The grave of Constance Lloyd Wilde in Genoa, visited by Oscar Wilde a year before his death
Patrick Comerford
My choice of a Poem for Lent on this Monday in Holy Week is ‘Sonnet written in Holy Week at Genoa,’ by the Dublin-born Irish playwright and poet Oscar Wilde (1854-1900).
Today, Wilde is remembered for his witty epigrams, his plays and his poems, and for the circumstances that led to his imprisonment and his early death, but is rarely remembered for his religious piety.
Oscar Fingal O’Flahertie Wills Wilde was born on 16 October 1854 in 21 Westland Row, Dublin, the son of Sir William Wilde and his wife, Jane Francesca (Elgee), whose grandfather was Archdeacon of Ferns and Rector of Wexford. She wrote poetry under the pseudonym Speranza (the Italian for “Hope”), while her husband was Ireland’s leading ear and eye surgeon of the day.
Oscar Wilde was educated at Portora, Trinity College Dublin, and Magdalen College Oxford. On the walls of his rooms at Oxford in the 1870s, he hung pictures of Cardinal Manning and Pope Pius IX, and The Imitation of Christ Thomas à Kempis was his nightly reading.
In 1877, Wilde travelled to Greece with the Revd Sir John Pentland Mahaffy, his former tutor in Trinity College Dublin. On his return through Italy, Wilde had a private audience with Pope Pius IX in Rome. Afterwards, Wilde locked himself in his room, emerging only after writing a sonnet inspired by and dedicated to the Pope. But hours later, he visited the Protestant Cemetery in Rome where the Romantic poet, John Keats, was buried. Kneeling at his grave, Wilde ostentatiously declared it to be “the holiest place in Rome.”
His works include the novel The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890), the plays Salome (1891) and The Importance of Being Earnest (1895), and the poems ‘De Profundis’ (1897, published 1905) and ‘The Ballad of Reading Gaol’ (1898).
Oscar Wilde was sentenced to two years in jail in 1895. After his release from prison in May 1897, injured and in poor health, his first act on his release was to write to the Jesuits of Farm Street, London, begging to make a six-month retreat at their house. His request was refused and Wilde then fled across the Channel to France to be reunited with his lover, Lord Alfred Douglas. He wrote to his wife, Constance, but he saw neither her, nor their two young sons, again.
In 1899, the exiled Wilde, travelled throughout Europe. He was in Rome with his companion Robbie Ross briefly in 1900. There they attended Masses and papal audiences, and Wilde received a blessing from Leo XIII that he thought had a physically curative effect on him, and he joked to Ross that he was “a violent Papist.”
By then, his health was deteriorating and he was drinking to excess. Wilde left Rome for Paris, and there, on 28 November 1900, as Wilde lay dying on his bed, Robbie Ross called in a Roman Catholic priest, an Irish-born English Passionist, Father Cuthbert Dunne (1869-1950). Wilde received conditional Baptism and was anointed. For a short time he emerged from delirium into lucidity, and Father Dunne was satisfied that Wilde had freely desired reception into the Roman Catholic Church.
The poet who had once been one of the best-known personalities of his day died destitute in Paris on 30 November 1900 at the age of 46.
Today’s poem, ‘Sonnet written in Holy Week at Genoa,’ is technically an iambic pentameter, it but follows a strict rhyming pattern that has more in common with what is called the Italian sonnet, possibly adopted by Wilde because he was writing in Genoa.
The poem was published in 1881 on Wilde’s return to England, but he probably wrote it in Genoa, where Wilde may have attended the Chiesa Anglicana or Anglican Church.
During his travels in Greece with Mahaffy, Wilde’s interest in Roman Catholicism waned, and he was tinged with a little guilt when he was back in Italy in 1881 and realised in Genoa during Holy Week that he would rather remain an Anglican than become a Roman Catholic, or that he would rather be in Greece than in Rome:
... those dear Hellenic hours
Had drowned all memory of Thy bitter pain,
The Cross, the Crown, the Soldiers, and the Spear.
The sonnet opens with the poet in Scoglietto, the park around Villa Rosazza, near the Di Negro Metro Station. The oranges hanging from the trees are a common feature of Genoa in Via Negro as elsewhere. The imagery here is powerful with the oranges as lamps their brightness shaming the day. The flower blossoms, disturbed by the birds fluttering, fall as snow, an unusual but not uncommon feature of the climate in Genoa.
