21 March 2017

Leamy House, a unique
Tudor Gothic building
in the heart of Limerick

The former Leamy Free Schools on Hartstonge Street, Limerick (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

Patrick Comerford

Frank McCourt (1930-2009), who received the Pulitzer Prize for Angela’s Ashes, is one of Limerick’s best-known writers, alongside Kate O’Brien, (1897-1974), Donal Ryan, and the poet Desmond O’Grady.

Although Frank McCourt divided Limerick opinion with his portrayal in Angela’s Ashes of squalor and poverty in the slums, he is celebrated in the heart of the city with a museum in his former school, and a sculpture outside.

The Frank McCourt Museum is based in the middle floor of Leamy House on Hartstonge Street, which runs between O’Connell Street and Pery Square. The museum was established in 2011 by the artist Una Heaton, and was opened by his brother Malachy McCourt.

This Tudor-style building, which would not be out of place at a Cambridge college, was formerly the Leamy School, and Frank and Malachy McCourt both went to school here. The museum includes the 1930s classroom of Leamy School and houses a collection of memorabilia, including school books of the period and old photographs donated by former pupils.

The museum has a large selection of memorabilia associated with Angela’s Ashes, and period props and sets from the film have been used to recreate the McCourt home on Roden Lane.

Although Frank McCourt was born in Brooklyn, the family returned to Limerick, his mother’s home town, when he was a child, and his schools included the Leamy School.

The Leamy Free Schools were built by William Atkins and Joseph Fogerty in the 1840s (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

The Leamy Free Schools were established under a trust set up in the will of William Leamy, who left £13,000 for the education of the children of the poor in Limerick. Leamy spent his life on the high seas, and may have made his fortune through dabbling in piracy before he died in Madeira.

In 1841, the Court of Chancery decided how Leamy’s endowment should be administered. The pupils in Leamy’s School were to be taught without paying fees and to receive a good English education. Members of the Church of Ireland and Roman Catholics were to be taught in their own beliefs with lessons in the National Schools books. A sum of £3,940 was spent on the schools and site at Harstonge Street, while the interest on the balance was to maintain the facility.

This imposing building in the Tudor Revival style was designed by the architect William Atkins and built by Joseph Fogerty of Henry Street, Limerick. It has an elaborate façade and retains many of its original features, inside and out, that make it stand out from the other terraced buildings on this street, which are predominantly Georgian.

This is a detached, five-bay three-storey over basement Tudor Revival symmetrical brick school, built in 1841-1845, with a central crenellated tower and a four-bay, two-storey stone return.

The square-plan tower rises a stage above the roof, with a crenellated parapet (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

The square-plan tower rises a stage above the roof, with a crenellated parapet and cut saddle-backed limestone coping with a stone moulding below that has carved human and animal heads and a higher octagonal crenellated turret to the west.

To either side there is a half gable, while the outer bays form a pair of gabled breakfronts and a saddle-back limestone coping covers all the gables and parapets. The gabled breakfront is repeated to both side elevations.

The red brick wall was laid in Flemish bond and there is cement re-pointing on a moulded limestone plinth course with squared rough limestone at the basement level. To the rear there are rough-hewn squared snecked and coursed limestone walls.

There are square-headed window openings with smooth limestone ashlar splayed reveals. The windows have cross-casement timber window frames and these are mainly iron diamond pane windows, although there are uPVC replacement windows on the second floor.

A three-sided oriel window beside the tower (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

At the first floor, on either side of the tower, a three-sided oriel window has a smooth limestone surround and a moulded base and parapet, which forms a balcony to the half dormers above.

The tower has a limestone square panel to the upper stage with a hood-mould and clock flanked by a pair of heraldic decorations. Below the panel, a carved limestone panel has Tudor and Gothic arch mouldings. This panel is repeated as a pair to the stage below with a square-headed window to the centre and a rectangular panel below.

A stone inscription reads: ‘Joseph Fogerty Builder.’

The flat-pointed arched limestone door opening has a hood moulding and a moulded stop-chamfered surround. There are double-leaf, timber-panelled doors with perpendicular arches to the upper panels, opening onto a limestone threshold and concrete steps that are flanked by a limestone ashlar wall that encloses the basement area.

The entrance hall at the former Leamy Free Schools (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

The entrance hall is vaulted and contains an intact internal door.

