The former Durham Synagogue at the top of Laburnum Avenue, now Durham Presbyterian Church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
We spent last weekend in York, and for the first time ever I visited Durham, the county town of County Durham and a cathedral city on a bend in the river Wear, with a population of about 50,000 people.
During my short visit, I went in search of the stories of Jewish life in Durham, including the early 20th century synagogues and the stories of Jewish family and community in Durham.
These are the stories of a community was always small and that was one of the late communities to emerge in England at the end of the 19th century. The Jewish community in Durham faded away in the mid-20th century, but in recent decades a small new community has been formed, Jewish student life has become vibrant, and Durham University has become an important centre in the academic world for Jewish studies.
Early Jewish services in Durham were held at the home of Jacob Morris at 8 The Avenue (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
There may have been a minyan of Jews in Spennymoor, seven miles south of Durham, in the mid-19th century. But it seems the first Jews moved to Durham ca 1888, and that regular services were being held in private homes by the early 1890s.
Those first Jewish families came to Durham for economic reasons, and many of those early Jewish settlers sold clothing and furniture on credit to local miners, with weekly payments.
The earliest Jewish resident in Durham seems to have been a Mr B Morris, who arrived from Lithuania in 1888. He was soon joined by his brother Edward Morris, his father Jacob Morris, and his nephews Nachman and Boruch. They were a family of learned Talmudic scholars and they dominated Jewish community life in Durham for many years.
Jacob Morris led a deputation to Sunderland in 1891 seeking a loan of a Sepher Torah, and at the time members of the Jewish community in Durham were members of the Sunderland Hebrew Congregation. Reports in Jewish Chronicle show early services in Durham were held in members’ homes, in particular at the home of Jacob Morris at 8 The Avenue in 1899-1900.
There was a small synagogue at 11 John Street, Durham, in 1901-1909 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The London Jewish Board of Guardians had a policy of ‘dispersal’ in the early 20th century, and sent a number of East European Jews to Durham. As a consequence, the Jewish community in Durham was able to form a minyan and set up a small place for communal worship at 11 John Street, in the Viaduct area.
The congregation held its annual general meeting at the synagogue at 11 John Street in 1901, when Edward Morris was elected president, S Herman treasurer, and B Morris the secretary. The New Year and High Holy Day services were held in the Shakespeare Hall, North Road, in 1903.
A request for the congregation in Durham to become a branch or affiliate of the Sunderland congregation was rejected by Sunderland on 13 April 1904. By then the premises on John Street were too cramped and a new synagogue, with a capacity for 125 people, was built at 107 Laburnum Avenue, off Hawthorn Terrace, in 1909.
The synagogue at the top of Laburnum Avenue was opened in 1909 by the Bradford philanthropist Jacob Moser (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The foundation stone of the new synagogue was laid in January 1909 and the synagogue was opened on 19 August 1909 by the Bradford philanthropist Jacob Moser (1839-1922). He was Lord Mayor of Bradford in 1910 and a founder of the Bradford Reform Synagogue, the second oldest surviving Reform synagogue in the United Kingdom.
The new synagogue in Durham was consecrated in a service led by the Revd S Franklin of Newcastle, with addresses by Rabbi Dr Salis Daiches (1880-1945) of Sunderland and Rabbi Yochel Myer Sandelson (1880-1935) of Newcastle.
The Archdeacon of Durham, the Ven Henry Watkins (1844-1922), sent a cordial letter, writing: ‘All lovers of humanity must thankfully acknowledge their indebtedness to the Jewish nation, and all Christian people must recognise the indebtedness of the church to the synagogue.’ Watkins was also Professor of Hebrew at Durham University, and his letter concluded with a Hebrew blessing.
The ceremonies were followed by a reception in the Durham Miners’ Hall.
The only known resident minister in Durham was the Revd Maurice David Hershman (1862-1931), who was appointed reader, teacher and mohel in 1912. His appointment was of very short duration and there was no minister or shochet in Durham for much of the time, although Dr Samuel Daiches, the resident minister of Sunderland, was a visiting minister from time to time.