The sweetness of life in Genoa is underlined with the imagery of the sea and the narcissi and contrasted by the announcement of the death of Christ by the boy-priest, an image that reminds us not only of Wilde’s infatuation with Roman Catholicism but possibly of his troubled sexuality too.
The snows of the fifth line become flowers again to fill the sepulchre, a common practice in Italy and Greece as Christians decorate the churches for Easter.
The Hellenic hours could have various meanings, both to Wilde’s own sexuality but also the Graeco-Roman history of Christianity.
The last line is a kind of poetic shorthand summoning up aspects of the Crucifixion that are part of the common Christian memory.
Seventeen years after this poem was published, Oscar Wilde’s wife, Constance Lloyd, died in Genoa in 1898 and was buried in the Staglieno Cemetery. A year later, he visited her grave in Genoa on 26 February 1899 – a poignant and little-known episode in his life – and spent some more time in Genoa just a year before his own death.
A statue of Oscar Wilde in Merrion Square, opposite the Wilde family’s former home at 1 Merrion Square, Dublin (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Sonnet written in Holy Week at Genoa, by Oscar Wilde
I wandered in Scoglietto’s green retreat,
The oranges on each o’erhanging spray
Burned as bright lamps of gold to shame the day;
Some startled bird with fluttering wings and fleet
Made snow of all the blossoms, at my feet
Like silver moons the pale narcissi lay:
And the curved waves that streaked the sapphire bay
Laughed i’ the sun, and life seemed very sweet.
Outside the young boy-priest passed singing clear,
“Jesus the Son of Mary has been slain,
O come and fill his sepulchre with flowers.”
Ah, God! Ah, God! those dear Hellenic hours
Had drowned all memory of Thy bitter pain,
The Cross, the Crown, the Soldiers, and the Spear.
Canon Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism and Liturgy, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and a canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin.
02 April 2012
Palm Sunday, listening to Thomas Weelkes
The choir sings ‘Hosanna to the Son of David’ by Thomas Weelkes at the start of the Palm Sunday liturgy in Christ Church Cathedral (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
Patrick Comerford
Christ Church Cathedral was bathed in warm sunshine this morning as we began Palm Sunday by gathering in the Cloister Garth on the south side of the cathedral for the Liturgy of the Palms and the reading of the Gospel of the Entry into Jerusalem (Mark 11: 1-11).
As we processed out of the Cathedral with our palm branches and palm crosses, the choir most appropriately sang as a motet Hosanna to the Son of David by Thomas Weelkes (1575-1623).
Weelkes had a reputation as a notorious drunkard and blasphemer, who was in regular conflict with all at Winchester Cathedral, where he was the organist from 1602 until his death in 1623, the same year as William Byrd and Orlando Gibbons died. But whatever his personal flaws may have been, he was one of the most prolific composers of church music in his day. His music is sublime, and he is now regarded as one of the finest composers of Elizabethan and Jacobean church music.
We processed back into the cathedral singing JM Neale’s All glory, laud, and honour ... it seems almost impossible to imagine a Palm Sunday liturgy without singing this hymn and Samuel Crossman’s My Song is Love unknown. Our Post-Communion hymn this morning was Bishop William Walsham How’s It is a thing most wonderful, which was my choice for a Poem for Lent in this blog last Friday [30 March 2012].
We had a dramatised reading of the Gospel (Luke 22: 14 to Luke 23: 56), and the Post-Communion motet was O sacrum convivium by Thomas Tallis.
Sunshine in Dublin Castle this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
After lunch in the Silk Road Café in Dublin Castle and a short visit to Saint Patrick’s Cathedral ,where I am preaching on Good Friday [6 April 2012], I was back in Christ Church Cathedral this afternoon for Choral Evensong, at which I read the first lesson (Isaiah 5: 1-7). The setting for the canticles Magnificat and Nunc Dimittis was the Gloucester Service by Herbert Howells.
Later in the afternoon, I had a short stroll through Temple Bar, and paid a pastoral visit to the Mater Private Hospital before two of us went on out to Skerries for a walk on the beach.
Coffee at ‘Storm in a Teacup’ in Skerries was more than welcome this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
Caffeine levels were low and we first had a coffee at ‘Storm in a Teacup,’ which was doing a brisk business at the harbour despite the late hour and the grey clouds.
