Setting out on the journey along Forster Street from its corner with Eyre Square (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
Patrick Comerford
During a break from the conference yesterday afternoon, I took the bus from Taylor’s Hill into the centre of Galway, passing the campus of NUI Galway and the cathedral, and hopping off at Eyre Square.
I was in search of some of the houses in Galway that have links with the Comerford family, and in particular the house in Forster Street off Eyre Square associated with Charles ffrench Blake-Forster (1851-1874), the romantic Victorian genealogist who popularised many of the stories about the origins of the Comerford family in Ireland, and whose mother, Mary Josephine Comerford, was from Galway.
In The Irish Chieftains, or, a struggle for the crown (Dublin, 1872), Blake-Forster, who was then only 21, claimed:
‘Amongst the chivalrous and bold warriors (all of whom were not Normans) who accompanied William II, second reigning Duke of Normandy, surnamed the Conqueror, in his invasion of England, AD 1066, was Sir Fulco de Comerford, under whose azure banner, on which was emblazoned three mullets or, fought twenty men-at-arms, and four knights of his own kindred to aid William of Normandy in his invasion of England in 1066. After the conquest Sir Fulco received a grant of several lordships from William the Conqueror, and from him descended De Comerford [sic], of the county of Stafford, whose younger brother, Sir Henry, and his nephew, Sir Fulco de Comerford, came to Ireland in the rain of Prince John, son of King Henry II, in 1189. Fulco returned to England with the Earl of Montaigne; but Sir Henry remained in Ireland, and, marrying a sister of the powerful Hugo de Lacy, Governor of Ireland, became possessed of considerable property, and was ancestor of the Irish Comerfords; according to an ancient vellum Ms, “Hee was ane gudely knyghte, and ancesture of ye Comerfords, Barons of Dangeanmor”.’ [Blake-Forster, Irish Chieftains] (Dublin: McGlashran & Gill, 1872, p. 476, n. 68).
Henry Comerford inherited Ballykeel House, or Ballykeale House, near Ennistymon and Kilfenora, Co Clare, once the home of the Lysaght family, in 1839, and it passed from Henry Comerford to the Blake-Forster family in 1846 when his eldest daughter and co-heiress, Mary Josephine, married Captain Francis Blake-Forster, JP, of Castle Forster – the name the Blake-Forsters gave to the old French estate in the Doorus Demesne near Kinvara.
Francis and Mary Josephine (Comerford) Blake-Forster were the parents of Charles ffrench Blake-Forster, who became a prodigal but controversial journalist, writer, historical novelist, periodical writer and genealogist.
Forster House, Forster Street, Galway (Google Maps)
Charles Blake-Forster was born in Forster House, Forster Street, Galway, and was proud of his descent from the Comerford family and his long lineage traced through the Blake-Forster and ffrench families, and his grandmother was a sister of the last Warden of Galway, Edmund ffrench.
Francis Blake-Forster, of Ashfield and Knockmoy Abbey, Co Galway, was born at Raford, his grandfather’s home, in 1787. In 1810, he married the Hon Rose ffrench, daughter of Thomas Hamilton ffrench, 2nd Baron ffrench, of Castle ffrench, Co Galway.
Francis and Rose Blake-Forster were the parents of five children – two sons and three daughters. Their two sons were Captain Francis Blake-Forster, JP, of Forster House, Forster Street, Galway, and Ballykeale House, Co Clare, and Robert Blake-Forster of Ashfield.
In 1846, the elder son, Captain Francis Blake-Forster, JP, of Castle Forster, married Mary Josephine, eldest daughter and co-heiress of Henry Comerford, JP of Ballykeale House, Co Clare.
Their elder son, Charles ffrench Blake-Forster, was born in Forster House on Forster Street and was privately educated at home and later in England. On his return from England in his late teens, he began to play a prominent part in public affairs in Galway, and he began writing for local newspapers, including the Galway Vindicator and the Galway Express.
