11 February 2025

A Victorian clock inspired
by Lichfield Cathedral
remains on display in
the old grammar school

The Cathedral Clock in the style of Lichfield Cathedral by Charles Thorneloe (1805-1885), on display in the old grammar school (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)

Patrick Comerford

The ‘house warmer’ hosted by Lichfield Discovered in the Old Grammar School, Saint John Street, last week was a joyful celebration and was an opportunity to meet many old friends. But it was also an opportunity to visit the premises of Lichfield District Council, and to see many of the historic exhibits on display.

One of the (literally) striking exhibits is labelled as a ‘Golden Clock for a Great Exhibition’. The Cathedral Clock is a cased striking clock made in the style of Lichfield Cathedral by Charles Thorneloe (1805-1885) of Tamworth Street and later of Bore Street for the Great Exhibition in London in 1851.

The Victorian clock is a reminder of the artistic craft work in Lichfield almost 200 years ago. It was described in the exhibition catalogue as a ‘Gothic Skeleton Clock which strikes quarters and goes 32 days. Lichfield Cathedral.’

The Great Exhibition in the Crystal Palace in Hyde Park attracted 13,000 exhibitors from around the world. It was a celebration of Victorian progress and invention, showcasing the finest technologies from around the world, and was divided into over 30 different classes of objects, ranging from mining and minerals to the latest weaponry.

Charles Thorneloe was exhibitor number 43 among the 739 exhibitors who made up Class 10, Philosophical, Musical, Horological, and Surgical Instruments. He was a well-respected clockmaker and watchmaker based at Tamworth Street and later on Bore Street. His ornate striking clock at the Great Exhibition was designed in the shape of Lichfield Cathedral and displayed his skills as both a metal worker and a clockmaker.

There are records of watchmakers working in Lichfield since at least in 1741, and by 1818 there were five watch and clockmakers, including William Vale in Bore Street, still working in 1841. Edmund Vale was a brass founder employing 15 men and five boys in 1861 and was one of five clockmakers in Lichfield in 1864.

The Thorneloe family in Lichfield can be traced for more 300 years back to Richard Thorneloe and his wife Mary Bell. They had moved from Lancashire by 1705, when their first son, Richard Thorneloe (1705-1749), the ancestor of this family, was born in Lichfield.

Richard Thorneloe’s son, William Thorneloe (1733-1810), was born in Lichfield in 1733 and married Mary Bailes in Saint Michael’s Church, Lichfield, in 1770. Their son, Thomas Thorneloe (1771-1846), was born in Lichfield in 1771. He married Ann Knight (1769-1827) in Coventry in 1797, and they were the parents of seven children, four sons and three daughters, including Charles Thorneloe, who was born in Lichfield in September 1805 and was baptised in Saint Chad’s Church on 8 October 1805.

Charles Thorneloe married Sarah Saunders (1797-1861) in Saint Mary’s Church, Lichfield, on 15 September 1831. By 1834, he was in business as a brass founder and clockmaker in Tamworth Street. He designed and manufactured clocks for over 30 years, and also served as a mentor to clockmakers.

After displaying his skills to the world at the Crystal Palace, Thorneloe returned to Lichfield with his clock. He continued to work at Tamworth Street as a clockmaker and watchmaker, but later moved the business to 25 Bore Street. He was the Mayor of Lichfield in 1861, the year his wife Sarah died.

Charles Thorneloe died on 21 December 1885. Although his siblings had children, whose descendants continued to live in Lichfield in the 20th century, Charles had no children. His business was taken over by John Salloway, who had worked as an apprentice clockmaker to Thorneloe in Tamworth Street from 1861.

John Salloway died in 1900, leaving the business to his brother William Salloway and wife Harriet Salloway. Harriet continued to run the shop and shifted the focus to jewellery and silver. Following a distinguished military career, William’s son, Frank Salloway took over the business in 1922 and eventually passed the baton on to his son John Salloway.

John and Mary Salloway were the parents of Nigel Salloway, who joined the company full time in 1984 and became the fourth generation of the family to run the firm. Salloways traded as a family-run business in Lichfield until 2018, when plans were announced to close shop.

When Nigel Salloway decided to retire, he told the local media that none of his three children wanted to take over the business. ‘Salloway has been a part of my life, man and boy. It’s going to be a very sad day when we finally close the doors,’ he said at the time.’

Meanwhile, Thorneloe’s striking clock designed in the shape of Lichfield Cathedral for the Great Exhibition was acquired by Lichfield District Council in 1983, and was put on display in the District Council House. It continues to impress people to this day, and it is a reminder of one of Lichfield’s finest craftsmen.

