‘Genesis’, a sculpture in resin bronze by Naomi Blake (1924-2018) in Saint Mary and All Saints Church, Little Walsingham (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Patrick Comerford
The closing acts of worship during this week’s Ecumenical Pilgrimage to Walsingham were in the Shrine Church, led by Prebendary Norman Wallwork and the Revd Dr Richard Clutterbuck, and in the Parish Church of Saint Mary and All Saints in Little Walsingham, where the celebrant and preacher was Bishop Lindsay Urwin of the Diocese of Southwark.
The parish church in Little Walsingham, which I hope to describe in another posting, holds three important works of art from the 1980s, commissioned in association with ‘Art in Churches’: ‘Genesis’ (1986) by Naomi Blake; Ruth Duckworth’s untitled ceramic relief installed in 1988; and ‘Spring Carpet’ (1985), a painting by John Riches.
‘Genesis’ is a sculpture in resin bronze by Naomi Blake (1924-2018) which she ‘dedicated to the sanctity of life’ and depicts a mother and child. Both the title of the sculpture and its subject suggest her Jewish background and faith. Naomi Blake is a Jewish sculptor who was born in the former Czechoslovakia, and her work can be seen in cathedrals and churches and other locations throughout England.
Blake’s works that I have written about in the past include two sculptures at the Royal Foundation of Saint Katharine in Limehouse, London, ‘Genesis’ (1994) and ‘Love is My Meaning’ (2000), and ‘View’ in Fitzroy Square Garden, London.
Naomi Blake was born in Mukaĉevo, Czechoslovakia (now Mukacheve, Ukraine) to Jewish parents in 1924. The youngest of 10 children, her original name was Zisel Dum – she was named Zisel, meaning ‘sweet’, by her parents. She survived the Holocaust as a child in Auschwitz, although many members of her family died there.
In 1942, her family included 32 members: four grandparents, her parents, nine siblings, six spouses and 10 young nieces and nephews. In 1944, when Naomi was 20, most of her family was deported to Auschwitz and she was separated from everyone except her older sister Malchi; her father, another sister and her nieces and nephews were led into the gas chambers. She returned to Mukacevo in July 1945 to find her family home in ruins and that of the 32 family members before the war, only had seven survived by 1945.
After World War II, she lived in Milan, Rome and Jerusalem, before making her home in North London. She changed her name to Naomi in 1948 and she left Israel in 1952 to seek medical help and rejoin members of her family.
She met and married a young German refugee, Asher Blake, they settled in London, and they were the parents of two children, Jonathan and Anita (Nin). The early days were not easy as she knew no-one, spoke poor English and had no qualifications. But Asher encouraged Naomi to pursue her love of sculpture as a career. She enrolled at the Hornsey School of Art, now Middlesex University, and she studied there in 1955-1960.
Naomi’s work began with ceramic pots and portrait sculpture, progressing to figurative and then abstract work. Sculpting originally in clay and then in polystyrene for casting in bronze, she gradually reintroduced figurative elements in her work, showing the influences of Henry Moore and Barbara Hepworth.
Her work developed through a cycle of embryonic forms, enclosed and protected figures, gradually opening out ‘to free the figure from its haven to stand against all adversity and spread its free wings.’ With her great interest in Jewish life and learning, she also sculpted imposing, expressive Biblical figures, bringing to life their strength and character.
Through her work, Naomi Blake promoted understanding between faiths. Her work has been exhibited in many galleries in Britain and abroad, and her sculptures can be seen in many places of worship such as the cathedrals in Bristol, Chelmsford and Norwich, Saint Ethelburga’s Church, London, Saint Botolph’s Church, Aldgate, Saint James’ Church, Muswell Hill, All Saints’ Church, East Finchley, the Royal Foundation of Saint Katharine’s, Limehouse, and synagogues in Finchley, Hampstead Garden, Kingsbury, Leeds and Oxford, as well as the National Holocaust Centre in Newark, Nottinghamshire. Her work is also in many royal collections and in public places such as Great Ormond Street Hospital, the University of Leicester, and Fitzroy Square.
Naomi Blake’s ‘Genesis’ (1994) in the gardens of Saint Katharine’s, Limehouse … given ‘to promote understanding between people of different faiths’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Naomi Blake’s ‘Genesis’ (1994) in the Royal Foundation of Saint Katharine’s, Limehouse, is a figure of a mother and child with an inscription explaining that the work was given in honour of Lady Elizabeth Basset and ‘to promote understanding between people of different faiths.’
Her ‘Genesis’ (1984) in Little Walsingham predates that by ten years. The viewer may, perhaps, recall the words of Isaiah: ‘Look to the rock from when you were hewn, to the quarry from which you were dug; look to your father Abraham and to Sarah who gave you birth’ (Isaiah 51: 1-2).
In its present setting, in a church dedicated to the Virgin Mary, the sculpture is interpreted, inevitably, as a Madonna and Child. In this context, the title ‘Genesis’ reminds the Christian that the Incarnation is about a new beginning, or genesis for humanity.
‘Genesis’ was the gift of the artist to the church. She dedicated the sculpture to ‘The Sanctity of Life’ and this dedication proclaims the common conviction of Jew and Christian that human life has a special holiness through the gift of God.
In spite of her Holocaust experiences, Naomi Blake believed ‘there is something positive in the human figure – there is a lot of good in people … with my past, if I were pessimistic, somehow, it wouldn’t have been worthwhile surviving.’
Naomi Blake died on 7 November 2018. Her daughter Anita Peleg, published two books devoted to her life and work: Naomi Blake: Dedication in Sculpture, a comprehensive catalogue of her sculptures; and Glimmer of Hope: The Story of Naomi Blake, telling the story of how she defied the odds and survived to bring joy to thousands.
Ruth Duckworth’s untitled ceramic relief, installed in the church in Little Walsingham in 1988 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Ruth Duckworth’s untitled ceramic relief was installed in the church in Little Walsingham in 1988 with the support of Art in Churches, and was the gift of Peter Palumbo. The artist has deliberately left the mural untitled so that no one interpretation is imposed on the person looking at it. It evokes different ideas and thoughts in different people, but ultimately the subtlety of line and colour is sufficient to make it appropriate to its setting. The coloured folds which emerge from the alcove in two distinct sections suggest, on some interpretations, this present life and the life to come.
Ruth Duckworth (1919-2009) was a modernist sculptor who specialised in ceramics, she worked in stoneware, porcelain and bronze. Her sculptures are mostly untitled. She is best known for Clouds over Lake Michigan, a wall sculpture.
She was born Ruth Windmüller in Hamburg, the daughter of Ellen Strack, a Lutheran, and Edgar Albert Windmüller, a Jewish lawyer. She left Nazi Germany in 1936 to study at the Liverpool College of Art and later studied at the Hammersmith School of Art and at the City and Guilds of London Art School.
She married the British artist Aidron Duckworth in 1949 and they later moved to the US in 1964, where Ruth taught at the University of Chicago and was a visiting professor of sculpture at the University of Illinois. The couple divorced in 1967.
‘Spring Carpet’, a painting by John Riches (1941-1999) in the church in Little Walsingham (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
‘Spring Carpet’ in the church in Little Walsingham is a painting by John Riches (1941-1999), who was originally from Norwich and who returned in 1972 to teach at the Norwich School of Art. His later work was strongly influenced by his interest in church iconography and mediaeval decoration.
‘Spring Carpet’ speaks of new life by means of light filtered through branches speckling the earth which harbours the new buds of life.
It was appropriate that I saw this work in springtime, because The artist asked that his painting should hang in a place where the sunlight would fall on it, with the shadows made by the window tracery giving the impression the sunlight was filtering down through the branches of trees onto the earth, earth in which new plant life is springing up.
These three works of contemporary art were added to Saint Mary and All Saints Church following exhibitions in the church from 1985 to 1988 and with the support of Art in Churches. They were originally grouped at the entrance to the Lady Chapel. But Naomi Blake’s ‘Genesis’ has since been moved to a corner at the west end and sadly it is easily missed by people entering and leaving the church by the north door at the west end.
Naomi Blake's ‘Genesis’ is hidden when the north-west door is opened in the church in Little Walsingham (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2026)
Showing posts with label Genesis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genesis. Show all posts
14 March 2026
08 February 2026
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2026:
6, Sunday 8 February 2026,
Second Sunday before Lent
‘Look at the birds of the air …’ (Matthew 6: 26) … birds in the air at sunset at Malahide Castle, Co Dublin (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar, Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent are ten days away (18 February 2026), and today is the Second Sunday before Lent. Later this morning, I hope to be involved in the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, reading one of the lessons.
But, before my day begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink’ (Matthew 6: 25) … tables set for dinner at Pigadi restaurant in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Matthew 6: 25-34 (NRSVA):
25 [Jesus said:] ‘Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air; they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 And can any of you by worrying add a single hour to your span of life? 28 And why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin, 29 yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not clothed like one of these. 30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you – you of little faith? 31 Therefore do not worry, saying, “What will we eat?” or “What will we drink?” or “What will we wear?” 32 For it is the Gentiles who strive for all these things; and indeed your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.
34 ‘So do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today’s trouble is enough for today.’
‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1: 1) … ‘on the seventh day he rested from all his work’ (Genesis 2: 2) … sunrise at Igoumenitsa in northern Greece (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
The three Sundays before Lent once had special Latin names in the Book of Common Prayer, names that were shared in most traditions in the Western Church. These Sundays were known as Septuagesima, Sexagesima and Quinquagesima. The names were based on counting up seventy days to Easter, perhaps in some ways paralleling the seven days of creation.
This Sunday, the Second Sunday before Lent, was known as Sexagesima Sunday – a bit of a tongue twister, even for those of us who did Latin at school. I find it much easier that in many parts of the Anglican Communion, including the Church of Ireland and the Church in Wales this is known as ‘Creation Sunday.’ It is so appropriate, with our growing awareness about climate change and the threats to God’s creation – emphasised by recent weather fluctuations, including the storms and floods in recent weeks in both England and Ireland, and the debates about carbon emission and climate change.
Care for the creation is not a marginal concern for the Church, nor a matter of the Church keeping up with current social and political trends and fashions. The fifth of the Five Marks of Mission accepted throughout the Anglican Communion is:
• To strive to safeguard the integrity of creation, and sustain and renew the life of the earth.
The first reading this morning (Genesis 1: 1 to 2: 3) is a celebration of creation, a poetic description of God’s creation, reaching its climax or fulfilment in the creation of humanity and God’s relationship with us.
Like all good stories, this story begins at the beginning: ‘In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1: 1).
At first, there was chaos, ‘an empty, formless void’ (verse 2). However, the life-giving power of God, the ‘wind’ or Spirit ‘from God’, sweeps over this chaos. The creation story is then told in the form of a poem or hymn, with a refrain, ‘And God saw that it was good’ (verses 4, 10, 12, 18, 20, 25).
God then says, ‘Let us’ (26), invoking the royal plural. The creation of humanity is the climax of the creation story. We are made in God’s image and likeness: the Hebrew words used here are צֶלֶם (Tselem), referring to a shadow, outline, or representative figure, emphasising the functional role of humans representing God on earth and דְּמוּת (demuth), suggests a resemblance in form or character. The Greek word in the Septuagint (LXX) is εἰκόνα (eikona, accusative of eikon), ‘image’, denoting es a likeness, portrait, or representation, and implies an exact copy or reproduction.
Because of God’s blessings, we have procreative power, we are to be fruitful and to multiply, and to have dominion over the earth, acting as God’s regents, taking responsibility for a just rule in and care for the creation.
And we are told not only that ‘God saw that it was good’ – as on the other days of creation – but, ‘indeed, it was very good’ (verse 31).
The seventh day is then the day of rest, a reminder of the Sabbath. God blesses the seventh day, and God sets it apart or makes it holy. There is no evening at the end of this day – this relationship between God and humanity is to continue for ever, to the end of the story (see Revelation 21 and 22).
The late Chief Rabbi, Lord (Jonathan) Sacks has pointed out that few texts have had a deeper influence on Western civilisation than the first chapter of Genesis, with its momentous vision of the universe coming into being as the work of God. Set against the grandeur of the narrative, what stands out is the smallness yet uniqueness of humans, vulnerable but also undeniably set apart from all other beings.
The psalm (Psalm 136) this morning echoes the wonder and humility we might feel as we realise the splendour of creation and know and find the love of God in this creation.
God who made the heavens and the earth, who spread out the waters, who made the great lights, the sun, moon and stars, is the loving God whose steadfast love endures for ever.
The honour and glory that crowns the human race is possession of the earth, which is the culmination of God’s creative work: ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over [it]’ (Genesis 1: 28).
While the creation narrative in Genesis clearly establishes God as the Master of the Universe, it is humanity who is appointed master or guardian of the earth.
But this raises fundamental questions about our place in creation and our responsibility for it. A literal interpretation suggests a world in which people cut down forests, slaughter animals, and dump waste into the seas at our leisure, much as we see in our world today.
On the other hand, Rav Kook (1865-1935), the first Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, says any intelligent person should know that Genesis 1: 28, ‘does not mean the domination of a harsh ruler, who afflicts his people and servants merely to fulfil his personal whim and desire, according to the crookedness of his heart.’
Could God have really created such a complex and magnificent world solely for the caprice of humans?