His only full-length published book was The Irish Chieftains, or, a struggle for the Crown, was published in 1872. In this book, he does not give his source for ‘an ancient vellum Ms’ that contained the family tree of the Comerfords and it has never been traced.
He became a town councillor in Galway, a member of the local Board of Guardians, and he was only 23 when he became High Sheriff of Galway in 1874. As High Sheriff of Galway Town, he presided at three Parliamentary elections in 1874.
Sadly, later that year he died of a brain haemorrhage, brought on by overwork, at his father’s house in Forster Street, Galway, on 9 September 1874. He was 23 and unmarried, and was buried in the family vault at Bushypark Church, on the Galway-Oughterard road.
On Thursday afternoon, I walked part of the length of Forster Street, but failed in my searches to find Forster Street House which stands at 48 Forster Street.
This large house was designed and built around 1850 by William Forster, and it occupies a prominent position overlooking Lough Atalia. I understand it is imposing and attractive house on one of the main approaches to the city centre.
Having failed, during this week’s visit, to find the house on Forster Street where Charles ffrench Blake-Forster was born in 1851, I headed back through the city to the Spanish Arch on the banks of the River Corrib.
Comerford House, beside the Spanish Arch in the heart of Galway (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
The Galway City Museum, behind the Spanish Arch, opened ten years ago in 2007. Until then, the City Museum had been housed in Comerford House, beside the Spanish Arch.
William JV Comerford was also a well-known local historian in Co Galway, and he believed his branch of the Comerford family was descended from the Comerford family of Inchiholohan, Co Kilkenny. His historical papers included: ‘Some notes on the Borough of Tuam and its records, 1817–1822,’ in the Journal of the Galway Archaeological and Historical Society. He was a founding member of the Old Tuam Society in 1942. He moved to Comerford House, beside the Spanish Arch, Galway, in the 1950s, but when he retired in the 1970s he moved to Dublin, where he died.
Comerford House was built beside the Spanish Arch around 1800. The best-known tenant of the Comerfords in this house was the sculptor Clare Sherridan, a cousin of both Sir Winston Churchill and Sir Shane Leslie. She is said to have had romantic interludes with Trotsky, Mussolini, Ataturk and even Charlie Chaplin, and after her conversion to Roman Catholicism she used one large room in the house as her private chapel.
The house as later donated to Galway Corporation and from 1976 to 2004 it housed Galway City Museum, before the museum moved to a new building.
Today, as I found it in 2010, Comerford House is still suffering sadly from neglect, crumbling and decaying, and in need of restoration. The square-headed door opening which is now closed up without any respect or dignity, has fluted flanking piers with plinths, one pier retaining a finial comprising acanthus leaves and barley-sugar cone.
Behind Comerford House and alongside it are the extensions to Galway’s old city walls, built in 1584. For many years, the Spanish Arch was known as the Blind Arch, and its present name is only a recent innovation, perhaps an attempt to enhance Galway’s romantic, Latin reputation.
Across the open space in front of the Spanish Arch and Comerford House stands a small monument dedicated to Christopher Columbus. Local lore claims Columbus visited Galway and that looking out to the Atlantic from this spot he was inspired to set out on the voyage that led to his discovery of America.
My voyage of discovery on Thursday afternoon was incomplete. I have to return.
Local lore claims that on a visit to Galway Christopher Columbus was inspired to set out on the voyage that led to his discovery of America (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
13 October 2017
Reflections at the
end of the day
on ‘A Song of Love’
‘Belov’d, since God loved us so much, we ought also to love one another’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
The conference in Galway is punctuated each day with prayer, at the beginning, in the middle of the day, and at the end of each working day.
Throughout each day of the conference, we are being challenged too to reflect on Scripture in the context of ministry and mission.
These two elements of prayer and Scripture study complement each other and come together in surprising ways.
