pray:
We pray for the people of Africa and all who have links to the continent.
The Collect:
Everlasting God,
you sent the gentle bishop Aidan
to proclaim the gospel in this land:
grant us to live as he taught
in simplicity, humility and love for the poor;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Holy Father,
who gathered us here around the table of your Son
to share this meal with the whole household of God:
in that new world where you reveal
the fullness of your peace,
gather people of every race and language
to share with Aidan and all your saints
in the eternal banquet of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Collect on the Eve of Trinity XIV:
Almighty God,
whose only Son has opened for us
a new and living way into your presence:
give us pure hearts and steadfast wills
to worship you in spirit and in truth;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Saint Aidan depicted in a panel on the altar in Saint Chad’s Church, Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
‘Throw him into the outer darkness’ (Matthew 25: 30) … at night on Souliou Street in Rethymnon in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and tomorrow is the Fourteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIV, 1 September 2024). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (31 August) remembers Saint Aidan (651), Bishop of Lindisfarne, Missionary.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
Talents and drachmai … old coins outside an antique shop in Rethymnon in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 25: 14-30 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 14 ‘For it is as if a man, going on a journey, summoned his slaves and entrusted his property to them; 15 to one he gave five talents,[a] to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 The one who had received the five talents went off at once and traded with them, and made five more talents. 17 In the same way, the one who had the two talents made two more talents. 18 But the one who had received the one talent went off and dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money. 19 After a long time the master of those slaves came and settled accounts with them. 20 Then the one who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five more talents, saying, “Master, you handed over to me five talents; see, I have made five more talents.” 21 His master said to him, “Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” 22 And the one with the two talents also came forward, saying, “Master, you handed over to me two talents; see, I have made two more talents.” 23 His master said to him, “Well done, good and trustworthy slave; you have been trustworthy in a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master.” 24 Then the one who had received the one talent also came forward, saying, “Master, I knew that you were a harsh man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed; 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.” 26 But his master replied, “You wicked and lazy slave! You knew, did you, that I reap where I did not sow, and gather where I did not scatter? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and on my return I would have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him, and give it to the one with the ten talents. 29 For to all those who have, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from those who have nothing, even what they have will be taken away. 30 As for this worthless slave, throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth”.’
Is the parable less about talents and money and more about those who are exploited in the world by others and who are left destitute? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
The catchphrase ‘Loadsamoney’ and the character to go with it were part of the comedy sketches created by the English comedian Harry Enfield on Channel 4 in the 1980s.
‘Loadsamoney’ was an obnoxious Cockney plasterer who constantly boasted about how much money he had to throw away. The character took on a life of his own and adapted the song ‘Money, Money,’ from the musical Cabaret, for a hit single in 1988 and a sell-out live tour.
That year, the Labour leader, Neil Kinnock, used the catchphrase to criticise the policies of the Conservative government of the day and journalists began to refer to the ‘loadsamoney mentality’ and the ‘loadsamoney economy.’
On the other hand, we all know people who are reluctant to flash their cash and who would prefer to stash their cash. We have all heard of people who kept their savings in a mattress, thinking it was safer there than in the bank.
They may never have realised how right they might have been about the banks. But leaving your money under the mattress is not going to put it to work. And, these days, putting my money on deposit in the bank may cost me money rather than earning it. With low deposit rates and taxation at source, you may end up collecting less than you had when you first opened that savings account.
But piling up your money has its risks too. At a time of rapid inflation in war-time Greece and Germany, people who saved their money as banknotes found it quickly depreciated in value. I have enough 5 million drachmai notes to make my two sons multi-millionaires. Sad to say, those notes date from the 1940s and the only value they have today is mere curiosity value.
Saving them in the bank, or piling them up under the mattress would have earned nothing for their original owners.
And yet, I am aware of how many people in this parish are feeling the financial pinch created by the fiscal policies over the past 14 years by the previous government. Yet the cost of living seems to continue to rise.
This morning’s parable is set in the realm of finance. Before leaving on a journey, a master entrusts his servants (that word deacon again) with his money, each according to his ability.
A talent (τάλαντον, tálanton) was a lot of money – enough to make any one of those slaves a millionaire, and enough to make them fret and worry about the enormity with which he had been entrusted.
One source says a talent was the equivalent of more than 15 years’ wages for a labourer. Another suggests a talent was worth the equivalent of 7,300 denarii. With one denarius equal to a day’s pay, a talent would work out at more than 26 years’ wages. So a talent was extremely valuable, and the slave who was given five talents was given 85 to 130 years’ wages, vastly more than he could ever imagine earning in lifetime.
Earlier in this Gospel, we have come across another parable of talents, when a servant who is forgiven a debt of 10,000 talents refuses to forgive another servant who owes him only 100 denarii (Matthew 18: 23-35).
Two servants invest the money they have been entrusted with and earn more, but the third simply buries it.
When the master returns, he praises the investors. He says they will be made responsible for many things, and will enter into the joy of their master.
But the third slave, admitting that he was afraid of his master’s wrath, simply returns the original sum. The master chastises him for his wickedness and laziness. He loses not only what he has been given but is also condemned to outer darkness.
What would have happened to the two investors who took risks with vast sums of money had they lost everything?
There was an old maxim that you ‘must speculate to accumulate.’ But every investor knows there are risks, and the greater the risk the higher the interest rates that are promised.
What if they had overstepped their master’s expectations in the risks they had taken?
What if this bondholder had been burned because of the folly of two of his risk-takers, and only one had been a careful steward? After all, there is a rabbinical maxim that commends burying money to protect it.
If this parable is about the kingdom of heaven, if the master stands for God and the servants for different kinds of people, what lesson does it teach us?
Does God reward us for our works but behave like a stern judge when we keep faith without taking risks?
Will we be judged by our work?
Will failure to use what God gives us result in punishment and our separation from God?
Of course, we cannot imagine that the two slaves who traded with their talents and produced a profit were engaged in reckless trading and speculation, still less in reckless gambling.
What was the third slave doing with his time after he buried his talent? Was he doing any other work on behalf of the master? Is he chided for his refusal to invest or speculate, or for his refusal to work, his laziness?
In this, did he show disdain for his master?
Is my relationship with God one of trust and gratitude? Or do I fear God to the point of thinking of God as the source of injustice?
What talents and gifts has God entrusted me with?
Are they mine? Or are they God’s?
Am I using or investing them to my fullest ability?
‘To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability’ (Matthew 25: 15) … old coins in a table top in the bar at the Hedgehog Vintage Inn in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Saturday 31 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), has been the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Saturday 31 August 2024, International Day for people of African Descent) invites us to pray:
We pray for the people of Africa and all who have links to the continent.
The Collect:
Everlasting God,
you sent the gentle bishop Aidan
to proclaim the gospel in this land:
grant us to live as he taught
in simplicity, humility and love for the poor;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Holy Father,
who gathered us here around the table of your Son
to share this meal with the whole household of God:
in that new world where you reveal
the fullness of your peace,
gather people of every race and language
to share with Aidan and all your saints
in the eternal banquet of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Collect on the Eve of Trinity XIV:
Almighty God,
whose only Son has opened for us
a new and living way into your presence:
give us pure hearts and steadfast wills
to worship you in spirit and in truth;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Saint Aidan depicted in a panel on the altar in Saint Chad’s Church, Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
‘Throw him into the outer darkness’ (Matthew 25: 30) … at night on Souliou Street in Rethymnon in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
30 August 2024
‘Not by might, nor by
power, but by my spirit,
says the Lord of hosts’
A menorah that has been with me for more than 50 years is now in Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
When I visited Dublin earlier this month, I returned with a small menorah that I have owned for over fifty years. This battered menorah is covered in old candle-wax and is none the better for all its moves over five decades and more.
I acquired this menorah around 1971 or 1972, and I have kept it window ledges or bookshelves in flats in Wexford, houses in Dublin, the book cases in my study in the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and in the Rector in Askeaton. Now it is on a shelf in the flat in Stony Stratford.
The seven-branch menorah (מְנוֹרָה) is one of the oldest symbols of the Jewish faith, and as a symbol of Judaism and Jews is much older than the Star of David.
The menorah or seven-branched candelabrum was used in the Temple in Jerusalem and is described in the Bible and later ancient sources. Since ancient times, the menorah has been a symbol of the Jewish people and Judaism in both the Land of Israel and the Diaspora.
The Bible recalls the revelation of the design for the menorah to Moses (Exodus 25: 31-40). The menorah in the First and Second Temples was made of pure gold and had seven branches. The kohanim or priests lit the menorah in the sanctuary every evening and cleaned it out every morning, replacing the wicks and putting fresh olive oil into the cups.
According to II Kings and I and II Chronicles, Solomon’s Temple had ten menorot or menorahs. The Book of Jeremiah recalls how they were plundered by the Babylonian general Nebuzaradan after the destruction of Jerusalem.
The Second Temple also had a menorah. Antiochus IV took away the lampstands when he pillaged the temple. The chanukiah or nine-branched menorah used during Hanukkah commemorates the miracle that a day’s worth of oil for the menorah lasted eight days, with the raised ninth lamp set apart as the shamash (servant) light that is used to kindle the other lights.