I was last in Skerries for a retreat on Ash Wednesday, and it was a delight to walk on the beaches after an absence of a few weeks. We walked close to the North Strand beside the harbour, before going in behind the Sailing Club for a brief brisk walk on the South Strand.
The tide was out and the sand was soft in Skerries this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
The tide was out, the sand was soft, and there were few people there in the dusky lights of late evening.
On the way back to South Dublin, through Rush, Lusk and on the M50, we listened to the new CD by the Choir of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, directed by Sidney’s first Director of Music, David Skinner: ‘Thomas Weelkes Grant the King a long life, English Anthems & Instrumental Music.’
The chaplain of Sidney Sussex College, the Revd Dr Peter Waddell, sent me this new CD last week as part of his generous thank you for preaching in Sidney Sussex earlier this year.
The new CD by the Choir of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, directed by David Skinner, is being launched later this month
After Easter, the Choir of Sidney Sussex, directed by David Skinner, is celebrating Evensong in the Quire at Westminster Abbey on Tuesday 17 April 2012 at 5 pm. After the service the Choir and members of Sidney Sussex will process to the tomb of the college foundress, Lady Frances Sidney, Countess of Sussex, where the choir will sing the College Grace. This new CD will be launched later that evening at a reception, hosted by the Sidney Sussex Society in the Oxford and Cambridge Club, Pall Mall, at 6.30 pm.
Despite the title of this new CD, the opening track on this collection is Hosanna to the Son of David. And so, Palm Sunday ended just as it began.
Canon Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism and Liturgy, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and a canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin.
Patrick Comerford
Christ Church Cathedral was bathed in warm sunshine this morning as we began Palm Sunday by gathering in the Cloister Garth on the south side of the cathedral for the Liturgy of the Palms and the reading of the Gospel of the Entry into Jerusalem (Mark 11: 1-11).
As we processed out of the Cathedral with our palm branches and palm crosses, the choir most appropriately sang as a motet Hosanna to the Son of David by Thomas Weelkes (1575-1623).
Weelkes had a reputation as a notorious drunkard and blasphemer, who was in regular conflict with all at Winchester Cathedral, where he was the organist from 1602 until his death in 1623, the same year as William Byrd and Orlando Gibbons died. But whatever his personal flaws may have been, he was one of the most prolific composers of church music in his day. His music is sublime, and he is now regarded as one of the finest composers of Elizabethan and Jacobean church music.
We processed back into the cathedral singing JM Neale’s All glory, laud, and honour ... it seems almost impossible to imagine a Palm Sunday liturgy without singing this hymn and Samuel Crossman’s My Song is Love unknown. Our Post-Communion hymn this morning was Bishop William Walsham How’s It is a thing most wonderful, which was my choice for a Poem for Lent in this blog last Friday [30 March 2012].
We had a dramatised reading of the Gospel (Luke 22: 14 to Luke 23: 56), and the Post-Communion motet was O sacrum convivium by Thomas Tallis.
Sunshine in Dublin Castle this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
After lunch in the Silk Road Café in Dublin Castle and a short visit to Saint Patrick’s Cathedral ,where I am preaching on Good Friday [6 April 2012], I was back in Christ Church Cathedral this afternoon for Choral Evensong, at which I read the first lesson (Isaiah 5: 1-7). The setting for the canticles Magnificat and Nunc Dimittis was the Gloucester Service by Herbert Howells.
Later in the afternoon, I had a short stroll through Temple Bar, and paid a pastoral visit to the Mater Private Hospital before two of us went on out to Skerries for a walk on the beach.
Coffee at ‘Storm in a Teacup’ in Skerries was more than welcome this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
Caffeine levels were low and we first had a coffee at ‘Storm in a Teacup,’ which was doing a brisk business at the harbour despite the late hour and the grey clouds.
I was last in Skerries for a retreat on Ash Wednesday, and it was a delight to walk on the beaches after an absence of a few weeks. We walked close to the North Strand beside the harbour, before going in behind the Sailing Club for a brief brisk walk on the South Strand.
The tide was out and the sand was soft in Skerries this afternoon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2012)
The tide was out, the sand was soft, and there were few people there in the dusky lights of late evening.
On the way back to South Dublin, through Rush, Lusk and on the M50, we listened to the new CD by the Choir of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, directed by Sidney’s first Director of Music, David Skinner: ‘Thomas Weelkes Grant the King a long life, English Anthems & Instrumental Music.’