Outside, a path that was once gravelled leads through the front garden, which is enclosed by a low rock-faced limestone ashlar wall with a plinth, saddle-back coping and spear-headed iron railings. Matching gates hang from pair of high limestone ashlar piers.

The Cork-based architect William Atkins (1812-1887) was the fourth son of Dr Ringrose Atkins, and was born at Firville, near Mallow. He was apprenticed to his uncle by marriage, the Limerick-based architect George Richard Pain, and exhibited at the Cork Society for Promoting the Fine Arts and the Royal Hibernian Academy.

In 1845, Atkins married his cousin Louisa Gelston (1812-1904), and two years later he inherited half the estate of his maternal grandfather William Atkins at Fountainville, near Mallow.

Between 1845 and 1869, Atkins entered at least 13 architectural competitions, and attained first place in five of them, including Cork Town Hall and Killarney Railway Hotel, both in 1852. In the late 1860s, he designed several new Church of Ireland churches in the Munster area for the Ecclesiastical Commissioners.

His other works include the chapel at Mount Jerome Cemetery in Dublin, Saint Columba’s College, Rathfarnham, and Saint Mary’s Church, Killarney. He died on 5 January 1887.

The stone inscription reading ‘Joseph Fogerty Builder’ (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

Joseph Fogerty (1806-1887), who built the Leamy Schools, was a Limerick-born architect and builder, who was baptised in Saint Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick. His other works in Limerick include Trinity Episcopal Church in Catherine Street, and the Theatre Royal in Henry Street.

Meanwhile, the Leamy Free Schools opened in 1844, but soon faced difficulties. It was well supported by the Protestant pupils, but rarely had more than 20 Catholic pupils, and the school close in 1865 for a number of years.

The school had reopened by 1874. But in 1887, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Limerick, Edward Thomas O’Dwyer, forbade Catholic children from attending the school. Bishop O’Dwyer said that although Leamy may have died a Catholic, schools should be denominational rather than non-denominational, and most of the poor uneducated were Catholics. He said: ‘I will never allow the Catholics of Limerick, while I am bishop, to attend a mixed school.’

The dispute was resolved in 1894, when a new scheme for the school was drawn up. According to this, the Protestant community of Limerick received a quarter of the assets of the school, and the remainder, including the property, was vested in the Catholic community. The Department of Education now administers the Leamy Endowment.

A Limerick Civic Trust green plaque reads: ‘Leamy School. This school was built in 1843 out of the proceeds of a trust set up by William Leamy. In 1814 he bequeathed £13,300 for the education of poor children in Ireland. The school closed in 1952.’

The bust of Frank McCourt was commissioned by Una Heaton, who established the Frank McCourt Museum (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2017)

The school closed in 1952 and three years later the premises were bought by the Crescent Clothing Company which manufactured men’s clothing until 1993.

The late Jack Heaton later bought the building, and Una Heaton opened an art gallery here in 2009. That year, she commissioned that bust of Frank McCourt that stands at the entrance and she began transforming the middle floor into the Frank McCourt Museum.

Since it opened in 2009, almost 100,000 people have visited the museum, where a portion of the author’s ashes have been placed in a box overlooking his former classroom.

Following an unsuccessful business investment in which the building was used as collateral, it was put on the market on the instructions of a bank. In 2014, it was put up for sale through Murphy Gubbins Auctioneers for €325,000. It was for sale again last year at an Allsop auction in Dublin at a reduced guide price of €140,000-€180,000.

The Limerick Post reported [7 April 2016] that Leamy House was being sold by Allsops, the auctioneers who deal with distressed properties. But Leamy House was withdrawn before it was due to be auctioned. Allsops said it was removed from auction because all the relevant documents were not submitted in time to allow potential buyers to inspect it ahead of the sale.

A spokesperson for Limerick City and County Council said the council had considered buying the building in the past but decided against it ‘for structural reasons.’ It was said the building provided an annual rental income of €23,500 from its four tenants, including an annual rent of €100 from the museum on an ‘informal tenancy.’

At the time, Una Heaton was reported to be making efforts to buy the building and said she was determined to keep the museum open, although she accepted its future was uncertain.

Later reports said it had been bought by a well-known Limerick businessman and that the future of Frank McCourt Museum is secure. Another tenant, tailor Joe Clancy, also remains in the building. Una Heaton told the media: ‘I am absolutely delighted. I am just over the moon. The phoenix is rising from the ashes.’

