Waiting for the banquet at sunset on the beach in Rethymnon in Crete … in the Kingdom of God, ‘the best is yet to come.’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
Sunday, 20 January 2019
The Second Sunday after the Epiphany
9.30 a.m.: Morning Prayer, Saint Mary’s Church, Askeaton, Co Limerick.
11.30 a.m.: The Parish Eucharist, Saint Brendan’s Church, Kilnaughtin (Tarbert), Co Kerry.
Readings: Isaiah 62: 1-5; Psalm 36: 5-10; I Corinthians 12: 1-11; John 2: 1-11.
Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim (John 2: 7) … two large jars or pithoi at the Minoan palace in Knossos, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
May I speak to you in the name of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
This morning, our readings continue the great themes of Epiphany, exploring those moments of sudden and striking realisation that in Christ God is present among us on earth, in our daily lives.
Over the past few Sundays, we have heard two of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Visit of the Magi (Matthew 2: 1-12, 6 January 2019, The Epiphany);
● The Baptism of Christ (Luke 3: 17-17, 21-22, 13 February 2019, the First Sunday after Epiphany);
Now, this morning, we hear the third of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Wedding at Cana (John 2: 1-11).
In each of these three events, Christ is manifest as God-incarnate at a point that marks the beginning of his ministry or his presence among us. It is the moment when we are caught off guard as we realise that this seemingly helpless new-born child, or this one among many in the stream of visitors to Saint John the Baptist at the River Jordan, or this anonymous guest who is one among many at a small-town wedding, is in fact the omnipotent God, the one through all things are made, the King and Ruler of the universe.
There are many reasons why I enjoy returning to his morning’s Gospel reading again and again.
It is one of my favourite passages for weddings, because it talks about how families are made and shaped, and asks us to think again about how we cannot shape or control our own families. We cannot decide or control who is going to be an uncle or aunt by marriage to our children or grandchildren. And if we cannot control relationships like that, then, in the same way, we should rejoice in diversity, variety and pluralism in the Church and in Society.
I find too that this passage is a good reminder that Christ is truly God and truly human. Chapter 1 of Saint John’s Gospel introduces us to a new creation, a new creation that is in Christ. Then, there are six days in this new creation, and this reading brings us to Day Seven.
What did God do on the Seventh Day in the creation story? God rested. And now that we have arrived at Day Seven in the Saint John’s Gospel, we come to the Day that Christ rests with his disciples, and to a foretaste of the Heavenly Banquet, which is the completion of God’s creation.
‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb’ (Revelation 19: 9).
Christ rests as God on the seventh day, and Christ rests in a very human way on the seventh day: an Epiphany experience in the truest sense.
This is also the story of the first of the Seven Signs in Saint John’s Gospel, and the first of the seven signs comes on the seventh of the seven days that introduce the Gospel.
But there is another way in which this Gospel story should reach our emotions and into our hearts.
While Christ is at the wedding in Cana with his disciples, the hosts run out of wine. The mother of Jesus tells him: ‘They have no more wine.’ And Jesus replies: ‘Dear woman, why do you involve me? My time has not yet come.’
His mother then says to the servants: ‘Do whatever he tells you.’
Jesus orders the servants to fill the empty containers with water and to draw out some and take it to the chief waiter. After tasting the water that had become wine, and not knowing what Christ has done, he remarks to the bridegroom that he has departed from the custom of serving the best wine first by serving it last.
This miracle is not mentioned in any of the other three Gospels, although it has parallels with the parable of the New Wine and Old Wineskins.
In the Old Testament, we read promises that there will be an abundance of wine in the time of the Messiah (Genesis 27: 27-28; 49: 10-12; Amos 9: 13-14), especially at the wedding feasts (see Isaiah 62: 4-5). The wine in this story represents the overflowing and abundant blessings of God coming to fruition.
The wine gives out.
Why do you think this happens?
Because everyone has had too much to drink?
Because the groom, as he ought to in that tradition, did not buy in enough wine?
Or, because the groom had bought enough wine, but someone was siphoning it off, hoping everyone would be too drunk to notice?
Embarrassing, yes. But for whom?
Certainly, for Mary, she takes action immediately. You can just picture her as the concerned aunt, like so many aunts at a wedding, not wanting her nephew and his new wife, or her niece and her new husband, to be embarrassed.
Did you notice that Mary does not make a request here? She simply observes or passes comment on a matter of fact in her conversation with her son. They have no wine. She is not asking for a miracle.
She accepts whatever her Son may say, even if it is not going to turn out to be what she expected.
What did she expect?
What did she know at this stage?
What did she think her Son could say or would do?
But, whatever about Mary’s embarrassment, this is not an embarrassing moment for Jesus.
And not for the servants either. They seem to have done just what they were told to do.
Jesus says his time, his ‘hour has not yet come’ (verse 4).
So, why does he seem to change his mind, and do something that means that this wedding is not going to crash into disaster?
Wine fraud is one of the oldest frauds in the world. Perhaps the finger of suspicion points at the chief steward, the master of the feast.
He has not been paying attention to what has been going on. At best, he has been negligent, at worst he was complicit, perhaps even the organiser.
Have the newly-wed couple and their guests, and their servants too, been the victims of a smart con trick by the chief steward?
Is he inefficient?
Does he not realise what is going on?
Did he not buy all the wine that he had charged up to the couple getting married or their parents?