The chaplain of Sidney Sussex College, the Revd Dr Peter Waddell, sent me this new CD last week as part of his generous thank you for preaching in Sidney Sussex earlier this year.
The new CD by the Choir of Sidney Sussex College Cambridge, directed by David Skinner, is being launched later this month
After Easter, the Choir of Sidney Sussex, directed by David Skinner, is celebrating Evensong in the Quire at Westminster Abbey on Tuesday 17 April 2012 at 5 pm. After the service the Choir and members of Sidney Sussex will process to the tomb of the college foundress, Lady Frances Sidney, Countess of Sussex, where the choir will sing the College Grace. This new CD will be launched later that evening at a reception, hosted by the Sidney Sussex Society in the Oxford and Cambridge Club, Pall Mall, at 6.30 pm.
Despite the title of this new CD, the opening track on this collection is Hosanna to the Son of David. And so, Palm Sunday ended just as it began.
Canon Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism and Liturgy, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and a canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin.
Remembering the last heretic burned at the stake 400 years ago
Edward Wightman was executed in the Market Square, Lichfield, on 11 April 1612 ... a contemporary woodcut of the last burning at the stake for heresy in England
Patrick Comerford
Edward Wightman, who died in the Market Square Lichfield on 11 April 1612, was the last person in England to be burnt at the stake for heresy. The Diocese of Lichfield is marking the 400th anniversary of his death with thanksgiving that it was the last execution of its kind, and Dr Ian Atherton’s lecture a few weeks ago, ‘Edward Wightman and the religious intolerance of the Early Stuarts,’ was the first in a series of five Lenten lectures in Lichfield Cathedral this year reflecting on Church-State relations.
We know little about Edward Wightman (1566-1612), for little of his own words and none of his writings survive. What we do know paints a sorry story of religious conflict and intolerance.
A plaque on the north wall of Saint Mary’s Church recalls the events in the Market Square 400 years ago this month (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
An early Puritan
The self-proclaimed prophet was born on 20 December 1566 in Wykin Hall at Burbage, near Hinckley in Leicestershire, and was baptised in the local parish church. His parents later moved to nearby Burton-upon-Trent, in Staffordshire, where they rented a house in the High Street. His father was probably master of Burton Grammar School and from 1557 he was the first headmaster of Repton Grammar School in Derbyshire.
Edward attended Burton-upon-Trent Grammar School before entering the clothiers’ business run by his mother’s family. He was apprenticed to John Barnes, a woollen draper in Shrewsbury, and in 1590 was admitted as a master of the Shrewsbury Drapers’ Company. On returning to Burton, he set up as a draper in what was then Burton’s staple industry, and he married Frances Darbye of Hinckley in Burton in September 1593.
Earlier martyrs of the Reformation era recalled on a plaque in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
By the mid-1590s, he was an important figure in Puritan circles in Burton, and played a leading role in some remarkable events in the town in 1596, when Thomas Darling, a 13-year-old schoolboy, alleged that he been possessed by a devil sent by a witch, Alice Goodridge. In his fits of possession, Darling had episodes of vomiting and paralysis, d visions of green angels and a green cat, and claimed to be both diabolically possessed and divinely inspired.
During the investigation, Wightman was one of the five men who questioned Alice Goodridge, while Wightman’s wife Frances spent a day in prayer and fasting over the boy in preparation for his deliverance.
Darling’s devil was finally exorcised, it was said, and Wightman’s involvement in the case became a turning point in his life. In 1600, he was described as a clothier, but in 1604 he was licensed as an alehouse keeper. In a report to the Bishop of London, the churchwardens of Burton explained the change, saying Wightman was “much impoverished, and deeply indebted.” He may have been a victim of a severe crisis in the 1590s when bad harvests undermined the economy in general and the cloth trade in particular. Wightman was more successful selling ale than selling cloth, and it was alleged too that he was an inveterate gambler. Soon his journey into heresy was unstoppable.
Early heresies
After the death of Sir Humphrey Ferrers of Tamworth Castle in 1608, Wightman was heard in his own home expressing the “damnable heresy” that “the soul of man dies with the body and does not participate in either of the joys of Heaven or the pains of Hell, until the general day of Judgment, but rests with the body until then.”