The Talmud says only the centre lamp was left burning all day, as a sign that the Shechinah or presence of God rested among Israel. Contrary to some modern designs, the ancient menorah burned oil and did not contain anything resembling candles, which were unknown in the Middle East until about 400 CE.
After the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 CE, the menorah was taken to Rome. A frieze on the Arch of Titus in Rome depicts the menorah being carried away by triumphant Romans along with other spoils of the destroyed temple.
The menorah was reportedly taken to Carthage by the Vandals after the sacking of Rome in 455. Byzantine historian Procopius reported that the Byzantine army recovered it in 533 and brought it to Constantinople, then later returned it to Jerusalem. But there are many other theories about its eventual location.
The Hanukkah menorah in Etz Hayyim Synagogue in Chania, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Following the destruction of the Second Temple, the menorah became a distinctively Jewish symbol and was depicted on tomb walls, synagogue floors, sculptures and reliefs, as well as glass and metal objects. Since then, the menorah has been also used to distinguish synagogues and Jewish cemeteries.
It became a tradition not to duplicate anything from the Temple and so many menorahs no longer had seven branches. The use of six-branched menorahs became popular, but, in modern times, some rabbis have gone back to the seven-branched menorahs, arguing that they are not the same as those used in the Temple because they are electrified.
The Talmud says the menorah symbolised the ideal of universal enlightenment and wisdom. The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp. The menorah also symbolises the creation in seven days, with the centre light representing the Sabbath.
The Book of Revelation refers to a mystery of seven golden lampstands representing seven churches. According to Clement of Alexandria and Philo Judaeus, the seven lamps of the menorah represented the seven classical planets: the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
The menorah has a longer history as a Jewish symbol than the Star of David, which seems to have become a popular symbol of the Jewish people only in the Middle Ages.
Menorahs in the Monasterioton Synagogue in Thessaloniki (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Most synagogues today display either a menorah or an artistic representation of a menorah. Synagogues also have a continually lit lamp or light in front of the Torah ark or aron haKodesh, where the Torah scroll is kept. This lamp is called the ner tamid (the continual lamp or ‘eternal flame’) and represents the continually lit ner Elohim of the menorah in the Temple.
The menorah is also the main element in several Holocaust memorials.
The menorah became the official symbol of the State of Israel after it was founded in 1948, although the Star of David is the symbol on the flag.
The menorah is a symbol of the Jewish people and their mission to be ‘a light to the nations’ (Isaiah 42: 6).
The sages emphasise that this light is not a violent force: Israel is to accomplish its mission by setting an example, not by using force. This idea is highlighted in the vision of the Prophet Zechariah when he sees a menorah:
4 The angel who talked with me came again, and wakened me, as one is wakened from sleep. 2 He said to me, ‘What do you see?’ And I said, ‘I see a lampstand all of gold, with a bowl on the top of it; there are seven lamps on it, with seven lips on each of the lamps that are on the top of it. 3 And by it there are two olive trees, one on the right of the bowl and the other on its left.’ 4 I said to the angel who talked with me, ‘What are these, my lord?’ 5 Then the angel who talked with me answered me, ‘Do you not know what these are?’ I said, ‘No, my lord.’ 6 He said to me, ‘This is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel: Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, says the Lord of hosts’ (Zechariah 4: 1-6).
Shabbat Shalom, שבת שלום
A tilting menorah and tilting Star of David at the Jewish Memorial at the Aristotelean University of Thessaloniki (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
When I visited Dublin earlier this month, I returned with a small menorah that I have owned for over fifty years. This battered menorah is covered in old candle-wax and is none the better for all its moves over five decades and more.
I acquired this menorah around 1971 or 1972, and I have kept it window ledges or bookshelves in flats in Wexford, houses in Dublin, the book cases in my study in the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and in the Rector in Askeaton. Now it is on a shelf in the flat in Stony Stratford.
The seven-branch menorah (מְנוֹרָה) is one of the oldest symbols of the Jewish faith, and as a symbol of Judaism and Jews is much older than the Star of David.
The menorah or seven-branched candelabrum was used in the Temple in Jerusalem and is described in the Bible and later ancient sources. Since ancient times, the menorah has been a symbol of the Jewish people and Judaism in both the Land of Israel and the Diaspora.
The Bible recalls the revelation of the design for the menorah to Moses (Exodus 25: 31-40). The menorah in the First and Second Temples was made of pure gold and had seven branches. The kohanim or priests lit the menorah in the sanctuary every evening and cleaned it out every morning, replacing the wicks and putting fresh olive oil into the cups.
According to II Kings and I and II Chronicles, Solomon’s Temple had ten menorot or menorahs. The Book of Jeremiah recalls how they were plundered by the Babylonian general Nebuzaradan after the destruction of Jerusalem.
The Second Temple also had a menorah. Antiochus IV took away the lampstands when he pillaged the temple. The chanukiah or nine-branched menorah used during Hanukkah commemorates the miracle that a day’s worth of oil for the menorah lasted eight days, with the raised ninth lamp set apart as the shamash (servant) light that is used to kindle the other lights.
The Talmud says only the centre lamp was left burning all day, as a sign that the Shechinah or presence of God rested among Israel. Contrary to some modern designs, the ancient menorah burned oil and did not contain anything resembling candles, which were unknown in the Middle East until about 400 CE.
After the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 CE, the menorah was taken to Rome. A frieze on the Arch of Titus in Rome depicts the menorah being carried away by triumphant Romans along with other spoils of the destroyed temple.
The menorah was reportedly taken to Carthage by the Vandals after the sacking of Rome in 455. Byzantine historian Procopius reported that the Byzantine army recovered it in 533 and brought it to Constantinople, then later returned it to Jerusalem. But there are many other theories about its eventual location.
The Hanukkah menorah in Etz Hayyim Synagogue in Chania, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Following the destruction of the Second Temple, the menorah became a distinctively Jewish symbol and was depicted on tomb walls, synagogue floors, sculptures and reliefs, as well as glass and metal objects. Since then, the menorah has been also used to distinguish synagogues and Jewish cemeteries.
It became a tradition not to duplicate anything from the Temple and so many menorahs no longer had seven branches. The use of six-branched menorahs became popular, but, in modern times, some rabbis have gone back to the seven-branched menorahs, arguing that they are not the same as those used in the Temple because they are electrified.
The Talmud says the menorah symbolised the ideal of universal enlightenment and wisdom. The seven lamps allude to the branches of human knowledge, represented by the six lamps inclined inwards towards, and symbolically guided by, the light of God represented by the central lamp. The menorah also symbolises the creation in seven days, with the centre light representing the Sabbath.
The Book of Revelation refers to a mystery of seven golden lampstands representing seven churches. According to Clement of Alexandria and Philo Judaeus, the seven lamps of the menorah represented the seven classical planets: the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
The menorah has a longer history as a Jewish symbol than the Star of David, which seems to have become a popular symbol of the Jewish people only in the Middle Ages.
Menorahs in the Monasterioton Synagogue in Thessaloniki (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Most synagogues today display either a menorah or an artistic representation of a menorah. Synagogues also have a continually lit lamp or light in front of the Torah ark or aron haKodesh, where the Torah scroll is kept. This lamp is called the ner tamid (the continual lamp or ‘eternal flame’) and represents the continually lit ner Elohim of the menorah in the Temple.
The menorah is also the main element in several Holocaust memorials.
The menorah became the official symbol of the State of Israel after it was founded in 1948, although the Star of David is the symbol on the flag.
The menorah is a symbol of the Jewish people and their mission to be ‘a light to the nations’ (Isaiah 42: 6).
The sages emphasise that this light is not a violent force: Israel is to accomplish its mission by setting an example, not by using force. This idea is highlighted in the vision of the Prophet Zechariah when he sees a menorah:
4 The angel who talked with me came again, and wakened me, as one is wakened from sleep. 2 He said to me, ‘What do you see?’ And I said, ‘I see a lampstand all of gold, with a bowl on the top of it; there are seven lamps on it, with seven lips on each of the lamps that are on the top of it. 3 And by it there are two olive trees, one on the right of the bowl and the other on its left.’ 4 I said to the angel who talked with me, ‘What are these, my lord?’ 5 Then the angel who talked with me answered me, ‘Do you not know what these are?’ I said, ‘No, my lord.’ 6 He said to me, ‘This is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel: Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, says the Lord of hosts’ (Zechariah 4: 1-6).
Shabbat Shalom, שבת שלום
A tilting menorah and tilting Star of David at the Jewish Memorial at the Aristotelean University of Thessaloniki (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2024:
112, Friday 30 August 2024
‘Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom … and five were wise’ (Matthew 25: 1-2) … sculptures at the West Front of Saint Fin Barre’s Cathedral, Cork (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIII). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (30 August) remembers John Bunyan (1688), spiritual writer.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom … Five of them were foolish’ (Matthew 25: 1-2) … sculptures at the West Front of Saint Fin Barre’s Cathedral, Cork (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 25: 1-13 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 1 ‘Then the kingdom of heaven will be like this. Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of them were foolish, and five were wise. 3 When the foolish took their lamps, they took no oil with them; 4 but the wise took flasks of oil with their lamps. 5 As the bridegroom was delayed, all of them became drowsy and slept. 6 But at midnight there was a shout, “Look! Here is the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.” 7 Then all those bridesmaids got up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish said to the wise, “Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.” 9 But the wise replied, “No! there will not be enough for you and for us; you had better go to the dealers and buy some for yourselves.” 10 And while they went to buy it, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went with him into the wedding banquet; and the door was shut. 11 Later the other bridesmaids came also, saying, “Lord, lord, open to us.” 12 But he replied, “Truly I tell you, I do not know you.” 13 Keep awake therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.’
Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom (Matthew 25: 1)
Today’s Reflection:
The setting for the Gospel reading (Matthew 25: 1-13) is on the Mount of Olives, looking down on the Temple. Christ has been teaching there in the week leading up to the Passover, and in the week leading up to his Passion, Death and Resurrection.
In the verses immediately before this reading (Matthew 24: 45-51), Christ tells the parable of a master who leaves his household for a time, but suddenly returns. If, while he is away, his servant lives a godly, ethical life, he is ‘blessed’ when the master returns. On the other hand, if he thinks his master is delayed in returning, misbehaves and lives a life of debauchery, he will be condemned when his master returns.
In fact, the master will return when the servant least expects him to return.
The wise and foolish young women in verse 2 can be compared to the wise man and the foolish man who each build a house, one on firm foundations, the other on sand (see Matthew 7: 24).
In Christ’s day, weddings could last for days, as we know from the story of the Wedding at Cana (see John 2: 1-11). Weddings still go on, for days on end, in Greece and other Mediterranean countries today.
In Christ’s day, the groom and his family would gather at his household, while the bride and her family and guests would gather at her household. The groom and his family then make their way to the bride’s house to meet the bride. When the groom arrived, he would take the bride inside, the marriage would be consummated and the wedding celebrations would continue.
In this parable, the party goes ahead without the bridesmaids who have not prepared themselves properly for the arrival of the groom, and who hastily rush away and try to return in the pretence that they had been prepared all along.
It was normal at Jewish weddings for the bridegroom to be delayed (verse 5). So, the sudden, early arrival of the bridegroom (verses 10) is unexpected and surprising to those who are the first to listen to the telling of this parable.
Oil is not only a symbol of life but also a symbol of repentance and anointing (see Matthew 6: 17). Each of the wise bridesmaids has made her preparation and has made sure she is spiritually prepared. But being prepared is something we cannot transfer to others. Their refusal to give oil to the foolish bridesmaids is not an act of selfishness but a lesson in how each of us is expected to make his or her own preparations.
The Greek word that the NRSVA translates as ‘bridesmaid’ and the RSV as ‘maidens’ (verse 1) is παρθένος, which means a virgin, a marriageable maiden, a woman who has never had sexual intercourse with a man, or a marriageable daughter.
But this word has resonances that go beyond single, chaste women. This is the word that also gives us the name of the Parthenon in Athens. Athena Parthenos (Ἀθηνᾶ Παρθένος, Athena the Virgin) was the title of a giant-size statue in gold and ivory of the Greek goddess Athena in the Parthenon in Athens.
It was the best-known cult image of Athens, and was seen as the greatest achievement of Phidias, the most acclaimed sculptor in ancient Greece.
There may be a reference here, therefore, to cult worship, often in the night and under the cover of darkness, and true worship of God, which should take place in the light. If so, there is an interesting connection between this Gospel reading and the persistent Johannine theme of darkness and light and the true worship Christ invites us to take part in.
Other Johannine parallels can be found in the Book of Revelation:
‘Let us rejoice and exult
and give him the glory,
for the marriage of the Lamb has come,
and his bride has made herself ready’ (Revelation 19: 7).
‘And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband’ (Revelation 21: 2).
The surprise created by the early arrival of the bridegroom is added to as two further developments unfold in the story: the door is shut against those who arrive late (verse 10); and the groom refuses to recognise the foolish bridesmaids: ‘I do not know you’ (verse 12). Those who are not prepared, or are too late in their preparation, are refused entry to the Kingdom.
The surprise is shocking when we think that this is the same Jesus who taught, healed, and broke bread with anyone who would join him, and who has particular compassion for the poor and outcast. Why now is Christ portrayed as someone who would shut the door on half of those who are waiting for his arrival?
But what are the expectations of the majority of people in our society today?
What would they prefer most?
The values of this world’s kingdoms … or the demands and expectations of the Kingdom of God?
The exhortation to ‘keep awake’ (verse 13) is a call to be prepared – for the coming of the Kingdom of God, for the Second Coming of Christ.
The Parthenon on the Acropolis in Athens … the word παρθένος has resonances that go beyond single, chaste women (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 30 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 30 August 2024) invites us to pray:
Heavenly Father, we pray for all students of theological education. We pray that they will dig deep in your word and in their relationship with you so that they will be spiritually fruitful. May they be ambassadors of reconciliation and messengers of salvation.
The Collect:
God of peace,
who called your servant John Bunyan
to be valiant for truth:
grant that as strangers and pilgrims
we may at the last rejoice with all Christian people
in your heavenly city;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
God of truth,
whose Wisdom set her table
and invited us to eat the bread and drink the wine
of the kingdom:
help us to lay aside all foolishness
and to live and walk in the way of insight,
that we may come with John Bunyan to the eternal feast of heaven;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Sir Joseph Edgar Boehm’s statue of John Bunyan in Bedford, erected in 1874 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow</b>
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Later the other bridesmaids came also, saying, ‘Lord, lord, open to us.’ But he replied, ‘Truly I tell you, I do not know you’ (Matthew 25: 11-12)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIII). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today (30 August) remembers John Bunyan (1688), spiritual writer.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom … Five of them were foolish’ (Matthew 25: 1-2) … sculptures at the West Front of Saint Fin Barre’s Cathedral, Cork (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 25: 1-13 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 1 ‘Then the kingdom of heaven will be like this. Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of them were foolish, and five were wise. 3 When the foolish took their lamps, they took no oil with them; 4 but the wise took flasks of oil with their lamps. 5 As the bridegroom was delayed, all of them became drowsy and slept. 6 But at midnight there was a shout, “Look! Here is the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.” 7 Then all those bridesmaids got up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish said to the wise, “Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.” 9 But the wise replied, “No! there will not be enough for you and for us; you had better go to the dealers and buy some for yourselves.” 10 And while they went to buy it, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went with him into the wedding banquet; and the door was shut. 11 Later the other bridesmaids came also, saying, “Lord, lord, open to us.” 12 But he replied, “Truly I tell you, I do not know you.” 13 Keep awake therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.’
Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom (Matthew 25: 1)
Today’s Reflection:
The setting for the Gospel reading (Matthew 25: 1-13) is on the Mount of Olives, looking down on the Temple. Christ has been teaching there in the week leading up to the Passover, and in the week leading up to his Passion, Death and Resurrection.
In the verses immediately before this reading (Matthew 24: 45-51), Christ tells the parable of a master who leaves his household for a time, but suddenly returns. If, while he is away, his servant lives a godly, ethical life, he is ‘blessed’ when the master returns. On the other hand, if he thinks his master is delayed in returning, misbehaves and lives a life of debauchery, he will be condemned when his master returns.
In fact, the master will return when the servant least expects him to return.
The wise and foolish young women in verse 2 can be compared to the wise man and the foolish man who each build a house, one on firm foundations, the other on sand (see Matthew 7: 24).
In Christ’s day, weddings could last for days, as we know from the story of the Wedding at Cana (see John 2: 1-11). Weddings still go on, for days on end, in Greece and other Mediterranean countries today.
In Christ’s day, the groom and his family would gather at his household, while the bride and her family and guests would gather at her household. The groom and his family then make their way to the bride’s house to meet the bride. When the groom arrived, he would take the bride inside, the marriage would be consummated and the wedding celebrations would continue.
In this parable, the party goes ahead without the bridesmaids who have not prepared themselves properly for the arrival of the groom, and who hastily rush away and try to return in the pretence that they had been prepared all along.
It was normal at Jewish weddings for the bridegroom to be delayed (verse 5). So, the sudden, early arrival of the bridegroom (verses 10) is unexpected and surprising to those who are the first to listen to the telling of this parable.
Oil is not only a symbol of life but also a symbol of repentance and anointing (see Matthew 6: 17). Each of the wise bridesmaids has made her preparation and has made sure she is spiritually prepared. But being prepared is something we cannot transfer to others. Their refusal to give oil to the foolish bridesmaids is not an act of selfishness but a lesson in how each of us is expected to make his or her own preparations.
The Greek word that the NRSVA translates as ‘bridesmaid’ and the RSV as ‘maidens’ (verse 1) is παρθένος, which means a virgin, a marriageable maiden, a woman who has never had sexual intercourse with a man, or a marriageable daughter.
But this word has resonances that go beyond single, chaste women. This is the word that also gives us the name of the Parthenon in Athens. Athena Parthenos (Ἀθηνᾶ Παρθένος, Athena the Virgin) was the title of a giant-size statue in gold and ivory of the Greek goddess Athena in the Parthenon in Athens.
It was the best-known cult image of Athens, and was seen as the greatest achievement of Phidias, the most acclaimed sculptor in ancient Greece.