Has he, perhaps, been siphoning off the wine?
He is certainly not a model of probity as a wedding planner. Perhaps he is avoiding some potentially tough questions when he claims dismissively: ‘Everyone serves the good wine first.’
We know this is not so. At some dinners, people may mark the end of the celebrations with a good port. At weddings, we often hold off on serving the good wine, so that the champagne is there to toast the bride and groom later on.
Why do you think the servants obeyed Mary and then obeyed Jesus?
And why was the steward not in control of what was going on at this stage?
Was he hiding in embarrassment?
Had he headed off to buy some more wine?
The steward never even asks where this good wine comes from. He just accepts that it is there. Perhaps he suspects he has been caught out.
The steward shifts responsibility to the bridegroom. But the truth is that the good wine has been kept until now. Now the best of God’s promises are about to be fulfilled.
The six stone jars contain water for rites of purification. They are ceremonial rites, not hygienic rites – they are not drinking water, but more like the waters of Baptism. Each jar contained 20 or 30 gallons, so we are talking about 180 gallons of wine – roughly speaking, in today’s terms, 1,091 bottles of wine. And because the wine was so good (see 9-10) in those days, it had to have water added to it, so this may have doubled the amount –perhaps up to 1,500 or 2,000 bottles of wine by today’s reckoning. It was enough to ensure they partied for days … and weddings in the Eastern Mediterranean do go on for days.
The Wedding at Cana, the Epiphany cycle of stories, the promises contained in the stories that compare wedding banquets with the Kingdom of God, all let us know that in God’s plans, in Christ’s hope, for ‘the little people’ who feel cheated and marginalised, ‘the best is yet to come.’
This is not just after the seventh day in a new creation, but we are told that in another cycle it has become the third day.
Anyone listening to this Gospel soon after it was written would immediately associate the third day with the Resurrection.
And the good news is that on third day Christ is Risen, that we are all invited to the banquet.
So, what are we to take away from this morning’s Gospel story?
1, The Christ revealed to us at Epiphany time is truly human and truly divine.
2, In Christ there is a new creation – the best is yet to come.
3, In our obedience to Christ we find that he takes away all our embarrassments – if you like, he saves us from all that is sinful.
4, God’s generosity to us in Christ is over-generous, God’s love for us in Christ is over-abundant, God’s goodness to us is the best, is beyond measure, is beyond our imagination.
5, God in Christ calls us all to join him in the waters of baptism and to feast with him at the Heavenly Banquet.
And so may all we think, say and do be to the praise, honour and glory of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
Empty tables waiting for the wedding banquet … in the third of the great themes of Epiphany, the wedding feast is the royal banquet (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
John 2: 1-11 (NRSVA):
1 On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2 Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, ‘They have no wine.’ 4 And Jesus said to her, ‘Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come.’ 5 His mother said to the servants, ‘Do whatever he tells you.’ 6 Now standing there were six stone water-jars for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. 7 Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim. 8 He said to them, ‘Now draw some out, and take it to the chief steward.’ So they took it. 9 When the steward tasted the water that had become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward called the bridegroom 10 and said to him, ‘Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good wine until now.’ 11 Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.
‘On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee’ (John 2: 1) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Liturgical Colour: White
The Penitential Kyries:
God be merciful to us and bless us,
and make his face to shine on us.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
May your ways be known on earth,
your saving power to all nations.
Christ, have mercy.
Christ, have mercy.
You, Lord, have made known your salvation,
and reveal your justice in the sight of the nations.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
in Christ you make all things new:
Transform the poverty of our nature
by the riches of your grace,
and in the renewal of our lives
make known your heavenly glory;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Introduction to the Peace:
Our Saviour Christ is the Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of his government and of peace
there shall be no end. (cf Isaiah 9: 6, 7)
Preface:
For Jesus Christ our Lord
who in human likeness revealed your glory,
to bring us out of darkness
into the splendour of his light:
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God of glory,
you nourish us with bread from heaven.
Fill us with your Holy Spirit
that through us the light of your glory
may shine in all the world.
We ask this in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.
The Blessing:
Christ the Son be manifest to you,
that your lives may be a light to the world:
Finding good wine to serve at the end of the meal (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Hymns:
553, Jesu, love of my soul (CD 32)
52, Christ whose glory fills the skies (CD 4)
445, Soul, array thyself with gladness (CD 26)
The Wedding at Cana … a modern icon
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
20 January 2019
‘Everyone serves the good
wine first’ … or do they?
‘On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee’ (John 2: 1) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
Sunday, 20 January 2019
The Second Sunday after the Epiphany
9.30 a.m.: Morning Prayer, Saint Mary’s Church, Askeaton, Co Limerick.
Readings: Isaiah 62: 1-5; Psalm 36: 5-10; I Corinthians 12: 1-11; John 2: 1-11.
Waiting for the banquet at sunset on the beach in Rethymnon in Crete … in the Kingdom of God, ‘the best is yet to come.’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
May I speak to you in the name of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
This morning, our readings continue the great themes of Epiphany, exploring those moments of sudden and striking realisation that in Christ God is present among us on earth, in our daily lives.
Over the past few Sundays, we have heard two of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Visit of the Magi (Matthew 2: 1-12, 6 January 2019, The Epiphany);
● The Baptism of Christ (Luke 3: 17-17, 21-22, 13 February 2019, the First Sunday after Epiphany);
Now, this morning, we hear the third of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Wedding at Cana (John 2: 1-11).
