Summertown United Reformed Church on Banbury Road, Oxford, closed in 2022 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
When I saw the Summertown United Reformed Church and Twining House side-by-side on Banbury Road in Oxford last week, I thought one had been the church hall for the other. Instead, I came across the story of Alderman Francis Twining, an enlightened and benevolent grocer and property developer, and the story of the Congregationalists in north Oxford.
Both buildings stand side-by-side among the attractive shops along this stretch of Banbury Road, and provide insights into the ways this suburb of north Oxford developed in the late Victorian and Edwardian years. The church has historic, social, philanthropic and architectural significance in Oxford and has contributed to the character of Summertown. It also has links with Mansfield College, an academic and intellectual centre for Congregationalism and nonconformism in Oxford.
The church was built in 1893 as a Congregational church to meet the needs of a growing community in Summertown and in greater Oxford. It was designed by the Oxford builder Thomas Henry Kingerlee (1843-1929), who designed many prominent buildings in Oxford, including the Rivermead Hospital, Headington Junior School, the original New Theatre, Elliston & Cavell (later Debenhams), the Oxford Marmalade Factory and Twining House.
TH Kingerlee was an active Congregationalist and a deacon in George Street Congregational Church. He was a local magistrate, a Liberal member of Oxford City Council, an Alderman in 1906 and twice Mayor of Oxford, in 1898-1899 and 1911-1912. He stood as the Liberal candidate for MP of Oxford in 1895, but was defeated by the Conservative candidate, Arthur Annesley (1843-1927), 11th Viscount Valentia, who held the seat until 1917. The Kingerlee firm survives today as a fifth generation business, now based in Kidlington.
Kingerlee used similar patterns when he was building Summertown Congregational Church in 1893 and Twining’s grocery shop next door at 294 Banbury Road a decade later in 1902 – now known as Twining House and the offices of the estate agents Breckon and Breckon.
Congregational churches and other nonconformist churches often have two front doors, one for women to enter and one for men. But Kingerlee’s church in Summertown has only one front door to the narthex, with two inner doors then opening to the nave.
The west door is solid timber with ironwork strap hinges that have elaborate curled elements. Inside, the craft work in the church is of the highest quality, typical of Kingerlee’s work. The main lobby or narthex has encaustic geometrical tiles, and the interior details include the hammerbeam roof, the floorboards and the pews, complete with original name card holders and cast iron umbrella holders. The organ dates from ca 1899.
The church has no aisles, columns or side chapels, and there is no decoration, reflecting the Puritan roots of nonconformists. The church was extended with the addition of meeting rooms in 1910.
The story of the growth and development of Congregationalism in Oxford, from the Puritans of the mid-17th century up to the early 21st century, is told by Michael Hopkins in his MPhil thesis at the University of Birmingham in 2010, including the story of the New Road Meeting House, the Congregational Churches on George Street and in Summertown, Mansfield College and other suburban and village chapels.
The modern Congregationalist movement in Oxford began with a secession from New Road Baptist chapel. A breakaway group of 12 New Road members was meeting in the house of William Cousins, coachmaker, in High Street in 1830, and later in the home of Samuel Collingwood, printer to the university, in St Giles’s Street.
Both men accepted the baptism of children, as did most of the 28 New Road members who had seceded by 1836. The new group’s stated aim was ‘to supply the lamentable deficiency of places of worship where evangelical truth was preached’. The first Congregational chapel in 1832 in George Street was a brick building in Anglo-Norman style, designed by J Greenshields of Oxford. It could seat 500 people, and this number had increased to over 700 by 1851.
The new society grew rapidly: there were 70 members in 1837, 143 in 1841 as well as a large Sunday school, and there were congregations of over 250 at times in 1851.
The Revd David Martin was the pastor for over 20 years (1858-1879), but after his time numbers began to fall decreased, and the church's decline was hastened by vacancies in the pastorate, rapid turnover of ministers, difficulties in raising money for the minister's stipend, and the gradual depopulation of the city centre which began in the 1880s. Members lived at rather greater distances from each other than those in Summertown and formed a less close community.
The opening of Mansfield College in 1889 provided Congregationalists in the university with a chapel of their own, but a few academics, including the lexicographer Sir James Murray (1837-1915), attended the George Street chapel.