There may be a reference here, therefore, to cult worship, often in the night and under the cover of darkness, and true worship of God, which should take place in the light. If so, there is an interesting connection between this Gospel reading and the persistent Johannine theme of darkness and light and the true worship Christ invites us to take part in.
Other Johannine parallels can be found in the Book of Revelation:
‘Let us rejoice and exult
and give him the glory,
for the marriage of the Lamb has come,
and his bride has made herself ready’ (Revelation 19: 7).
‘And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband’ (Revelation 21: 2).
The surprise created by the early arrival of the bridegroom is added to as two further developments unfold in the story: the door is shut against those who arrive late (verse 10); and the groom refuses to recognise the foolish bridesmaids: ‘I do not know you’ (verse 12). Those who are not prepared, or are too late in their preparation, are refused entry to the Kingdom.
The surprise is shocking when we think that this is the same Jesus who taught, healed, and broke bread with anyone who would join him, and who has particular compassion for the poor and outcast. Why now is Christ portrayed as someone who would shut the door on half of those who are waiting for his arrival?
But what are the expectations of the majority of people in our society today?
What would they prefer most?
The values of this world’s kingdoms … or the demands and expectations of the Kingdom of God?
The exhortation to ‘keep awake’ (verse 13) is a call to be prepared – for the coming of the Kingdom of God, for the Second Coming of Christ.
The Parthenon on the Acropolis in Athens … the word παρθένος has resonances that go beyond single, chaste women (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 30 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 30 August 2024) invites us to pray:
Heavenly Father, we pray for all students of theological education. We pray that they will dig deep in your word and in their relationship with you so that they will be spiritually fruitful. May they be ambassadors of reconciliation and messengers of salvation.
The Collect:
God of peace,
who called your servant John Bunyan
to be valiant for truth:
grant that as strangers and pilgrims
we may at the last rejoice with all Christian people
in your heavenly city;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
God of truth,
whose Wisdom set her table
and invited us to eat the bread and drink the wine
of the kingdom:
help us to lay aside all foolishness
and to live and walk in the way of insight,
that we may come with John Bunyan to the eternal feast of heaven;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Sir Joseph Edgar Boehm’s statue of John Bunyan in Bedford, erected in 1874 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow</b>
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Later the other bridesmaids came also, saying, ‘Lord, lord, open to us.’ But he replied, ‘Truly I tell you, I do not know you’ (Matthew 25: 11-12)
Labels:
Acropolis,
Athens,
Bedford,
Bunyan,
Cork,
Greece 2024,
Mission,
Parables,
Parthenon,
Prayer,
Revelation,
Saint Matthew's Gospel,
Sculpture,
theological education,
USPG,
Weddings
29 August 2024
Reminders of legends,
highwaymen and
long journeys along
the Great North Road
The Great North Road is merely a memory … but there are reminders of it along the old A1 route (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
There is a Great Northern Road in Cambridge, close to Station Square and Station Road, and I had always thought it was part of the Great North Road that was once the main highway between England and Scotland from mediaeval times until the 20th century.
The Great North Road was link a spine that linked most of England, and it later became a coaching route used by stagecoaches and mail coaches travelling from London to York and Edinburgh. Local lore and embellished myths made it the main stomping ground of the legendary highwayman Dick Turpin.
But the Great North Road is merely a memory – albeit a cherished memory – for people today, since it was replaced by the modern A1, upgraded, realigned and brought up to motorway standards in recent decades, bypassing towns and villages that once thrived on the trade and traffic.
Still, I was reminded in Eaton Socon in Cambridgeshire last week, the route of the Great North Road can traced in many places, and some of the coaching inns and staging posts have survived here and there, reminders of the days when horses were changed and travellers stayed overnight.
Like many of the ancient Roman roads and routes that cross England – such as Watling Street (A5) from south-east to north-west, and Ryknild Street from south-west to north-east – there is evidence for the route of the Great North Road in Roman accounts and in the archaeological record of towns, forts, bridges and the road itself.
Ermine Street and Dere Street are the names later given to the Roman roads from London to York, and from York to Hadrian’s Wall near Corbridge and on towards Scotland.
But the river crossings established by the Romans were not maintained in many placed and many of the routes were neglected By the Middle Ages, long distance routes had become difficult to follow. Many monarchs, religious leaders and others travelling from London and the south to York and the north found an alternative to the Great North Road, opting for a more westerly route along Watling Street through Stony Stratford and then on through Northampton and Leicester.
In time, wooden bridges were built along the main roads, and then replaced by stone bridges, by the 14th century the standard route to York had reverted towards the Roman line of Ermine Street in the south, and via Grantham, Newark and Doncaster through Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.
The road was mapped described in detail by John Ogilby in 1675. A century later, the classic coaching route along the Great North Road came into its own with the stagecoaches and post coaches in the 18th century. The turnpikes and their planned improvement to the roads opened up the route out of London though Hatfield, Stevenage and Baldock, displacing the earlier ‘Old North Road’ via Royston.
The traditional starting point for the Great North Road was Smithfield Market on the edge of the City of London. The Great North Road followed St John Street to the junction at the Angel Inn where the local road name changes from St John Street to Islington High Street.
Dick Turpin’s flight from London to York on Black Bess in less than 15 hours is the best-known legend associated with the Great North Road. Various inns along the route claim he ate there or stopped there to rest his horse. The legendary ride is now questioned by historians, but became popular through Harrison Ainsworth’s romantic novel Rookwood (1834).
55 miles to London … a fading milestone on the Great North Road (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Of course, the Great North Road was never the only route from London to the north. Many coaches continued to run along the Old North Road.
The Great North Road joined the Old North Road at Alconbury, an older route that followed the Roman Ermine Street. There a milestone records mileages to London along both routes: 65 by the Old North Road and 68 by the Great North Road.
In Yorkshire, the route was through Selby, York and Northallerton. Further north, the route to Edinburgh from Newcastle was by the coastal route through Berwick.
In Sir Walter Scott’s The Heart of Midlothian, Jeanie Deans travels through several places on the Great North Road on her way to London. Charles Dickens also features the road in The Pickwick Papers.
When the General Post Office at St Martin’s-le-Grand in Aldersgate ward was built in 1829, coaches started using an alternative route, beginning at the Post Office and following Aldersgate Street and Goswell Road before joining the old route close to the Angel. In the Golden Age of Coaching, between 1815 and 1835, coaches could travel from London to York in 20 hours, and from London to Edinburgh in 45½ hours.
But just as the stagecoach routes were at their most successful in the 1830s, the arrival of the railways undermined their relevance and viability. The last coach from London to Newcastle left in 1842 and the last from Newcastle to Edinburgh in July 1847. By the second half of the 19th century, the Great North Road had become something to look back on with nostalgia.
The arrival of cars brough the roads back to life in the late 19th and early 20th century, and the great roads of the past were rediscovered. When Britain decided to follow France with a national road numbering system in 1921, the Great North Road became the A1. But in the century since, repeated improvements and realignments have seen the A1 by-pass virtually all the cities, towns and villages along the route.
The Great North Road once passed by the village green in Eaton Socon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Last week, when I was in Eaton Socon on the edges of St Neots in Cambridgeshire, I realised it was once a major stop on the journey from London to the North. Eaton Socon is aligned on the north-south axis, formed by the original Great North Road, where it is now designated the B1428.
Some stage coaches in the late 18th and early 19th century diverted through St Neots, but the majority continued on the Great North Road through Eaton Socon, were inns provided refreshments and overnight accommodation for travellers, and feed and rest facilities for horses.
The Great North Road is named by JB Priestley in The Good Companions, by Dorothy L Sayers in her Lord Peter Wimsey short story ‘The Fantastic Horror of the Cat in the Bag’, by Nevil Shute in Ruined City, by HG Wells in The War of the Worlds, and by George Orwell in his essay ‘England Your England’.
But, slowly – and, for many, sadly – the Great North Road of folklore is a distant memory from the past, has faded away or even has died. Many of the inns, taverns, cafés and truck stops that gave it character to the Great North Road and then the A1 are now gone.
The Great North Road of folklore is a distant memory from the past (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
There is a Great Northern Road in Cambridge, close to Station Square and Station Road, and I had always thought it was part of the Great North Road that was once the main highway between England and Scotland from mediaeval times until the 20th century.
The Great North Road was link a spine that linked most of England, and it later became a coaching route used by stagecoaches and mail coaches travelling from London to York and Edinburgh. Local lore and embellished myths made it the main stomping ground of the legendary highwayman Dick Turpin.
But the Great North Road is merely a memory – albeit a cherished memory – for people today, since it was replaced by the modern A1, upgraded, realigned and brought up to motorway standards in recent decades, bypassing towns and villages that once thrived on the trade and traffic.
Still, I was reminded in Eaton Socon in Cambridgeshire last week, the route of the Great North Road can traced in many places, and some of the coaching inns and staging posts have survived here and there, reminders of the days when horses were changed and travellers stayed overnight.
Like many of the ancient Roman roads and routes that cross England – such as Watling Street (A5) from south-east to north-west, and Ryknild Street from south-west to north-east – there is evidence for the route of the Great North Road in Roman accounts and in the archaeological record of towns, forts, bridges and the road itself.