In each of these three events, Christ is manifest as God-incarnate at a point that marks the beginning of his ministry or his presence among us. It is the moment when we are caught off guard as we realise that this seemingly helpless new-born child, or this one among many in the stream of visitors to Saint John the Baptist at the River Jordan, or this anonymous guest who is one among many at a small-town wedding, is in fact the omnipotent God, the one through all things are made, the King and Ruler of the universe.
There are many reasons why I enjoy returning to his morning’s Gospel reading again and again.
It is one of my favourite passages for weddings, because it talks about how families are made and shaped, and asks us to think again about how we cannot shape or control our own families. We cannot decide or control who is going to be an uncle or aunt by marriage to our children or grandchildren. And if we cannot control relationships like that, then, in the same way, we should rejoice in diversity, variety and pluralism in the Church and in Society.
I find too that this passage is a good reminder that Christ is truly God and truly human. Chapter 1 of Saint John’s Gospel introduces us to a new creation, a new creation that is in Christ. Then, there are six days in this new creation, and this reading brings us to Day Seven.
What did God do on the Seventh Day in the creation story? God rested. And now that we have arrived at Day Seven in the Saint John’s Gospel, we come to the Day that Christ rests with his disciples, and to a foretaste of the Heavenly Banquet, which is the completion of God’s creation.
‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb’ (Revelation 19: 9).
Christ rests as God on the seventh day, and Christ rests in a very human way on the seventh day: an Epiphany experience in the truest sense.
This is also the story of the first of the Seven Signs in Saint John’s Gospel, and the first of the seven signs comes on the seventh of the seven days that introduce the Gospel.
But there is another way in which this Gospel story should reach our emotions and into our hearts.
While Christ is at the wedding in Cana with his disciples, the hosts run out of wine. The mother of Jesus tells him: ‘They have no more wine.’ And Jesus replies: ‘Dear woman, why do you involve me? My time has not yet come.’
His mother then says to the servants: ‘Do whatever he tells you.’
Jesus orders the servants to fill the empty containers with water and to draw out some and take it to the chief waiter. After tasting the water that had become wine, and not knowing what Christ has done, he remarks to the bridegroom that he has departed from the custom of serving the best wine first by serving it last.
This miracle is not mentioned in any of the other three Gospels, although it has parallels with the parable of the New Wine and Old Wineskins.
In the Old Testament, we read promises that there will be an abundance of wine in the time of the Messiah (Genesis 27: 27-28; 49: 10-12; Amos 9: 13-14), especially at the wedding feasts (see Isaiah 62: 4-5). The wine in this story represents the overflowing and abundant blessings of God coming to fruition.
The wine gives out.
Why do you think this happens?
Because everyone has had too much to drink?
Because the groom, as he ought to in that tradition, did not buy in enough wine?
Or, because the groom had bought enough wine, but someone was siphoning it off, hoping everyone would be too drunk to notice?
Embarrassing, yes. But for whom?
Certainly, for Mary, she takes action immediately. You can just picture her as the concerned aunt, like so many aunts at a wedding, not wanting her nephew and his new wife, or her niece and her new husband, to be embarrassed.
Did you notice that Mary does not make a request here? She simply observes or passes comment on a matter of fact in her conversation with her son. They have no wine. She is not asking for a miracle.
She accepts whatever her Son may say, even if it is not going to turn out to be what she expected.
What did she expect?
What did she know at this stage?
What did she think her Son could say or would do?
But, whatever about Mary’s embarrassment, this is not an embarrassing moment for Jesus.
And not for the servants either. They seem to have done just what they were told to do.
Jesus says his time, his ‘hour has not yet come’ (verse 4).
So, why does he seem to change his mind, and do something that means that this wedding is not going to crash into disaster?
Wine fraud is one of the oldest frauds in the world. Perhaps the finger of suspicion points at the chief steward, the master of the feast.
He has not been paying attention to what has been going on. At best, he has been negligent, at worst he was complicit, perhaps even the organiser.
Have the newly-wed couple and their guests, and their servants too, been the victims of a smart con trick by the chief steward?
Is he inefficient?
Does he not realise what is going on?
Did he not buy all the wine that he had charged up to the couple getting married or their parents?
Has he, perhaps, been siphoning off the wine?
He is certainly not a model of probity as a wedding planner. Perhaps he is avoiding some potentially tough questions when he claims dismissively: ‘Everyone serves the good wine first.’
We know this is not so. At some dinners, people may mark the end of the celebrations with a good port. At weddings, we often hold off on serving the good wine, so that the champagne is there to toast the bride and groom later on.
Why do you think the servants obeyed Mary and then obeyed Jesus?
And why was the steward not in control of what was going on at this stage?
Was he hiding in embarrassment?
Had he headed off to buy some more wine?
The steward never even asks where this good wine comes from. He just accepts that it is there. Perhaps he suspects he has been caught out.
The steward shifts responsibility to the bridegroom. But the truth is that the good wine has been kept until now. Now the best of God’s promises are about to be fulfilled.
The six stone jars contain water for rites of purification. They are ceremonial rites, not hygienic rites – they are not drinking water, but more like the waters of Baptism. Each jar contained 20 or 30 gallons, so we are talking about 180 gallons of wine – roughly speaking, in today’s terms, 1,091 bottles of wine. And because the wine was so good (see 9-10) in those days, it had to have water added to it, so this may have doubled the amount –perhaps up to 1,500 or 2,000 bottles of wine by today’s reckoning. It was enough to ensure they partied for days … and weddings in the Eastern Mediterranean do go on for days.