The old grammar school is the new home of Lichfield Discovered (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)

Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2025:
9, Tuesday 11 February 2025

Classical masks on sale near the Acropolis in Athens … the word ‘hypocrite’ comes from the Greek word for an actor who masked or hid his face (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)

Patrick Comerford

We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar. This week began with the Fourth Sunday before Lent (9 February 2025), and Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent are just three weeks away (5 March 2025).

Later today, I have a meeting of the Town Centre Working Group in Stony Stratford. Before today begins, however, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:

1, today’s Gospel reading;

2, a short reflection;

3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;

4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.

‘There are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles’ (Mark 7: 4) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)

Mark 7: 1-13 (NRSVA):

1 Now when the Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem gathered around him, 2 they noticed that some of his disciples were eating with defiled hands, that is, without washing them. 3 (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they thoroughly wash their hands, thus observing the tradition of the elders; 4 and they do not eat anything from the market unless they wash it; and there are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles). 5 So the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, ‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ 6 He said to them, ‘Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written,

“This people honours me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me;
7 in vain do they worship me,
teaching human precepts as doctrines.”
8 You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.’

9 Then he said to them, ‘You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition! 10 For Moses said, “Honour your father and your mother”; and, “Whoever speaks evil of father or mother must surely die.” 11 But you say that if anyone tells father or mother, “Whatever support you might have had from me is Corban” (that is, an offering to God) – 12 then you no longer permit doing anything for a father or mother, 13 thus making void the word of God through your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many things like this.’

‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ (Mark 7: 5) (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)

Today’s Reflection:

Sometimes our comfortable differences can trip us up in ways that surprise or even embarrass us.

I was talking to a priest colleague recently, who is not from these islands. He was telling me how, within weeks, he came a cropper in a new parish. He comes from a society and a culture where people speak openly and directly. He regards this as a mark of efficiency and a sign of his honesty.

But when he arrived in that new parish, this did not go down well at all.

When he told parishioners what he wanted to do, he thought he was being frank, honest and direct.

But his parishioners immediately saw him as abrupt, abrasive and rude.

In his next parish, he knew he needed to be a little less direct and a lot more diplomatic.

We all know what diplomats mean when they say talks have been frank and honest: bruising encounters with no one behaving in what we might call a civilised manner, or behaving towards each other like Christians.

We respond instinctively as if we expect to be treated politely and that others expect us to treat them politely too.

I offer two examples of how I think England and Ireland are unique in this respect. In other countries, when people pay for a service, they feel that they are doing someone a favour, giving them their custom and their money, and so walk away when the transaction is complete. It is a bonus for them if the person at the till says as they leave, ‘Thank you.’

But here, on these islands, we respond differently: when we pay in a shop or café, or get off a bus or train, it is we, the paying customers, who say ‘Thank You!’

Or again: How often have I asked someone for information that I know or expect them to have – looking for directions on the street, or asking for information at an airport or a train station.

And every now and then we meet someone who is curmudgeonly, who got out on the wrong side of the bed, or is just downright rude. And they answer brusquely, ‘I don’t know,’ or ‘Look at the timetable.’

And what do I say in reply? I say, ‘Thank You!’

I am just too Anglo-Saxon with my manners for my own good at times. I put on a polite mask, and I put up.

And sometimes we confuse those good manners with the answer we expect to that perennial question, ‘What Would Jesus Do?’

Well, look at what Jesus does over in our Gospel readings over these two weeks, and we’re in for something of a shocker.

Over these two weeks, we are going to come across what appear to be interesting, front-parlour meetings with Jesus. But that’s because English is such a polite language, and the translators add their own polite priorities and good manners to how they translate what Jesus says in the original and very direct Greek into palatable, modern English.

In today’s reading, we hear what sounds like Jesus being very rude to some very religious people, who come with real doubts and with polite questions.

How does he respond? He calls them hypocrites.

And to add to that, in the reading on Thursday, Jesus later goes on to compare a woman who comes to him in distress with dogs, and he seems to call her daughter what amounts to – in the original Greek – a ‘little bitch’ (Mark 7: 24-30, 13 February 2025).

Then in the reading on Friday, he meets a man who is deaf and dumb – and he sticks his fingers in his ears and spits on him. (Mark 7: 31-37, 14 February 2025).

Hypocrites, dogs, little bitches, spitting at someone. Now, imagine if I responded in any one of these ways to someone who gives me a curt answer when I try to find my way through a busy train station or a crowded airport, or if they responded to me like that!

In today’s reading, the Pharisees come to Jesus with a genuine question that arises from rules they apply in their religious life, and rules that are radical, reforming, and easy for us to identify with when the reasons behind them are explained.

We need to keep in mind that the Pharisees are very religious, pious and good people. Too often we forget that Saint Paul boasts he is a Pharisee, that among the different Jewish groups of the day the Pharisees are the closest in tradition and practice to Jesus, and that Pharisaic Judaism is the spiritual ancestor of all modern forms of Judaism today.