Genesis 1 is only one side of the complex biblical equation. It is balanced by the narrative of Genesis 2, which features a second creation narrative that focuses on humans and their place in the Garden of Eden. The first person is set in the Garden ‘to till it and keep it’ or ‘to work it and take care of it’ (Genesis 2: 15).
The two Hebrew verbs used here are significant. The first verb – le’ovdah (לעובדח) – literally means ‘to serve it.’ The human being is thus both master and servant of nature.
The second verb – leshomrah (לשמרח) – means ‘to guard it.’ This is the same verb used later in the Bible to describe the responsibilities of a guardian of property that belongs to someone else. This guardian must exercise vigilance while protecting and is personally liable for losses that occur through negligence.
This is, perhaps, the best short definition of humanity’s responsibility for nature as the Bible presents it.
We do not own nature; ‘The earth is the Lord’s and all that is in it’ (Psalm 24: 1) We are its stewards on behalf of God, who created and owns everything. As guardians of the earth, we are duty-bound to respect its integrity.
Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808-1888) put this rather well in an original interpretation of Genesis 1: 26, ‘Let us make humankind in our image according to our likeness.’ Us? Who would God consult in the process of creating humans?
Rabbi Hirsch suggests the ‘us’ in this verse refers to the rest of creation. Before creating us as humans, destined to develop the capacity to alter and possibly endanger the natural world, God sought the approval of nature itself. This interpretation implies that we would use nature only in such a way that is faithful to the purposes of the Creator and acknowledges nature’s consent to the existence of humanity.
The mandate in Genesis 1 to exercise dominion is, therefore, not technical, but moral: humanity would control, within our means, the use of nature towards the service of God. This mandate is limited by the requirement to serve and guard as seen in Genesis 2. The famous story of Genesis 2-3 – the eating of the forbidden fruit and the subsequent exile of Adam and Eve – supports this point.
Not everything is permitted. There are limits to how we interact with the earth. When we do not treat creation according to God’s will, disaster can follow.
We see this today, Rabbi Sacks says, as scientists predict more intense and destructive storms, floods, and droughts due to human-induced changes in the atmosphere. If we do not take action now, we risk the very survival of civilisation.
In the Gospel reading (Matthew 6: 25-34) this morning, we continue reading from the Sermon on the Mount. In verse 24, Christ tells us not to be anxious, to be troubled with cares, in a way that gives priorities to my own interests, that is preoccupied with or absorbed by my own self-interest.
Our self-preoccupation and self-absorption cannot lengthen our lives (verse 27). And he points to examples from nature, simple examples from creation, like lilies on the hillsides, grass in the fields, and the birds of the air, to illustrate God’s care for all creation.
‘Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today’s trouble is enough for today’ (verse 34).
I have been musing on recent evenings about the way we use the word tomorrow, both in Greek, where the word αύριο (avrio) seldom conveys a sense of immediacy or urgency, and in Irish folklore, where the word tomorrow is sometimes deployed to advantage against malign or even evil forces.
In today’s Gospel reading, Christ is saying that being self-absorbed about our own petty needs will not give us a new tomorrow. But caring for the little details of nature, like God cares for the little details of creation, will ensure that our tomorrows reflect God's plans for the creation.
The Midrash says that God showed Adam around the Garden of Eden and said, ‘Look at my works! See how beautiful they are – how excellent! For your sake I created them all. See to it that you do not spoil and destroy my world; for if you do, there will be no one else to repair it.’
Creation has its own dignity, and while we have the mandate to use it, we have none to destroy or despoil it. Rabbi Hirsch says that Shabbat was given to humanity ‘in order that he should not grow overbearing in his dominion’ of God’s creation. On the Day of Rest, ‘he must, as it were, return the borrowed world to its Divine Owner in order to realise that it is but lent to him.’
If we see how we have a unique opportunity to truly serve and care for the planet, its creatures, and its resources, then we can reclaim our status as stewards of the world, and all these things will be given to us as well.
‘Even Solomon in all his glory was not clothed like one of these’ (Matthew 6: 29) … watching a mother sparrow feed her chicks in a nest in the ceiling of Aghias Anna Church, Maroulas, near Rethymnon in Crete (Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 8 February 2026, Second Sunday before Lent):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is: ‘Safe Routes’ (pp 26-27). This theme is introduced today with a Programme Update by Bradon Muilenburg, Anglican Refugee Support Lead, who writes:
‘I’m writing from Calais, where I have spent five years working with refugees. Many people ask me, “What can be done about the small boats?” From what I’ve seen, the only real answer is to create safe routes across the English Channel – ways for people to claim asylum without having to risk their lives. The Channel is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, with freezing waters and dangerous currents. Lifejackets for the crossing are hard to obtain and often confiscated by authorities. When legal pathways are available – like family reunion visas or humanitarian corridors – people use them, because they are safer and cheaper.
‘The right to seek sanctuary was hard-won after World War II. We must remember that history, because if we forget it, we risk repeating the same mistakes.
‘One of the most important parts of justice is keeping families together. It is deeply painful when children are separated from their parents for years, even after asylum is granted. This is not right, and it can be changed. There is hope on the horizon: the Refugee Family Reunion Bill currently in the House of Lords. While it is only a first step, it is a crucial step toward a more just world, the world Jesus calls us to pursue.
‘I want to encourage everyone to take action – not only through donations, but by standing with families, writing to MPs, and advocating for safe and humane policies. Together, we can ensure that hope, justice, and compassion guide the choices we make. Every small act of advocacy brings us closer to a world where families are safe, reunited, and valued.
‘As a first step, watch and share the video Victims of the Border: A Memorial on YouTube @USPGglobal. Hear some of the stories of those who journeyed in hope.’
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 8 February 2026) invites us to pray as we read and meditate today’s Gospel reading.
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty God,
you have created the heavens and the earth
and made us in your own image:
teach us to discern your hand in all your works
and your likeness in all your children;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who with you and the Holy Spirit reigns supreme over all things,
now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God our creator,
by your gift
the tree of life was set at the heart of the earthly paradise,
and the bread of life at the heart of your Church:
may we who have been nourished at your table on earth
be transformed by the glory of the Saviour’s cross
and enjoy the delights of eternity;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
Almighty God,
give us reverence for all creation
and respect for every person,
that we may mirror your likeness
in Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday's Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
‘But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today …’ (Matthew 6: 30) … green fields and countryside at Cross in Hand Lane, north of Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar, Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent are ten days away (18 February 2026), and today is the Second Sunday before Lent. Later this morning, I hope to be involved in the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, reading one of the lessons.
But, before my day begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink’ (Matthew 6: 25) … tables set for dinner at Pigadi restaurant in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Matthew 6: 25-34 (NRSVA):
25 [Jesus said:] ‘Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air; they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 And can any of you by worrying add a single hour to your span of life? 28 And why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin, 29 yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not clothed like one of these. 30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you – you of little faith? 31 Therefore do not worry, saying, “What will we eat?” or “What will we drink?” or “What will we wear?” 32 For it is the Gentiles who strive for all these things; and indeed your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.
34 ‘So do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today’s trouble is enough for today.’
‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1: 1) … ‘on the seventh day he rested from all his work’ (Genesis 2: 2) … sunrise at Igoumenitsa in northern Greece (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
The three Sundays before Lent once had special Latin names in the Book of Common Prayer, names that were shared in most traditions in the Western Church. These Sundays were known as Septuagesima, Sexagesima and Quinquagesima. The names were based on counting up seventy days to Easter, perhaps in some ways paralleling the seven days of creation.
This Sunday, the Second Sunday before Lent, was known as Sexagesima Sunday – a bit of a tongue twister, even for those of us who did Latin at school. I find it much easier that in many parts of the Anglican Communion, including the Church of Ireland and the Church in Wales this is known as ‘Creation Sunday.’ It is so appropriate, with our growing awareness about climate change and the threats to God’s creation – emphasised by recent weather fluctuations, including the storms and floods in recent weeks in both England and Ireland, and the debates about carbon emission and climate change.
Care for the creation is not a marginal concern for the Church, nor a matter of the Church keeping up with current social and political trends and fashions. The fifth of the Five Marks of Mission accepted throughout the Anglican Communion is:
• To strive to safeguard the integrity of creation, and sustain and renew the life of the earth.
The first reading this morning (Genesis 1: 1 to 2: 3) is a celebration of creation, a poetic description of God’s creation, reaching its climax or fulfilment in the creation of humanity and God’s relationship with us.
Like all good stories, this story begins at the beginning: ‘In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1: 1).
At first, there was chaos, ‘an empty, formless void’ (verse 2). However, the life-giving power of God, the ‘wind’ or Spirit ‘from God’, sweeps over this chaos. The creation story is then told in the form of a poem or hymn, with a refrain, ‘And God saw that it was good’ (verses 4, 10, 12, 18, 20, 25).
God then says, ‘Let us’ (26), invoking the royal plural. The creation of humanity is the climax of the creation story. We are made in God’s image and likeness: the Hebrew words used here are צֶלֶם (Tselem), referring to a shadow, outline, or representative figure, emphasising the functional role of humans representing God on earth and דְּמוּת (demuth), suggests a resemblance in form or character. The Greek word in the Septuagint (LXX) is εἰκόνα (eikona, accusative of eikon), ‘image’, denoting es a likeness, portrait, or representation, and implies an exact copy or reproduction.
Because of God’s blessings, we have procreative power, we are to be fruitful and to multiply, and to have dominion over the earth, acting as God’s regents, taking responsibility for a just rule in and care for the creation.
And we are told not only that ‘God saw that it was good’ – as on the other days of creation – but, ‘indeed, it was very good’ (verse 31).
The seventh day is then the day of rest, a reminder of the Sabbath. God blesses the seventh day, and God sets it apart or makes it holy. There is no evening at the end of this day – this relationship between God and humanity is to continue for ever, to the end of the story (see Revelation 21 and 22).
The late Chief Rabbi, Lord (Jonathan) Sacks has pointed out that few texts have had a deeper influence on Western civilisation than the first chapter of Genesis, with its momentous vision of the universe coming into being as the work of God. Set against the grandeur of the narrative, what stands out is the smallness yet uniqueness of humans, vulnerable but also undeniably set apart from all other beings.
The psalm (Psalm 136) this morning echoes the wonder and humility we might feel as we realise the splendour of creation and know and find the love of God in this creation.
God who made the heavens and the earth, who spread out the waters, who made the great lights, the sun, moon and stars, is the loving God whose steadfast love endures for ever.
The honour and glory that crowns the human race is possession of the earth, which is the culmination of God’s creative work: ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over [it]’ (Genesis 1: 28).
While the creation narrative in Genesis clearly establishes God as the Master of the Universe, it is humanity who is appointed master or guardian of the earth.
But this raises fundamental questions about our place in creation and our responsibility for it. A literal interpretation suggests a world in which people cut down forests, slaughter animals, and dump waste into the seas at our leisure, much as we see in our world today.
On the other hand, Rav Kook (1865-1935), the first Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, says any intelligent person should know that Genesis 1: 28, ‘does not mean the domination of a harsh ruler, who afflicts his people and servants merely to fulfil his personal whim and desire, according to the crookedness of his heart.’
Could God have really created such a complex and magnificent world solely for the caprice of humans?
Genesis 1 is only one side of the complex biblical equation. It is balanced by the narrative of Genesis 2, which features a second creation narrative that focuses on humans and their place in the Garden of Eden. The first person is set in the Garden ‘to till it and keep it’ or ‘to work it and take care of it’ (Genesis 2: 15).
The two Hebrew verbs used here are significant. The first verb – le’ovdah (לעובדח) – literally means ‘to serve it.’ The human being is thus both master and servant of nature.
The second verb – leshomrah (לשמרח) – means ‘to guard it.’ This is the same verb used later in the Bible to describe the responsibilities of a guardian of property that belongs to someone else. This guardian must exercise vigilance while protecting and is personally liable for losses that occur through negligence.
This is, perhaps, the best short definition of humanity’s responsibility for nature as the Bible presents it.
We do not own nature; ‘The earth is the Lord’s and all that is in it’ (Psalm 24: 1) We are its stewards on behalf of God, who created and owns everything. As guardians of the earth, we are duty-bound to respect its integrity.
Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808-1888) put this rather well in an original interpretation of Genesis 1: 26, ‘Let us make humankind in our image according to our likeness.’ Us? Who would God consult in the process of creating humans?
Rabbi Hirsch suggests the ‘us’ in this verse refers to the rest of creation. Before creating us as humans, destined to develop the capacity to alter and possibly endanger the natural world, God sought the approval of nature itself. This interpretation implies that we would use nature only in such a way that is faithful to the purposes of the Creator and acknowledges nature’s consent to the existence of humanity.
The mandate in Genesis 1 to exercise dominion is, therefore, not technical, but moral: humanity would control, within our means, the use of nature towards the service of God. This mandate is limited by the requirement to serve and guard as seen in Genesis 2. The famous story of Genesis 2-3 – the eating of the forbidden fruit and the subsequent exile of Adam and Eve – supports this point.
Not everything is permitted. There are limits to how we interact with the earth. When we do not treat creation according to God’s will, disaster can follow.
We see this today, Rabbi Sacks says, as scientists predict more intense and destructive storms, floods, and droughts due to human-induced changes in the atmosphere. If we do not take action now, we risk the very survival of civilisation.