The Wedding at Cana, the Epiphany cycle of stories, the promises contained in the stories that compare wedding banquets with the Kingdom of God, all let us know that in God’s plans, in Christ’s hope, for ‘the little people’ who feel cheated and marginalised, ‘the best is yet to come.’
This is not just after the seventh day in a new creation, but we are told that in another cycle it has become the third day.
Anyone listening to this Gospel soon after it was written would immediately associate the third day with the Resurrection.
And the good news is that on third day Christ is Risen, that we are all invited to the banquet.
So, what are we to take away from this morning’s Gospel story?
1, The Christ revealed to us at Epiphany time is truly human and truly divine.
2, In Christ there is a new creation – the best is yet to come.
3, In our obedience to Christ we find that he takes away all our embarrassments – if you like, he saves us from all that is sinful.
4, God’s generosity to us in Christ is over-generous, God’s love for us in Christ is over-abundant, God’s goodness to us is the best, is beyond measure, is beyond our imagination.
5, God in Christ calls us all to join him in the waters of baptism and to feast with him at the Heavenly Banquet.
And so may all we think, say and do be to the praise, honour and glory of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
Empty tables waiting for the wedding banquet … in the third of the great themes of Epiphany, the wedding feast is the royal banquet (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
John 2: 1-11 (NRSVA):
1 On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2 Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, ‘They have no wine.’ 4 And Jesus said to her, ‘Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come.’ 5 His mother said to the servants, ‘Do whatever he tells you.’ 6 Now standing there were six stone water-jars for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. 7 Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim. 8 He said to them, ‘Now draw some out, and take it to the chief steward.’ So they took it. 9 When the steward tasted the water that had become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward called the bridegroom 10 and said to him, ‘Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good wine until now.’ 11 Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.
Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim (John 2: 7) … two large jars or pithoi at the Minoan palace in Knossos, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Liturgical Colour: White
The Penitential Kyries:
God be merciful to us and bless us,
and make his face to shine on us.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
May your ways be known on earth,
your saving power to all nations.
Christ, have mercy.
Christ, have mercy.
You, Lord, have made known your salvation,
and reveal your justice in the sight of the nations.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
in Christ you make all things new:
Transform the poverty of our nature
by the riches of your grace,
and in the renewal of our lives
make known your heavenly glory;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Introduction to the Peace:
Our Saviour Christ is the Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of his government and of peace
there shall be no end. (cf Isaiah 9: 6, 7)
The Blessing:
Christ the Son be manifest to you,
that your lives may be a light to the world:
Finding good wine to serve at the end of the meal (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Hymns:
553, Jesu, love of my soul (CD 32)
52, Christ whose glory fills the skies (CD 4)
445, Soul, array thyself with gladness (CD 26)
The Wedding at Cana … a modern icon
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
Sunday, 20 January 2019
The Second Sunday after the Epiphany
9.30 a.m.: Morning Prayer, Saint Mary’s Church, Askeaton, Co Limerick.
Readings: Isaiah 62: 1-5; Psalm 36: 5-10; I Corinthians 12: 1-11; John 2: 1-11.
Waiting for the banquet at sunset on the beach in Rethymnon in Crete … in the Kingdom of God, ‘the best is yet to come.’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
May I speak to you in the name of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
This morning, our readings continue the great themes of Epiphany, exploring those moments of sudden and striking realisation that in Christ God is present among us on earth, in our daily lives.
Over the past few Sundays, we have heard two of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Visit of the Magi (Matthew 2: 1-12, 6 January 2019, The Epiphany);
● The Baptism of Christ (Luke 3: 17-17, 21-22, 13 February 2019, the First Sunday after Epiphany);
Now, this morning, we hear the third of the three great Epiphany stories:
● The Wedding at Cana (John 2: 1-11).
In each of these three events, Christ is manifest as God-incarnate at a point that marks the beginning of his ministry or his presence among us. It is the moment when we are caught off guard as we realise that this seemingly helpless new-born child, or this one among many in the stream of visitors to Saint John the Baptist at the River Jordan, or this anonymous guest who is one among many at a small-town wedding, is in fact the omnipotent God, the one through all things are made, the King and Ruler of the universe.
There are many reasons why I enjoy returning to his morning’s Gospel reading again and again.
It is one of my favourite passages for weddings, because it talks about how families are made and shaped, and asks us to think again about how we cannot shape or control our own families. We cannot decide or control who is going to be an uncle or aunt by marriage to our children or grandchildren. And if we cannot control relationships like that, then, in the same way, we should rejoice in diversity, variety and pluralism in the Church and in Society.
I find too that this passage is a good reminder that Christ is truly God and truly human. Chapter 1 of Saint John’s Gospel introduces us to a new creation, a new creation that is in Christ. Then, there are six days in this new creation, and this reading brings us to Day Seven.
What did God do on the Seventh Day in the creation story? God rested. And now that we have arrived at Day Seven in the Saint John’s Gospel, we come to the Day that Christ rests with his disciples, and to a foretaste of the Heavenly Banquet, which is the completion of God’s creation.
‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb’ (Revelation 19: 9).
Christ rests as God on the seventh day, and Christ rests in a very human way on the seventh day: an Epiphany experience in the truest sense.