The community at one time had over 70 members in 15 families, and the principal family names included Bergson, Garstein, Robinson, Cannon, Garbett, Berg, Book, Herman and Cohen.
Isidore Newman (1916-1944) lived at 52-53 Hawthorn Terrace (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Some notable Jewish connections with Durham include Farrer Herschell (1837-1899), 1st Baron Herschell of the City of Durham, who was MP for Durham (1874-1885), and Lord High Chancellor (1886, 1892-1895). Herschell’s father, the Revd Ridley Haim Herschell (1807-1864), from Strzelno in Poland, had converted from Judaism to Christianity.
Isidore Newman (1916-1944) was a British secret agent in the French section of the Special Operations Executive during World War II. The son of Russian Jewish immigrants Joseph and Tilly Newman, he grew up in Durham and trained there as a teacher.
He joined the Royal Corps of Signals in August 1940, and transferred to the French (F) Section in ‘Churchill’s Secret Army’ in July 1941. He was betrayed in France, arrested on 31 March 1944, taken to the Gestapo prison in Paris, and moved to Mauthausen concentration camp, where he was murdered on 7 September 1944. A plaque in his honour was unveiled at his former home at 52-53 Hawthorn Terrace, Durham, in 2023.
Gerald (Gerry) Steinberg (1945-2015) was born in Durham and was a teacher in Spennymoor; he was co-Leader of Durham City Council (1983-1987) and Labour MP for Durham (1987- 2005).
Four large stones and eight smaller ones embedded in the wall recall some of the trustees of the former Durham Synagogue (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The community began to decline in the 1930s. The synagogue continued to be used by the Durham Hebrew Congregation until the last services during autumn 1944. The building was finally sold in 1955, and the last trustees are named in 1962, when the community was dissolved.
The last two Jewish families – the families of Dr Harry Waters and Sonia Waters and Dr Harry Shenkin and Cynthia Shenkin – left Durham in the 1970s.
The former synagogue building at the top of Laburnum Avenue was bought in 1997 by Durham Presbyterian Church, which was formed 10 years earlier in 1987. The Revd Phil Baiden has been the minister since 2015.
The former synagogue at the top of Laburnum Avenue was bought by Durham Presbyterian Church in 1997 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
In behind the hedges and the growth at the top of Laburnum Avenue last weekend, I found four large stones and eight smaller ones embedded in the wall commemorating some of the trustees of the former Durham Synagogue, although most of the names have been erased over time.
Durham and North-East Liberal Jewish Community is a new community that meets about once a month in Durham and other parts of the north-east.
The other Jewish communities nearby are in Newcastle: Newcastle United Hebrew Congregation and Newcastle Reform Synagogue.
Saint Chad’s College, Durham … the Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University was founded in 2015 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The Centre for the Study of Jewish Culture, Society and Politics at Durham University was founded ten years ago in 2015. It brings together a group of leading scholars coming from a wide range of disciplines including anthropology, cultural studies, geography, history, literary theory, political science and theology.
The centre provides a multidisciplinary forum for scholars working at the intersection of Jewish Studies and other fields of academic inquiry, developing cutting edge theoretical and empirical scholarship and engaging with issues of wider societal concern.
Durham University’s Jewish Society is one of the fastest-growing in Britain. In partnership with the university, UJC and the North East Jewish Chaplaincy Board, it holds weekly events open to all Jewish students and staff of the university. These events are usually held in Saint Aidan’s College, Durham. They include a weekly Shabbat dinner cooked in the dedicated kosher kitchen.
Shabbat Shalom, שבת שלום
The plaque commemorating Isidore Newman was unveiled on Hawthorn Terrace in 2023 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
12 September 2025
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2025:
125, Friday 12 September 2025
‘Why do you see the speck in your neighbour’s eye?’ (Luke 6: 41) … street art in Plaza de Judería in Malaga (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and the week began with the Twelfth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XII, 7 September 2025).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘First take the log out of your own eye’ (Luke 6: 39) … autumn logs by the River Ouse in Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 6: 39-42 (NRSVA):
39 He also told them a parable: ‘Can a blind person guide a blind person? Will not both fall into a pit? 40 A disciple is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully qualified will be like the teacher. 41 Why do you see the speck in your neighbour’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? 42 Or how can you say to your neighbour, “Friend, let me take out the speck in your eye”, when you yourself do not see the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbour’s eye.’