In the Gospel reading (Matthew 6: 25-34) this morning, we continue reading from the Sermon on the Mount. In verse 24, Christ tells us not to be anxious, to be troubled with cares, in a way that gives priorities to my own interests, that is preoccupied with or absorbed by my own self-interest.
Our self-preoccupation and self-absorption cannot lengthen our lives (verse 27). And he points to examples from nature, simple examples from creation, like lilies on the hillsides, grass in the fields, and the birds of the air, to illustrate God’s care for all creation.
‘Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today’s trouble is enough for today’ (verse 34).
I have been musing on recent evenings about the way we use the word tomorrow, both in Greek, where the word αύριο (avrio) seldom conveys a sense of immediacy or urgency, and in Irish folklore, where the word tomorrow is sometimes deployed to advantage against malign or even evil forces.
In today’s Gospel reading, Christ is saying that being self-absorbed about our own petty needs will not give us a new tomorrow. But caring for the little details of nature, like God cares for the little details of creation, will ensure that our tomorrows reflect God's plans for the creation.
The Midrash says that God showed Adam around the Garden of Eden and said, ‘Look at my works! See how beautiful they are – how excellent! For your sake I created them all. See to it that you do not spoil and destroy my world; for if you do, there will be no one else to repair it.’
Creation has its own dignity, and while we have the mandate to use it, we have none to destroy or despoil it. Rabbi Hirsch says that Shabbat was given to humanity ‘in order that he should not grow overbearing in his dominion’ of God’s creation. On the Day of Rest, ‘he must, as it were, return the borrowed world to its Divine Owner in order to realise that it is but lent to him.’
If we see how we have a unique opportunity to truly serve and care for the planet, its creatures, and its resources, then we can reclaim our status as stewards of the world, and all these things will be given to us as well.
‘Even Solomon in all his glory was not clothed like one of these’ (Matthew 6: 29) … watching a mother sparrow feed her chicks in a nest in the ceiling of Aghias Anna Church, Maroulas, near Rethymnon in Crete (Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 8 February 2026, Second Sunday before Lent):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is: ‘Safe Routes’ (pp 26-27). This theme is introduced today with a Programme Update by Bradon Muilenburg, Anglican Refugee Support Lead, who writes:
‘I’m writing from Calais, where I have spent five years working with refugees. Many people ask me, “What can be done about the small boats?” From what I’ve seen, the only real answer is to create safe routes across the English Channel – ways for people to claim asylum without having to risk their lives. The Channel is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, with freezing waters and dangerous currents. Lifejackets for the crossing are hard to obtain and often confiscated by authorities. When legal pathways are available – like family reunion visas or humanitarian corridors – people use them, because they are safer and cheaper.
‘The right to seek sanctuary was hard-won after World War II. We must remember that history, because if we forget it, we risk repeating the same mistakes.
‘One of the most important parts of justice is keeping families together. It is deeply painful when children are separated from their parents for years, even after asylum is granted. This is not right, and it can be changed. There is hope on the horizon: the Refugee Family Reunion Bill currently in the House of Lords. While it is only a first step, it is a crucial step toward a more just world, the world Jesus calls us to pursue.
‘I want to encourage everyone to take action – not only through donations, but by standing with families, writing to MPs, and advocating for safe and humane policies. Together, we can ensure that hope, justice, and compassion guide the choices we make. Every small act of advocacy brings us closer to a world where families are safe, reunited, and valued.
‘As a first step, watch and share the video Victims of the Border: A Memorial on YouTube @USPGglobal. Hear some of the stories of those who journeyed in hope.’
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 8 February 2026) invites us to pray as we read and meditate today’s Gospel reading.
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty God,
you have created the heavens and the earth
and made us in your own image:
teach us to discern your hand in all your works
and your likeness in all your children;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who with you and the Holy Spirit reigns supreme over all things,
now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God our creator,
by your gift
the tree of life was set at the heart of the earthly paradise,
and the bread of life at the heart of your Church:
may we who have been nourished at your table on earth
be transformed by the glory of the Saviour’s cross
and enjoy the delights of eternity;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
Almighty God,
give us reverence for all creation
and respect for every person,
that we may mirror your likeness
in Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday's Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
‘But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today …’ (Matthew 6: 30) … green fields and countryside at Cross in Hand Lane, north of Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Country Walks,
Creation,
Creation Sunday,
Crete 2026,
Eating Out,
Environment,
Genesis,
Greece 2026,
Igoumenitsa,
Lichfield,
Malahide,
Maroulas,
Mission,
Prayer,
Rethymnon,
Saint Matthew's Gospel,
Stony Stratford,
USPG
13 November 2025
Two cottages and two houses
on Moreton Road contribute
to the colourful architectural
heritage of Buckingham
The Cottage on a bend on Moreton Road, Buckingham … an early 19th century ‘picture postcard’ blue and white ‘cottage orné’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
As I was walking between Buckingham and Maids Moreton a few times this week and last, four houses at the Buckingham end of Moreton Road that are Grade II listed buildings caught my attention: Moriah Cottage, Sandon House and Fernleigh are side-by-side with one another, and, facing them on the opposite side of Moreton Road, is The Cottage at 47 Moreton Road.
The Cottage is on a bend on the road and set back from the street behind a hedge. It is an attractive ‘picture postcard’ blue and white cottage orné dating from the early 19th century.
It is set back from the street behind hedges and railings and remains a unique example in Buckingham of this picturesque style of architecture.
The Cottage on Moreton Road, Buckingham, is set back from the street behind hedges and railings (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The cottage orné or decorated cottage style dates from a movement of ‘rustic’ stylised cottages in the late 18th and early 19th century, when there was a fashion to discover a more ‘natural’ way of living as opposed to the formality of the baroque and neo-classical architectural styles.
As with the earlier Petit hameau de la Reine at Versaillesin France, these picturesque cottages were popular with aristocratic and gentry families in the early 19th century as places to ‘play at being peasants’ and to entertain guests, and as places for picnics, card games and theatricals.
English Heritage defines the term as ‘a rustic building of picturesque design.’ These cottages often feature well-shaped thatch roofs and ornate timberwork. Many were inspired by Strawberry Hill House – often known simply as Strawberry Hill – the Gothic Revival villa in Twickenham built by Horace Walpole (1717-1797) in 1749-1776.
Some cottages in this style in Ireland include the Swiss Cottage in Cahir, Co Tipperary, designed by the Regency architect John Nash (1752-1835) ca 1817 for Richard Butler (1775-1819), 1st Earl of Glengall; Martinstown House, Co Kildare, designed by Decimus Burton (1800-1881) for Augustus Frederick FitzGerald (1791-1874), 3rd Duke of Leinster; and Laurelmere Lodge in Marlay Park, Rathfarnham, designed for the La Touche family and later known as Tamplin’s Cottage – although, to generations of children in south Dublin, it is known as ‘Goldilocks Cottage.’ There are similar cottages at Burrenwood, Co Down, Derrymore, Co Armagh, and Glengarriff, Co Cork.
The Cottage in Buckingham has a central hipped tiled range with thatched roofs on the small side wings (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The Cottage on Moreton Road in Buckingham is a storey and a half in height, is ‘T’-shaped in plan and has a central hipped tiled range with thatched roofs on the small side wings on each side, and with rear ranges, a brick ridge and end stacks. It is built of brick, pebble-dashed and colour washed. The windows are metal casements with arched heads.
The house has a central plank door with a pointed arched head flanked by two-light leaded casement windows with pointed arched heads, central division and glazing bars that evoke Y-tracery. Similar ‘Gothick-style’ leaded casement can been seen in the wing to the left.
The wing to the rear, behind the central unit, has a half-hipped thatch roof and an attic storey, with a pair of two-light leaded casements on the ground floor, pointed-arched heads and a two-light leaded casement in the attic.
The right wing is separate from the rest of the cottage and it was formerly an outbuilding. The right-hand wing has a plank door to the left with a pointed-arched head and a small quartered window to the far right. Undressed timbers are said to be used in the roofs throughout The Cottage.
Moriah Cottage was once the coachman’s house for Sandon House (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Across the street from the Cottage, Moriah Cottage is a curious and eye-catching detached house on Moreton Road. It was once the coachman’s house for Sandon House. Moriah Cottage was built in the Tudor style in the early 19th century and was altered in the 20th century. It house stands close to the back edge of the footpath, with its gable end facing onto the street.
But how did Moriah Cottage gets its name?
Moriah Cottage may take its name from the place in the Book of Genesis where Abraham’s binding of Isaac is said to have taken place. Traditionally, the mountain in Genesis is also identified with Mount Moriah in the Book of Chronicles where Solomon’s Temple was built. Both places are identified with the present Temple Mount in Jerusalem.< br />
Moriah Cottage drip-moulds to the windows and the central arched doorway (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Moriah Cottage is two storeys high, with a basement, and the front façade of the house is the gable end. The roof is covered in Welsh slate and the wooden bargeboards are ornamental. A prominent element of the elevation facing onto the street is the ground floor drip-moulds to the windows and the central arched doorway.
In front of the 20th century front door is one stone step. The door has a depressed arched head, a rendered surround with incised masonry patterns and a hood mould.
The two-light casement windows on the ground floor and the first floor have similar surrounds, and those on the ground floor have hood moulds. There is a rendered, chamfered plinth with basement windows on either side of door with cambered arched heads.
Sandon House on Moreton Road is set back from the road and probably dates from the late 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Beside Moriah Cottage, Sandon House on Moreton Road is set back from the road behind a low brick wall, and it probably dates from the late 18th century. The stone house was re-fronted in red brick in the early 19th century. It is a three-bay, four-storey red brick house in Flemish bond with a slate roof and brick end stacks.
A flight of 11 stone steps leads to up to the central front door at the first-floor level. The steps have iron balustrades with standards bearing vase finials. The six-panel door has a fanlight with intersecting glazing bars, panelled reveals and a round-arched head. Other features and details include a curved, hanging bay window and a 12-pane sash window on the first floor, incised masonry patterns, giant blank arches, blank windows and round-arched and segmental-arched heads with key blocks. The semi-circular headed panels at the second-floor level add to the distinctive appearance of Sandon House.
Beside Sandon House on Moreton Road, Fernleigh is an early 19th century red brick house. The house is three bays wide and two storeys high with a cement rendered basement. Like Sandon House, the principal entrance to Fernleigh is up a flight of steps to a central doorway flanked on either side by sash windows.
As a cluster of buildings close to one another on Moreton Road, these four picturesque houses and cottages make an important contribution to the streetscape and to the Conservation Area in the Buckingham North area of Aylesbury Vale.
Fernleigh (left) is an early 19th century house, while Sandon House (right) dates from the late 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
As I was walking between Buckingham and Maids Moreton a few times this week and last, four houses at the Buckingham end of Moreton Road that are Grade II listed buildings caught my attention: Moriah Cottage, Sandon House and Fernleigh are side-by-side with one another, and, facing them on the opposite side of Moreton Road, is The Cottage at 47 Moreton Road.
The Cottage is on a bend on the road and set back from the street behind a hedge. It is an attractive ‘picture postcard’ blue and white cottage orné dating from the early 19th century.
It is set back from the street behind hedges and railings and remains a unique example in Buckingham of this picturesque style of architecture.
The Cottage on Moreton Road, Buckingham, is set back from the street behind hedges and railings (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The cottage orné or decorated cottage style dates from a movement of ‘rustic’ stylised cottages in the late 18th and early 19th century, when there was a fashion to discover a more ‘natural’ way of living as opposed to the formality of the baroque and neo-classical architectural styles.
As with the earlier Petit hameau de la Reine at Versaillesin France, these picturesque cottages were popular with aristocratic and gentry families in the early 19th century as places to ‘play at being peasants’ and to entertain guests, and as places for picnics, card games and theatricals.
English Heritage defines the term as ‘a rustic building of picturesque design.’ These cottages often feature well-shaped thatch roofs and ornate timberwork. Many were inspired by Strawberry Hill House – often known simply as Strawberry Hill – the Gothic Revival villa in Twickenham built by Horace Walpole (1717-1797) in 1749-1776.
Some cottages in this style in Ireland include the Swiss Cottage in Cahir, Co Tipperary, designed by the Regency architect John Nash (1752-1835) ca 1817 for Richard Butler (1775-1819), 1st Earl of Glengall; Martinstown House, Co Kildare, designed by Decimus Burton (1800-1881) for Augustus Frederick FitzGerald (1791-1874), 3rd Duke of Leinster; and Laurelmere Lodge in Marlay Park, Rathfarnham, designed for the La Touche family and later known as Tamplin’s Cottage – although, to generations of children in south Dublin, it is known as ‘Goldilocks Cottage.’ There are similar cottages at Burrenwood, Co Down, Derrymore, Co Armagh, and Glengarriff, Co Cork.
The Cottage in Buckingham has a central hipped tiled range with thatched roofs on the small side wings (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The Cottage on Moreton Road in Buckingham is a storey and a half in height, is ‘T’-shaped in plan and has a central hipped tiled range with thatched roofs on the small side wings on each side, and with rear ranges, a brick ridge and end stacks. It is built of brick, pebble-dashed and colour washed. The windows are metal casements with arched heads.
The house has a central plank door with a pointed arched head flanked by two-light leaded casement windows with pointed arched heads, central division and glazing bars that evoke Y-tracery. Similar ‘Gothick-style’ leaded casement can been seen in the wing to the left.