This is also the story of the first of the Seven Signs in Saint John’s Gospel, and the first of the seven signs comes on the seventh of the seven days that introduce the Gospel.
But there is another way in which this Gospel story should reach our emotions and into our hearts.
While Christ is at the wedding in Cana with his disciples, the hosts run out of wine. The mother of Jesus tells him: ‘They have no more wine.’ And Jesus replies: ‘Dear woman, why do you involve me? My time has not yet come.’
His mother then says to the servants: ‘Do whatever he tells you.’
Jesus orders the servants to fill the empty containers with water and to draw out some and take it to the chief waiter. After tasting the water that had become wine, and not knowing what Christ has done, he remarks to the bridegroom that he has departed from the custom of serving the best wine first by serving it last.
This miracle is not mentioned in any of the other three Gospels, although it has parallels with the parable of the New Wine and Old Wineskins.
In the Old Testament, we read promises that there will be an abundance of wine in the time of the Messiah (Genesis 27: 27-28; 49: 10-12; Amos 9: 13-14), especially at the wedding feasts (see Isaiah 62: 4-5). The wine in this story represents the overflowing and abundant blessings of God coming to fruition.
The wine gives out.
Why do you think this happens?
Because everyone has had too much to drink?
Because the groom, as he ought to in that tradition, did not buy in enough wine?
Or, because the groom had bought enough wine, but someone was siphoning it off, hoping everyone would be too drunk to notice?
Embarrassing, yes. But for whom?
Certainly, for Mary, she takes action immediately. You can just picture her as the concerned aunt, like so many aunts at a wedding, not wanting her nephew and his new wife, or her niece and her new husband, to be embarrassed.
Did you notice that Mary does not make a request here? She simply observes or passes comment on a matter of fact in her conversation with her son. They have no wine. She is not asking for a miracle.
She accepts whatever her Son may say, even if it is not going to turn out to be what she expected.
What did she expect?
What did she know at this stage?
What did she think her Son could say or would do?
But, whatever about Mary’s embarrassment, this is not an embarrassing moment for Jesus.
And not for the servants either. They seem to have done just what they were told to do.
Jesus says his time, his ‘hour has not yet come’ (verse 4).
So, why does he seem to change his mind, and do something that means that this wedding is not going to crash into disaster?
Wine fraud is one of the oldest frauds in the world. Perhaps the finger of suspicion points at the chief steward, the master of the feast.
He has not been paying attention to what has been going on. At best, he has been negligent, at worst he was complicit, perhaps even the organiser.
Have the newly-wed couple and their guests, and their servants too, been the victims of a smart con trick by the chief steward?
Is he inefficient?
Does he not realise what is going on?
Did he not buy all the wine that he had charged up to the couple getting married or their parents?
Has he, perhaps, been siphoning off the wine?
He is certainly not a model of probity as a wedding planner. Perhaps he is avoiding some potentially tough questions when he claims dismissively: ‘Everyone serves the good wine first.’
We know this is not so. At some dinners, people may mark the end of the celebrations with a good port. At weddings, we often hold off on serving the good wine, so that the champagne is there to toast the bride and groom later on.
Why do you think the servants obeyed Mary and then obeyed Jesus?
And why was the steward not in control of what was going on at this stage?
Was he hiding in embarrassment?
Had he headed off to buy some more wine?
The steward never even asks where this good wine comes from. He just accepts that it is there. Perhaps he suspects he has been caught out.
The steward shifts responsibility to the bridegroom. But the truth is that the good wine has been kept until now. Now the best of God’s promises are about to be fulfilled.
The six stone jars contain water for rites of purification. They are ceremonial rites, not hygienic rites – they are not drinking water, but more like the waters of Baptism. Each jar contained 20 or 30 gallons, so we are talking about 180 gallons of wine – roughly speaking, in today’s terms, 1,091 bottles of wine. And because the wine was so good (see 9-10) in those days, it had to have water added to it, so this may have doubled the amount –perhaps up to 1,500 or 2,000 bottles of wine by today’s reckoning. It was enough to ensure they partied for days … and weddings in the Eastern Mediterranean do go on for days.
The Wedding at Cana, the Epiphany cycle of stories, the promises contained in the stories that compare wedding banquets with the Kingdom of God, all let us know that in God’s plans, in Christ’s hope, for ‘the little people’ who feel cheated and marginalised, ‘the best is yet to come.’
This is not just after the seventh day in a new creation, but we are told that in another cycle it has become the third day.
Anyone listening to this Gospel soon after it was written would immediately associate the third day with the Resurrection.
And the good news is that on third day Christ is Risen, that we are all invited to the banquet.
So, what are we to take away from this morning’s Gospel story?
1, The Christ revealed to us at Epiphany time is truly human and truly divine.
2, In Christ there is a new creation – the best is yet to come.
3, In our obedience to Christ we find that he takes away all our embarrassments – if you like, he saves us from all that is sinful.
4, God’s generosity to us in Christ is over-generous, God’s love for us in Christ is over-abundant, God’s goodness to us is the best, is beyond measure, is beyond our imagination.
5, God in Christ calls us all to join him in the waters of baptism and to feast with him at the Heavenly Banquet.
And so may all we think, say and do be to the praise, honour and glory of God, + Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Amen.