‘Why do you see the speck in your neighbour’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?’ (Luke 6: 41) … what do we see in our own eyes? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
For some days, the Gospel readings have taken us through the ‘Sermon on the Level Place’, Saint Luke’s equivalent of the Sermon on the Mount, which we began reading yesterday with Saint Luke’s version of the Beatitudes (Luke 6: 20-38).
As we continue this sequence of readings from Saint Luke’s Gospel, we read sayings whose parallels in Saint Matthew’s Gospel (see Matthew 15) are addressed to the Pharisees, but here are addressed to the disciples.
In this reading, Christ makes two points.
Firstly, the blind cannot lead the blind. The disciple, left to himself or herself, does not know very much and depends on the teacher. But once the disciple is fully trained and has learnt everything it is possible to discern from the teacher, then the learner becomes an extension of the teacher. At that point, the disciple shares the teacher’s knowledge and wisdom and can, in turn, be a guide to others.
We ought to listen carefully to what Christ says to us and make it part of our own lives. Only then can we effectively lead others to him.
But, secondly, we need to be mindful about sitting in judgment on others. Christ uses a graphic image of someone trying to remove a speck of dust from another person’s eye while there is a large ‘log’ in their own. How can I see properly to correct the vision of my fellow disciple or Christian when my own vision is so distorted?
The faults I so easily see in others are often trivial in comparison with my own shortcomings. Of course, much of the energy I exert in gossip and in putting down others may be sub-conscious attempts to compensate for my own shortcomings. Instead of lifting myself up by changing my ways, I can try to drag others down.
But then, our judgments so often are based purely on external behaviour. We usually have no idea of the inner motives or intentions of other people, or an awareness of their inability to behave in way other than the way then do.
How often, when I am quick to criticism other people behind their backs am I equally quick to say those things to face-to-face. Yet, how often, when I am asked professionally to offer an objective evaluation of a person’s behaviour or their fitness for some responsibility, do I shy away from those responsibilities?
What is true sight and true light?
During a visit to Liverpool many years ago, I visited Hope Street, and there above the Hope Street entrance to the former Royal School for the Blind was the inscription: ‘Christ heals the blind, for who denies that in the mind dwell truer sight and clearer light than in the eyes?’
Both this morning’s reading and that inscription also find interesting parallels in Plato’s ‘Allegory of the Cave’ (The Republic, Book VII).
No one, of course, denies the idea that the mind possesses truer sight and clearer light than the eyes. In an account of Socrates in The Republic, Plato argues that our earthly senses can be misleading and that true understanding is found through the intellect and the forms, not the physical senses.
In Plato’s ‘Allegory of the Cave’, prisoners mistake shadows on a wall for reality. When one prisoner is freed and sees the true objects and the light of the sun, he finds the ‘reality’ of the cave far less clear than the true world, even though his eyes are pained by the light. This illustrates that physical sight can be deceptive, while the intellect understands a higher reality.
Plato believed that the intellect and reason, not the senses, provide true understanding and wisdom. The mind's perception is superior to the deceptive nature of physical vision.
He recalls Socrates’ allegory of the cave. Socrates has compared a philosophic education to leaving a dark cave and emerging into the light. He notes that, when you leave the dark and enter the light, it takes your eyes awhile to adjust; you cannot see at first.
Imagine leaving a dark cinema in the middle of a sunny day: it is hard to see outside at first.
So, the philosophers need to leave the cave and have their eyes adjust to the bright outside world. Once this happens, though, Socrates argues that they must be forced to go back into the dark cave, to rule.