The wing to the rear, behind the central unit, has a half-hipped thatch roof and an attic storey, with a pair of two-light leaded casements on the ground floor, pointed-arched heads and a two-light leaded casement in the attic.
The right wing is separate from the rest of the cottage and it was formerly an outbuilding. The right-hand wing has a plank door to the left with a pointed-arched head and a small quartered window to the far right. Undressed timbers are said to be used in the roofs throughout The Cottage.
Moriah Cottage was once the coachman’s house for Sandon House (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Across the street from the Cottage, Moriah Cottage is a curious and eye-catching detached house on Moreton Road. It was once the coachman’s house for Sandon House. Moriah Cottage was built in the Tudor style in the early 19th century and was altered in the 20th century. It house stands close to the back edge of the footpath, with its gable end facing onto the street.
But how did Moriah Cottage gets its name?
Moriah Cottage may take its name from the place in the Book of Genesis where Abraham’s binding of Isaac is said to have taken place. Traditionally, the mountain in Genesis is also identified with Mount Moriah in the Book of Chronicles where Solomon’s Temple was built. Both places are identified with the present Temple Mount in Jerusalem.< br />
Moriah Cottage drip-moulds to the windows and the central arched doorway (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Moriah Cottage is two storeys high, with a basement, and the front façade of the house is the gable end. The roof is covered in Welsh slate and the wooden bargeboards are ornamental. A prominent element of the elevation facing onto the street is the ground floor drip-moulds to the windows and the central arched doorway.
In front of the 20th century front door is one stone step. The door has a depressed arched head, a rendered surround with incised masonry patterns and a hood mould.
The two-light casement windows on the ground floor and the first floor have similar surrounds, and those on the ground floor have hood moulds. There is a rendered, chamfered plinth with basement windows on either side of door with cambered arched heads.
Sandon House on Moreton Road is set back from the road and probably dates from the late 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Beside Moriah Cottage, Sandon House on Moreton Road is set back from the road behind a low brick wall, and it probably dates from the late 18th century. The stone house was re-fronted in red brick in the early 19th century. It is a three-bay, four-storey red brick house in Flemish bond with a slate roof and brick end stacks.
A flight of 11 stone steps leads to up to the central front door at the first-floor level. The steps have iron balustrades with standards bearing vase finials. The six-panel door has a fanlight with intersecting glazing bars, panelled reveals and a round-arched head. Other features and details include a curved, hanging bay window and a 12-pane sash window on the first floor, incised masonry patterns, giant blank arches, blank windows and round-arched and segmental-arched heads with key blocks. The semi-circular headed panels at the second-floor level add to the distinctive appearance of Sandon House.
Beside Sandon House on Moreton Road, Fernleigh is an early 19th century red brick house. The house is three bays wide and two storeys high with a cement rendered basement. Like Sandon House, the principal entrance to Fernleigh is up a flight of steps to a central doorway flanked on either side by sash windows.
As a cluster of buildings close to one another on Moreton Road, these four picturesque houses and cottages make an important contribution to the streetscape and to the Conservation Area in the Buckingham North area of Aylesbury Vale.
Fernleigh (left) is an early 19th century house, while Sandon House (right) dates from the late 18th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
13 October 2025
‘Holy pandemonium’ and
exuberant celebrations
of the cycle of life and
death at Simchat Torah
The Torah scrolls in Milton Keynes and District Reform Synagogue, including scroll No 970 (left) from Pacov in the Czech Republic (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The paired Jewish holidays of Shemini Hag’Atseret and Simchat Torah, which follow immediately after Sukkot being this evening. Shemini Hag’Atseret starts at sunset this evening (Monday 13 October), Simchat Torah starts at sunset tomorrow (Tuesday 14 October), and the celebrations end at nightfall the following evening (Wednesday 15 October).
The seven joyous days of Sukkot in the Jewish calendar are followed by these celebrations that mark the completion of one annual Torah reading cycle and the immediate beginning of the next Torah reading cycle.
Traditionally these are joyous milestones and they are marked with dancing with the Torah scrolls in seven circuits of the synagogue, known as hakafot, when the Torah scrolls are held aloft in procession. The celebrations include lighting candles each night, festive meals at both night and day and avoiding work. Among Reform Jews and in Israel, Simchat Torah is generally celebrated on the same day as Shemini Atzeret.
Sukkot, which finishes with these celebrations, is also known as the Feast of Tabernacles or the Feast of Ingathering, and recalls the 40 years the fleeing slaves wandered in the desert, living in temporary shelters. Sukkot is also regarded as a harvest festival, marking the end of the agricultural year.
The Jewish calendar and the western secular calendar are calculated in different ways. But every Jew celebrating Simchat Torah will remember that the surprise attack launched from Gaza by Hamas two years ago on the morning of 7 October 2023 coincided with Simchat Torah. Simchat Torah two years ago fell between sunset on 6 October and nightfall on 7 October. A day that was meant to be filled with joy, singing and dancing became the darkest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust.
Simchat Torah means ‘Rejoicing with the Torah’ and is meant to be a joyous holiday that celebrates the Jewish love of Torah and study – a day of exuberant celebration of Torah and its centrality to Jewish life.
But that joy is tempered this year with memories of the horrors of events two years ago and mixed anxieties and hopes now this year about the ceasefire in the Middle East, the release of the last remaining hostages and the bodies of those who did not survive, and anxiety too about finding a just, lasting and sustainable peace in the Middle East and an end to the cycle of violence that has continued not just for decades, but for generations and for centuries.
The rabbis understood that time is both cyclical and linear. Cosmic time has a linear quality in which God acts to redeem people in History. Our life span is also linear, we are born and one day we will die. But, life continues around us, history continues to unfold, even when we are no longer a part of it.
Time, however, also exists cyclically. The seasons and religious festivals come round and are repeated year after year. Regardless of what happens on the historical stage to us or to those we know and love, these cycles will continue. The moon will continue to mark our days, weeks and months, the sun and the rains will nourish our crops, and the Torah will continue to inspire, instruct and comfort generations year after year.
Simchat Torah marks the end of one cycle of Torah readings and the beginning of a new cycle of Torah readings. The concluding section of the fifth book of the Torah, Deuteronomy (D’varim), is read, and immediately following that the opening section of Genesis (B’reishit) is read, representing this eternal cycle of living and our relationship with God.
To look at the Torah’s beginning immediately after its end presents an important perspective. By the end of veZot haBerakha (Deuteronomy 33: 1 to 34: 12), 613 commandments have been given and received, frameworks for every aspect of life have been outlined, and people have found themselves truly immersed in religious, moral and ethical issues.
But many people may find they have not made a connection between those issues and creation and the natural world. Reading about the prohibitions against charging interest and delaying payment to workers does not necessarily mesh in our with the creation of stars and planets. By the end of the cycle of readings, it may be easy to forget the beginning.
The reading on Simchat Torah is an opportunity to see Torah not simply as a book of diverse commandments, but as a unified framework for life that sees the earliest origins of the universe and our complex developments as humans as part of an entire system.
In its own subtle way, the reading of Simchat Torah highlights an important question: Do the scholars and adherents of the God’s law also genuinely see it embedded in God’s world? Indeed, can we properly study the laws and ideas of Torah without paying close attention to nature?
As one cycle of Torah reading ends with reading about the death of Moses, a new cycle begins immediately with reading about the days of Creation. Death and birth, ending and beginning, the cycle continues on for another year, and this is celebrated joyfully.
The highlight of Simchat Torah is the hakafot, held on both the eve and the morning of the festival, in which people process and dance with the Torah scrolls while circling round the synagogue seven times, singing and dancing but making sure that everyone who wants to is able to dance with a scroll. These celebrations are expected to be wholehearted and exuberant, and the effect is one that has been described as ‘holy pandemonium’.
It is a custom in many synagogues to invite specific members of the community who have been noteworthy for their contribution to community life in the past year to read the end of Deuteronomy and the beginning of Genesis. In many communities the remaining aliyot or calls to reading will be offered to as many people as possible, often needing the repetition of sections of the Creation story so that as many people as possible can take part. Simchat Torah is also the only time in the year when children are also called up to the Torah.
Despite the fragility we so often experience in life, Simchat Torah is a traditional celebration of the joy of living, of hope in which life continues. It celebrates our relationship with God, who looks to us to embrace all that life has to offer as we look to God to share it with us.
Torah crowns and mantles on the scrolls in the Aron haKodesh or Ark in Milton Keynes and District Reform Synagogue (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The paired Jewish holidays of Shemini Hag’Atseret and Simchat Torah, which follow immediately after Sukkot being this evening. Shemini Hag’Atseret starts at sunset this evening (Monday 13 October), Simchat Torah starts at sunset tomorrow (Tuesday 14 October), and the celebrations end at nightfall the following evening (Wednesday 15 October).
The seven joyous days of Sukkot in the Jewish calendar are followed by these celebrations that mark the completion of one annual Torah reading cycle and the immediate beginning of the next Torah reading cycle.
Traditionally these are joyous milestones and they are marked with dancing with the Torah scrolls in seven circuits of the synagogue, known as hakafot, when the Torah scrolls are held aloft in procession. The celebrations include lighting candles each night, festive meals at both night and day and avoiding work. Among Reform Jews and in Israel, Simchat Torah is generally celebrated on the same day as Shemini Atzeret.
Sukkot, which finishes with these celebrations, is also known as the Feast of Tabernacles or the Feast of Ingathering, and recalls the 40 years the fleeing slaves wandered in the desert, living in temporary shelters. Sukkot is also regarded as a harvest festival, marking the end of the agricultural year.
The Jewish calendar and the western secular calendar are calculated in different ways. But every Jew celebrating Simchat Torah will remember that the surprise attack launched from Gaza by Hamas two years ago on the morning of 7 October 2023 coincided with Simchat Torah. Simchat Torah two years ago fell between sunset on 6 October and nightfall on 7 October. A day that was meant to be filled with joy, singing and dancing became the darkest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust.
Simchat Torah means ‘Rejoicing with the Torah’ and is meant to be a joyous holiday that celebrates the Jewish love of Torah and study – a day of exuberant celebration of Torah and its centrality to Jewish life.
But that joy is tempered this year with memories of the horrors of events two years ago and mixed anxieties and hopes now this year about the ceasefire in the Middle East, the release of the last remaining hostages and the bodies of those who did not survive, and anxiety too about finding a just, lasting and sustainable peace in the Middle East and an end to the cycle of violence that has continued not just for decades, but for generations and for centuries.
The rabbis understood that time is both cyclical and linear. Cosmic time has a linear quality in which God acts to redeem people in History. Our life span is also linear, we are born and one day we will die. But, life continues around us, history continues to unfold, even when we are no longer a part of it.
Time, however, also exists cyclically. The seasons and religious festivals come round and are repeated year after year. Regardless of what happens on the historical stage to us or to those we know and love, these cycles will continue. The moon will continue to mark our days, weeks and months, the sun and the rains will nourish our crops, and the Torah will continue to inspire, instruct and comfort generations year after year.
Simchat Torah marks the end of one cycle of Torah readings and the beginning of a new cycle of Torah readings. The concluding section of the fifth book of the Torah, Deuteronomy (D’varim), is read, and immediately following that the opening section of Genesis (B’reishit) is read, representing this eternal cycle of living and our relationship with God.
To look at the Torah’s beginning immediately after its end presents an important perspective. By the end of veZot haBerakha (Deuteronomy 33: 1 to 34: 12), 613 commandments have been given and received, frameworks for every aspect of life have been outlined, and people have found themselves truly immersed in religious, moral and ethical issues.
But many people may find they have not made a connection between those issues and creation and the natural world. Reading about the prohibitions against charging interest and delaying payment to workers does not necessarily mesh in our with the creation of stars and planets. By the end of the cycle of readings, it may be easy to forget the beginning.
The reading on Simchat Torah is an opportunity to see Torah not simply as a book of diverse commandments, but as a unified framework for life that sees the earliest origins of the universe and our complex developments as humans as part of an entire system.
In its own subtle way, the reading of Simchat Torah highlights an important question: Do the scholars and adherents of the God’s law also genuinely see it embedded in God’s world? Indeed, can we properly study the laws and ideas of Torah without paying close attention to nature?
As one cycle of Torah reading ends with reading about the death of Moses, a new cycle begins immediately with reading about the days of Creation. Death and birth, ending and beginning, the cycle continues on for another year, and this is celebrated joyfully.
The highlight of Simchat Torah is the hakafot, held on both the eve and the morning of the festival, in which people process and dance with the Torah scrolls while circling round the synagogue seven times, singing and dancing but making sure that everyone who wants to is able to dance with a scroll. These celebrations are expected to be wholehearted and exuberant, and the effect is one that has been described as ‘holy pandemonium’.
It is a custom in many synagogues to invite specific members of the community who have been noteworthy for their contribution to community life in the past year to read the end of Deuteronomy and the beginning of Genesis. In many communities the remaining aliyot or calls to reading will be offered to as many people as possible, often needing the repetition of sections of the Creation story so that as many people as possible can take part. Simchat Torah is also the only time in the year when children are also called up to the Torah.
