Saint Edmund’s Church in Maids Moreton, Buckinghamshire, dates from the late 14th century but probably stands on the site of an earlier Anglo-Saxon church (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
I was in Maids Moreton, on the edges of Buckingham, earlier last week, looking for the Old Rectory as part of my continuing research into the work of the Stony Stratford architect Edward Swinfen Harris (1841-1924).
Maids Moreton is a pretty Buckinghamshire village that retains its rural and rustic charms despite its proximity to Buckingham, with many timber framed houses and thatched cottages in the village. But the oldest building in Maids Moreton is the Parish Church of Saint Edmund, said to date from the late 14th century but probably standing on the site of an earlier Anglo-Saxon church.
Saint Edmund’s is dedicated to the ninth century Anglo-Saxon King Edmund who was martyred and beheaded by the Danes in Essex in the year 869. He is buried at Bury St Edmunds and Saint Edmund and Saint Edward the Confessor were the patron saints of mediaeval England until they were replaced by Saint George in the 15th century. Saint Edmund’s Day is later next week, on 20 November.
A modern portrait of Saint Edmund, king and martyr, in Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Saint Edmund’s Church is a simple structure with a chancel, nave and tower, north and south porches and a south vestry that was extended in 1882. It is of exceptional quality in the Perpendicular style, a uniquely English variation of Gothic architecture that emphasises verticality, light and proportion. This is seen in the large windows with vertical mullions that continue downwards to stone seats. The most notable feature of the church are the four fan vaults that are contemporary with the building and among the earliest to be seen today.
The church was entirely rebuilt ca 1450, and later legends and local lore associate the founding or re-founding of the church with two women who became known as the Maids of Moreton. They were said to have been daughters of the last Thomas Pever, who died in 1429, and are said to give Maids Moreton its name.
The legend and its dating is further confused by a stone slab, originally in the centre of the nave and now under a section of the floor that can be lifted. It has the outline of the brasses of two women dated to ca 1380-1420. They too have been identified with the two women said to have given Maids Moreton its name.
Inside Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, looking towards the chancel and the east end (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
A late 12th century font and some 12th century moulded stones, reused in the rear arches of the windows of the north porch, are parts of an earlier church, and the list of rectors of the parish begins in 1241 with one Robert.
The windows throughout the church, with their tracery of vertical mullions and horizontal transoms, are the most obvious feature in the Perpendicular style. The original oak roofs of the nave and chancel remain. All the vaults in Saint Edmund’s are of an early design and construction, similar to the cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral, with the ribs doubling and re-doubling in number as the cone expands.
These architectural details suggest Saint Edmund’s Church was completed before 1400, and the unusually large number of stone seats, especially in the chancel, suggest it may have been intended for a singing school.
The chancel, the oldest part of Saint Edmund’s Church, may have been built before the Black Death in 14th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The chancel is the oldest part of the church and may have been built before the Black Death in 14th century, with the nave and tower built after that. The chancel roof is of two bays, the carved boss at the centre of the tie-beam shows Christ in Majesty sitting on a throne holding the world in his left hand while his right hand is raised in blessing.
The east window has a three-centred arch that is flat at the top rather than pointed in the Gothic tradition. Pieces of mediaeval glass at the top of the window indicate it originally depicted the Tree of Jesse, illustrating the genealogy of Jesus through King David.
The stained glass in the east window is the work of Percy Charles Haydon Bacon (1860-1935), who founded the firm of Percy Bacon & Brothers in 1892. He also made windows in Saint James the Great Church, Hanslope, and Saint Simon and Saint Jude Church, Castlethorpe.
The window by Percy Charles Haydon Bacon was installed in 1898 to mark Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee the previous year. It shows five major events in the life of Christ: the Nativity; the Baptism of Christ in the Jordan by Saint John the Baptist; the Crucifixion; the Resurrection or Noli Me Tangere; and the Ascension, though with only two of the disciples, Saint Peter and Saint John.