The churchwardens suggested this error opened up the floodgates to further blasphemies. Local Puritan leaders tried to convince him of the error of his ways. But he began publishing books, stopped attending his local parish church as he become more radical and more heretical. By early 1611, he was preaching deeply unorthodox ideas and had become increasingly confrontational.
Lichfield Cathedral ... the case against Edward Wightman was initiated by the Bishop of Lichfield, Richard Neile (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
During a visitation to Burton by the Bishop of Lichfield, Richard Neile, in February 1611, Wightman was presented by the vicar and churchwardens. A warrant for his arrest was quickly issued, with an order to bring him before the bishop for questioning. Wightman was brought before the bishop at the house of the Chancellor of Lichfield, Dr Zachary Babington, in Curborough, outside Lichfield.
Within days he was taken to Westminster. There, in preparation for his trial, Wightman wrote a compendium of his theology, sending copies to the clergy to garner support. Wightman condemned the baptism of infants, rejected the doctrine of the Trinity, the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed, and claimed Christ was only a man “and a mere Creature and not both God and man in one person.”
Wightman also sent a copy to James I, but the king did not take kindly to this uninvited gift, and he soon found himself a prisoner. He was brought before the High Commission four times before being discharged in mid-June.
Trial in cathedral
Lichfield Cathedral ... the trail of Edward Wightman opened in the Consistory Court (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
On 4 September, however, Neile again summoned Wightman and his trial began in the Consistory Court in Lichfield Cathedral on 19 November. On the second day of the trial, 26 November, the crowd was so big – perhaps as many as 500– that the trial was moved to the larger space in the Lady Chapel.
The south side of the Lady Chapel in Lichfield Cathedral ... the trial was moved here because the crowd was so big (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Bishop Neile’s Chaplain, who assisted in prosecuting Wightman, was William Laud, the future Archbishop of Canterbury, who was later executed in 1645.
The birthplace of Elias Ashmole in Lichfield ... his papers provide a contemporary account of the trial (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
A record of the trial survives in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, among the papers of the Lichfield-born antiquary, Elias Ashmole. Throughout the trial, it seems, Wightman made no attempt to defend himself. On 5 December, he was brought before the court for the last time, and was condemned for holding “the wicked heresies of the Ebionites, Cerinthians, Valentinians, Arrians, Macedonians, of Simon Magus, of Manes, Manichees, of Photinus, and Anabaptists, and of other heretical, execrable, and unheard opinions, by the instinct of Satan.”
The charges brought against him included 11 distinct heresies. Part of the charge was that he believed “that the baptising of infants was an abominable custom; that the doctrine was a total fabrication and that Christ was only a mere man and not the son of God; that the Lord’s Supper and Baptism were not to be celebrated; and that Christianity was not wholly professed and preached in the Church of England, but only in part.” Other charges included several equally radical and incompatible opinions.
Preparing for a 17th century pageant in the Market Square, on the very spot where Edward Wightman was burned at the stake (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
On 20 March 1612, he was brought to the Market Square in Lichfield to be burned at the stake. But as the fires were lit, his courage failed him. He quickly cried out that he would recant. By then he was “well scorched,” and the crowd ran forward to put out the flames, some of them suffering burns in the process.
A form of recantation was hastily prepared, which he read before he was unchained and brought back to gaol. He was brought before the consistory court a few weeks later to repeat his recantation. But, no longer fearing the searing flames, he refused and “blasphemed more audaciously than before.”
On hearing the news, James I quickly ordered his final execution. Bartholomew Legate went to the stake on 18 March 1612, but before that no-one had been executed for heresy in England since 1589, when Francis Kett went to the stake in Norwich.
On 11 April 1612, Wightman was led to the stake once again. This time, he was not given a second chance. A contemporary account says he “was carried again to the stake where feeling the heat of the fire again would have recanted, but for all his crying the sheriff told him he should cost him no more and commanded faggots to be set to him where roaring, he was burned to ashes.”
Victim or deranged?
Saint Mary’s Church and the Market Square in Lichfield today (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
For some, Wightman symbolises the cruelty of a past age. Others have seen him as an early martyr for the English Baptists or Unitarians. But most historians dismiss him as being mentally unstable or a mad enthusiast, or deranged. Christopher Hill sees him as part of a plebeian underground of radical religious dissent, but most modern scholars dismiss him as either a spectacular curiosity or a deranged fantasist.