Despite a continued decline in numbers, a site for a new church in St Giles’s Street was bought in 1900, but the proposal was abandoned in 1910. By 1930, congregations averaged only about 50, the congregation disbanded in 1933 and the church was closed and was sold to the city council.
Summertown Congregational Church was built in 1893 and opened in 1894 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
As for the church on Banbury Road, Congregationalist services started in Summertown in 1838, partly to counter the growing influence of the Tractarian or Oxford Movement. A house was registered for worship in 1840, and 22 members left the George Street church in 1843 to form a new congregation in Summertown. A chapel in Middle Way was opened in 1844 with HB Bulteel among the preachers at the opening service. The new church, which served a poor area that was still a village, depended greatly on the support of prominent families such as the Lindseys and the Pharaohs, but poverty meant there were long gaps in the appointments of pastors.
A Methodist local preacher JM Crapper acted as minister in 1850-1851. The chapel was almost full in 1851, with average congregations of 160 in the morning and 190 in the evening. Methodist Free Church ministers helped at Summertown between 1867 and 1873, and from the late 1880s the pulpit was often supplied by students from Mansfield College.
Although the congregation had long been without a minister, a new and larger church was built on the Banbury Road in 1893. The foundation stone of the new building was laid on 13 June 1893 by William Crosfield, MP for Lincoln. The new church opened on 25 January 1894. The service was unusual in that it included the ordination of the new pastor named Eason, who had come from Ireland to study at Mansfield College, before being ordained as pastor at Summertown.
Eason resigned at the end of 1901 following a call from a church in Derry. By then, membership was 44 and Sunday congregations averaged 200.
Special services to attract the many newcomers to the neighbourhood helped to raise membership from 58 in 1897 to 81 in 1901. Between the World War I and World War II, a number of professional people joined the congregation, which until then had been largely working-class.
A manse was bought on 6 Beechcroft Road in 1922, and later manses were at 226 Banbury Road, 42 Lonsdale Road and then 100 Victoria Road.
When the church on George Street closed in 1933, a small number of members moved to the church in Summertown. The Revd Henry Roberts Moxley of Summertown was a member of the founding committee of Oxfam in 1942.
A prominent member from the 1950s was the theologian the Revd Dr John Marsh (1904-1994), Principal of Mansfield College (1953-1970), the Congregational representative on the World Council of Churches, and later President of the Faith and Order Committee, and author of the Pelican Commentary on Saint John’s Gospel (1968). Other members at that time included the New Testament scholar Charles Harold (CH) Dodd (1884-1971), who had retired as Norris–Hulse Professor of Divinity in Cambridge in 1949.
After the Congregational Church on Cowley Road closed in 1962, Summertown’s place as the main Congregational church in Oxford was undisputed.
The ecumenical advances at Summertown and Blackbird Leys were well ahead of their time, driven by Congregationalists. But Hopkins had found that while the witness of the Congregational tradition in Oxford was strong, those efforts were divided in the face of unrecognised opportunities. Without the university or Mansfield College things would have been very different, Hopkins argues. But Summertown, in stark contrast to the other Congregational churches, developed a new model of church that was a success before the United Reformed Church was formed in 1972.
The Summertown Church Partnership was formed in 1982 after 18 months work, involving the Anglican parishes of Saint Michael’s Summertown and Saint Peter’s Wolvercote, now working as a team, and Summertown United Reformed Church, formalising their long commitment to shared outreach and church life. The Revd Ruth Whitehead became Summertown’s first female minister in 1997.
Summertown United Reformed Church closed for worship in 2022 after a continuing presence in that part of Oxford stretching back 179 years. It is still used by local arts groups. The Wessex Synod Trust of the URC owns the building and continues to hire out the premises to community groups, but now intends to sell it. A group of users have come together as Summertown Arts Community (SAC) to raise money to buy the building, and has until 28 July to buy the premises.
The active churches of the United Reformed Church in Oxford today include Saint Columba’s Church on Alfred Street, off the High Street.