As I come to the end of this day, this is a Canticle we prayed together at the closing worship yesterday. Our second Canticle, ‘A Song of Love,’ is based on I John 4: 7-11:
A Song of Love
1 Belov’d, let us love one another, for love is of God;
everyone who loves is born of God and knows God.
2 Whoever does not love does not know God,
for God is love.
3 In this the love of God was revealed among us,
that God sent his only Son into the world,
so that we might live through him.
4 In this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us
and sent his Son to be the expiation for our sins.
5 Belov’d, since God loved us so much,
we ought also to love one another.
6 For if we love one another, God abides in us,
and God’s love will be perfected in us.
– I John 4: 7-11
‘If we love one another, God abides in us’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
Patrick Comerford
The conference in Galway is punctuated each day with prayer, at the beginning, in the middle of the day, and at the end of each working day.
Throughout each day of the conference, we are being challenged too to reflect on Scripture in the context of ministry and mission.
These two elements of prayer and Scripture study complement each other and come together in surprising ways.
As I come to the end of this day, this is a Canticle we prayed together at the closing worship yesterday. Our second Canticle, ‘A Song of Love,’ is based on I John 4: 7-11:
A Song of Love
1 Belov’d, let us love one another, for love is of God;
everyone who loves is born of God and knows God.
2 Whoever does not love does not know God,
for God is love.
3 In this the love of God was revealed among us,
that God sent his only Son into the world,
so that we might live through him.
4 In this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us
and sent his Son to be the expiation for our sins.
5 Belov’d, since God loved us so much,
we ought also to love one another.
6 For if we love one another, God abides in us,
and God’s love will be perfected in us.
– I John 4: 7-11
‘If we love one another, God abides in us’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
Why would clergy
meet in a room
named after Herod?
The stairs leading up to the Tetrarch in the Ardilaun Hotel in Galway (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)
Patrick Comerford
The conference sessions in the Ardilaun Hotel in Galway this week are taking place in the Tetrarch Suite.
At first, some people were asking what the name meant. But others wanted to know whether the room was named after Herod the Tetrach. Who could imagine a group of priests and bishops meeting in a place named after Herod?
On the other hand, I am also familiar with the statue of the Four Tetrarchs at a corner of the facade of Saint Mark’s Basilica in Venice. Which of these four rulers could have given their name to a room in an hotel in the west of Ireland?
The statue of the Four Tetrarchs at a corner of the facade of Saint Mark’s Basilica in Venice
The term tetrarchy, from the Greek τετραρχία (tetrarchia), means the rule of or by four people,’ describes a form of government in which power is shared among four rulers.
Herod the Tetrarch should not be confused with Herod the Great. Saint Matthew and Saint Luke date the birth of Christ to the reign of Herod the Great (see Matthew 2: 1-12, 19; Luke 1: 5), who was the King of Judea and a large swathe of Palestine from 40 to 4 BC. It was he who tried to beguile the Magi on their way to Bethlehem, and he who ordered the slaughter of the innocent children.
But the other Gospel references to Herod are to Herod the Tetrarch. For example, Saint Luke sets the scene for the story of John the Baptist by recording that the events took place ‘In the fifteenth year of the reign of Emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was ruler [tetrarch] of Galilee, and his brother Philip [tetrarch] of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias ruler [tetrarch] of Abilene …’ (Luke 3: 1).
Herod the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea ruled from 4 BC to 39 AD. So, his father Herod the Great is blamed for the slaughter of the innocents, while Herod the Tetrarch is anti-hero in other Gospel passages.
On the other hand, Saint Mark portrays Herod as a somewhat fearful and conflicted ruler who is easily manipulated by others (see Mark 6: 14-29).
Saint Luke records how Herod arrests and beheads Saint John the Baptist (Luke 3: 20; 9: 9) for being an outspoken critic of the tetrarch. This Herod directs similar animosity toward Christ, whom he seeks to kill (Luke 13: 31). Finally, when he meets Christ in Jerusalem, Herod mocks him and dresses him up in royal attire before returning him to Pilate (Luke 23: 6-12).