Looking down at the Market Square in Lichfield from the house where Samuel Johnson was born (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
However, in their recent study of Wightman, Ian Atherton of Keele University and David Como of Stanford University argue that Wightman’s story shows the Puritan movement included a large group of people with radical social, religious and political views.
Wightman was the victim of a complex series of events. His trial took place against the backdrop of the “Vorstius Affair,” involving the intense opposition of James I to an appointment in the University of Leiden of Conrad Vorstius, who was accused of atheism, Arianism and heretical opinions about the Holy Spirit.
The death of Archbishop Bancroft in 1610 led to intense infighting within the Church of England. When Neile’s predecessor in Lichfield, George Abbot, became Archbishop of Canterbury in April 1611, he began undermining a circle that included William Laud, Lancelot Andrewes, John Buckeridge and Richard Neile, whose own sacramental piety and anti-Calvinist views threatened Abbot.
Wightman’s trial posed a threat to Abbot because of his links with the Midland Puritans, of whom Wightman was a product. The eight clerics who preached in Lichfield Cathedral against Wightman on the final day of the trial included Neile’s chaplain, William Laud, who would succeed Abbot at Canterbury in 1633 – and was executed in 1645.
Changing the laws
“Woe to the Bloody City of Lichfield” ... a painting by Robert Spence (1871-1964) depicts George Fox, bare-footed and ragged, denouncing the city of Lichfield in the Market Square in 1651 (Lichfield Heritage Centre)
The execution may have inspired the Quaker founder, George Fox, in 1651, when he stood barefoot in the Market Square and denounced the city: “Woe to the Bloody City of Lichfield.” In the 1550s, during the reign of Queen Mary, Thomas Hayward, John Goreway and Joyce Lewis were burnt at the stake in the same square
Frances Wightman moved with her children to London, and their descendants emigrated to Rhode Island. In 1648, a new law condemned to death those who denied “the triune God, the resurrection, the last judgment, and that the Bible is the Word of God.” But the law was never enforced, and after the restoration of Charles II an act was passed in 1677 “forbidding the burning of heretics.”
A monument to Charles II outside Lichfield Cathedral … burning heretics at the stake was abolished after the restoration of the monarchy (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The death penalty for heresy remained in Scotland, where the last person executed for blasphemy or heresy was Thomas Aikenhead, hanged in Edinburgh in January 1697 for denying the Trinity. Burning at the stake remained on the statute books in England until 1790 as the punishment for a woman who murdered her husband, and it was occasionally used in the 18th century.
The witchcraft and murder trial in London last month had resonances of the Thomas Darling’s case, while the story of Edward Wightman challenges us to ask who we marginalise in the Church and in society today, who we do this to them and how we punish them.
Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism and Liturgy, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and a canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin. This essay was first published in April 2012 in the Church Review (Dublin and Glendalough) and the Diocesan Magazine (Cashel and Ossory).
Patrick Comerford
Edward Wightman, who died in the Market Square Lichfield on 11 April 1612, was the last person in England to be burnt at the stake for heresy. The Diocese of Lichfield is marking the 400th anniversary of his death with thanksgiving that it was the last execution of its kind, and Dr Ian Atherton’s lecture a few weeks ago, ‘Edward Wightman and the religious intolerance of the Early Stuarts,’ was the first in a series of five Lenten lectures in Lichfield Cathedral this year reflecting on Church-State relations.
We know little about Edward Wightman (1566-1612), for little of his own words and none of his writings survive. What we do know paints a sorry story of religious conflict and intolerance.
A plaque on the north wall of Saint Mary’s Church recalls the events in the Market Square 400 years ago this month (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
An early Puritan
The self-proclaimed prophet was born on 20 December 1566 in Wykin Hall at Burbage, near Hinckley in Leicestershire, and was baptised in the local parish church. His parents later moved to nearby Burton-upon-Trent, in Staffordshire, where they rented a house in the High Street. His father was probably master of Burton Grammar School and from 1557 he was the first headmaster of Repton Grammar School in Derbyshire.
Edward attended Burton-upon-Trent Grammar School before entering the clothiers’ business run by his mother’s family. He was apprenticed to John Barnes, a woollen draper in Shrewsbury, and in 1590 was admitted as a master of the Shrewsbury Drapers’ Company. On returning to Burton, he set up as a draper in what was then Burton’s staple industry, and he married Frances Darbye of Hinckley in Burton in September 1593.