Empty tables waiting for the wedding banquet … in the third of the great themes of Epiphany, the wedding feast is the royal banquet (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
John 2: 1-11 (NRSVA):
1 On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2 Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, ‘They have no wine.’ 4 And Jesus said to her, ‘Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come.’ 5 His mother said to the servants, ‘Do whatever he tells you.’ 6 Now standing there were six stone water-jars for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. 7 Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim. 8 He said to them, ‘Now draw some out, and take it to the chief steward.’ So they took it. 9 When the steward tasted the water that had become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward called the bridegroom 10 and said to him, ‘Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good wine until now.’ 11 Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.
Jesus said to them, ‘Fill the jars with water.’ And they filled them up to the brim (John 2: 7) … two large jars or pithoi at the Minoan palace in Knossos, Crete (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Liturgical Colour: White
The Penitential Kyries:
God be merciful to us and bless us,
and make his face to shine on us.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
May your ways be known on earth,
your saving power to all nations.
Christ, have mercy.
Christ, have mercy.
You, Lord, have made known your salvation,
and reveal your justice in the sight of the nations.
Lord, have mercy.
Lord, have mercy.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
in Christ you make all things new:
Transform the poverty of our nature
by the riches of your grace,
and in the renewal of our lives
make known your heavenly glory;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Introduction to the Peace:
Our Saviour Christ is the Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of his government and of peace
there shall be no end. (cf Isaiah 9: 6, 7)
The Blessing:
Christ the Son be manifest to you,
that your lives may be a light to the world:
Finding good wine to serve at the end of the meal (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Hymns:
553, Jesu, love of my soul (CD 32)
52, Christ whose glory fills the skies (CD 4)
445, Soul, array thyself with gladness (CD 26)
The Wedding at Cana … a modern icon
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Saint John’s, a lost mediaeval
church, and the once forgotten
grave of John Redmond
The site of the mediaeval Saint John’s Church is behind the white-washed wall on the corner of Lower John Street and John’s Gate Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019; click on image for full-screen resolution)
Patrick Comerford
Saint John’s graveyard or cemetery is located on the corner of Lower John Street and John’s Gate Street, behind a lime-washed perimeter wall with rendered coping. The entrance is from Lower John Street, and Wexford Council maintains the cemetery. However, I found when I visited on yesterday afternoon [18 January 2019] that because of the fragile condition of the cemetery, it is still kept locked, as it has been for many decades.
This graveyard is an important element in the church history and heritage of the Diocese of Ferns and of Co Wexford. This Church stood outside the walls of Wexxford town, on the corner of John Street and John’s Gate Street in the present cemetery, but its ruins have long since disappeared.
Although no church ruins survive, this extensive graveyard occupies the site of the mediaeval Church and Hospital of Saint John, founded in the early 13th century by William Marshall, the builder of Tintern Abbey, Co Wexford. It was given to the Knights of Saint John by his son, the younger William Marshall.
Mediaeval Wexford once boasted 20 churches, but Saint John’s was the only church in the town with a steeple.
A presentment of a Jury of Wexford town and Corporation made in October 1537 found that, ‘On ye 20th day of March 1532, ye Suffreign and Comyns of ye Town of Wexford kept fyre to the doore of ye steeple of St. John’s for to let out a thyef that made escape of ye towne gaole.’
At the dissolution of the monastic houses at the Reformation, Saint John’s was suppressed and the site was granted in perpetuity to laymen. The church was demolished and its stones were used as building material.
Saint John’s Church graveyard has a large collection of gravestones from 1723 and 1932 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
The graveyard has a collection of gravestones recording deaths between 1723 and 1932, and at least one marker is signed by James Byrne of Clone, an example of the Irish churchyard sculpture tradition in Co Wexford.
The most important graves and tombs in Saint John’s Cemetery are those of the Talbot and Redmond families.
The most prominent mausoleum was erected in 1828 on a rectangular plan. It is made of cut-granite, with a stepped roof, and has cast-iron fleche or ‘spirelet’ pinnacles at the corners, granite ashlar walls, a cut-granite plinth, cut-granite monolithic piers at the corners, and a beaded cornice on a blind frieze.
The Tudor-headed door opening is between paired clustered colonettes with a cut-granite step threshold, and a cut-granite flush block-and-start surround with chamfered reveals framing the cast-iron panelled double doors that have a quatrefoil-perforated overpanel.
The Talbot and Redmond mausoleum is an important part of the early 19th-century heritage of Wexford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
This mausoleum is an important part of the early 19th-century heritage of Wexford. It was erected by John Hyacinth Talbot (1794-1868) after the death of his wife, Anne Eliza (née Redmond) (1799-1826). They were married in 1822 and she died in childbirth.
The mausoleum Talbot built for his wife is the one in which members of the Redmond political dynasty are buried too, including John Edward Redmond MP (1806-1865) of The Deeps; John Edward Redmond MP (1856-1918), chairman of the Parnellite Minority and Chairman of the Irish Parliamentary Party; and his son, Captain William Archer Redmond MP (1886-1932), who fought in World War I.
Towards the end of the 1700s, the Redmond family became involved in trade, commerce and shipping. John Edward Redmond was a liberal MP for Wexford Town from 1859 until he died in 1865. Through his influence, the railway was brought to Wexford, he developed Wexford harbour and the docks and he was responsible for the reclamation of 5,000 acres of Wexford harbour now called the slob lands.