The word tetrarch suggests four rulers, although Josephus only mentions three. So, who were the four tetrarchs?
Because of Judea’s status as a Roman client kingdom, when Herod the Great died in 4 BC his plans for succession had to be ratified by the Emperor Augustus, and his three heirs travelled to Rome to make their claims.
Antipas argued that he ought to inherit the whole kingdom, but the others argued that Herod’s final should be honoured.
Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus, however, had to content himself with the title of ethnarch rather than king, while Herod Antipas and Philip were tetrarchs in inheritance, and Herod’s sister Salome I ruled as Queen of Jamnia.
When Salome I died in 10 CE, her domain was incorporated into Judea. But other parts of the Herodian Tetrarchy continued to function under the Herodian dynasty, so that Philip the Tetrarch ruled Batanea, with Trachonitis, as well as Auranitis until 34 AD, while Herod Antipas ruled Galilee and Perea until 39 AD.
The term not only describes different governments, but also different systems of government.
Historically, the term refers especially to the system introduced by Roman Emperor Diocletian in 293. This tetrarchy lasted until 313, when conflicts within the empire eventually left Constantine in control of the western half of the empire, and Licinius in control of the eastern half. However, the term tetrarch was never used during the reign of Diocletian.
During the system introduced by Diocletian, the four tetrarchs were based not at Rome but in other cities closer to the frontiers with bordering rivals and barbarians.
These four centres, or the tetrarchic capitals, were:
● Nicomedia in north-west Asia Minor, which is modern Izmit in Turkey.
●Sirmium, which is modern Sremska Mitrovica in the Vojvodina region of Serbia, near Belgrade on the Danube border. This was the capital of Galerius, the eastern Caesar, and would become the Balkans-Danube prefecture of Illyricum.
● Mediolanum, which is modern Milan, was near the Alps and was the capital of Maximian, the western Augustus. His domain was known as Italia et Africa.
● Augusta Treverorum is modern Trier in Germany. This was the capital of Constantius Chlorus, the western Caesar, near the strategic Rhine border. It had been the capital of Gallic emperor Tetricus I, and this quarter became the prefecture Galliae.
But there was no precise division between the four tetrarchs, and during this period the Roman state was not split up into four distinct sub-empires. But later writers misunderstood the tetrarchic system and believed it involved a stricter division of territories between the four emperors.
But, after exploring the concept of tetrarchy, and distinguishing between Herod the Great and Herod the Tetrarch, I found the room in the Ardilaun Hotel where we are meeting was called after none of these figures from antiquity.
The house was originally built in the 1840s for the Persse family, and was originally known as Glenarde.
The Persse family claimed kinship with the powerful Percy family of Northumberland. They were descended from the Revd Robert Persse, who came to Ireland at the end of the 16th century and lived in Bodenstown, Co Kildare. The family survived the 1641 rebellion and his grandson, the Very Revd Dudley Persse, was Dean of Kilmacduagh and Archdeacon of Tuam.
Dudley Persse was granted an estate in Co Galway by Charles II in 1677. By the 19th century, his descendants held lands in Galway, Offaly, Kilkenny, Mayo and Roscommon.
By the 19th century too, family members were prominent in the commercial, maritime, political, social and sporting life of Galway. Prominent family members included Isabella Augusta Persse, Lady Gregory (1852-1932), dramatist and co-founder of the Abbey Theatre; Henry Stratford Persse (1838-1900) of Glenarde, manager of the distillery at Nun’s Island, Galway; his daughter Sarah Persse, the Irish suffragist; and Henry Seymour (‘Atty’) Persse (1869-1960), a champion trainer.
The Tetrarch (1911-1935) was one of the great thoroughbred racehorses owned by Atty Persse over 100 years ago, and has given his name to the Tetrarch Stakes at the Curragh. The Tetrarch was undefeated in a racing career of seven starts and was voted the best two-year-old of the 20th century.