Ermine Street and Dere Street are the names later given to the Roman roads from London to York, and from York to Hadrian’s Wall near Corbridge and on towards Scotland.
But the river crossings established by the Romans were not maintained in many placed and many of the routes were neglected By the Middle Ages, long distance routes had become difficult to follow. Many monarchs, religious leaders and others travelling from London and the south to York and the north found an alternative to the Great North Road, opting for a more westerly route along Watling Street through Stony Stratford and then on through Northampton and Leicester.
In time, wooden bridges were built along the main roads, and then replaced by stone bridges, by the 14th century the standard route to York had reverted towards the Roman line of Ermine Street in the south, and via Grantham, Newark and Doncaster through Lincolnshire and Yorkshire.
The road was mapped described in detail by John Ogilby in 1675. A century later, the classic coaching route along the Great North Road came into its own with the stagecoaches and post coaches in the 18th century. The turnpikes and their planned improvement to the roads opened up the route out of London though Hatfield, Stevenage and Baldock, displacing the earlier ‘Old North Road’ via Royston.
The traditional starting point for the Great North Road was Smithfield Market on the edge of the City of London. The Great North Road followed St John Street to the junction at the Angel Inn where the local road name changes from St John Street to Islington High Street.
Dick Turpin’s flight from London to York on Black Bess in less than 15 hours is the best-known legend associated with the Great North Road. Various inns along the route claim he ate there or stopped there to rest his horse. The legendary ride is now questioned by historians, but became popular through Harrison Ainsworth’s romantic novel Rookwood (1834).
55 miles to London … a fading milestone on the Great North Road (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Of course, the Great North Road was never the only route from London to the north. Many coaches continued to run along the Old North Road.
The Great North Road joined the Old North Road at Alconbury, an older route that followed the Roman Ermine Street. There a milestone records mileages to London along both routes: 65 by the Old North Road and 68 by the Great North Road.
In Yorkshire, the route was through Selby, York and Northallerton. Further north, the route to Edinburgh from Newcastle was by the coastal route through Berwick.
In Sir Walter Scott’s The Heart of Midlothian, Jeanie Deans travels through several places on the Great North Road on her way to London. Charles Dickens also features the road in The Pickwick Papers.
When the General Post Office at St Martin’s-le-Grand in Aldersgate ward was built in 1829, coaches started using an alternative route, beginning at the Post Office and following Aldersgate Street and Goswell Road before joining the old route close to the Angel. In the Golden Age of Coaching, between 1815 and 1835, coaches could travel from London to York in 20 hours, and from London to Edinburgh in 45½ hours.
But just as the stagecoach routes were at their most successful in the 1830s, the arrival of the railways undermined their relevance and viability. The last coach from London to Newcastle left in 1842 and the last from Newcastle to Edinburgh in July 1847. By the second half of the 19th century, the Great North Road had become something to look back on with nostalgia.
The arrival of cars brough the roads back to life in the late 19th and early 20th century, and the great roads of the past were rediscovered. When Britain decided to follow France with a national road numbering system in 1921, the Great North Road became the A1. But in the century since, repeated improvements and realignments have seen the A1 by-pass virtually all the cities, towns and villages along the route.
The Great North Road once passed by the village green in Eaton Socon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Last week, when I was in Eaton Socon on the edges of St Neots in Cambridgeshire, I realised it was once a major stop on the journey from London to the North. Eaton Socon is aligned on the north-south axis, formed by the original Great North Road, where it is now designated the B1428.
Some stage coaches in the late 18th and early 19th century diverted through St Neots, but the majority continued on the Great North Road through Eaton Socon, were inns provided refreshments and overnight accommodation for travellers, and feed and rest facilities for horses.
The Great North Road is named by JB Priestley in The Good Companions, by Dorothy L Sayers in her Lord Peter Wimsey short story ‘The Fantastic Horror of the Cat in the Bag’, by Nevil Shute in Ruined City, by HG Wells in The War of the Worlds, and by George Orwell in his essay ‘England Your England’.
But, slowly – and, for many, sadly – the Great North Road of folklore is a distant memory from the past, has faded away or even has died. Many of the inns, taverns, cafés and truck stops that gave it character to the Great North Road and then the A1 are now gone.
The Great North Road of folklore is a distant memory from the past (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2024:
111, Thursday 29 August 2024
The Execution of Saint John the Baptist … an early 18th century icon from the Monastery of Saint John the Theologian in Anopolis, in the Museum of Christian Art in the Church of Saint Catherine of Sinai in Iraklion in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began on Sunday with the Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIII). The Church Calendar today remembers the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist (29 August).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The daughter of Herodias dances for the head of Saint John the Baptist … a fresco in the Church of Analipsi in Georgioupoli, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 14:1-12 (NRSVA):
1 At that time Herod the ruler heard reports about Jesus; 2 and he said to his servants, ‘This is John the Baptist; he has been raised from the dead, and for this reason these powers are at work in him.’ 3 For Herod had arrested John, bound him, and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife, 4 because John had been telling him, ‘It is not lawful for you to have her.’ 5 Though Herod wanted to put him to death, he feared the crowd, because they regarded him as a prophet. 6 But when Herod’s birthday came, the daughter of Herodias danced before the company, and she pleased Herod 7 so much that he promised on oath to grant her whatever she might ask. 8 Prompted by her mother, she said, ‘Give me the head of John the Baptist here on a platter.’ 9 The king was grieved, yet out of regard for his oaths and for the guests, he commanded it to be given; 10 he sent and had John beheaded in the prison. 11 The head was brought on a platter and given to the girl, who brought it to her mother. 12 His disciples came and took the body and buried it; then they went and told Jesus.
The beheading of Saint John the Baptist … a fresco in the Church of Analipsi in Georgioupoli, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
It is about six weeks since the Sunday Gospel reading told the story of the execution of Saint John the Baptist (Mark 6: 14-29) and a little more than two months since we commemorated the Birth of Saint John the Baptist (24 June 2024). Now, the Church Calendar today again marks his Beheading.
This Gospel story is full of stark, cruel, violent reality. To achieve this dramatic effect, it is told with recall, flashback or with the use of the devise modern movie-makers call ‘back story.’
Cruel Herod has already executed Saint John the Baptist – long ago. Now he hears about the miracles and signs being worked by Jesus and his disciples.
Some people think that Saint John the Baptist has returned, even though John has been executed by Herod. Others think Jesus is Elijah – and popular belief at the time expected Elijah to return at Judgment Day (Malachi 4: 5).
On the other hand, Herod, the deranged Herod who has already had John beheaded, wonders whether John is back again. And we are presented with a flashback to the story of Saint John the Baptist, how he was executed in a moment of passion, how Herod grieved, and how John was buried.
When I was reflecting on this story in Saint Mark’s Gospel last month (Sunday 14 July 2024, Trinity VII) is asked: Did you ever get mistaken for someone else? Or, do you ever wonder whether the people you work with, or who are your neighbours, really know who you are?
I was thinking then of two examples. Anthony Hope Hawkins was the son of the Vicar of Saint Bride’s in Fleet Street, the Revd Edwards Comerford Hawkins. He was walking home to his father’s vicarage in London one dusky evening when he came face-to-face with a man who looked like his mirror image.
He wondered what would happen if they swapped places, if this double went back to Saint Bride’s vicarage, while he headed off instead to the suburbs. Would anyone notice? It inspired him, under the penname of Anthony Hope, to write his best-selling novel, The Prisoner of Zenda.
The other example I think of is the way I often hear people put themselves down with sayings such as: ‘If they only knew what I’m really like … if they only knew what I’m truly like …’
What are you truly like?
And would you honestly want to swap your life for someone else’s?
Would you take on all their woes, and angsts and burdens, along with their way of life?
It is a recurring theme for poets, writers and philosophers over the centuries. It was the theme in John Boorman’s movie The Tiger’s Tail (2006). Brendan Gleeson plays both the main character and his protagonist. Is he his doppelgänger, a forerunner warning of doom, destruction and death? Or is he the lost twin brother who envies his achievements and lifestyle?
The doppelgänger was regarded as a harbinger of doom and death. There is a way in which Saint John the Baptist is seen as the harbinger of the death of his own cousin, Christ.
The account of Saint John’s execution anticipates the future facing Christ and some of the disciples, and Christ’s own burial (see Mark 15: 45-47). The idea that John might be raised from the dead anticipates Christ’s resurrection.
As well as attracting similar followers and having similar messages, did these two cousins, in fact, look so like one another physically?
But Herod had known John the Baptist, he knew him as a righteous and a holy man, and he protected him. Why, he even liked to listen to John.
Do you think Herod was confused about the identities of Christ and of Saint John the Baptist?
Is Herod so truly deranged that he can believe someone he has executed, whose severed head he has seen, could come back to life in such a short period?
Or is Herod’s reaction merely one of exasperation and exhaustion: ‘Oh no! Not that John, back again!’
We too are forerunners, sent out to be signs of the Kingdom of God. To be a disciple is to follow a risky calling – or at least it ought to be so.
To be a disciple is to follow a risky calling – or at least it ought to be so.
I once had a poster with a grumpy looking judge and the words, ‘If you were accused of being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?’