Praying in Lent 2017 with USPG,
(24) Tuesday 21 March 2017

Saint Paul’s Cathedral, Nicosia … ‘Give thanks for the determination of disciples in the Diocese of Cyprus and the Gulf to seek peace and reconciliation and, where necessary, tackle injustice’

Patrick Comerford

The Lent 2017 edition of the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel) follows the theme of the USPG Lent study course, ‘Living an Authentic Life.’

I am using this Prayer Diary for my prayers and reflections each morning throughout Lent. Why not join me in these prayers and reflections, for just a few moments each morning?

In the articles and prayers in the prayer diary, USPG invites us to investigate what it means to be a disciple of Christ. The Lent study course, ‘Living an Authentic Life’ (available online or to order at www.uspg.org.uk/lent), explores the idea that discipleship and authenticity are connected.

This week, from Sunday (19 March) until next Saturday (25 March), the USPG Lent Prayer Diary is following the topic ‘Living with Difference.’ The topic was introduced yesterday in an article in the Prayer Diary by the Right Revd Michael Lewis, Bishop of Cyprus and the Gulf, who was a speaker at the USPG conference in High Leigh in 2014.

I continue to remember with fondness and affection how, after a working visit to Cyprus in Easter 2000, the congregation of Saint Paul’s Cathedral, Nicosia, named me in their prayers on the morning of my ordination.

In his article Bishop Michael reflected on being a disciple among communities of diverse backgrounds and asked how we should be disciples.

Tuesday 21 March 2017:

Give thanks for the determination of disciples in the Diocese of Cyprus and the Gulf to seek peace and reconciliation and, where necessary, tackle injustice.

Continued tomorrow

Yesterday’s reflection and prayer

Lenten studies in Saint John’s
Gospel (2), John 7: 14-36:
who do you say Jesus is?

Robert Spence (1871-1964), ‘Woe to the Bloody City of Lichfield,’ depicts George Fox preaching barefooted in the Market Square in Lichfield 1651 … George Fox challenged his followers to say who Christ is for them (Lichfield Heritage Centre)

Patrick Comerford

Introduction:

John 7: 14-36

The Bishop of Limerick and Killaloe, the Right Revd Dr Kenneth Kearon, has issued a Lent Challenge to this diocese. The challenge is to use a form of Daily Prayer every day during Lent this year [2017]. In the diocesan magazine, Newslink, he has provided an order for Daily Prayer, together with Daily Readings and Collects.

We are invited to find a quiet time each day in a comfortable chair, to pray and to read a Bible reading, either alone or with someone else.

The challenge began on Ash Wednesday [1 March 2017], with the lectionary reading for that day (Matthew 6: 1-6, 16-21), and has continued each day since, with readings from Saint John’s Gospel.

I have invited parishioners to the Rectory in Askeaton, Co Limerick, each Monday evening in Lent, to look at the bishop’s suggested Bible reading for that day, and to pray using his suggested form of prayer.

Last Monday [13 March 2017], we looked at the story of the Samaritan woman at the well in John 4: 5-42, and on the previous Monday [6 March 2017] we looked at the story of the Wedding at Cana (John 2: 1-12).

In our Bible study this evening [20 March 2017], we are looking at John 7: 14-36, where the authority of Jesus is challenged.

John 7: 14-36

14 Ἤδη δὲ τῆς ἑορτῆς μεσούσης ἀνέβη Ἰησοῦς εἰς τὸ ἱερὸν καὶ ἐδίδασκεν. 15 ἐθαύμαζον οὖν οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι λέγοντες, Πῶς οὗτος γράμματα οἶδεν μὴ μεμαθηκώς; 16 ἀπεκρίθη οὖν αὐτοῖς [ὁ] Ἰησοῦς καὶ εἶπεν, Ἡ ἐμὴ διδαχὴ οὐκ ἔστιν ἐμὴ ἀλλὰ τοῦ πέμψαντός με: 17 ἐάν τις θέλῃ τὸ θέλημα αὐτοῦ ποιεῖν, γνώσεται περὶ τῆς διδαχῆς πότερον ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστιν ἢ ἐγὼ ἀπ' ἐμαυτοῦλαλῶ. 18 ὁ ἀφ' ἑαυτοῦ λαλῶν τὴν δόξαν τὴν ἰδίαν ζητεῖ: ὁ δὲ ζητῶν τὴν δόξαν τοῦ πέμψαντος αὐτόν, οὗτος ἀληθής ἐστιν καὶ ἀδικία ἐν αὐτῷ οὐκ ἔστιν.