With Steve Donoghue (1884-1945) in the saddle, the Tetrarch won all of his seven two-year-old races in 1914. But, because of doubts about his fitness, the Tetrarch was retired to Atty Persse’s cousin, Major Dermot McCalmot, and his stud in Mount Juliet, Co Kilkenny, where he sired many winners, including Tetramina, who in turn sired Mr Jinks, a maverick TD who was the only member of the Dail for the National League Party.
A notice outside the door of the conference room says Atty Persse remained convinced that the Tetrarch would never have been beaten over any distance such was his phenomenal speed.
The Tetrarch was sired by Roi Herode (France). His male line died out with the death of Kilmore, who won the Grand National in 1962. Undoubtedly his name referred to Herod’s abilitity to ‘kill more.’ So, indirectly, I suppose, the Tetrarch Suite owes its name to both King Herod and Herod the Tetrarch.
Patrick Comerford
The conference sessions in the Ardilaun Hotel in Galway this week are taking place in the Tetrarch Suite.
At first, some people were asking what the name meant. But others wanted to know whether the room was named after Herod the Tetrach. Who could imagine a group of priests and bishops meeting in a place named after Herod?
On the other hand, I am also familiar with the statue of the Four Tetrarchs at a corner of the facade of Saint Mark’s Basilica in Venice. Which of these four rulers could have given their name to a room in an hotel in the west of Ireland?
The statue of the Four Tetrarchs at a corner of the facade of Saint Mark’s Basilica in Venice
The term tetrarchy, from the Greek τετραρχία (tetrarchia), means the rule of or by four people,’ describes a form of government in which power is shared among four rulers.
Herod the Tetrarch should not be confused with Herod the Great. Saint Matthew and Saint Luke date the birth of Christ to the reign of Herod the Great (see Matthew 2: 1-12, 19; Luke 1: 5), who was the King of Judea and a large swathe of Palestine from 40 to 4 BC. It was he who tried to beguile the Magi on their way to Bethlehem, and he who ordered the slaughter of the innocent children.
But the other Gospel references to Herod are to Herod the Tetrarch. For example, Saint Luke sets the scene for the story of John the Baptist by recording that the events took place ‘In the fifteenth year of the reign of Emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was ruler [tetrarch] of Galilee, and his brother Philip [tetrarch] of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias ruler [tetrarch] of Abilene …’ (Luke 3: 1).
Herod the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea ruled from 4 BC to 39 AD. So, his father Herod the Great is blamed for the slaughter of the innocents, while Herod the Tetrarch is anti-hero in other Gospel passages.
On the other hand, Saint Mark portrays Herod as a somewhat fearful and conflicted ruler who is easily manipulated by others (see Mark 6: 14-29).
Saint Luke records how Herod arrests and beheads Saint John the Baptist (Luke 3: 20; 9: 9) for being an outspoken critic of the tetrarch. This Herod directs similar animosity toward Christ, whom he seeks to kill (Luke 13: 31). Finally, when he meets Christ in Jerusalem, Herod mocks him and dresses him up in royal attire before returning him to Pilate (Luke 23: 6-12).
The word tetrarch suggests four rulers, although Josephus only mentions three. So, who were the four tetrarchs?
Because of Judea’s status as a Roman client kingdom, when Herod the Great died in 4 BC his plans for succession had to be ratified by the Emperor Augustus, and his three heirs travelled to Rome to make their claims.
Antipas argued that he ought to inherit the whole kingdom, but the others argued that Herod’s final should be honoured.
Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus, however, had to content himself with the title of ethnarch rather than king, while Herod Antipas and Philip were tetrarchs in inheritance, and Herod’s sister Salome I ruled as Queen of Jamnia.
When Salome I died in 10 CE, her domain was incorporated into Judea. But other parts of the Herodian Tetrarchy continued to function under the Herodian dynasty, so that Philip the Tetrarch ruled Batanea, with Trachonitis, as well as Auranitis until 34 AD, while Herod Antipas ruled Galilee and Perea until 39 AD.