Despite the fragility we so often experience in life, Simchat Torah is a traditional celebration of the joy of living, of hope in which life continues. It celebrates our relationship with God, who looks to us to embrace all that life has to offer as we look to God to share it with us.
Torah crowns and mantles on the scrolls in the Aron haKodesh or Ark in Milton Keynes and District Reform Synagogue (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
10 July 2025
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2025:
62, Thursday 10 July 2025
‘If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town’ (Matthew 10: 14) … a colourful welcome on India Street in Kuching in Sarawak (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Third Sunday after Trinity (Trinity III, 6 July 2025). I am travelling to Oxford later today and staying there overnight in advance of an early-morning medical procedure tomorrow.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, reading today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Take no gold, or silver, or copper in your belts’ (Matthew 10: 9) … a selection of old coins in an antiques shop in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Matthew 10: 7-15 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 7 ‘As you go, proclaim the good news, “The kingdom of heaven has come near.” 8 Cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons. You received without payment; give without payment. 9 Take no gold, or silver, or copper in your belts, 10 no bag for your journey, or two tunics, or sandals, or a staff; for labourers deserve their food. 11 Whatever town or village you enter, find out who in it is worthy, and stay there until you leave. 12 As you enter the house, greet it. 13 If the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it; but if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you. 14 If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town. 15 Truly I tell you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgement than for that town.’
‘If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town’ (Matthew 10: 14) … a welcome sign at Athens International Airport (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
The Gospel reading at the Eucharist today (Matthew 10: 7-15) continues yesterday’s account of the commission and mission of the Twelve (Matthew 10: 1-7), as the Twelve are given their instructions for mission among the ‘lost sheep’: they are to cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons; they are to give without expecting payment in return, travel lightly, be humble in accepting generosity, and to wish peace to all; and they are reminded of the dreadful consequences of hospitality not offered or hospitality spurned.
When I was discussing the particularly Greek concept of φῐλοξενῐ́ᾱ (philoxenia) in a blog posting last night (9 July 2025), I talked about a need to understand the sacrament of hospitality. But most of the discussions about sacramental hospitality are actually discussing to whom should we extend hospitality at the Eucharist rather than any potential sacramental understanding of generous hospitality itself.
The reference to Sodom and Gomorrah in today’s reading is a reminder of the story in Genesis 19, in which two angels are sent to destroy Sodom. Lot welcomes them into his home, but all the men of the town surround the house and demand that Lot surrender his visitors that they may ‘know’ them carnally (see Genesis 19: 5). Lot offers the mob his virgin daughters to ‘do to them as you please’, but they refuse and threaten to do worse to Lot.
In response, the angels strike the crowd blind, and tell Lot: ‘the outcry against its people has become great before the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it’ (Genesis 19: 13).
The next morning, because Lot had lingered, the angels take Lot, Lot’s wife, and his two daughters by the hand and out of the city, and tell Lot to flee to the hills and not look back. Lot says that the hills are too far away and asks to go to Zoar instead. Sulphur and fire are then rained down on Sodom and Gomorrah, all the Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground (Genesis 19: 24-25). Lot and his daughters are saved, but his wife disregards the warning, looks back, and is turned into a pillar of salt.
‘Sodom and Gomorrah’ would become bywords for destruction and desolation (see Deuteronomy 29: 21-23). Other Biblical books initially attribute a variety of non-sexual sins to the inhabitants of Sodom. It is only much later that what came to be labelled ‘unnatural’ sex and homosexuality began to be included on these lists, and eventually homosexuality was interpreted as the primary sin of Sodom.
Sodom and Gomorrah, or the ‘cities of the plain’, were used historically and in modern discourse as metaphors for homosexuality, and are the origin of the English words sodomite, a pejorative term for male homosexuals, ‘sod’, a vulgar English slang term for male homosexuals, and sodomy, which is used in a legal context under the label crimes against nature to describe anal or oral sex (particularly homosexual) and bestiality.
The origin of the argument that sodomy was sinful is found in a contested reading of one word in the story. Citing Sodom and Gomorrah, Christian authorities began to label and condemn acts of sodomy as the worst of all sexual sins, and one of the worst crimes in general. For many centuries, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah was used by the Church to justify criminalisation of sexual practices between men, and people labelled sodomites were often punished by execution.
To this day, the phrase ‘Save Ulster from Sodomy’ remains a rallying call among some far-right groups in Northern Ireland.
However, since the mid 20th century, scholars in increasing numbers have seen the great sin of Sodom as the inhospitable treatment of guests. Much of the debate in modern interpretation of the greatest sin of Sodom, and whether the story concerns or condemns homosexuality, rests on interpreting the moment the mob from Sodom confronts Lot about his guests.
Today, many scholars dispute the interpretation that the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah involve homosexuality. They cite Ezekiel 16: 49-50 and interpret the sin as arrogance and lack of hospitality. As with Ezekiel, later prophetic reproaches of Sodom and Gomorrah do not condemn, implicate, or even mention homosexual conduct as the reason for the destruction of the city. Instead, they assign the blame to other sins, ranging from adultery, sexual violence and exploitation and dishonesty, to a lack of charity and an unwillingness to extend appropriate and generous hospitality.
If the obsession with equating gay sexuality with the sin of Sodom that is found among many evangelicals to this day was tempered even by true Biblical literalism and instead became widespread condemnation by those evangelicals, particularly in Trump’s America, of sexual violence and exploitation, dishonesty and an unwillingness to offer generous hospitality to the stranger, imagine what a different place the United States of America would be this day.
But, perhaps, I ought to conclude with a story retold this week that conveys how we can mis-hear and minterpret words because of our already determined cultural presuppositions and prejudices.
In its obituary of Lord (David) Lipsey, the journalist and Labour peer who died tragically earlier this week, the Guardian recalled on Tuesday how he had founded a newspaper at school in Bryanston and interviewed his future mentor, Anthony Crosland, then the Education Secretary and committed to abolishing public schools. The young interviewer reported Crosland saying prep schools were ‘stinking breeding grounds of sodomy’. Years later, Lipsey came across a Crosland speech and realised he had misheard the last word. It should have been ‘snobbery’.
A welcome sign in English, Hebrew and Greek at Etz Hayyim Synagogue in Chania, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Thursday 10 July 2025):
The theme this week (6 to 12 July) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Following in the Footsteps of Saint Thomas.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from the Revd Mark Woodrow, USPG Bishop’s Nominee for St Edmundsbury and Ipswich and Parish Priest and Rural Dean in Suffolk.
The USPG prayer diary today (Thursday 10 July 2025) invites us to pray:
Loving God, we pray for churches across India. May they be strengthened amidst change, fill the gaps left by departing youth, and guide all who follow you into deeper trust.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
you have broken the tyranny of sin
and have sent the Spirit of your Son into our hearts
whereby we call you Father:
give us grace to dedicate our freedom to your service,
that we and all creation may be brought
to the glorious liberty of the children of God;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
O God, whose beauty is beyond our imagining
and whose power we cannot comprehend:
show us your glory as far as we can grasp it,
and shield us from knowing more than we can bear
until wemay look upon you without fear;
through Jesus Christ our Saviour.
Additional Collect:
God our saviour,
look on this wounded world
in pity and in power;
hold us fast to your promises of peace
won for us by your Son,
our Saviour Jesus Christ.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
A welcome sign at Saint John’s Hospital in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Third Sunday after Trinity (Trinity III, 6 July 2025). I am travelling to Oxford later today and staying there overnight in advance of an early-morning medical procedure tomorrow.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, reading today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Take no gold, or silver, or copper in your belts’ (Matthew 10: 9) … a selection of old coins in an antiques shop in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Matthew 10: 7-15 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 7 ‘As you go, proclaim the good news, “The kingdom of heaven has come near.” 8 Cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons. You received without payment; give without payment. 9 Take no gold, or silver, or copper in your belts, 10 no bag for your journey, or two tunics, or sandals, or a staff; for labourers deserve their food. 11 Whatever town or village you enter, find out who in it is worthy, and stay there until you leave. 12 As you enter the house, greet it. 13 If the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it; but if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you. 14 If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town. 15 Truly I tell you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgement than for that town.’
‘If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet as you leave that house or town’ (Matthew 10: 14) … a welcome sign at Athens International Airport (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflection:
The Gospel reading at the Eucharist today (Matthew 10: 7-15) continues yesterday’s account of the commission and mission of the Twelve (Matthew 10: 1-7), as the Twelve are given their instructions for mission among the ‘lost sheep’: they are to cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons; they are to give without expecting payment in return, travel lightly, be humble in accepting generosity, and to wish peace to all; and they are reminded of the dreadful consequences of hospitality not offered or hospitality spurned.
When I was discussing the particularly Greek concept of φῐλοξενῐ́ᾱ (philoxenia) in a blog posting last night (9 July 2025), I talked about a need to understand the sacrament of hospitality. But most of the discussions about sacramental hospitality are actually discussing to whom should we extend hospitality at the Eucharist rather than any potential sacramental understanding of generous hospitality itself.
The reference to Sodom and Gomorrah in today’s reading is a reminder of the story in Genesis 19, in which two angels are sent to destroy Sodom. Lot welcomes them into his home, but all the men of the town surround the house and demand that Lot surrender his visitors that they may ‘know’ them carnally (see Genesis 19: 5). Lot offers the mob his virgin daughters to ‘do to them as you please’, but they refuse and threaten to do worse to Lot.
In response, the angels strike the crowd blind, and tell Lot: ‘the outcry against its people has become great before the Lord, and the Lord has sent us to destroy it’ (Genesis 19: 13).
The next morning, because Lot had lingered, the angels take Lot, Lot’s wife, and his two daughters by the hand and out of the city, and tell Lot to flee to the hills and not look back. Lot says that the hills are too far away and asks to go to Zoar instead. Sulphur and fire are then rained down on Sodom and Gomorrah, all the Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground (Genesis 19: 24-25). Lot and his daughters are saved, but his wife disregards the warning, looks back, and is turned into a pillar of salt.
‘Sodom and Gomorrah’ would become bywords for destruction and desolation (see Deuteronomy 29: 21-23). Other Biblical books initially attribute a variety of non-sexual sins to the inhabitants of Sodom. It is only much later that what came to be labelled ‘unnatural’ sex and homosexuality began to be included on these lists, and eventually homosexuality was interpreted as the primary sin of Sodom.
Sodom and Gomorrah, or the ‘cities of the plain’, were used historically and in modern discourse as metaphors for homosexuality, and are the origin of the English words sodomite, a pejorative term for male homosexuals, ‘sod’, a vulgar English slang term for male homosexuals, and sodomy, which is used in a legal context under the label crimes against nature to describe anal or oral sex (particularly homosexual) and bestiality.
The origin of the argument that sodomy was sinful is found in a contested reading of one word in the story. Citing Sodom and Gomorrah, Christian authorities began to label and condemn acts of sodomy as the worst of all sexual sins, and one of the worst crimes in general. For many centuries, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah was used by the Church to justify criminalisation of sexual practices between men, and people labelled sodomites were often punished by execution.
To this day, the phrase ‘Save Ulster from Sodomy’ remains a rallying call among some far-right groups in Northern Ireland.
However, since the mid 20th century, scholars in increasing numbers have seen the great sin of Sodom as the inhospitable treatment of guests. Much of the debate in modern interpretation of the greatest sin of Sodom, and whether the story concerns or condemns homosexuality, rests on interpreting the moment the mob from Sodom confronts Lot about his guests.
Today, many scholars dispute the interpretation that the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah involve homosexuality. They cite Ezekiel 16: 49-50 and interpret the sin as arrogance and lack of hospitality. As with Ezekiel, later prophetic reproaches of Sodom and Gomorrah do not condemn, implicate, or even mention homosexual conduct as the reason for the destruction of the city. Instead, they assign the blame to other sins, ranging from adultery, sexual violence and exploitation and dishonesty, to a lack of charity and an unwillingness to extend appropriate and generous hospitality.
If the obsession with equating gay sexuality with the sin of Sodom that is found among many evangelicals to this day was tempered even by true Biblical literalism and instead became widespread condemnation by those evangelicals, particularly in Trump’s America, of sexual violence and exploitation, dishonesty and an unwillingness to offer generous hospitality to the stranger, imagine what a different place the United States of America would be this day.
But, perhaps, I ought to conclude with a story retold this week that conveys how we can mis-hear and minterpret words because of our already determined cultural presuppositions and prejudices.
In its obituary of Lord (David) Lipsey, the journalist and Labour peer who died tragically earlier this week, the Guardian recalled on Tuesday how he had founded a newspaper at school in Bryanston and interviewed his future mentor, Anthony Crosland, then the Education Secretary and committed to abolishing public schools. The young interviewer reported Crosland saying prep schools were ‘stinking breeding grounds of sodomy’. Years later, Lipsey came across a Crosland speech and realised he had misheard the last word. It should have been ‘snobbery’.
A welcome sign in English, Hebrew and Greek at Etz Hayyim Synagogue in Chania, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Thursday 10 July 2025):
The theme this week (6 to 12 July) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Following in the Footsteps of Saint Thomas.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from the Revd Mark Woodrow, USPG Bishop’s Nominee for St Edmundsbury and Ipswich and Parish Priest and Rural Dean in Suffolk.