19 οὐ Μωϋσῆς δέδωκεν ὑμῖν τὸν νόμον; καὶ οὐδεὶς ἐξ ὑμῶν ποιεῖ τὸν νόμον. τί με ζητεῖτε ἀποκτεῖναι; 20 ἀπεκρίθη ὁ ὄχλος, Δαιμόνιον ἔχεις: τίς σε ζητεῖ ἀποκτεῖναι; 21 ἀπεκρίθη Ἰησοῦς καὶ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς, Ἓν ἔργον ἐποίησα καὶ πάντες θαυμάζετε. 22 διὰ τοῦτο Μωϋσῆς δέδωκεν ὑμῖν τὴν περιτομήν οὐχ ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ Μωϋσέως ἐστὶν ἀλλ' ἐκ τῶν πατέρων καὶ ἐν σαββάτῳ περιτέμνετε ἄνθρωπον. 23 εἰ περιτομὴν λαμβάνει ἄνθρωπος ἐν σαββάτῳ ἵνα μὴ λυθῇ ὁ νόμος Μωϋσέως, ἐμοὶ χολᾶτε ὅτι ὅλον ἄνθρωπον ὑγιῆ ἐποίησα ἐν σαββάτῳ; 24 μὴ κρίνετε κατ' ὄψιν, ἀλλὰ τὴν δικαίαν κρίσιν κρίνετε.

25 Ἔλεγον οὖν τινες ἐκ τῶν Ἱεροσολυμιτῶν, Οὐχ οὗτός ἐστιν ὃν ζητοῦσιν ἀποκτεῖναι; 26 καὶ ἴδε παρρησίᾳ λαλεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν αὐτῷ λέγουσιν. μήποτε ἀληθῶς ἔγνωσαν οἱ ἄρχοντες ὅτι οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ Χριστός; 27 ἀλλὰ τοῦτον οἴδαμεν πόθεν ἐστίν: ὁ δὲ Χριστὸς ὅταν ἔρχηται οὐδεὶς γινώσκει πόθεν ἐστίν. 28 ἔκραξεν οὖν ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ διδάσκων ὁ Ἰησοῦς καὶ λέγων, Κἀμὲ οἴδατε καὶ οἴδατε πόθεν εἰμί: καὶ ἀπ'ἐμαυτοῦ οὐκ ἐλήλυθα, ἀλλ' ἔστιν ἀληθινὸς ὁ πέμψας με, ὃν ὑμεῖς οὐκ οἴδατε: 29 ἐγὼ οἶδα αὐτόν, ὅτι παρ' αὐτοῦ εἰμι κἀκεῖνός με ἀπέστειλεν. 30 Ἐζήτουν οὖν αὐτὸν πιάσαι, καὶ οὐδεὶς ἐπέβαλεν ἐπ' αὐτὸν τὴν χεῖρα, ὅτι οὔπω ἐληλύθει ἡ ὥρα αὐτοῦ. 31 Ἐκ τοῦ ὄχλου δὲ πολλοὶ ἐπίστευσαν εἰς αὐτόν, καὶ ἔλεγον, Ὁ Χριστὸς ὅταν ἔλθῃ μὴ πλείονα σημεῖα ποιήσει ὧν οὗτος ἐποίησεν;

32 Ἤκουσαν οἱ Φαρισαῖοι τοῦ ὄχλου γογγύζοντος περὶ αὐτοῦ ταῦτα, καὶ ἀπέστειλαν οἱ ἀρχιερεῖς καὶ οἱ Φαρισαῖοι ὑπηρέτας ἵνα πιάσωσιν αὐτόν. 33 εἶπεν οὖν ὁ Ἰησοῦς, Ἔτι χρόνον μικρὸν μεθ' ὑμῶν εἰμι καὶ ὑπάγω πρὸς τὸν πέμψαντά με. 34 ζητήσετέ με καὶ οὐχ εὑρήσετέ [με], καὶ ὅπου εἰμὶ ἐγὼ ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν. 35 εἶπον οὖν οἱ Ἰουδαῖοι πρὸς ἑαυτούς, Ποῦ οὗτος μέλλει πορεύεσθαι ὅτι ἡμεῖς οὐχ εὑρήσομεν αὐτόν; μὴ εἰς τὴν διασπορὰν τῶν Ἑλλήνων μέλλει πορεύεσθαι καὶ διδάσκειν τοὺς Ελληνας; 36 τίς ἐστιν ὁ λόγος οὗτος ὃν εἶπεν, Ζητήσετέ με καὶ οὐχ εὑρήσετέ [με], καὶ ὅπου εἰμὶ ἐγὼ ὑμεῖς οὐ δύνασθε ἐλθεῖν;