The term not only describes different governments, but also different systems of government.
Historically, the term refers especially to the system introduced by Roman Emperor Diocletian in 293. This tetrarchy lasted until 313, when conflicts within the empire eventually left Constantine in control of the western half of the empire, and Licinius in control of the eastern half. However, the term tetrarch was never used during the reign of Diocletian.
During the system introduced by Diocletian, the four tetrarchs were based not at Rome but in other cities closer to the frontiers with bordering rivals and barbarians.
These four centres, or the tetrarchic capitals, were:
● Nicomedia in north-west Asia Minor, which is modern Izmit in Turkey.
●Sirmium, which is modern Sremska Mitrovica in the Vojvodina region of Serbia, near Belgrade on the Danube border. This was the capital of Galerius, the eastern Caesar, and would become the Balkans-Danube prefecture of Illyricum.
● Mediolanum, which is modern Milan, was near the Alps and was the capital of Maximian, the western Augustus. His domain was known as Italia et Africa.
● Augusta Treverorum is modern Trier in Germany. This was the capital of Constantius Chlorus, the western Caesar, near the strategic Rhine border. It had been the capital of Gallic emperor Tetricus I, and this quarter became the prefecture Galliae.
But there was no precise division between the four tetrarchs, and during this period the Roman state was not split up into four distinct sub-empires. But later writers misunderstood the tetrarchic system and believed it involved a stricter division of territories between the four emperors.
But, after exploring the concept of tetrarchy, and distinguishing between Herod the Great and Herod the Tetrarch, I found the room in the Ardilaun Hotel where we are meeting was called after none of these figures from antiquity.
The house was originally built in the 1840s for the Persse family, and was originally known as Glenarde.
The Persse family claimed kinship with the powerful Percy family of Northumberland. They were descended from the Revd Robert Persse, who came to Ireland at the end of the 16th century and lived in Bodenstown, Co Kildare. The family survived the 1641 rebellion and his grandson, the Very Revd Dudley Persse, was Dean of Kilmacduagh and Archdeacon of Tuam.
Dudley Persse was granted an estate in Co Galway by Charles II in 1677. By the 19th century, his descendants held lands in Galway, Offaly, Kilkenny, Mayo and Roscommon.
By the 19th century too, family members were prominent in the commercial, maritime, political, social and sporting life of Galway. Prominent family members included Isabella Augusta Persse, Lady Gregory (1852-1932), dramatist and co-founder of the Abbey Theatre; Henry Stratford Persse (1838-1900) of Glenarde, manager of the distillery at Nun’s Island, Galway; his daughter Sarah Persse, the Irish suffragist; and Henry Seymour (‘Atty’) Persse (1869-1960), a champion trainer.
The Tetrarch (1911-1935) was one of the great thoroughbred racehorses owned by Atty Persse over 100 years ago, and has given his name to the Tetrarch Stakes at the Curragh. The Tetrarch was undefeated in a racing career of seven starts and was voted the best two-year-old of the 20th century.
With Steve Donoghue (1884-1945) in the saddle, the Tetrarch won all of his seven two-year-old races in 1914. But, because of doubts about his fitness, the Tetrarch was retired to Atty Persse’s cousin, Major Dermot McCalmot, and his stud in Mount Juliet, Co Kilkenny, where he sired many winners, including Tetramina, who in turn sired Mr Jinks, a maverick TD who was the only member of the Dail for the National League Party.
A notice outside the door of the conference room says Atty Persse remained convinced that the Tetrarch would never have been beaten over any distance such was his phenomenal speed.
The Tetrarch was sired by Roi Herode (France). His male line died out with the death of Kilmore, who won the Grand National in 1962. Undoubtedly his name referred to Herod’s abilitity to ‘kill more.’ So, indirectly, I suppose, the Tetrarch Suite owes its name to both King Herod and Herod the Tetrarch.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)