The monument in Redmond Square to his memory is inscribed with his last words: ‘My heart is in the town of Wexford, nothing can extinguish that love but the cold sod of the grave.’
His nephews, John and Willie Redmond, grew up in Ballytrent House, near Rosslare. John Redmond was born on 1 September 1856 in Kilrane, Co Wexford. He was an MP first for New Ross (1881-1885), and then for North Wexford (1885-1891). He became the main ally and supporter of Charles Stewart Parnell, and after Parnell died in 1891 Redmond became the leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party.
Redmond remained in Parliament as the MP for Waterford City (1891-1918). In 1910, after two general elections, HH Asquith and the Liberals needed Irish support to secure the Parliament Act of 1911. Redmond’s support was won in return for the (third) Home Rule Bill introduced in 1912, and Redmond secured Home Rule in 1914.
However, his victory was side-lined with the outbreak of World War I later that year, and the Irish Volunteers soon split between those who enlisted in the army and those who supported the Irish rebellion.
During the Irish Convention on Home Rule, John Redmond died in London on 6 March 1918 from heart failure after an operation to remove an intestinal obstruction. His last words were, ‘Father, I am a broken-hearted man.’ He was 61.
Fearing street protests, Redmond’s friends and family took his body from Kingstown Harbour (Dun Laoghaire) and placed it on a special train to Wexford town. The people of Wexford turned out in their tens of thousands for his funeral in Wexford town. The bells of ever church in the town tolled simultaneously, every shop was closed, and house blinds were drawn.
His seat in Parliament was taken by his son Willian Archer Redmond, who had been MP for East Tyrone. But later that year, Redmond’s party was defeated by Sinn Fein in the general election in December 1918.
An inscription on the mausoleum reads:
Here lie the remains of
+
JOHN EDWARD REDMOND, MP
(MP for Boro’ of New Ross 1881-5.
North Wexford 1885-1891.
Waterford City 1891-1918.)
and Chairman of the
Irish Parliamentary Party
until his death,
which occurred on March 6th 1918,
aged 61 years.
Also his son
CAPt. WILLIAM ARCHER REDMOND, DSO, TD,
MP for East Tyrone 1910-1918,
for Waterford City and County, 1918
till his death.
Died at Waterford April 17th 1932
aged 45 years.
A commemoration event in the town marked his death for many years. The centenary of his birth in 1956 attracted seven government ministers and in an address Éamon de Valera paid tribute to a ‘great Wexford man’ – while decrying his decision to encourage Irishmen to fight in World War I.
Outside, a panel on the John Street wall points out that graveyard is the burial place of Richard Monaghan (‘Dick Monk’) Captain of the John Street Corps of United Irish rebels in 1798. He led his men in actions in Co Wexford, Co Wicklow, Co Kilkenny, Co Carlow and Co Laois and was killed by a party of Yeomen near Bunclody around 27 June 1798.
Saint John’s churchyard was kept locked for many decades (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
Over the years, however, the cemetery was kept locked, the Redmond mausoleum was neglected fell into disrepair, its granite walls covered in grime its railings rusting and the pinnacles falling off.
The tomb was cleaned up for the centenary of the passing of the Home Rule Act in 2014 and the cemetery was cleaned up for the centenary of his death. The local author Billy Roche has written two pieces for a walking tour, one for the mausoleum and another for Redmond Park, named in honour of John Redmond’s brother, Major Willie Redmond, who was killed at the Battle of Messines Ridge.
Saint John’s is open by request but is still closed to the general public. Wexford County Council has plans to re-open the graveyard and provide access to the Redmond mausoleum. The graveyard conservation works plan to return the site to a grassed space.
The author Billy Roche has written a pieces for the Redmond mausoleum as part a walking tour (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
Patrick Comerford
Saint John’s graveyard or cemetery is located on the corner of Lower John Street and John’s Gate Street, behind a lime-washed perimeter wall with rendered coping. The entrance is from Lower John Street, and Wexford Council maintains the cemetery. However, I found when I visited on yesterday afternoon [18 January 2019] that because of the fragile condition of the cemetery, it is still kept locked, as it has been for many decades.
This graveyard is an important element in the church history and heritage of the Diocese of Ferns and of Co Wexford. This Church stood outside the walls of Wexxford town, on the corner of John Street and John’s Gate Street in the present cemetery, but its ruins have long since disappeared.
Although no church ruins survive, this extensive graveyard occupies the site of the mediaeval Church and Hospital of Saint John, founded in the early 13th century by William Marshall, the builder of Tintern Abbey, Co Wexford. It was given to the Knights of Saint John by his son, the younger William Marshall.
Mediaeval Wexford once boasted 20 churches, but Saint John’s was the only church in the town with a steeple.
A presentment of a Jury of Wexford town and Corporation made in October 1537 found that, ‘On ye 20th day of March 1532, ye Suffreign and Comyns of ye Town of Wexford kept fyre to the doore of ye steeple of St. John’s for to let out a thyef that made escape of ye towne gaole.’
At the dissolution of the monastic houses at the Reformation, Saint John’s was suppressed and the site was granted in perpetuity to laymen. The church was demolished and its stones were used as building material.
Saint John’s Church graveyard has a large collection of gravestones from 1723 and 1932 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
The graveyard has a collection of gravestones recording deaths between 1723 and 1932, and at least one marker is signed by James Byrne of Clone, an example of the Irish churchyard sculpture tradition in Co Wexford.