Summertown Arts Community has until 28 July to buy the former church on Banbury Road (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
15 July 2025
Daily prayer in Ordinary Time 2025:
67, Tuesday 15 July 2025
The Crying Women of Sidon … a sarcophagus from Sidon now in the Istanbul Archaeological Museum
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and the week began with the Fourth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity IV, 13 July 2025). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Swithun (862), Bishop of Winchester, and Saint Bonaventure (1274), Friar, Bishop, Teacher of the Faith.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, reading today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite Woman … a modern icon by Brother Robert Lentz OFM
Matthew 11: 20-24 (NRSVA):
20 Then he began to reproach the cities in which most of his deeds of power had been done, because they did not repent. 21 ‘Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. 22 But I tell you, on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. 23 And you, Capernaum,
will you be exalted to heaven?
No, you will be brought down to Hades.
For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24 But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.’
Iokasti, a restaurant in Koutouloufari in Crete … are there comparisons between Iocasta and her daughter in ‘The Phoenician Women’ and the Greek-speaking Syro-Phoenician or Canaanite woman in Tyre and Sidon? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The short Gospel reading at the Eucharist today (Matthew 11: 20-24) seems to threaten judgement and doom for two pairs of cities – Chorazin and Bethsaida, and Tyre and Sidon – and links Capernaum with Hades, but not Sodom with Gomorrah.
But what deeds of power are going to be done in Tyre and Sidon? What signs of the day of judgement are going to be seen in Tyre and Sidon?
Perhaps this passage should not be read without also skipping forward a few chapters to Matthew 15: 21–28:
21 Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. 22 Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ 23 But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ 24 He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ 25 But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ 26 He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ 27 She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’ 28 Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly.
One of the first decisions of Jesus on that visit to Tyre and Sidon is to hear the cry for mercy from a Canaanite or Syro-Phoenician woman, to heal her daughter, and to commend their faith. The outsiders are counted in, and judgement is experienced as love and mercy, compassion and inclusion.
Can you recall a moment, a place, or an occasion when you felt rejected? To be rejected I do not need to be an outsider. We can be rejected by our own brothers or sisters, by those who live around us, by those who share our religious or cultural values.
We can be rejected because of our lifestyle, our family background, our ethnic or religious backgrounds, our personal habits, our family circumstances, our sexuality, or marital status or lack of marital status … the list is endless.
Can you think of how you feel when you are made to feel rejected, an outsider, sent away?
And, have you found yourself blaming yourself rather than those who reject or marginalise you?
If so, then you know what it is like to become a double victim: a victim of the prejudices of others, and a victim of the perceptions that are projected onto you.
The disciples reject the Canaanite woman who is pleading for mercy, seeing her as unclean and an outsider, and bring judgement down on this woman and her daughter in Tyre and Sidon.
Having heard the Pharisees suggest Jesus should reject them, they now say to Jesus, ‘send her away’ (verse 23).
But there is a paradox in their rejection of her, for they use a word (ἀπόλυσον, apoluson) that also means to set free, to let go, to give liberty to, to release.
The same verb is used to set a debtor free of debts, or to allow a woman to divorce her husband, setting her free from the bonds that tie husband and wife. In wanting to be free from her demanding calls, they – ironically – call for mother and daughter to be freed from their torments.
In our feelings of rejection and marginalisation, how do we find acceptance, liberation, and a place in God’s unfolding plan for his people, for all people, God’s future for us?
The disciples want to turn her away. They see her as a pest, a nuisance, a pushy woman, breaking into their closed space, their private area.
Christ and the Disciples are in the coastal area of Tyre and Sidon, an area of small villages, perhaps looking for a quiet break for a few days. But if they are planning to get away for a few quiet days, those plans are frustrated when this woman arrives with her pressing demands.
This is foreign territory, inhabited by Canaanites or Phoenicians, who were culturally Hellenised and mainly Greek-speaking. It is also the territory associated with Elijah, who raised the widow’s child from death (I Kings 17: 9-24) and who ‘was markedly open to foreigners.’
So, Christ could expect to find himself among a large number of Greek-speaking ‘Gentiles.’ Would the Disciples expect him to behave like Elijah and break all the rules in being open to them, taking miraculous care of a lone mother and her child?
In the classical world, Phoenician women were pushy women. About 400 years earlier, the great Greek playwright Euripides wrote his tragic play The Phoenician Women (Φοίνισσαι, Phoenissae).
The title of the play, The Phoenician Women, refers to the Greek chorus, which is composed of Phoenician women on their way to Delphi and who are trapped in Thebes by war.
The two key women in the play are Jocasta and her daughter Antigone, who have survived against all odds. They challenge the accepted concepts in Classical times of fate and free-will.