Earlier martyrs of the Reformation era recalled on a plaque in Lichfield (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
By the mid-1590s, he was an important figure in Puritan circles in Burton, and played a leading role in some remarkable events in the town in 1596, when Thomas Darling, a 13-year-old schoolboy, alleged that he been possessed by a devil sent by a witch, Alice Goodridge. In his fits of possession, Darling had episodes of vomiting and paralysis, d visions of green angels and a green cat, and claimed to be both diabolically possessed and divinely inspired.
During the investigation, Wightman was one of the five men who questioned Alice Goodridge, while Wightman’s wife Frances spent a day in prayer and fasting over the boy in preparation for his deliverance.
Darling’s devil was finally exorcised, it was said, and Wightman’s involvement in the case became a turning point in his life. In 1600, he was described as a clothier, but in 1604 he was licensed as an alehouse keeper. In a report to the Bishop of London, the churchwardens of Burton explained the change, saying Wightman was “much impoverished, and deeply indebted.” He may have been a victim of a severe crisis in the 1590s when bad harvests undermined the economy in general and the cloth trade in particular. Wightman was more successful selling ale than selling cloth, and it was alleged too that he was an inveterate gambler. Soon his journey into heresy was unstoppable.
Early heresies
After the death of Sir Humphrey Ferrers of Tamworth Castle in 1608, Wightman was heard in his own home expressing the “damnable heresy” that “the soul of man dies with the body and does not participate in either of the joys of Heaven or the pains of Hell, until the general day of Judgment, but rests with the body until then.”
The churchwardens suggested this error opened up the floodgates to further blasphemies. Local Puritan leaders tried to convince him of the error of his ways. But he began publishing books, stopped attending his local parish church as he become more radical and more heretical. By early 1611, he was preaching deeply unorthodox ideas and had become increasingly confrontational.
Lichfield Cathedral ... the case against Edward Wightman was initiated by the Bishop of Lichfield, Richard Neile (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
During a visitation to Burton by the Bishop of Lichfield, Richard Neile, in February 1611, Wightman was presented by the vicar and churchwardens. A warrant for his arrest was quickly issued, with an order to bring him before the bishop for questioning. Wightman was brought before the bishop at the house of the Chancellor of Lichfield, Dr Zachary Babington, in Curborough, outside Lichfield.
Within days he was taken to Westminster. There, in preparation for his trial, Wightman wrote a compendium of his theology, sending copies to the clergy to garner support. Wightman condemned the baptism of infants, rejected the doctrine of the Trinity, the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed, and claimed Christ was only a man “and a mere Creature and not both God and man in one person.”
Wightman also sent a copy to James I, but the king did not take kindly to this uninvited gift, and he soon found himself a prisoner. He was brought before the High Commission four times before being discharged in mid-June.
Trial in cathedral
Lichfield Cathedral ... the trail of Edward Wightman opened in the Consistory Court (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
On 4 September, however, Neile again summoned Wightman and his trial began in the Consistory Court in Lichfield Cathedral on 19 November. On the second day of the trial, 26 November, the crowd was so big – perhaps as many as 500– that the trial was moved to the larger space in the Lady Chapel.
The south side of the Lady Chapel in Lichfield Cathedral ... the trial was moved here because the crowd was so big (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Bishop Neile’s Chaplain, who assisted in prosecuting Wightman, was William Laud, the future Archbishop of Canterbury, who was later executed in 1645.
The birthplace of Elias Ashmole in Lichfield ... his papers provide a contemporary account of the trial (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
A record of the trial survives in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, among the papers of the Lichfield-born antiquary, Elias Ashmole. Throughout the trial, it seems, Wightman made no attempt to defend himself. On 5 December, he was brought before the court for the last time, and was condemned for holding “the wicked heresies of the Ebionites, Cerinthians, Valentinians, Arrians, Macedonians, of Simon Magus, of Manes, Manichees, of Photinus, and Anabaptists, and of other heretical, execrable, and unheard opinions, by the instinct of Satan.”
The charges brought against him included 11 distinct heresies. Part of the charge was that he believed “that the baptising of infants was an abominable custom; that the doctrine was a total fabrication and that Christ was only a mere man and not the son of God; that the Lord’s Supper and Baptism were not to be celebrated; and that Christianity was not wholly professed and preached in the Church of England, but only in part.” Other charges included several equally radical and incompatible opinions.