The most important graves and tombs in Saint John’s Cemetery are those of the Talbot and Redmond families.
The most prominent mausoleum was erected in 1828 on a rectangular plan. It is made of cut-granite, with a stepped roof, and has cast-iron fleche or ‘spirelet’ pinnacles at the corners, granite ashlar walls, a cut-granite plinth, cut-granite monolithic piers at the corners, and a beaded cornice on a blind frieze.
The Tudor-headed door opening is between paired clustered colonettes with a cut-granite step threshold, and a cut-granite flush block-and-start surround with chamfered reveals framing the cast-iron panelled double doors that have a quatrefoil-perforated overpanel.
The Talbot and Redmond mausoleum is an important part of the early 19th-century heritage of Wexford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
This mausoleum is an important part of the early 19th-century heritage of Wexford. It was erected by John Hyacinth Talbot (1794-1868) after the death of his wife, Anne Eliza (née Redmond) (1799-1826). They were married in 1822 and she died in childbirth.
The mausoleum Talbot built for his wife is the one in which members of the Redmond political dynasty are buried too, including John Edward Redmond MP (1806-1865) of The Deeps; John Edward Redmond MP (1856-1918), chairman of the Parnellite Minority and Chairman of the Irish Parliamentary Party; and his son, Captain William Archer Redmond MP (1886-1932), who fought in World War I.
Towards the end of the 1700s, the Redmond family became involved in trade, commerce and shipping. John Edward Redmond was a liberal MP for Wexford Town from 1859 until he died in 1865. Through his influence, the railway was brought to Wexford, he developed Wexford harbour and the docks and he was responsible for the reclamation of 5,000 acres of Wexford harbour now called the slob lands.
The monument in Redmond Square to his memory is inscribed with his last words: ‘My heart is in the town of Wexford, nothing can extinguish that love but the cold sod of the grave.’
His nephews, John and Willie Redmond, grew up in Ballytrent House, near Rosslare. John Redmond was born on 1 September 1856 in Kilrane, Co Wexford. He was an MP first for New Ross (1881-1885), and then for North Wexford (1885-1891). He became the main ally and supporter of Charles Stewart Parnell, and after Parnell died in 1891 Redmond became the leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party.
Redmond remained in Parliament as the MP for Waterford City (1891-1918). In 1910, after two general elections, HH Asquith and the Liberals needed Irish support to secure the Parliament Act of 1911. Redmond’s support was won in return for the (third) Home Rule Bill introduced in 1912, and Redmond secured Home Rule in 1914.
However, his victory was side-lined with the outbreak of World War I later that year, and the Irish Volunteers soon split between those who enlisted in the army and those who supported the Irish rebellion.
During the Irish Convention on Home Rule, John Redmond died in London on 6 March 1918 from heart failure after an operation to remove an intestinal obstruction. His last words were, ‘Father, I am a broken-hearted man.’ He was 61.
Fearing street protests, Redmond’s friends and family took his body from Kingstown Harbour (Dun Laoghaire) and placed it on a special train to Wexford town. The people of Wexford turned out in their tens of thousands for his funeral in Wexford town. The bells of ever church in the town tolled simultaneously, every shop was closed, and house blinds were drawn.
His seat in Parliament was taken by his son Willian Archer Redmond, who had been MP for East Tyrone. But later that year, Redmond’s party was defeated by Sinn Fein in the general election in December 1918.
An inscription on the mausoleum reads:
Here lie the remains of
+
JOHN EDWARD REDMOND, MP
(MP for Boro’ of New Ross 1881-5.
North Wexford 1885-1891.
Waterford City 1891-1918.)
and Chairman of the
Irish Parliamentary Party
until his death,
which occurred on March 6th 1918,
aged 61 years.
Also his son
CAPt. WILLIAM ARCHER REDMOND, DSO, TD,
MP for East Tyrone 1910-1918,
for Waterford City and County, 1918
till his death.
Died at Waterford April 17th 1932
aged 45 years.
A commemoration event in the town marked his death for many years. The centenary of his birth in 1956 attracted seven government ministers and in an address Éamon de Valera paid tribute to a ‘great Wexford man’ – while decrying his decision to encourage Irishmen to fight in World War I.
Outside, a panel on the John Street wall points out that graveyard is the burial place of Richard Monaghan (‘Dick Monk’) Captain of the John Street Corps of United Irish rebels in 1798. He led his men in actions in Co Wexford, Co Wicklow, Co Kilkenny, Co Carlow and Co Laois and was killed by a party of Yeomen near Bunclody around 27 June 1798.
Saint John’s churchyard was kept locked for many decades (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
Over the years, however, the cemetery was kept locked, the Redmond mausoleum was neglected fell into disrepair, its granite walls covered in grime its railings rusting and the pinnacles falling off.
The tomb was cleaned up for the centenary of the passing of the Home Rule Act in 2014 and the cemetery was cleaned up for the centenary of his death. The local author Billy Roche has written two pieces for a walking tour, one for the mausoleum and another for Redmond Park, named in honour of John Redmond’s brother, Major Willie Redmond, who was killed at the Battle of Messines Ridge.
Saint John’s is open by request but is still closed to the general public. Wexford County Council has plans to re-open the graveyard and provide access to the Redmond mausoleum. The graveyard conservation works plan to return the site to a grassed space.
The author Billy Roche has written a pieces for the Redmond mausoleum as part a walking tour (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2019)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)