The cave, it turns out, is an image of the city with its conventional opinions, as opposed to the truth. Socrates notes that, when the philosophers go back into the cave, it will also take some time for their eyes to adjust to the darkness.
Imagine, now, going back into that dark cinema in the middle of that sunny day; it is hard to see inside at first.
Socrates is comparing bodily vision to intellectual vision. There are two possible causes for someone who has bad bodily vision: they might be going from the dark to the light; or they might be going from the light to the dark. So too with intellectual vision: someone with bad intellectual vision may be going from the dark cave of opinions to the light of the truth, or they may be going from the light of the truth back to the dark cave of opinions.
This morning’s Gospel sayings warn us against either form of blindness, but also warn us against leading others when we are not aware of suffering from one or other – or both – forms of blindness.
Blind Socrates … a small figure among trinkets and figurines in an antique shop in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 12 September 2025):
The theme this week (7 to 13 September) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Cementing a Legacy’ (pp 36-37). This theme was introduced last Sunday with reflections from Rachel Weller, Communications Officer, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 12 September 2025) invites us to pray:
Heavenly Father, help us to steward our financial gifts with wisdom and faithfulness, ensuring they are used to support your work and care for all in need.
The Collect:
Almighty and everlasting God,
you are always more ready to hear than we to pray
and to give more than either we desire or deserve:
pour down upon us the abundance of your mercy,
forgiving us those things of which our conscience is afraid
and giving us those good things
which we are not worthy to ask
but through the merits and mediation
of Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
God of all mercy,
in this eucharist you have set aside our sins
and given us your healing:
grant that we who are made whole in Christ
may bring that healing to this broken world,
in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
God of constant mercy,
who sent your Son to save us:
remind us of your goodness,
increase your grace within us,
that our thankfulness may grow,
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
An inscription above the Hope Street entrance of the former Royal School for the Blind, Liverpool (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and the week began with the Twelfth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XII, 7 September 2025).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘First take the log out of your own eye’ (Luke 6: 39) … autumn logs by the River Ouse in Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 6: 39-42 (NRSVA):
39 He also told them a parable: ‘Can a blind person guide a blind person? Will not both fall into a pit? 40 A disciple is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully qualified will be like the teacher. 41 Why do you see the speck in your neighbour’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? 42 Or how can you say to your neighbour, “Friend, let me take out the speck in your eye”, when you yourself do not see the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbour’s eye.’
‘Why do you see the speck in your neighbour’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?’ (Luke 6: 41) … what do we see in our own eyes? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
For some days, the Gospel readings have taken us through the ‘Sermon on the Level Place’, Saint Luke’s equivalent of the Sermon on the Mount, which we began reading yesterday with Saint Luke’s version of the Beatitudes (Luke 6: 20-38).
As we continue this sequence of readings from Saint Luke’s Gospel, we read sayings whose parallels in Saint Matthew’s Gospel (see Matthew 15) are addressed to the Pharisees, but here are addressed to the disciples.
In this reading, Christ makes two points.
Firstly, the blind cannot lead the blind. The disciple, left to himself or herself, does not know very much and depends on the teacher. But once the disciple is fully trained and has learnt everything it is possible to discern from the teacher, then the learner becomes an extension of the teacher. At that point, the disciple shares the teacher’s knowledge and wisdom and can, in turn, be a guide to others.
We ought to listen carefully to what Christ says to us and make it part of our own lives. Only then can we effectively lead others to him.
But, secondly, we need to be mindful about sitting in judgment on others. Christ uses a graphic image of someone trying to remove a speck of dust from another person’s eye while there is a large ‘log’ in their own. How can I see properly to correct the vision of my fellow disciple or Christian when my own vision is so distorted?
The faults I so easily see in others are often trivial in comparison with my own shortcomings. Of course, much of the energy I exert in gossip and in putting down others may be sub-conscious attempts to compensate for my own shortcomings. Instead of lifting myself up by changing my ways, I can try to drag others down.
But then, our judgments so often are based purely on external behaviour. We usually have no idea of the inner motives or intentions of other people, or an awareness of their inability to behave in way other than the way then do.