Last Sunday’s Gospel reading told of how Christ sent out the disciples, two by two, inviting people into the Kingdom of God. But they are beginning to realise that the authorities are rejecting Christ.
Now with Herod’s maniacal and capricious way of making decisions, discipleship has become an even more risk-filled commitment.
But Herod’s horrid banquet runs right into the next story in Saint Mark’s Gospel where Christ feeds the 5,000, a sacramental sign of the invitation to all to the heavenly banquet – more than we can imagine can be fed in any human undertaking.
The invitation to Herod’s banquet, for the privileged and the prejudiced, is laden with the smell of death.
The invitation to Christ’s banquet, for the marginalised and the rejected, is laden with the promise of life.
Herod feeds the prejudices of his own family and a closed group of courtiers. Christ shows that, despite the initial prejudices of the disciples, all are welcome to his banquet.
Herod is in a lavish palace in his city, but is isolated and deserted. Christ withdraws to an open but deserted place to be alone, but a great crowd follows him.
Herod fears the crowd beyond his palace gates. Christ rebukes the disciples for wanting to keep the crowds away.
Herod offers his daughter half his kingdom. Christ offers us all, as God’s children, the fullness of the kingdom of God.
Herod’s daughter asks for John’s head on a platter. On the mountainside, Christ feeds all.
Our lives are filled with choices.
Herod chooses loyalty to his inner circle and their greed. Christ tells his disciples to make a choice in favour of those who need food and shelter.
Herod’s banquet leads to destruction and death. Christ’s banquet is an invitation to building the kingdom and to new life.
Would I rather be at Herod’s Banquet for the few in the palace or with Christ as he feeds the masses in the wilderness?
Who would you invite to the banquet?
And who do you think feels excluded from the banquet?
We may never get the chance to be like Herod when it comes to lavish banqueting and decadent partying. But we have an opportunity to be party to inviting the many to the banquet that really matters.
Who feels turned away from the banquet by the Church today, abandoned and left to fend for themselves?
And, in our response to their needs, when we become signs of the Kingdom of God, we provide evidence enough to convict us when we are accused of being Christians.
An icon of the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist in a church in Koutouloufári in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Thursday 29 August 2024, the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Thursday 29 August 2024) invites us to pray:
We pray for the smooth running of the Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme as it begins in September.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
who called your servant John the Baptist
to be the forerunner of your Son in birth and death:
strengthen us by your grace
that, as he suffered for the truth,
so we may boldly resist corruption and vice
and receive with him the unfading crown of glory;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Merciful Lord,
whose prophet John the Baptist
proclaimed your Son as the Lamb of God
who takes away the sin of the world:
grant that we who in this sacrament
have known your forgiveness and your life–giving love
may ever tell of your mercy and your peace;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Father Irenaeus, a monk in the Monastery of Saint Macarius in Wadi Natrun in Egypt, shows me the relics in the crypt of Saint John the Baptist below the northern wall of the church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began on Sunday with the Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XIII). The Church Calendar today remembers the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist (29 August).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The daughter of Herodias dances for the head of Saint John the Baptist … a fresco in the Church of Analipsi in Georgioupoli, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Matthew 14:1-12 (NRSVA):
1 At that time Herod the ruler heard reports about Jesus; 2 and he said to his servants, ‘This is John the Baptist; he has been raised from the dead, and for this reason these powers are at work in him.’ 3 For Herod had arrested John, bound him, and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife, 4 because John had been telling him, ‘It is not lawful for you to have her.’ 5 Though Herod wanted to put him to death, he feared the crowd, because they regarded him as a prophet. 6 But when Herod’s birthday came, the daughter of Herodias danced before the company, and she pleased Herod 7 so much that he promised on oath to grant her whatever she might ask. 8 Prompted by her mother, she said, ‘Give me the head of John the Baptist here on a platter.’ 9 The king was grieved, yet out of regard for his oaths and for the guests, he commanded it to be given; 10 he sent and had John beheaded in the prison. 11 The head was brought on a platter and given to the girl, who brought it to her mother. 12 His disciples came and took the body and buried it; then they went and told Jesus.
The beheading of Saint John the Baptist … a fresco in the Church of Analipsi in Georgioupoli, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
It is about six weeks since the Sunday Gospel reading told the story of the execution of Saint John the Baptist (Mark 6: 14-29) and a little more than two months since we commemorated the Birth of Saint John the Baptist (24 June 2024). Now, the Church Calendar today again marks his Beheading.
This Gospel story is full of stark, cruel, violent reality. To achieve this dramatic effect, it is told with recall, flashback or with the use of the devise modern movie-makers call ‘back story.’
Cruel Herod has already executed Saint John the Baptist – long ago. Now he hears about the miracles and signs being worked by Jesus and his disciples.
Some people think that Saint John the Baptist has returned, even though John has been executed by Herod. Others think Jesus is Elijah – and popular belief at the time expected Elijah to return at Judgment Day (Malachi 4: 5).
On the other hand, Herod, the deranged Herod who has already had John beheaded, wonders whether John is back again. And we are presented with a flashback to the story of Saint John the Baptist, how he was executed in a moment of passion, how Herod grieved, and how John was buried.
When I was reflecting on this story in Saint Mark’s Gospel last month (Sunday 14 July 2024, Trinity VII) is asked: Did you ever get mistaken for someone else? Or, do you ever wonder whether the people you work with, or who are your neighbours, really know who you are?
I was thinking then of two examples. Anthony Hope Hawkins was the son of the Vicar of Saint Bride’s in Fleet Street, the Revd Edwards Comerford Hawkins. He was walking home to his father’s vicarage in London one dusky evening when he came face-to-face with a man who looked like his mirror image.
He wondered what would happen if they swapped places, if this double went back to Saint Bride’s vicarage, while he headed off instead to the suburbs. Would anyone notice? It inspired him, under the penname of Anthony Hope, to write his best-selling novel, The Prisoner of Zenda.
The other example I think of is the way I often hear people put themselves down with sayings such as: ‘If they only knew what I’m really like … if they only knew what I’m truly like …’
What are you truly like?
And would you honestly want to swap your life for someone else’s?
Would you take on all their woes, and angsts and burdens, along with their way of life?
It is a recurring theme for poets, writers and philosophers over the centuries. It was the theme in John Boorman’s movie The Tiger’s Tail (2006). Brendan Gleeson plays both the main character and his protagonist. Is he his doppelgänger, a forerunner warning of doom, destruction and death? Or is he the lost twin brother who envies his achievements and lifestyle?
The doppelgänger was regarded as a harbinger of doom and death. There is a way in which Saint John the Baptist is seen as the harbinger of the death of his own cousin, Christ.
The account of Saint John’s execution anticipates the future facing Christ and some of the disciples, and Christ’s own burial (see Mark 15: 45-47). The idea that John might be raised from the dead anticipates Christ’s resurrection.
As well as attracting similar followers and having similar messages, did these two cousins, in fact, look so like one another physically?
But Herod had known John the Baptist, he knew him as a righteous and a holy man, and he protected him. Why, he even liked to listen to John.
Do you think Herod was confused about the identities of Christ and of Saint John the Baptist?
Is Herod so truly deranged that he can believe someone he has executed, whose severed head he has seen, could come back to life in such a short period?
Or is Herod’s reaction merely one of exasperation and exhaustion: ‘Oh no! Not that John, back again!’
We too are forerunners, sent out to be signs of the Kingdom of God. To be a disciple is to follow a risky calling – or at least it ought to be so.
To be a disciple is to follow a risky calling – or at least it ought to be so.
I once had a poster with a grumpy looking judge and the words, ‘If you were accused of being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?’
Last Sunday’s Gospel reading told of how Christ sent out the disciples, two by two, inviting people into the Kingdom of God. But they are beginning to realise that the authorities are rejecting Christ.
Now with Herod’s maniacal and capricious way of making decisions, discipleship has become an even more risk-filled commitment.
But Herod’s horrid banquet runs right into the next story in Saint Mark’s Gospel where Christ feeds the 5,000, a sacramental sign of the invitation to all to the heavenly banquet – more than we can imagine can be fed in any human undertaking.
The invitation to Herod’s banquet, for the privileged and the prejudiced, is laden with the smell of death.
The invitation to Christ’s banquet, for the marginalised and the rejected, is laden with the promise of life.
Herod feeds the prejudices of his own family and a closed group of courtiers. Christ shows that, despite the initial prejudices of the disciples, all are welcome to his banquet.
Herod is in a lavish palace in his city, but is isolated and deserted. Christ withdraws to an open but deserted place to be alone, but a great crowd follows him.
Herod fears the crowd beyond his palace gates. Christ rebukes the disciples for wanting to keep the crowds away.
Herod offers his daughter half his kingdom. Christ offers us all, as God’s children, the fullness of the kingdom of God.
Herod’s daughter asks for John’s head on a platter. On the mountainside, Christ feeds all.
Our lives are filled with choices.
Herod chooses loyalty to his inner circle and their greed. Christ tells his disciples to make a choice in favour of those who need food and shelter.
Herod’s banquet leads to destruction and death. Christ’s banquet is an invitation to building the kingdom and to new life.