The USPG prayer diary today (Thursday 10 July 2025) invites us to pray:
Loving God, we pray for churches across India. May they be strengthened amidst change, fill the gaps left by departing youth, and guide all who follow you into deeper trust.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
you have broken the tyranny of sin
and have sent the Spirit of your Son into our hearts
whereby we call you Father:
give us grace to dedicate our freedom to your service,
that we and all creation may be brought
to the glorious liberty of the children of God;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
O God, whose beauty is beyond our imagining
and whose power we cannot comprehend:
show us your glory as far as we can grasp it,
and shield us from knowing more than we can bear
until wemay look upon you without fear;
through Jesus Christ our Saviour.
Additional Collect:
God our saviour,
look on this wounded world
in pity and in power;
hold us fast to your promises of peace
won for us by your Son,
our Saviour Jesus Christ.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
A welcome sign at Saint John’s Hospital in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Athens,
Chania,
Crete 2025,
Ezekiel,
Genesis,
Greece 2025,
Guardian,
Hospitals,
India,
Kuching,
Lichfield,
Mission,
Oxford,
Prayer,
Rethymnon,
Saint Matthew's Gospel,
Sarawak,
USPG
16 August 2024
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2024:
98, Friday 16 August 2024
Potiphar names Joseph administrator … Potiphar is a Biblical example of a married eunuch (Bode Museum, Berlin)
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Eleventh Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XI).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
An icon of Saint Philip the Deacon with the Ethiopian Eunuch, by Ann Chapin (2008)
Matthew 19: 3-12 (NRSVA):
3 Some Pharisees came to him, and to test him they asked, ‘Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause?’ 4 He answered, ‘Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning “made them male and female”, 5 and said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.’ 7 They said to him, ‘Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?’ 8 He said to them, ‘It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but at the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.’
10 His disciples said to him, ‘If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.’ 11 But he said to them, ‘Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. 12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.’
Alessandro Moreschi (1858-1922), the last surviving castrato of the Sistine Chapel’s Choir
Today’s Reflection:
This morning’s Gospel reading comes in two parts that are both difficult and painful to read, to the point that it would be easier to reflect on one of the other appointed readings in the Lectionary (Ezekiel 16: 1-15, 60-63; Psalm 118: 14-18 or the Canticle Song of Deliverance; Isaiah 12: 2-6).
As a priest who is divorced and remarried, I find the first part of the Gospel (Matthew 19: 3-11) is a challenge every time I read it, even though I have dealt with its topics on many occasions in sermons I have preached in a parish and pastoral setting, in preparing couples for marriage, and in my own life. I wish some of my priest colleagues had been as generous to me in the past as I hope they are to their own parishioners when it comes to providing true pastoral care, understanding and support.
The second part of the reading (Matthew 19: 11-12) causes me even greater confusion and all my attempts to understand its context still leave me in search of meaning and understanding. But then even the text itself warns that some readers will not be able to receive what is being said.
Jesus’ words seem to find echoes in Saint Paul’s writings when, for example, he seems to advocate remaining single if someone is called to do so (see I Corinthians 7: 24-28), yet says it is wrong to forbid marriage to anyone (I Timothy 4: 1-3). However, both Jesus and Paul stress that relatively few people were called to a life of celibacy, a lifestyle that was generally unacceptable socially in their time.
I wince and even imagine physical pain when it comes to thinking about the concept of a eunuch, thinking of references to men who had been castrated before puberty, especially the castrati or male singers who, for the sake of retaining their high voices, underwent surgical castration before puberty.
Castration affected boys’ vocal cords, but it also had a profound effect on the rest of their body. By disrupting normal growth hormones, castration could result in a variety of unusual physical attributes, including remarkable height and an abnormally large chest cavity – which, in singing terms, meant powerful thoracic muscles and extra lung capacity. As such, castrati were uniquely equipped to produce the loud, sustained, highly ornamented phrases that Baroque audiences loved.
The earliest records of castrati date from the 1550s. At the time, castrati sang only sacred music. A supposed biblical injunction against women singing in church left a dearth of singers able to sing the high parts in sacred choral works.
When opera became part of the musical scene ca 1600, the castrato’s unusual voice was quickly embraced by composers working in the new genre. Claudio Monteverdi’s opera Orfeo (1607) featured castrati singing the opera’s Prologue as well as two female roles. Yet the castrato’s vocal powers lead them to be cast as the manliest role in opera: the primo uomo, or heroic male lead.
Successful castrati were the rock stars and celebrities of their day. The castrato known as Farinelli, born Carlo Broschi (1705-1782) was knighted by the King of Spain and held a ministerial role at the Spanish court.
By the 19th century, however, changing operatic styles and new conceptions of medical ethics meant the castrato tradition was quickly dying out. The Vatican banned castrati in 1903, and the last known castrato, Alessandro Moreschi, died in 1922. Recordings of Moreschi singing are the only surviving example of this voice type.
The Biblical references to eunuchs include impotent men and men not capable of sexual relations. In this morning’s reading, however, Jesus says that some men were born this way, some were made impotent by men and some made themselves impotent to better serve the kingdom of God.
The terms also described men who were trusted in royal courts to serve as chamberlains and to care for harems (see Esther 2: 15) or men trusted in royal courts with high positions and authority (see Daniel 1: 3-18; Acts 8: 27). Because eunuchs often served in the courts of kings, the words translated as ‘eunuch’ may have come to be used as a label for many senior officials, whether or not we would now regarded them as having been castrated.
The Hebrew word in the Bible is סְרִ֨יס (sarís) and it means ‘to castrate’. But this word is translated ‘officer’ or ‘officers’ 12 times in the Old Testament (see Genesis 37: 36; 39: 1; 40: 2; and 40: 7) and as ‘chamberlain’ or ‘chamberlains’ 13 times (see Esther 1: 10, 12, 15; 2: 21; and 4: 4-5).
In the Septuagint, the Hebrew word סְרִ֨יס is translated into Greek by εὐνοῦχος, and the word also has the meaning ‘eunuch’. However, in its context in the Tanakh, the word almost always refers to ministers or high servants at the court of a king. Not all of them were castrated in order to hold their posts, maybe they were merely bound to practise celibacy; the Bible, in Genesis, mentions at least one married eunuch, Potiphar, who is one of Pharoah’s courtiers in Egypt.
The Greek word εὐνοῦχοι (eunouchoi is usually understood as castrates, but the context speaks for understanding εὐνοῦχοι as ‘single’, and its etymology suggests the Greek word εὐνοῦχος (eunouchos) originally meant either ‘bedroom guard’ or ‘of good mind.’ Later, the word rendered ‘eunuch’ came to refer to a castrated man, to an impotent man and to an unmarried man.
At the time Jesus is speaking, the word ‘eunuch’ may have simply referred to a senior and trusted official in royal courts, a courtier who could be trusted not to take advantage of others, particularly people who depended on royal justice and who must not be exploited for personal financial or sexual advantage.
In the Roman world, the word eunuch was used to refer to a homosexual man. Some translations refer to ‘men who never marry,’ instead of ‘eunuchs’. Both terms were used as euphemisms for homosexual men.
Some commentators suggest that at the time of Jesus the word eunuch was used as a euphemism for people who were seen as being different or even outsiders because of their sexuality, men who were gay but dismissed as being ‘effeminate’, people who were gay and found it difficult to explain why they remained single in a society where marriage was the norm and celibacy was frowned on, individuals whose sexuality was not of their own choice but would have been unacceptable if they admitted to it publicly.
In the any case, in both the Hebrew and Christian texts, eunuchs had the same standing in God’s eyes as anyone else (see Isaiah 56: 3-5; Acts 8: 26-39).
These definitions might mean that those who make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven are simply men who remained unmarried to spend more time seeking the Lord and spreading the Gospel.
This morning’s passage was interpreted so literally in some parts of the early church that Origen of Alexandria (185-254 CE), in the impetuosity of youth, castrated himself. In later life he knew better. In his commentary on Saint Matthew’s Gospel, Origen rejects the literal interpretation of the words. He acknowledges that he once accepted a literal reading, but came to accept the saying should be understood spiritually and not ‘according to the flesh and the letter.’ But it was too late by then to reverse the process, I imagine, as I wince yet again this morning.
Perhaps, this passage should no more be taken literally than Christ’s words about cutting off my hand or foot, or gouging out my eye. If so, should the preceding verses on divorce be taken literally either? Perhaps they too are hyperbole, raw humour or reminders of the ideals of marriage which some may attain but many cannot live up to.
Both parts of this morning’s Gospel reading may be read more easily if we hear Jesus saying that all Christians, are representatives of the Kingdom of God, courtiers or ambassadors of that kingdom, irrespective of our marital status, our gender, our sexuality or what others may see as inappropriate or unacceptable lifestyles judged only by the cultural standards of the world today. We are called by Christ into the Church and into the kingdom, and some of us are even called to give up everything in order to pursue this calling.
Origen of Alexandria (185-254 CE), in the impetuosity of youth, castrated himself … in later life he knew better (Icon: Eileen McGuckin)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 16 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Whom Shall I Send?’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from the Revd Davidson Solanki, Regional Manager Asia and Middle East, USPG, on the Episcopal Province of Jerusalem and the Middle East’s new programme launched in accompaniment with USPG, ‘Whom Shall I Send.’
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 16 August 2024) invites us to pray:
Lord, we pray for an end to conflict in the Holy Land. We pray for peace across the nation.
The Collect:
O God, you declare your almighty power
most chiefly in showing mercy and pity:
mercifully grant to us such a measure of your grace,
that we, running the way of your commandments,
may receive your gracious promises,
and be made partakers of your heavenly treasure;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Lord of all mercy,
we your faithful people have celebrated that one true sacrifice
which takes away our sins and brings pardon and peace:
by our communion
keep us firm on the foundation of the gospel
and preserve us from all sin;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
God of glory,
the end of our searching,
help us to lay aside
all that prevents us from seeking your kingdom,
and to give all that we have
to gain the pearl beyond all price,
through our Saviour Jesus Christ.
Joseph and Potiphar’s wife … a ceramic plate produced in Urbino ca 1537 … Potiphar is a Biblical example of a married eunuch (National Museum of Bargello, Florence)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are continuing in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and this week began with the Eleventh Sunday after Trinity (Trinity XI).
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a reflection on the Gospel reading;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
An icon of Saint Philip the Deacon with the Ethiopian Eunuch, by Ann Chapin (2008)
Matthew 19: 3-12 (NRSVA):
3 Some Pharisees came to him, and to test him they asked, ‘Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause?’ 4 He answered, ‘Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning “made them male and female”, 5 and said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh”? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.’ 7 They said to him, ‘Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?’ 8 He said to them, ‘It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but at the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.’
10 His disciples said to him, ‘If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.’ 11 But he said to them, ‘Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. 12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.’
Alessandro Moreschi (1858-1922), the last surviving castrato of the Sistine Chapel’s Choir
Today’s Reflection:
This morning’s Gospel reading comes in two parts that are both difficult and painful to read, to the point that it would be easier to reflect on one of the other appointed readings in the Lectionary (Ezekiel 16: 1-15, 60-63; Psalm 118: 14-18 or the Canticle Song of Deliverance; Isaiah 12: 2-6).
As a priest who is divorced and remarried, I find the first part of the Gospel (Matthew 19: 3-11) is a challenge every time I read it, even though I have dealt with its topics on many occasions in sermons I have preached in a parish and pastoral setting, in preparing couples for marriage, and in my own life. I wish some of my priest colleagues had been as generous to me in the past as I hope they are to their own parishioners when it comes to providing true pastoral care, understanding and support.
The second part of the reading (Matthew 19: 11-12) causes me even greater confusion and all my attempts to understand its context still leave me in search of meaning and understanding. But then even the text itself warns that some readers will not be able to receive what is being said.
Jesus’ words seem to find echoes in Saint Paul’s writings when, for example, he seems to advocate remaining single if someone is called to do so (see I Corinthians 7: 24-28), yet says it is wrong to forbid marriage to anyone (I Timothy 4: 1-3). However, both Jesus and Paul stress that relatively few people were called to a life of celibacy, a lifestyle that was generally unacceptable socially in their time.
I wince and even imagine physical pain when it comes to thinking about the concept of a eunuch, thinking of references to men who had been castrated before puberty, especially the castrati or male singers who, for the sake of retaining their high voices, underwent surgical castration before puberty.
Castration affected boys’ vocal cords, but it also had a profound effect on the rest of their body. By disrupting normal growth hormones, castration could result in a variety of unusual physical attributes, including remarkable height and an abnormally large chest cavity – which, in singing terms, meant powerful thoracic muscles and extra lung capacity. As such, castrati were uniquely equipped to produce the loud, sustained, highly ornamented phrases that Baroque audiences loved.
The earliest records of castrati date from the 1550s. At the time, castrati sang only sacred music. A supposed biblical injunction against women singing in church left a dearth of singers able to sing the high parts in sacred choral works.
When opera became part of the musical scene ca 1600, the castrato’s unusual voice was quickly embraced by composers working in the new genre. Claudio Monteverdi’s opera Orfeo (1607) featured castrati singing the opera’s Prologue as well as two female roles. Yet the castrato’s vocal powers lead them to be cast as the manliest role in opera: the primo uomo, or heroic male lead.
Successful castrati were the rock stars and celebrities of their day. The castrato known as Farinelli, born Carlo Broschi (1705-1782) was knighted by the King of Spain and held a ministerial role at the Spanish court.