How often, when I am quick to criticism other people behind their backs am I equally quick to say those things to face-to-face. Yet, how often, when I am asked professionally to offer an objective evaluation of a person’s behaviour or their fitness for some responsibility, do I shy away from those responsibilities?
What is true sight and true light?
During a visit to Liverpool many years ago, I visited Hope Street, and there above the Hope Street entrance to the former Royal School for the Blind was the inscription: ‘Christ heals the blind, for who denies that in the mind dwell truer sight and clearer light than in the eyes?’
Both this morning’s reading and that inscription also find interesting parallels in Plato’s ‘Allegory of the Cave’ (The Republic, Book VII).
No one, of course, denies the idea that the mind possesses truer sight and clearer light than the eyes. In an account of Socrates in The Republic, Plato argues that our earthly senses can be misleading and that true understanding is found through the intellect and the forms, not the physical senses.
In Plato’s ‘Allegory of the Cave’, prisoners mistake shadows on a wall for reality. When one prisoner is freed and sees the true objects and the light of the sun, he finds the ‘reality’ of the cave far less clear than the true world, even though his eyes are pained by the light. This illustrates that physical sight can be deceptive, while the intellect understands a higher reality.
Plato believed that the intellect and reason, not the senses, provide true understanding and wisdom. The mind's perception is superior to the deceptive nature of physical vision.
He recalls Socrates’ allegory of the cave. Socrates has compared a philosophic education to leaving a dark cave and emerging into the light. He notes that, when you leave the dark and enter the light, it takes your eyes awhile to adjust; you cannot see at first.
Imagine leaving a dark cinema in the middle of a sunny day: it is hard to see outside at first.
So, the philosophers need to leave the cave and have their eyes adjust to the bright outside world. Once this happens, though, Socrates argues that they must be forced to go back into the dark cave, to rule.
The cave, it turns out, is an image of the city with its conventional opinions, as opposed to the truth. Socrates notes that, when the philosophers go back into the cave, it will also take some time for their eyes to adjust to the darkness.
Imagine, now, going back into that dark cinema in the middle of that sunny day; it is hard to see inside at first.
Socrates is comparing bodily vision to intellectual vision. There are two possible causes for someone who has bad bodily vision: they might be going from the dark to the light; or they might be going from the light to the dark. So too with intellectual vision: someone with bad intellectual vision may be going from the dark cave of opinions to the light of the truth, or they may be going from the light of the truth back to the dark cave of opinions.
This morning’s Gospel sayings warn us against either form of blindness, but also warn us against leading others when we are not aware of suffering from one or other – or both – forms of blindness.
Blind Socrates … a small figure among trinkets and figurines in an antique shop in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 12 September 2025):
The theme this week (7 to 13 September) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Cementing a Legacy’ (pp 36-37). This theme was introduced last Sunday with reflections from Rachel Weller, Communications Officer, USPG.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 12 September 2025) invites us to pray:
Heavenly Father, help us to steward our financial gifts with wisdom and faithfulness, ensuring they are used to support your work and care for all in need.
The Collect:
Almighty and everlasting God,
you are always more ready to hear than we to pray
and to give more than either we desire or deserve:
pour down upon us the abundance of your mercy,
forgiving us those things of which our conscience is afraid
and giving us those good things
which we are not worthy to ask
but through the merits and mediation
of Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
God of all mercy,
in this eucharist you have set aside our sins
and given us your healing:
grant that we who are made whole in Christ
may bring that healing to this broken world,
in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
God of constant mercy,
who sent your Son to save us:
remind us of your goodness,
increase your grace within us,
that our thankfulness may grow,
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
An inscription above the Hope Street entrance of the former Royal School for the Blind, Liverpool (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Classics,
Crete 2025,
Greece 2025,
Liverpool,
Malaga,
Mission,
Philosophy,
Plato,
Prayer,
Rethymnon,
River Ouse,
Saint Luke's Gospel,
Socrates,
Stony Stratford,
Street art,
USPG
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)