Preparing for a 17th century pageant in the Market Square, on the very spot where Edward Wightman was burned at the stake (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
On 20 March 1612, he was brought to the Market Square in Lichfield to be burned at the stake. But as the fires were lit, his courage failed him. He quickly cried out that he would recant. By then he was “well scorched,” and the crowd ran forward to put out the flames, some of them suffering burns in the process.
A form of recantation was hastily prepared, which he read before he was unchained and brought back to gaol. He was brought before the consistory court a few weeks later to repeat his recantation. But, no longer fearing the searing flames, he refused and “blasphemed more audaciously than before.”
On hearing the news, James I quickly ordered his final execution. Bartholomew Legate went to the stake on 18 March 1612, but before that no-one had been executed for heresy in England since 1589, when Francis Kett went to the stake in Norwich.
On 11 April 1612, Wightman was led to the stake once again. This time, he was not given a second chance. A contemporary account says he “was carried again to the stake where feeling the heat of the fire again would have recanted, but for all his crying the sheriff told him he should cost him no more and commanded faggots to be set to him where roaring, he was burned to ashes.”
Victim or deranged?
Saint Mary’s Church and the Market Square in Lichfield today (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
For some, Wightman symbolises the cruelty of a past age. Others have seen him as an early martyr for the English Baptists or Unitarians. But most historians dismiss him as being mentally unstable or a mad enthusiast, or deranged. Christopher Hill sees him as part of a plebeian underground of radical religious dissent, but most modern scholars dismiss him as either a spectacular curiosity or a deranged fantasist.
Looking down at the Market Square in Lichfield from the house where Samuel Johnson was born (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
However, in their recent study of Wightman, Ian Atherton of Keele University and David Como of Stanford University argue that Wightman’s story shows the Puritan movement included a large group of people with radical social, religious and political views.
Wightman was the victim of a complex series of events. His trial took place against the backdrop of the “Vorstius Affair,” involving the intense opposition of James I to an appointment in the University of Leiden of Conrad Vorstius, who was accused of atheism, Arianism and heretical opinions about the Holy Spirit.
The death of Archbishop Bancroft in 1610 led to intense infighting within the Church of England. When Neile’s predecessor in Lichfield, George Abbot, became Archbishop of Canterbury in April 1611, he began undermining a circle that included William Laud, Lancelot Andrewes, John Buckeridge and Richard Neile, whose own sacramental piety and anti-Calvinist views threatened Abbot.
Wightman’s trial posed a threat to Abbot because of his links with the Midland Puritans, of whom Wightman was a product. The eight clerics who preached in Lichfield Cathedral against Wightman on the final day of the trial included Neile’s chaplain, William Laud, who would succeed Abbot at Canterbury in 1633 – and was executed in 1645.
Changing the laws
“Woe to the Bloody City of Lichfield” ... a painting by Robert Spence (1871-1964) depicts George Fox, bare-footed and ragged, denouncing the city of Lichfield in the Market Square in 1651 (Lichfield Heritage Centre)
The execution may have inspired the Quaker founder, George Fox, in 1651, when he stood barefoot in the Market Square and denounced the city: “Woe to the Bloody City of Lichfield.” In the 1550s, during the reign of Queen Mary, Thomas Hayward, John Goreway and Joyce Lewis were burnt at the stake in the same square
Frances Wightman moved with her children to London, and their descendants emigrated to Rhode Island. In 1648, a new law condemned to death those who denied “the triune God, the resurrection, the last judgment, and that the Bible is the Word of God.” But the law was never enforced, and after the restoration of Charles II an act was passed in 1677 “forbidding the burning of heretics.”
A monument to Charles II outside Lichfield Cathedral … burning heretics at the stake was abolished after the restoration of the monarchy (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The death penalty for heresy remained in Scotland, where the last person executed for blasphemy or heresy was Thomas Aikenhead, hanged in Edinburgh in January 1697 for denying the Trinity. Burning at the stake remained on the statute books in England until 1790 as the punishment for a woman who murdered her husband, and it was occasionally used in the 18th century.
The witchcraft and murder trial in London last month had resonances of the Thomas Darling’s case, while the story of Edward Wightman challenges us to ask who we marginalise in the Church and in society today, who we do this to them and how we punish them.
Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism and Liturgy, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and a canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin. This essay was first published in April 2012 in the Church Review (Dublin and Glendalough) and the Diocesan Magazine (Cashel and Ossory).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)