Translation (NRSV):

14 About the middle of the festival Jesus went up into the temple and began to teach. 15 The Jews were astonished at it, saying, “How does this man have such learning, when he has never been taught?” 16 Then Jesus answered them, “My teaching is not mine but his who sent me. 17 Anyone who resolves to do the will of God will know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own. 18 Those who speak on their own seek their own glory; but the one who seeks the glory of him who sent him is true, and there is nothing false in him.

19 “Did not Moses give you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. Why are you looking for an opportunity to kill me?” 20 The crowd answered, “You have a demon! Who is trying to kill you?” 21 Jesus answered them, “I performed one work, and all of you are astonished. 22 Moses gave you circumcision (it is, of course, not from Moses, but from the patriarchs), and you circumcise a man on the sabbath. 23 If a man receives circumcision on the sabbath in order that the law of Moses may not be broken, are you angry with me because I healed a man’s whole body on the sabbath? 24 Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.”

25 Now some of the people of Jerusalem were saying, “Is not this the man whom they are trying to kill? 26 And here he is, speaking openly, but they say nothing to him! Can it be that the authorities really know that this is the Messiah? 27 Yet we know where this man is from; but when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from.” 28 Then Jesus cried out as he was teaching in the temple, “You know me, and you know where I am from. I have not come on my own. But the one who sent me is true, and you do not know him. 29 I know him, because I am from him, and he sent me.” 30 Then they tried to arrest him, but no one laid hands on him, because his hour had not yet come. 31 Yet many in the crowd believed in him and were saying, “When the Messiah comes, will he do more signs than this man has done?”

32 The Pharisees heard the crowd muttering such things about him, and the chief priests and Pharisees sent temple police to arrest him. 33 Jesus then said, “I will be with you a little while longer, and then I am going to him who sent me. 34 You will search for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.” 35 The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we will not find him? Does he intend to go to the Dispersion among the Greeks and teach the Greeks? 36 What does he mean by saying, ‘You will search for me and you will not find me’ and ‘Where I am, you cannot come’?”

Introduction:

This evening’s reading begins naturally at verse 14. In the immediate verses before this passage, Jesus’ brothers (see Mark 6: 3, where they are named as James, Joseph, Judas and Simon), challenge him to declare himself to the world by joining them and the pilgrims at the feast, where people are looking for him, asking: ‘Where is he?’ (verse 11).

Some people are saying Jesus is a good man, others are saying he is leading the people astray (verse 12), but no-one is speaking openly. His claims (discussed in Chapters 5 and 6) must be verified in Jerusalem.

The feast being celebrated is the Feast of the Tabernacles or Festival of Booths (Sukkot), which usually takes place around late September or in October (see Leviticus 23: 33-36; Deuteronomy 16: 13-15). It marks the end of harvest time, and is one of the three Pilgrimage Festivals, along with Passover and Pentecost.

Despite the urgings of others, and despite saying ‘I am not going up’ (verse 8), Christ travels in secret to Jerusalem (verse 10), and this secret journey might be compared with a later public journey (see John 12: 12-15).

This is Christ’s third visit to Jerusalem in Saint John’s Gospel; the first was at Passover (see John 2: 12-25), after the Wedding at Cana; the second visit to Jerusalem provides the setting for the healing at the pool in Bethzatha (John 5: 1-18).

Unlike, the first two journeys to Jerusalem, this next one we are reading about this evening is in secret. Apart from the fact that Christ knows that people are plotting to kill him, the reasons for this journey being secret are found in verse 8 (‘my time has not yet fully come’), compared with the reasons for his next journey being public (see 12: 23, ‘the hour has come’).

Verse 14-24:

On the fourth day of the festival (‘about the middle of the festival,’ verse 14), Christ arrives in the Temple and begins to teach. But we are not told here what was the content of his teaching on that day. Instead, we are told about the reactions to his teaching.