In the face of death, they refuse to accept what others see as their destiny, they refuse to be pushed aside, marginalised and dismissed as the men around then compete for power.
So, in Christ’s time, educated people could expect a Phoenician woman and her daughter to be pushy in the face of what appears to be a cruel fate, even if this involves confronting successful or ambitious men: they are prepared to stand up to kings and rulers, prepared to challenge them, and prepared to risk judgement that means rejection and exile.
Faced with her daughter’s needs, this woman ignores the disciples: she is direct and aggressive in demanding healing and justice. And in demanding justice and healing for her daughter, she is, of course, demanding these for herself too.
Nothing is said about the response of the disciples to the woman. They had been trying to push her away, despite her crying, her tears, her distress, her plight over her daughter.
Perhaps nothing is said about the response of the disciples … because we are the disciples. How do you and I respond to encounters like this?
As a social response, for example, we might consider that the confrontation is an illustration of how we might respond to the needs of strangers and foreigners.
Do we find them pushy and demanding?
How do we respond when the foreign woman in our society wants the same treatment in hospital for her child as a child born here?
How do we respond when foreigners who are more open and joyful in conversation, appear to be encroaching on our privacy on the bus, on the street or in a shop?
Are we like the Disciples, and want to send them away? Or are we like Jesus, and engage in conversation with them?
Do we think we have some privileges that should not be shared with the outsider and the stranger?
How do we respond to people who are pushy and continue to demand care for their children in the face of society’s decision to say no?
The parents who want teaching support for children with learning disabilities, the parents who want to know why children’s hospitals are so badly funded that they have to raise funds with charity events while their children wait for treatment.
But this Gospel story also raises questions at a personal, spiritual level too, when it comes to matters of faith.
How many people do you know who give up when they turn to God in prayer and find those who are supposed to represent Jesus appear to turn them away?
How many times have I dismissed the needs and prayers of others because they appear to be outside the community of faith as I understand it?
This woman is insistent, she is persistent; she refuses to accept what other people regard as her fate and destiny.
In the end, she receives the mercy and help she asks for, and much, much more … she is commended in front of the disciples for her faith, and her daughter is healed instantly.
We do not have to accept misery and rejection, especially when others see them as our fate or our destiny. And, in simple prayers, we may find more in the answer than we ever ask for.
‘What overwhelms us?’
‘What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
These questions were put to us some years by Bishop Margaret Vertue of the Diocese of False Bay in South Africa, at the USPG conference in High Leigh.
Bishop Margaret, who is the second woman to become a bishop in Africa, was leading that morning’s Bible study in 2017 on Matthew 11: 20-24.
She challenged us to think of how we respond in love and not in judgement. And, drawing on the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse, she asked: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
To illustrate how we might respond in love and not in judgement, she shared ‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda, with music by Giles Lamb. This short film from Purplefeather illustrates the power of words to radically change our message and our effect upon the world.
She challenged us that morning to consider our own contexts and to discuss: ‘What overwhelms us? What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
And she asked, in the words of the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda / Purplefeather, music by Giles Lamb
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 15 July 2025):
The theme this week (13 to 19 July) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Shaping the Future: Africa Six.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Senior Regional Manager: Africa, USPG.
The USPG prayer diary today (Tuesday 15 July 2025) invites us to pray
Loving Lord, bless the Centre for Anglican Women’s Leadership and Research in Africa as they work to equip and empower women to lead with strength, faith, and compassion. We pray this work will bear lasting fruit.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
by whose grace we celebrate again
the feast of your servant Swithun:
grant that, as he governed with gentleness
the people committed to his care,
so we, rejoicing in our Christian inheritance,
may always seek to build up your Church in unity and love;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God, shepherd of your people,
whose servant Swithun revealed the loving service of Christ
in his ministry as a pastor of your people:
by this eucharist in which we share
awaken within us the love of Christ
and keep us faithful to our Christian calling;
through him who laid down his life for us,
but is alive and reigns with you, now and for ever.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
The Theatre of Dionysus, beneath the slopes of the Acropolis in Athens … plays by the great playwrights, Euripides, Aeschylus and Sophocles were first performed there (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in Ordinary Time in the Church Calendar and the week began with the Fourth Sunday after Trinity (Trinity IV, 13 July 2025). The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Swithun (862), Bishop of Winchester, and Saint Bonaventure (1274), Friar, Bishop, Teacher of the Faith.