Would I rather be at Herod’s Banquet for the few in the palace or with Christ as he feeds the masses in the wilderness?
Who would you invite to the banquet?
And who do you think feels excluded from the banquet?
We may never get the chance to be like Herod when it comes to lavish banqueting and decadent partying. But we have an opportunity to be party to inviting the many to the banquet that really matters.
Who feels turned away from the banquet by the Church today, abandoned and left to fend for themselves?
And, in our response to their needs, when we become signs of the Kingdom of God, we provide evidence enough to convict us when we are accused of being Christians.
An icon of the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist in a church in Koutouloufári in Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Thursday 29 August 2024, the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is the ‘Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme in Africa.’ The course is expected to start in August 2024 and run until December 2025, and this theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Regional Manager Africa, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Thursday 29 August 2024) invites us to pray:
We pray for the smooth running of the Theological Education Executive Leadership Programme as it begins in September.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
who called your servant John the Baptist
to be the forerunner of your Son in birth and death:
strengthen us by your grace
that, as he suffered for the truth,
so we may boldly resist corruption and vice
and receive with him the unfading crown of glory;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Merciful Lord,
whose prophet John the Baptist
proclaimed your Son as the Lamb of God
who takes away the sin of the world:
grant that we who in this sacrament
have known your forgiveness and your life–giving love
may ever tell of your mercy and your peace;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Father Irenaeus, a monk in the Monastery of Saint Macarius in Wadi Natrun in Egypt, shows me the relics in the crypt of Saint John the Baptist below the northern wall of the church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
28 August 2024
Eaton Socon and
Eaton Ford, former
Bedford villages now
part of Cambridgeshire
Eaton Socon and Eaton Ford … two villages on the fringes of St Neots … once in Bedfordshire, they are now part of Cambridgeshire (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
As a child and teenager in the 1960s, I thought Eaton Square, near my grandmother’s house in Terenure, and Eaton Square in London, were both misspelled – we even joked about the misspelling being a proper ‘Eaton Mess.’
Eaton was also the name of a shop in Terenure, and recently became the clever name of a restaurant in the heart of the south Dublin suburban village.
Of course, both Eaton Squares take their names from Eaton Hall, the country house of the Duke of Westminster near Chester. But last week, after visiting St Neots in Cambridgeshire, I found myself in the twin villages of Eaton Ford and Eaton Socon, once rural villages in Bedfordshire, but now neighbouring suburban, residential areas of St Neots, close to the banks of the River Great Ouse and Riverside Park.
Both Eaton Socon and Eaton Ford were once part of Bedfordshire. But they were incorporated into St Neots in 1965 and were transferred to Huntingdonshire. Huntingdonshire, in turn, was abolished as a county in 1974, and since then Eaton Socon and Eaton Ford been part of Cambridgeshire.
Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon was built in the 14th century and was rebuilt in 1930-1932 after a devastating fire in 1930 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Eaton Socon has a conservation area and the listed buildings include some thatched cottages.
Small settlements grew up on the west side of the River Great Ouse in Anglo-Saxon times. A small village near the water’s edge was called Ea-tun, meaning waterside-village, while a smaller settlement to the northwas known as Forda, later simply Ford.
In time, Ea-tun became Eaton, and as part of a soke or local administrative unit, it became Eaton Socon, while the village at the important ford to the north became Eaton Ford.
A thatched cottage in the conservation area in Eaton Socon (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The monastic foundation at Eynesbury, with relics of Saint Neot attracted pilgrims and visitors, making the ford at Eaton an important river crossing, and slowly the name Eaton Ford came to be used.
The first bridge across the River Great Ouse at St Neots was probably built in the 11th or 12th century to bring traders and pilgrims into the market place established by the monks of St Neots Priory. The old bridge had 72 arches, was 704 ft long and 7 ft 6 in wide. A new town bridge with masonry piers was built in 1588.
The river formed the boundary between Bedfordshire and Huntingdonshire, and both counties contributed to the costs and labour.
The town bridge was replaced again, probably in 1617. The River Ouse (Bedfordshire) Navigation Act in 1670 enabled improvements to the River Ouse so that the river was navigable as far as Bedford.
The bridge was widened in the 19th century and the old stone bridge survived well into the 20th century, until the present bridge was built in 1964.
The east end of Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Ulmar was the local landholder at Eaton at the time of the Norman Conquest. The manor of Eaton was allocated at first to Lisois de Moutiers, but by the time of the Domesday Book in 1086 it had been transferred to Eudo Dapifer, a steward in the royal household, who held Eaton Socon ‘with the Manors of Wyboston and Sudbury’.
William of Colmworth and a group of monks not affiliated to any particular order were given a site at Bushmead by Hugh de Beauchamp ca 1195. This became an Augustinian priory after 1215, but it never rivalled the prestige of St Neot’s Priory.
Hugh de Beauchamp built a castle in Eaton Socon ca 1140. The castle may have been demolished when Henry II succeeded in 1154, and the earth mound is known today as the Hillings.
In time, the area became known as Soka de Eton by 1247. It was known as Eton cum Soca in 1645, and it had become Eaton Socon in the 19th century.
Eaton Socon, often known as ‘Eaton Town’ or ‘Eaton’, was the main settlement in the Parish of Eaton Socon. The parish was once the largest in Bedfordshire and included many hamlets such as Wyboston, Duloe, Staploe, Bushmead, Basmead, Honeydon, Bergwary, Tythe, Goodwick, Eaton Ford, Cross Hall, Cross Hall Ford and other vanished hamlets.
The Waggon and Horses in Eaton Socon … Eaton Socon was a major stop for stagecoaches on the journey from London to the North in the 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
In the days of stagecoach travel, Eaton Socon became a major stop on the journey from London to the North in the 18th century, with inns providing refreshments and overnight accommodation for travellers, and feed and rest facilities for horses.
The inns included the White Horse pub, dating from the 13th century, the Waggon and Horses and the Cock Inn.
By 1754, coaches were travelling from London as far as Edinburgh. At the height of stagecoach activity, 20 coaches were passing through Eaton Socon daily, collecting mail and passengers and changing horses.
In Charles Dickens’s novel Nicolas Nickleby, Squeers and some boys are making their way from London to Yorkshire by stagecoach, and stop at Eton Slocomb, evidently a pseudonym for Eaton Socon. The reference is noted on a blue plaque on the White Horse Public House in Eaton Socon.
The south side of Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon … rebuilt after a devastating fire in 1930 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The parish church of Saint Mary the Virgin stands on the green in the centre of Eaton Socon. Saint Mary’s was built in the 14th century and enlarged and completed in the 15th century. It was once famed for its poppy headed pew ends.
Saint Mary’s Church was substantially destroyed by a fire on 8 February 1930. Most of the timber and the six bells were destroyed, and the north wall collapsed the following afternoon. The tower was restored, the church was rebuilt, and a new altar was made from a slab of Derbyshire stone, weighing 600 kg.
The reconstruction was designed by the architect Albert Richardson, using local craftsmen. The chancel suffered least and its delicate perpendicular windows were repaired. The rebuilding included a rood screen, choir benches, parclose screens, roofing, and the organ case, all in Suffolk oak.
The stone carving includes many symbolical corbel groups and portraits. Among the faces are those of the Bishop of St Albans, the Archdeacon of Bedford, the Vicar of Eaton Socon, the churchwardens, the architect, the clerk of the works, and the builders’ foreman. After rebuilding, the church was rededicated in 1932.
Manor Cottage is a surviving part of the Manor House … the Cock Inn was renamed the Manor House but was demolished in the 1960s (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The railways brought an end to the stagecoach trade. The Cock Inn stood to the north of Eaton Socon Green, between the church and the corner of Peppercorn Lane. It was a large, elegant building of brick with a clay-tiled roof, and double bay windows, and was a large well-known coaching inn on the Great North Road.
A large cookery book was produced by the proprietors in 1830, and it is said Princess Victoria, later Queen Victoria, visited the Cock Inn in the 1830s.
The Cock Inn was later renamed the Manor House. Most of it was demolished in the 1960s and redeveloped in the 1960s as Manor House Close, although Manor Cottage, once part of the house, remains on the corner of Peppercorn Lane, leading to the local cricket club.
The former Eaton Socon Academy on Peppercorn Lane(Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
A large house on Peppercorn Lane was the Eaton Socon Academy in the 19th century. Later it was a private house and then a glove factory, then offices and a music centre. It has since been converted into private housing.
Eaton Socon, on the west side of St Neots, and between the River Great Ouse and the A1, has a population of over 9,000. The Little End Industrial Estate and the Quora Industrial Estate in Eaton Socon have a range of light industrial units.
Ford House is said to be the oldest building in Eaton Ford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Eaton Ford was once a small hamlet and an extension of Eaton Socon. By the 1500s, it had several timber-framed houses, including some built with stone from Saint Neot’s Priory after its dissolution during the Tudor Reformation.
Ford House was one of those timber-framed houses, and today it is said to be the oldest building in Eaton Ford. At the time of the Enclosure Act in 1799, it was described as the Mansion House and it was owned by George James Gorham, who founded St Neots Bank.