People begin to marvel and to ask where the authority of Jesus to teach comes from, because he has not been trained in a recognisable or official rabbinical school (verse 15). This is similar to the reaction to Jesus in the synoptic Gospels when he teaches in the synagogues (see Matthew 7: 28-29; Matthew 13: 54; Mark 1: 22; Mark 6: 2; Luke 4: 22, 32).

Verses 16-18:

Is Christ merely offering his own opinion? Is he competent to teach? Jesus’ teaching comes from the Father, not from himself, a fact that can be recognised by anyone who wishes to do God’s will (verse 17).

Verses 19-24:

The law of Moses condemns their desire to kill Jesus for healing on the sabbath (5: 18), for it enjoins circumcision, even when the eighth day falls on the sabbath (Leviticus 12: 3), why should not healing not take place on the Sabbath too?

Verses 25-31:

First Jesus’ authority to teach has been challenged. Now the possibility that he is the Messiah is denied because people know his origins is known, whereas it was believed at the time (according to Justin, the rabbinical sources and apocalyptic writings) that the Messiah’s origins would be mysterious, and that he would not be known until he was anointed by Elijah.

Everyone knows where Jesus is from, and who is family are. His human origin is apparent, but not his true origin in God, by whom he was sent and whose authority he bears.

Verses 32-36:

The chief priests (Sadducees) and the Pharisees were polar opposites and inveterate enemies. But here they unite in sending the Temple police to arrest Jesus. This leads Christ to speak of his death.

But Jesus says that later, when people will seek deliverance in the Messiah, they will not find him, for he will have ascended to where they cannot come because they are unbelievers (contrast 8: 21 with 12: 26 and 17: 24).

They miss the point about where he is going. Instead they speculate about whether he is going to the Jews dispersed among the Greeks (the Gentiles), the Diaspora.

The aftermath

Verses 37-39:

For seven days during this Festival, water was carried in a golden pitcher from the Pool of Siloam to the Temple as a reminder of the water from the rock in the desert (see Numbers 20: 2-13), and as a symbol of hope for the coming Messianic deliverance (Isaiah 12: 3).

There is a reminder too of yesterday’s Gospel reading (John 4: 5-42), when Jesus says on the last day of the festival: ‘Let anyone who is thirst come to me.’

He is the true water of life, who turns symbols into reality (Isaiah 44: 3; 55: 1). Believers become channels of life to others, through Christ's Spirit given at Pentecost after he was glorified (crucified, risen, ascended). The gift of the Spirit is a mark of the Messianic age (Joel 2: 28-29; Acts 2: 14-21).

And this evening’s readings leads us naturally to the reading next Sunday (John 9: 1-41), and the story of a man born blind who receives sight.

Discussing the passage

The passage ends with a series of unanswered questions about Jesus: what are his intentions, where is he going, what does he mean?

They really do not understand who Jesus is. But then, neither did his brothers in the verses before this passage.

Who do we say Jesus is for us today?

Who is Christ for you?

This is a question each and every one of us must ask ourselves anew time and time again.

He must be more than a good rabbi or teacher, because the expectations of a good religious leader or a good teacher change over time.

Who is the Messiah for you?

Again, many people at the time had false expectations of the Messiah.

We may see the difference between how John, near the end of his ministry, describes Christ, and how the disciples, at the beginning of answering Christ’s call, describe Christ.

But who is Christ for you?

George Fox, the founding Quaker, challenged his contemporaries: “You may say Christ saith this, and the apostles say this, but what canst thou say? Art thou a child of the Light and hast thou walked in the Light, and what thou speakest is it inwardly from God?”

Who is Christ for you?

Is he a personal saviour?

One who comforts you?

Or is he more than that for you?

Who do you say Christ is?

It is a question that challenges Saint Peter later in Saint Matthew’s Gospel (see Matthew 16: 15, which is part of the reading on 24 August 2014, the Tenth Sunday after Trinity, Matthew 16: 13-20). Not who do others say he is, but who do you say Christ is?

Next week, Monday, 27 March 2017:

Mothers’ Union Service in Saint Mary’s, Askeaton.

Next Bible Study: Monday, 3 April 2017.

(Revd Canon Professor) Patrick Comerford is Priest-in Charge, the Rathkeale and Askeaton Group of Parishes. This essay is based on notes prepared for a Lenten Bible study in Askeaton Rectory on Monday 20 March 2017.