Before today begins, I am taking some quiet time this morning to give thanks, to reflect, to pray and to read in these ways:
1, reading today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.

Matthew 11: 20-24 (NRSVA):
20 Then he began to reproach the cities in which most of his deeds of power had been done, because they did not repent. 21 ‘Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. 22 But I tell you, on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. 23 And you, Capernaum,
will you be exalted to heaven?
No, you will be brought down to Hades.
For if the deeds of power done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24 But I tell you that on the day of judgement it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you.’
The short Gospel reading at the Eucharist today (Matthew 11: 20-24) seems to threaten judgement and doom for two pairs of cities – Chorazin and Bethsaida, and Tyre and Sidon – and links Capernaum with Hades, but not Sodom with Gomorrah.
But what deeds of power are going to be done in Tyre and Sidon? What signs of the day of judgement are going to be seen in Tyre and Sidon?
Perhaps this passage should not be read without also skipping forward a few chapters to Matthew 15: 21–28:
21 Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. 22 Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ 23 But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ 24 He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ 25 But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ 26 He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ 27 She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’ 28 Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly.
One of the first decisions of Jesus on that visit to Tyre and Sidon is to hear the cry for mercy from a Canaanite or Syro-Phoenician woman, to heal her daughter, and to commend their faith. The outsiders are counted in, and judgement is experienced as love and mercy, compassion and inclusion.
Can you recall a moment, a place, or an occasion when you felt rejected? To be rejected I do not need to be an outsider. We can be rejected by our own brothers or sisters, by those who live around us, by those who share our religious or cultural values.
We can be rejected because of our lifestyle, our family background, our ethnic or religious backgrounds, our personal habits, our family circumstances, our sexuality, or marital status or lack of marital status … the list is endless.
Can you think of how you feel when you are made to feel rejected, an outsider, sent away?
And, have you found yourself blaming yourself rather than those who reject or marginalise you?
If so, then you know what it is like to become a double victim: a victim of the prejudices of others, and a victim of the perceptions that are projected onto you.
The disciples reject the Canaanite woman who is pleading for mercy, seeing her as unclean and an outsider, and bring judgement down on this woman and her daughter in Tyre and Sidon.
Having heard the Pharisees suggest Jesus should reject them, they now say to Jesus, ‘send her away’ (verse 23).
But there is a paradox in their rejection of her, for they use a word (ἀπόλυσον, apoluson) that also means to set free, to let go, to give liberty to, to release.
The same verb is used to set a debtor free of debts, or to allow a woman to divorce her husband, setting her free from the bonds that tie husband and wife. In wanting to be free from her demanding calls, they – ironically – call for mother and daughter to be freed from their torments.
In our feelings of rejection and marginalisation, how do we find acceptance, liberation, and a place in God’s unfolding plan for his people, for all people, God’s future for us?
The disciples want to turn her away. They see her as a pest, a nuisance, a pushy woman, breaking into their closed space, their private area.
Christ and the Disciples are in the coastal area of Tyre and Sidon, an area of small villages, perhaps looking for a quiet break for a few days. But if they are planning to get away for a few quiet days, those plans are frustrated when this woman arrives with her pressing demands.
This is foreign territory, inhabited by Canaanites or Phoenicians, who were culturally Hellenised and mainly Greek-speaking. It is also the territory associated with Elijah, who raised the widow’s child from death (I Kings 17: 9-24) and who ‘was markedly open to foreigners.’
So, Christ could expect to find himself among a large number of Greek-speaking ‘Gentiles.’ Would the Disciples expect him to behave like Elijah and break all the rules in being open to them, taking miraculous care of a lone mother and her child?
In the classical world, Phoenician women were pushy women. About 400 years earlier, the great Greek playwright Euripides wrote his tragic play The Phoenician Women (Φοίνισσαι, Phoenissae).
The title of the play, The Phoenician Women, refers to the Greek chorus, which is composed of Phoenician women on their way to Delphi and who are trapped in Thebes by war.
The two key women in the play are Jocasta and her daughter Antigone, who have survived against all odds. They challenge the accepted concepts in Classical times of fate and free-will.