By the 19th century, however, changing operatic styles and new conceptions of medical ethics meant the castrato tradition was quickly dying out. The Vatican banned castrati in 1903, and the last known castrato, Alessandro Moreschi, died in 1922. Recordings of Moreschi singing are the only surviving example of this voice type.
The Biblical references to eunuchs include impotent men and men not capable of sexual relations. In this morning’s reading, however, Jesus says that some men were born this way, some were made impotent by men and some made themselves impotent to better serve the kingdom of God.
The terms also described men who were trusted in royal courts to serve as chamberlains and to care for harems (see Esther 2: 15) or men trusted in royal courts with high positions and authority (see Daniel 1: 3-18; Acts 8: 27). Because eunuchs often served in the courts of kings, the words translated as ‘eunuch’ may have come to be used as a label for many senior officials, whether or not we would now regarded them as having been castrated.
The Hebrew word in the Bible is סְרִ֨יס (sarís) and it means ‘to castrate’. But this word is translated ‘officer’ or ‘officers’ 12 times in the Old Testament (see Genesis 37: 36; 39: 1; 40: 2; and 40: 7) and as ‘chamberlain’ or ‘chamberlains’ 13 times (see Esther 1: 10, 12, 15; 2: 21; and 4: 4-5).
In the Septuagint, the Hebrew word סְרִ֨יס is translated into Greek by εὐνοῦχος, and the word also has the meaning ‘eunuch’. However, in its context in the Tanakh, the word almost always refers to ministers or high servants at the court of a king. Not all of them were castrated in order to hold their posts, maybe they were merely bound to practise celibacy; the Bible, in Genesis, mentions at least one married eunuch, Potiphar, who is one of Pharoah’s courtiers in Egypt.
The Greek word εὐνοῦχοι (eunouchoi is usually understood as castrates, but the context speaks for understanding εὐνοῦχοι as ‘single’, and its etymology suggests the Greek word εὐνοῦχος (eunouchos) originally meant either ‘bedroom guard’ or ‘of good mind.’ Later, the word rendered ‘eunuch’ came to refer to a castrated man, to an impotent man and to an unmarried man.
At the time Jesus is speaking, the word ‘eunuch’ may have simply referred to a senior and trusted official in royal courts, a courtier who could be trusted not to take advantage of others, particularly people who depended on royal justice and who must not be exploited for personal financial or sexual advantage.
In the Roman world, the word eunuch was used to refer to a homosexual man. Some translations refer to ‘men who never marry,’ instead of ‘eunuchs’. Both terms were used as euphemisms for homosexual men.
Some commentators suggest that at the time of Jesus the word eunuch was used as a euphemism for people who were seen as being different or even outsiders because of their sexuality, men who were gay but dismissed as being ‘effeminate’, people who were gay and found it difficult to explain why they remained single in a society where marriage was the norm and celibacy was frowned on, individuals whose sexuality was not of their own choice but would have been unacceptable if they admitted to it publicly.
In the any case, in both the Hebrew and Christian texts, eunuchs had the same standing in God’s eyes as anyone else (see Isaiah 56: 3-5; Acts 8: 26-39).
These definitions might mean that those who make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven are simply men who remained unmarried to spend more time seeking the Lord and spreading the Gospel.
This morning’s passage was interpreted so literally in some parts of the early church that Origen of Alexandria (185-254 CE), in the impetuosity of youth, castrated himself. In later life he knew better. In his commentary on Saint Matthew’s Gospel, Origen rejects the literal interpretation of the words. He acknowledges that he once accepted a literal reading, but came to accept the saying should be understood spiritually and not ‘according to the flesh and the letter.’ But it was too late by then to reverse the process, I imagine, as I wince yet again this morning.
Perhaps, this passage should no more be taken literally than Christ’s words about cutting off my hand or foot, or gouging out my eye. If so, should the preceding verses on divorce be taken literally either? Perhaps they too are hyperbole, raw humour or reminders of the ideals of marriage which some may attain but many cannot live up to.
Both parts of this morning’s Gospel reading may be read more easily if we hear Jesus saying that all Christians, are representatives of the Kingdom of God, courtiers or ambassadors of that kingdom, irrespective of our marital status, our gender, our sexuality or what others may see as inappropriate or unacceptable lifestyles judged only by the cultural standards of the world today. We are called by Christ into the Church and into the kingdom, and some of us are even called to give up everything in order to pursue this calling.
Origen of Alexandria (185-254 CE), in the impetuosity of youth, castrated himself … in later life he knew better (Icon: Eileen McGuckin)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 16 August 2024):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Whom Shall I Send?’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from the Revd Davidson Solanki, Regional Manager Asia and Middle East, USPG, on the Episcopal Province of Jerusalem and the Middle East’s new programme launched in accompaniment with USPG, ‘Whom Shall I Send.’
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 16 August 2024) invites us to pray:
Lord, we pray for an end to conflict in the Holy Land. We pray for peace across the nation.
The Collect:
O God, you declare your almighty power
most chiefly in showing mercy and pity:
mercifully grant to us such a measure of your grace,
that we, running the way of your commandments,
may receive your gracious promises,
and be made partakers of your heavenly treasure;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post Communion Prayer:
Lord of all mercy,
we your faithful people have celebrated that one true sacrifice
which takes away our sins and brings pardon and peace:
by our communion
keep us firm on the foundation of the gospel
and preserve us from all sin;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Additional Collect:
God of glory,
the end of our searching,
help us to lay aside
all that prevents us from seeking your kingdom,
and to give all that we have
to gain the pearl beyond all price,
through our Saviour Jesus Christ.
Joseph and Potiphar’s wife … a ceramic plate produced in Urbino ca 1537 … Potiphar is a Biblical example of a married eunuch (National Museum of Bargello, Florence)
Yesterday’s reflection
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
20 December 2023
Daily prayers in Advent with
Leonard Cohen and USPG:
(18) 20 December 2023
‘You who build the altars now / To sacrifice these children / You must not do it anymore’ (Leonard Cohen) … the Sacrifice of Abraham depicted in the East Window in Holy Trinity Church, Old Wolverton (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2023)
Patrick Comerford
We are in the final stages of countdown to Christmas, with just five days to go to Christmas Day. The last week of Advent began on Sunday with the Third Sunday of Advent or Gaudete Sunday (17 December 2023), and this is a very short Advent this year.
I have spent a few days in Dublin, and after an evening flight from Birmingham I got back to Stony Stratford late last night. Before today begins, I am taking some time for prayer, reflection and reading this morning.
Throughout Advent this year, my reading and reflection each day includes a poem or song by Leonard Cohen. These Advent reflections are following this pattern:
1, A reflection on a poem or song by Leonard Cohen;
2, the Gospel reading of the day in the Church of England lectionary;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary.
‘The door it opened slowly / My father he came in’ (Leonard Cohen) … Abraham preparing for the sacrifice of Isaac … a stained glass window in Saint John’s Church, Wall, near Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Songs and Poems of Leonard Cohen: 18, ‘Story of Isaac’:
The poem and song ‘Story of Isaac’ by Leonard Cohen was first recorded by Judy Collins on her album Who Knows Where the Time Goes, released in December 1968, and it was the second track on Leonard Cohen’s second album, Songs from a Room, released in April 1969.
This song has also been covered by a number of musicians including Suzanne Vega, Linda Thompson, the Johnstons, Pain Teens and Roy Buchanan.
‘Story of Isaac’ is of the Biblical story in Genesis 22 of Isaac’s planned sacrifice by his father Abraham, but told now from Isaac’s perspective. It is also an anti-war song, specifically about the Vietnam war, and it’s a story about the children being sacrificed on behalf of the older generation.
Almost 20 years after it was first recorded, Cohen explained to John McKenna of RTÉ in 1988 that ‘Story of Isaac’ was an anti-war protest song. But he added, ‘I was careful in that song to try and put it beyond the pure, beyond the simple, anti-war protest, that it also is. Because it says at the end there the man of war the man of peace, the peacock spreads his deadly fan. In other words it isn’t necessarily for war that we’re willing to sacrifice each other.’
He added: ‘We’ll get some idea – some magnificent idea – that we’re willing to sacrifice each other for; it doesn’t necessarily have to involve an opponent or an ideology, but human beings being what they are we’re always going to set up people to die for some absurd situation that we define as important.’
The song is a commentary on the nature of sacrifice and faith, and the idea that we may think God is asking us to give up something we love in order to serve a higher purpose. The song also touches on themes of war and violence, as well as the relationship between father and son.
Overall, the message of the song is one of questioning and reflection on the nature of sacrifice and faith, and the idea that sometimes we may be called on to give up something we love in order to serve a greater good.
According to Leonard Cohen, the song is ‘about those who would sacrifice one generation on behalf of another.’
In another interview, he reflected: ‘There’s a story in the Bible about Isaac, how his father summoned him to go and climb a mountain, how his father built an altar there after he had been commanded to offer up his son. And just at the last moment before he was about to sacrifice Isaac, an angel held the hand of the father. But today the children are being sacrificed and no one raises a hand to end the sacrifice. And this is what this song is about.’
Rabbi Aubrey Glazer, formerly of Congregation Beth Sholom in San Francisco, discusses ‘Story of Isaac’ and many other poems by Leonard Cohen in his book Tangle of Matter & Ghost: Leonard Cohen’s Post-Secular Songbook of Mysticism(s) Jewish and Beyond (2017). The book is part of a series, ‘New Perspectives in Post-Rabbinic Judaism.’ Glazer notes the sudden and effective change of perspective as father and son ascend up the mountain and have a bird’s-eye view of the valley now far below. They are so high up that it takes a full minute for the bottle to fall and shatter, but Abraham calms his young son with a warm touch.
The tension is heightened, however, by Isaac’s continuing confusion over whether the scene was hurtling towards life, power and triumph, symbolised by the eagle; or towards imminent death, captured by the vulture. Either way, Abraham is secure in Isaac’s compliance and certain their destiny is firmly in God’s hands.
A stunning change of time and place juxtaposes the Biblical story with the still-unfolding tragedy between the descendants of Abraham. Cohen brings this ancient tale right up to the present, as he, through the voice of Isaac, begs us to tear down the altars upon which the children of our age are still sacrificed to settle age-old grievances.
He crystallises the parent’s grief and ambivalence by describing his ‘trembling hand,’ even as Abraham, and so many today, stands in awe of the divine command he believes he is obeying.
Cohen, whose father, like Abraham in this poem/song, also had blue eyes, always returned to his own Judaism. He refers to one of the most poignant messages of this Biblical passage, and one that recurs throughout the history of the Abrahamic people: this is a story of brothers. Earlier in the Biblical narrative, Isaac’s half-brother Ishmael was banished. Although they later come together to bury their father (Genesis 25), the effects of Ishmael’s exile and Isaac’s near-sacrifice reverberate through time.
Cohen deftly expresses the pain and power in this eternal family feud. In the end, he prays for mercy as these brothers take up arms against each other, and on which side one stands determines who is cast as the ‘man of peace’ and who is the ‘man of war.’
In Cohen’s telling, this tale becomes an anti-war hymn and a cautionary warning against all the ways we still sacrifice our children. Cohen expressed this in a BBC interview: ‘Just at the last moment before he was about to sacrifice Isaac, an angel held the hand of the father. But today the children are being sacrificed and no one raises a hand to end the sacrifice. And this is what this song is about.’
The near-sacrifice of Isaac, or the Akedah as it is known in Jewish tradition, is a gripping, chilling and troubling story, and a story that seems to ask more questions than it answers.
Each time I hear it, I am listening in horror as Abraham seems to be preparing to sacrifice his only son. And the story comes with all the gruesome details, as Abraham climbs the mountain, builds the altar, arranges the wood, binds his son, places him on the altar, and takes the knife into his hand. The looming tragedy is averted only at the very moment second.
But at a time when child-sacrifice was a cultural norm in that part of the ancient world, when people believed that sacrificing their first-born children was a way of appeasing the gods, this story turns those old superstitions on their head.
Abraham knows the old ways. But his relationship with God becomes a startling new relationship, founded on love. And this God is different from all the so-called gods. No, he does not demand human sacrifice. No, he does not have a mean and violent, capricious streak.
Instead, this God that Abraham has begun to get to know, wants a relationship with us that is built not on fear and brutalism, but on love and on freedom.
The child who was at risk is saved, the child who was bound up is set free, the child who was the victim of old-fashioned, out-dated superstitions now becomes part of the relationship between God and humanity and the promise for the future that is sealed not by sacrifices like this, but by love.
How could Abraham hav forgotten God’s earlier promise so soon, the promise made to Abraham and Sarah that they would have children and through them they would be the spiritual ancestors of all nations?
And it is a story that challenges us to reassess our own notions about God.
Are our relationships with God founded on fear or on love?
Do we believe in a god who would treat us as slaves who must obey, or as faithful partners who are caught up in his love?
Once again, we are offered a choice between death and life, between slavery and freedom, between blind obedience and love.