Ford House was a boys’ boarding school in the 1850s and the 1860s, and the Addington family lived there from the 1890s to the 1920s. During their time, wooden panelling from Netherstead Priory was installed in the house.
The Barley Mow in Eaton Ford was built in 1830, and was run for generation by the Osborne family (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The Barley Mow was built in 1830, and the public house was run by the Osborne family from the mid-1830s until 1915. They strongly influenced the development of Eaton Ford.
Eaton Ford expanded quickly under the London overspill programme in the 1960s, and was separated from Eaton Socon in 1963.
Much of the housing in Eaton Ford dates from the period of London overspill from the 1960s on. Today, Eaton Ford stands by the River Great Ouse and its facilities include the Riverside Park, St Neots Golf Club and the marina. It still has the feeling of a village, with its village green, village pub – the Barley Mow – and little or no industry.
The Chequers was a public house in Eaton Ford from the 1820s to 1911, and was run for generation by the Osborne family (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
As a child and teenager in the 1960s, I thought Eaton Square, near my grandmother’s house in Terenure, and Eaton Square in London, were both misspelled – we even joked about the misspelling being a proper ‘Eaton Mess.’
Eaton was also the name of a shop in Terenure, and recently became the clever name of a restaurant in the heart of the south Dublin suburban village.
Of course, both Eaton Squares take their names from Eaton Hall, the country house of the Duke of Westminster near Chester. But last week, after visiting St Neots in Cambridgeshire, I found myself in the twin villages of Eaton Ford and Eaton Socon, once rural villages in Bedfordshire, but now neighbouring suburban, residential areas of St Neots, close to the banks of the River Great Ouse and Riverside Park.
Both Eaton Socon and Eaton Ford were once part of Bedfordshire. But they were incorporated into St Neots in 1965 and were transferred to Huntingdonshire. Huntingdonshire, in turn, was abolished as a county in 1974, and since then Eaton Socon and Eaton Ford been part of Cambridgeshire.
Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon was built in the 14th century and was rebuilt in 1930-1932 after a devastating fire in 1930 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Eaton Socon has a conservation area and the listed buildings include some thatched cottages.
Small settlements grew up on the west side of the River Great Ouse in Anglo-Saxon times. A small village near the water’s edge was called Ea-tun, meaning waterside-village, while a smaller settlement to the northwas known as Forda, later simply Ford.
In time, Ea-tun became Eaton, and as part of a soke or local administrative unit, it became Eaton Socon, while the village at the important ford to the north became Eaton Ford.
A thatched cottage in the conservation area in Eaton Socon (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The monastic foundation at Eynesbury, with relics of Saint Neot attracted pilgrims and visitors, making the ford at Eaton an important river crossing, and slowly the name Eaton Ford came to be used.
The first bridge across the River Great Ouse at St Neots was probably built in the 11th or 12th century to bring traders and pilgrims into the market place established by the monks of St Neots Priory. The old bridge had 72 arches, was 704 ft long and 7 ft 6 in wide. A new town bridge with masonry piers was built in 1588.
The river formed the boundary between Bedfordshire and Huntingdonshire, and both counties contributed to the costs and labour.
The town bridge was replaced again, probably in 1617. The River Ouse (Bedfordshire) Navigation Act in 1670 enabled improvements to the River Ouse so that the river was navigable as far as Bedford.
The bridge was widened in the 19th century and the old stone bridge survived well into the 20th century, until the present bridge was built in 1964.
The east end of Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Ulmar was the local landholder at Eaton at the time of the Norman Conquest. The manor of Eaton was allocated at first to Lisois de Moutiers, but by the time of the Domesday Book in 1086 it had been transferred to Eudo Dapifer, a steward in the royal household, who held Eaton Socon ‘with the Manors of Wyboston and Sudbury’.
William of Colmworth and a group of monks not affiliated to any particular order were given a site at Bushmead by Hugh de Beauchamp ca 1195. This became an Augustinian priory after 1215, but it never rivalled the prestige of St Neot’s Priory.
Hugh de Beauchamp built a castle in Eaton Socon ca 1140. The castle may have been demolished when Henry II succeeded in 1154, and the earth mound is known today as the Hillings.
In time, the area became known as Soka de Eton by 1247. It was known as Eton cum Soca in 1645, and it had become Eaton Socon in the 19th century.
Eaton Socon, often known as ‘Eaton Town’ or ‘Eaton’, was the main settlement in the Parish of Eaton Socon. The parish was once the largest in Bedfordshire and included many hamlets such as Wyboston, Duloe, Staploe, Bushmead, Basmead, Honeydon, Bergwary, Tythe, Goodwick, Eaton Ford, Cross Hall, Cross Hall Ford and other vanished hamlets.
The Waggon and Horses in Eaton Socon … Eaton Socon was a major stop for stagecoaches on the journey from London to the North in the 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
In the days of stagecoach travel, Eaton Socon became a major stop on the journey from London to the North in the 18th century, with inns providing refreshments and overnight accommodation for travellers, and feed and rest facilities for horses.
The inns included the White Horse pub, dating from the 13th century, the Waggon and Horses and the Cock Inn.
By 1754, coaches were travelling from London as far as Edinburgh. At the height of stagecoach activity, 20 coaches were passing through Eaton Socon daily, collecting mail and passengers and changing horses.
In Charles Dickens’s novel Nicolas Nickleby, Squeers and some boys are making their way from London to Yorkshire by stagecoach, and stop at Eton Slocomb, evidently a pseudonym for Eaton Socon. The reference is noted on a blue plaque on the White Horse Public House in Eaton Socon.
The south side of Saint Mary’s Church in Eaton Socon … rebuilt after a devastating fire in 1930 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The parish church of Saint Mary the Virgin stands on the green in the centre of Eaton Socon. Saint Mary’s was built in the 14th century and enlarged and completed in the 15th century. It was once famed for its poppy headed pew ends.
Saint Mary’s Church was substantially destroyed by a fire on 8 February 1930. Most of the timber and the six bells were destroyed, and the north wall collapsed the following afternoon. The tower was restored, the church was rebuilt, and a new altar was made from a slab of Derbyshire stone, weighing 600 kg.
The reconstruction was designed by the architect Albert Richardson, using local craftsmen. The chancel suffered least and its delicate perpendicular windows were repaired. The rebuilding included a rood screen, choir benches, parclose screens, roofing, and the organ case, all in Suffolk oak.
The stone carving includes many symbolical corbel groups and portraits. Among the faces are those of the Bishop of St Albans, the Archdeacon of Bedford, the Vicar of Eaton Socon, the churchwardens, the architect, the clerk of the works, and the builders’ foreman. After rebuilding, the church was rededicated in 1932.
Manor Cottage is a surviving part of the Manor House … the Cock Inn was renamed the Manor House but was demolished in the 1960s (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The railways brought an end to the stagecoach trade. The Cock Inn stood to the north of Eaton Socon Green, between the church and the corner of Peppercorn Lane. It was a large, elegant building of brick with a clay-tiled roof, and double bay windows, and was a large well-known coaching inn on the Great North Road.
A large cookery book was produced by the proprietors in 1830, and it is said Princess Victoria, later Queen Victoria, visited the Cock Inn in the 1830s.
The Cock Inn was later renamed the Manor House. Most of it was demolished in the 1960s and redeveloped in the 1960s as Manor House Close, although Manor Cottage, once part of the house, remains on the corner of Peppercorn Lane, leading to the local cricket club.
The former Eaton Socon Academy on Peppercorn Lane(Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
A large house on Peppercorn Lane was the Eaton Socon Academy in the 19th century. Later it was a private house and then a glove factory, then offices and a music centre. It has since been converted into private housing.
Eaton Socon, on the west side of St Neots, and between the River Great Ouse and the A1, has a population of over 9,000. The Little End Industrial Estate and the Quora Industrial Estate in Eaton Socon have a range of light industrial units.
Ford House is said to be the oldest building in Eaton Ford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Eaton Ford was once a small hamlet and an extension of Eaton Socon. By the 1500s, it had several timber-framed houses, including some built with stone from Saint Neot’s Priory after its dissolution during the Tudor Reformation.
Ford House was one of those timber-framed houses, and today it is said to be the oldest building in Eaton Ford. At the time of the Enclosure Act in 1799, it was described as the Mansion House and it was owned by George James Gorham, who founded St Neots Bank.
Ford House was a boys’ boarding school in the 1850s and the 1860s, and the Addington family lived there from the 1890s to the 1920s. During their time, wooden panelling from Netherstead Priory was installed in the house.
The Barley Mow in Eaton Ford was built in 1830, and was run for generation by the Osborne family (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
The Barley Mow was built in 1830, and the public house was run by the Osborne family from the mid-1830s until 1915. They strongly influenced the development of Eaton Ford.
Eaton Ford expanded quickly under the London overspill programme in the 1960s, and was separated from Eaton Socon in 1963.
Much of the housing in Eaton Ford dates from the period of London overspill from the 1960s on. Today, Eaton Ford stands by the River Great Ouse and its facilities include the Riverside Park, St Neots Golf Club and the marina. It still has the feeling of a village, with its village green, village pub – the Barley Mow – and little or no industry.
The Chequers was a public house in Eaton Ford from the 1820s to 1911, and was run for generation by the Osborne family (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)