The Pharisees looked at the demands the religious law of the Book of Leviticus made on the priests in the Temple. This priestly class included some of Jesus’ own family, such as Zechariah, the father of Saint John the Baptist.

Purity and cleanliness were part of their role in the Temple. Before they ate or handled any sacred food, they had to wash their hands thoroughly. But these rules only applied when they were on the rota for priestly duties in the Temple. They took it in turn, and outside that turn, those rules did not apply. Nor did they apply to the people in general, the average, everyday Jew on the street or at home.

But after the people return from exile in Babylon to Jerusalem, the Pharisees see the whole people as a royal people, a holy priesthood. And to make the people conscious of how holy the whole nation is, they suggest people should take on those priestly practices, to show they are holy.

In time, this becomes so accepted that people who do not bother washing their hands ritually before they eat are seen as being hypocrites if, at the same time, they are supposed to be holy and religious people.

The word hypocrite comes from classical Greek drama. This word (ὑποκριτής, hypokrités) was used for an actor who on stage puts on a mask and speaks the words of someone else. The actor with the mask could have subtitles with a disclaimer: ‘These are not my words, I am only using the words of Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes … or one of the other great playwrights.’

So, a hypocrite was an actor, a pretender, a dissembler, a hypocrite puts on a mask and says something that represents someone else’s ideas, but that he does not necessarily believe himself.

Jesus is saying that the Pharisees are using someone else’s words but do not necessarily understand why those rules and regulations came about.

It is not that washing my hands before I eat is a bad idea, or that I am a hypocrite if I do so. If I habitually fail to wash my hands before I eat, I am going to get sick, quickly and often.

But if I forget why I have to wash my hands, I am a hypocrite if I then expect others to do so. And sometimes we leave ourselves in danger of going hungry if we insist on washing our hands before we eat: the facilities to wash my hands are not always to hand on a long train journey or a long flight.

The Pharisees had their own rituals, and I would be silly to think that only they had these problems. We all have our own rituals associated with eating and cleanliness.

It is said one of the principal causes of domestic arguments in the kitchen is about what way to stack the dishwasher, and how to empty it. Should the knives stand up or down? Which sides do you place the glasses and the cups on? Do you rinse the plates before they go in?

To tell the truth, it probably does not matter. But it is still irritating to open the dishwasher and to find someone else has packed it.

The level of questioning from the Pharisees is about a ritual that is probably more important than how you and I stack the dishwasher. And the level of response from Jesus is not as rude as we might first think – just as I shall explain next week why he is not being rude to the distressed woman or the disabled man.

But when he says the Pharisees are hypocrites, Jesus is challenging them to drop the mask and to own the words they speak and to own the reasons for those rituals.

Can you imagine how much more positively people at large would view the churches if every parish and church put as much care into seeing that our children are not abused or infected with racism or discrimination or hate as much as we put into seeing that the cups are clean for the tea and coffee after church, or as much as we attend to the cleanliness of the sacred vessels used for the Eucharist or Holy Communion?

If we are worried about how clean the patten and chalice are at Holy Communion, how clean the church is, how clean the coffee cup is when it comes out of the dishwasher, how much more should be worried about how clean the Church is as an institution, how worthy it is to be called – for us to be called – the Body of Christ.

How we stack the dishwasher can be a domestic ritual of cleanliness … and the cause of many domestic arguments (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)

Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 11 February 2025):

The theme this week in ‘Pray With the World Church’, the Prayer Diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Founders’ Day.’ USPG and SPCK are celebrating ‘Founders’ Day’ in Saint James’s Church, Picadilly, next week (Monday 17 February 2025). This theme was introduced on Sunday with a Reflection by Dr Jo Sadgrove, Research and Learning Advisor, USPG.


The USPG Prayer Diary today (Tuesday 11 February 2025) invites us to pray:

Father, we lament the silence that surrounds the brutal history of Codrington College, where the voices of the enslaved are still not heard. We grieve for the pain that is unspoken and for the erasure of the suffering caused by an economy of death.

The Collect:

O God,
you know us to be set
in the midst of so many and great dangers,
that by reason of the frailty of our nature
we cannot always stand upright:
grant to us such strength and protection
as may support us in all dangers
and carry us through all temptations;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.

The Post-Communion Prayer:

Go before us, Lord, in all we do
with your most gracious favour,
and guide us with your continual help,
that in all our works
begun, continued and ended in you,
we may glorify your holy name,
and finally by your mercy receive everlasting life;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Additional Collect:
Lord of the hosts of heaven,
our salvation and our strength,
without you we are lost:
guard us from all that harms or hurts
and raise us when we fall;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Yesterday’s Reflection

Continued Tomorrow

A classical Greek mask in a museum in Naxos in Sicily … the word ‘hypocrite’ comes from the Greek word for an actor who masked or hid his face as he said someone else’s words (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)

Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org