‘Abraham, our Father in Faith,’ by the Liverpool sculptor Sean Rice (1931-1997), in the west apse of the Cathedral of Christ the King, Liverpool (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Leonard Cohen, Story of Isaac:
The door it opened slowly
My father he came in
I was nine years old
And he stood so tall above me
Blue eyes they were shining
And his voice was very cold
Said, ‘I’ve had a vision
And you know I’m strong and holy
I must do what I've been told’
So he started up the mountain
I was running, he was walking
And his axe was made of gold
Well, the trees they got much smaller
The lake a lady’s mirror
We stopped to drink some wine
Then he threw the bottle over
Broke a minute later
And he put his hand on mine
Thought I saw an eagle
But it might have been a vulture
I never could decide
Then my father built an altar
He looked once behind his shoulder
He knew I would not hide
You might also like
You who build the altars now
To sacrifice these children
You must not do it anymore
A scheme is not a vision
And you never have been tempted
By a demon or a god
You who stand above them now
Your hatchets blunt and bloody
You were not there before
When I lay upon a mountain
And my father’s hand was trembling
With the beauty of the word
And if you call me brother now
Forgive me if I inquire
‘Just according to whose plan?’
When it all comes down to dust
I will kill you if I must
I will help you if I can
When it all comes down to dust
I will help you if I must
I will kill you if I can
And mercy on our uniform
Man of peace or man of war
The peacock spreads his fan.
‘The peacock spreads his fan’ (Leonard Cohen) … a peacock spreads his fan in a vineyard in Rivesaltes near Perpignan in France (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 1: 26-38 (NRSVA):
26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, 27 to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, favoured one! The Lord is with you.’ 29 But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. 30 The angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God. 31 And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob for ever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.’ 34 Mary said to the angel, ‘How can this be, since I am a virgin?’ 35 The angel said to her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. 36 And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. 37 For nothing will be impossible with God.’ 38 Then Mary said, ‘Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.’ Then the angel departed from her.
The Annunciation depicted in a panel in the altar in Saint Mary’s Church, Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2023)
Today’s Prayers (Wednesday 20 December 2023):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘The Joy of Advent.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (20 December 2023) invites us to pray in these words:
O Lord, help us to see the wonder in your creation, to find the joy amidst the trials. For in you, we can rejoice and be glad. No matter what the world brings, we can find joy in you.
The Annunciation depicted in a stained-glass window in Saint Mary’s Church, Bletchley (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2023)
The Collect:
O Lord Jesus Christ,
who at your first coming sent your messenger
to prepare your way before you:
grant that the ministers and stewards of your mysteries
may likewise so prepare and make ready your way
by turning the hearts of the disobedient to the wisdom of the just,
that at your second coming to judge the world
we may be found an acceptable people in your sight;
for you are alive and reign with the Father
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
We give you thanks, O Lord, for these heavenly gifts;
kindle in us the fire of your Spirit
that when your Christ comes again
we may shine as lights before his face;
who is alive and reigns now and for ever.
Additional Collect:
God for whom we watch and wait,
you sent John the Baptist to prepare the way of your Son:
give us courage to speak the truth,
to hunger for justice,
and to suffer for the cause of right,
with Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflection
Continued Tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in the final stages of countdown to Christmas, with just five days to go to Christmas Day. The last week of Advent began on Sunday with the Third Sunday of Advent or Gaudete Sunday (17 December 2023), and this is a very short Advent this year.
I have spent a few days in Dublin, and after an evening flight from Birmingham I got back to Stony Stratford late last night. Before today begins, I am taking some time for prayer, reflection and reading this morning.
Throughout Advent this year, my reading and reflection each day includes a poem or song by Leonard Cohen. These Advent reflections are following this pattern:
1, A reflection on a poem or song by Leonard Cohen;
2, the Gospel reading of the day in the Church of England lectionary;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary.
‘The door it opened slowly / My father he came in’ (Leonard Cohen) … Abraham preparing for the sacrifice of Isaac … a stained glass window in Saint John’s Church, Wall, near Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Songs and Poems of Leonard Cohen: 18, ‘Story of Isaac’:
The poem and song ‘Story of Isaac’ by Leonard Cohen was first recorded by Judy Collins on her album Who Knows Where the Time Goes, released in December 1968, and it was the second track on Leonard Cohen’s second album, Songs from a Room, released in April 1969.
This song has also been covered by a number of musicians including Suzanne Vega, Linda Thompson, the Johnstons, Pain Teens and Roy Buchanan.
‘Story of Isaac’ is of the Biblical story in Genesis 22 of Isaac’s planned sacrifice by his father Abraham, but told now from Isaac’s perspective. It is also an anti-war song, specifically about the Vietnam war, and it’s a story about the children being sacrificed on behalf of the older generation.
Almost 20 years after it was first recorded, Cohen explained to John McKenna of RTÉ in 1988 that ‘Story of Isaac’ was an anti-war protest song. But he added, ‘I was careful in that song to try and put it beyond the pure, beyond the simple, anti-war protest, that it also is. Because it says at the end there the man of war the man of peace, the peacock spreads his deadly fan. In other words it isn’t necessarily for war that we’re willing to sacrifice each other.’
He added: ‘We’ll get some idea – some magnificent idea – that we’re willing to sacrifice each other for; it doesn’t necessarily have to involve an opponent or an ideology, but human beings being what they are we’re always going to set up people to die for some absurd situation that we define as important.’
The song is a commentary on the nature of sacrifice and faith, and the idea that we may think God is asking us to give up something we love in order to serve a higher purpose. The song also touches on themes of war and violence, as well as the relationship between father and son.
Overall, the message of the song is one of questioning and reflection on the nature of sacrifice and faith, and the idea that sometimes we may be called on to give up something we love in order to serve a greater good.
According to Leonard Cohen, the song is ‘about those who would sacrifice one generation on behalf of another.’
In another interview, he reflected: ‘There’s a story in the Bible about Isaac, how his father summoned him to go and climb a mountain, how his father built an altar there after he had been commanded to offer up his son. And just at the last moment before he was about to sacrifice Isaac, an angel held the hand of the father. But today the children are being sacrificed and no one raises a hand to end the sacrifice. And this is what this song is about.’
Rabbi Aubrey Glazer, formerly of Congregation Beth Sholom in San Francisco, discusses ‘Story of Isaac’ and many other poems by Leonard Cohen in his book Tangle of Matter & Ghost: Leonard Cohen’s Post-Secular Songbook of Mysticism(s) Jewish and Beyond (2017). The book is part of a series, ‘New Perspectives in Post-Rabbinic Judaism.’ Glazer notes the sudden and effective change of perspective as father and son ascend up the mountain and have a bird’s-eye view of the valley now far below. They are so high up that it takes a full minute for the bottle to fall and shatter, but Abraham calms his young son with a warm touch.
The tension is heightened, however, by Isaac’s continuing confusion over whether the scene was hurtling towards life, power and triumph, symbolised by the eagle; or towards imminent death, captured by the vulture. Either way, Abraham is secure in Isaac’s compliance and certain their destiny is firmly in God’s hands.
A stunning change of time and place juxtaposes the Biblical story with the still-unfolding tragedy between the descendants of Abraham. Cohen brings this ancient tale right up to the present, as he, through the voice of Isaac, begs us to tear down the altars upon which the children of our age are still sacrificed to settle age-old grievances.
He crystallises the parent’s grief and ambivalence by describing his ‘trembling hand,’ even as Abraham, and so many today, stands in awe of the divine command he believes he is obeying.
Cohen, whose father, like Abraham in this poem/song, also had blue eyes, always returned to his own Judaism. He refers to one of the most poignant messages of this Biblical passage, and one that recurs throughout the history of the Abrahamic people: this is a story of brothers. Earlier in the Biblical narrative, Isaac’s half-brother Ishmael was banished. Although they later come together to bury their father (Genesis 25), the effects of Ishmael’s exile and Isaac’s near-sacrifice reverberate through time.
Cohen deftly expresses the pain and power in this eternal family feud. In the end, he prays for mercy as these brothers take up arms against each other, and on which side one stands determines who is cast as the ‘man of peace’ and who is the ‘man of war.’
In Cohen’s telling, this tale becomes an anti-war hymn and a cautionary warning against all the ways we still sacrifice our children. Cohen expressed this in a BBC interview: ‘Just at the last moment before he was about to sacrifice Isaac, an angel held the hand of the father. But today the children are being sacrificed and no one raises a hand to end the sacrifice. And this is what this song is about.’
The near-sacrifice of Isaac, or the Akedah as it is known in Jewish tradition, is a gripping, chilling and troubling story, and a story that seems to ask more questions than it answers.
Each time I hear it, I am listening in horror as Abraham seems to be preparing to sacrifice his only son. And the story comes with all the gruesome details, as Abraham climbs the mountain, builds the altar, arranges the wood, binds his son, places him on the altar, and takes the knife into his hand. The looming tragedy is averted only at the very moment second.
But at a time when child-sacrifice was a cultural norm in that part of the ancient world, when people believed that sacrificing their first-born children was a way of appeasing the gods, this story turns those old superstitions on their head.
Abraham knows the old ways. But his relationship with God becomes a startling new relationship, founded on love. And this God is different from all the so-called gods. No, he does not demand human sacrifice. No, he does not have a mean and violent, capricious streak.
Instead, this God that Abraham has begun to get to know, wants a relationship with us that is built not on fear and brutalism, but on love and on freedom.
The child who was at risk is saved, the child who was bound up is set free, the child who was the victim of old-fashioned, out-dated superstitions now becomes part of the relationship between God and humanity and the promise for the future that is sealed not by sacrifices like this, but by love.
How could Abraham hav forgotten God’s earlier promise so soon, the promise made to Abraham and Sarah that they would have children and through them they would be the spiritual ancestors of all nations?
And it is a story that challenges us to reassess our own notions about God.
Are our relationships with God founded on fear or on love?
Do we believe in a god who would treat us as slaves who must obey, or as faithful partners who are caught up in his love?
Once again, we are offered a choice between death and life, between slavery and freedom, between blind obedience and love.
‘Abraham, our Father in Faith,’ by the Liverpool sculptor Sean Rice (1931-1997), in the west apse of the Cathedral of Christ the King, Liverpool (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Leonard Cohen, Story of Isaac:
The door it opened slowly
My father he came in
I was nine years old
And he stood so tall above me
Blue eyes they were shining
And his voice was very cold
Said, ‘I’ve had a vision
And you know I’m strong and holy
I must do what I've been told’
So he started up the mountain
I was running, he was walking
And his axe was made of gold
Well, the trees they got much smaller
The lake a lady’s mirror
We stopped to drink some wine
Then he threw the bottle over
Broke a minute later
And he put his hand on mine
Thought I saw an eagle
But it might have been a vulture
I never could decide
Then my father built an altar
He looked once behind his shoulder
He knew I would not hide
You might also like
You who build the altars now
To sacrifice these children
You must not do it anymore
A scheme is not a vision
And you never have been tempted
By a demon or a god
You who stand above them now
Your hatchets blunt and bloody
You were not there before
When I lay upon a mountain
And my father’s hand was trembling
With the beauty of the word
And if you call me brother now
Forgive me if I inquire
‘Just according to whose plan?’
When it all comes down to dust
I will kill you if I must
I will help you if I can
When it all comes down to dust
I will help you if I must
I will kill you if I can
And mercy on our uniform
Man of peace or man of war
The peacock spreads his fan.
‘The peacock spreads his fan’ (Leonard Cohen) … a peacock spreads his fan in a vineyard in Rivesaltes near Perpignan in France (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 1: 26-38 (NRSVA):
26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, 27 to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, favoured one! The Lord is with you.’ 29 But she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be. 30 The angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God. 31 And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob for ever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.’ 34 Mary said to the angel, ‘How can this be, since I am a virgin?’ 35 The angel said to her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God. 36 And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the sixth month for her who was said to be barren. 37 For nothing will be impossible with God.’ 38 Then Mary said, ‘Here am I, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word.’ Then the angel departed from her.
The Annunciation depicted in a panel in the altar in Saint Mary’s Church, Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2023)
Today’s Prayers (Wednesday 20 December 2023):
The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church,’ the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘The Joy of Advent.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (20 December 2023) invites us to pray in these words:
O Lord, help us to see the wonder in your creation, to find the joy amidst the trials. For in you, we can rejoice and be glad. No matter what the world brings, we can find joy in you.
The Annunciation depicted in a stained-glass window in Saint Mary’s Church, Bletchley (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2023)
The Collect:
O Lord Jesus Christ,
who at your first coming sent your messenger
to prepare your way before you:
grant that the ministers and stewards of your mysteries
may likewise so prepare and make ready your way
by turning the hearts of the disobedient to the wisdom of the just,
that at your second coming to judge the world
we may be found an acceptable people in your sight;
for you are alive and reign with the Father
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
We give you thanks, O Lord, for these heavenly gifts;
kindle in us the fire of your Spirit
that when your Christ comes again
we may shine as lights before his face;
who is alive and reigns now and for ever.
Additional Collect:
God for whom we watch and wait,
you sent John the Baptist to prepare the way of your Son:
give us courage to speak the truth,
to hunger for justice,
and to suffer for the cause of right,
with Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflection
Continued Tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Abraham,
Advent 2023,
Annunciation,
Bletchley,
Christmas 2023,
Genesis,
Leonard Cohen,
Lichfield,
Liverpool,
Mission,
Music,
Perpignan,
Poetry,
Prayer,
Saint Luke's Gospel,
Sculpture,
USPG,
Wall,
Wolverton
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
