In the face of death, they refuse to accept what others see as their destiny, they refuse to be pushed aside, marginalised and dismissed as the men around then compete for power.
So, in Christ’s time, educated people could expect a Phoenician woman and her daughter to be pushy in the face of what appears to be a cruel fate, even if this involves confronting successful or ambitious men: they are prepared to stand up to kings and rulers, prepared to challenge them, and prepared to risk judgement that means rejection and exile.
Faced with her daughter’s needs, this woman ignores the disciples: she is direct and aggressive in demanding healing and justice. And in demanding justice and healing for her daughter, she is, of course, demanding these for herself too.
Nothing is said about the response of the disciples to the woman. They had been trying to push her away, despite her crying, her tears, her distress, her plight over her daughter.
Perhaps nothing is said about the response of the disciples … because we are the disciples. How do you and I respond to encounters like this?
As a social response, for example, we might consider that the confrontation is an illustration of how we might respond to the needs of strangers and foreigners.
Do we find them pushy and demanding?
How do we respond when the foreign woman in our society wants the same treatment in hospital for her child as a child born here?
How do we respond when foreigners who are more open and joyful in conversation, appear to be encroaching on our privacy on the bus, on the street or in a shop?
Are we like the Disciples, and want to send them away? Or are we like Jesus, and engage in conversation with them?
Do we think we have some privileges that should not be shared with the outsider and the stranger?
How do we respond to people who are pushy and continue to demand care for their children in the face of society’s decision to say no?
The parents who want teaching support for children with learning disabilities, the parents who want to know why children’s hospitals are so badly funded that they have to raise funds with charity events while their children wait for treatment.
But this Gospel story also raises questions at a personal, spiritual level too, when it comes to matters of faith.
How many people do you know who give up when they turn to God in prayer and find those who are supposed to represent Jesus appear to turn them away?
How many times have I dismissed the needs and prayers of others because they appear to be outside the community of faith as I understand it?
This woman is insistent, she is persistent; she refuses to accept what other people regard as her fate and destiny.
In the end, she receives the mercy and help she asks for, and much, much more … she is commended in front of the disciples for her faith, and her daughter is healed instantly.
We do not have to accept misery and rejection, especially when others see them as our fate or our destiny. And, in simple prayers, we may find more in the answer than we ever ask for.
‘What overwhelms us?’
‘What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
These questions were put to us some years by Bishop Margaret Vertue of the Diocese of False Bay in South Africa, at the USPG conference in High Leigh.
Bishop Margaret, who is the second woman to become a bishop in Africa, was leading that morning’s Bible study in 2017 on Matthew 11: 20-24.
She challenged us to think of how we respond in love and not in judgement. And, drawing on the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse, she asked: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
To illustrate how we might respond in love and not in judgement, she shared ‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda, with music by Giles Lamb. This short film from Purplefeather illustrates the power of words to radically change our message and our effect upon the world.
She challenged us that morning to consider our own contexts and to discuss: ‘What overwhelms us? What can we do about being overwhelmed?’
And she asked, in the words of the wisdom of the Carthusian monks of Grand Chartreuse: ‘I became human for you, will you become God with me?’
‘The Story of a Sign’ by Alonso Alvarez Barreda / Purplefeather, music by Giles Lamb
Today’s Prayers (Tuesday 15 July 2025):
The theme this week (13 to 19 July) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Shaping the Future: Africa Six.’ This theme was introduced on Sunday with a programme update from Fran Mate, Senior Regional Manager: Africa, USPG.
The USPG prayer diary today (Tuesday 15 July 2025) invites us to pray
Loving Lord, bless the Centre for Anglican Women’s Leadership and Research in Africa as they work to equip and empower women to lead with strength, faith, and compassion. We pray this work will bear lasting fruit.
The Collect:
Almighty God,
by whose grace we celebrate again
the feast of your servant Swithun:
grant that, as he governed with gentleness
the people committed to his care,
so we, rejoicing in our Christian inheritance,
may always seek to build up your Church in unity and love;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God, shepherd of your people,
whose servant Swithun revealed the loving service of Christ
in his ministry as a pastor of your people:
by this eucharist in which we share
awaken within us the love of Christ
and keep us faithful to our Christian calling;
through him who laid down his life for us,
but is alive and reigns with you, now and for ever.
Yesterday’s reflections
Continued tomorrow
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)