The east window by Percy Charles Haydon Bacon was installed in 1898 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The altar or communion table replaced the pre-Reformation stone altar that may once have held relics of Saint Edmund, and a later Reformation-era table. The carved oak Jacobean table is dated 1623 and the carvings include dragons with grape vines emerging from their mouths, symbols of the Holy Spirit and the fruit of the Spirits, a rose and thistle symbolising the united crowns of England and Scotland, various faces and shields with the name of the donor John More, the donor, and the coat of arms of the More family.
The sedilia on the south side of the chancel has an elaborately carved canopy above the seats for the priest, deacon and subdeacon. The canopy is of chalk, and probably dates from the late 15th century. The painting behind is of uncertain date. It showed the Last Supper, and was defaced probably by Cromwellian soldiers.
The sedilia on the south side of the chancel with its elaborately carved canopy (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The door on the north side of the chancel is made of wide vertical planks, mostly elm, and may have been made hastily to replace a door that Cromwellian soldiers broke through.
An elaborate monument in a recess in the centre of the north wall of the chancel commemorates Penelope Bate and her husband Edward Bate, the son of George Bate, who was the physician to Charles I, Oliver Cromwell and Charles II.
The lectern, now in the chancel, has an oak base and support, with an oak carving of an eagle. It was donated by Eliza Nickols of Oxford, in 1933, in memory of her mother, who was born in Maids Moreton.
The oak chancel screen dates from the 15th century. When Hugh Harrison, a consultant conservationist, examined the screen in 2012, he found convincing evidence that it was no later than the 15th century and had always been in its location. He said ‘the screen is one of the most complete, least altered or damaged mediaeval screens that I have ever seen.’
He found signs of the original red and green polychrome decoration. On top of the screen, at either end of the chancel arch, are two blackened oak figures with shields displaying the hammer and nails of the crucifixion. They may have been corbel fronts or bosses from an old roof.
The oak chancel screen dates from the 15th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The nave is divided into four bays by the spacing of the roof trusses. In each of the first, second and fourth bays on either side is a tall, finely-proportioned window of three transomed lights, cinquefoiled in both stages, with vertical tracery in a two-centred head.
In the third bay on either side are the north and south doorways, each set in a recess of the same character as those in the chancel, and rising to the same height as the heads of the windows.
The nave roof has four bays with carved bosses and a carved with a figure of Christ in Judgment sitting on a rainbow. The roof was renovated in 1882, overlaid with new timbers and reroofed.
The pulpit was presented by Bishop Edmund Harold Browne in memory of his parents (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The pulpit has carved oak rails in the Gothic style. It was presented by Edmund Harold Browne (1811-1891), Bishop of Ely, Bishop of Winchester and Norrisian Professor of Divinity at Cambridge, in memory of his parents, who lived at Moreton House and are buried by the church tower.
On the wall behind the pulpit, an 18th century tablet recalls Penelope Packe (1699-1718), a granddaughter of Edward Bate, who is commemorated on the north wall in the chancel, and the first wife of Richard Verney (1693-1752), 13th Lord Willoughby de Broke; she died when she was only 18.
The remains of a piscina – a drain used in rinsing the Communion vessels – in the south-east corner of the nave indicate an altar was originally in that place. The side chapel may have been the Lady Chapel, with a niche in the corner and a peculiar squint or hagiascope, that provided a view of the High Altar, so that the elevation at the two celebrations could take place at the same time.
The font is from the earlier church and may date from the 1140s or 1150s (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The font, which is from the earlier church, is of late Norman character, and has a large circular bowl resting on a large octagonal base and stem. The bowl is decorated with a series of six ornamented and beaded semi-circles, each enclosing a large acanthus leaf, with smaller leaves in the intermediate spaces. The bowl is believed to have been made in the workshop at Saint Peter’s in Northampton in the 1140s or 1150s.
Above the north door is a 17th century painted inscription with the arms of the Peyvre family, commemorating the Maids of Moreton, the legendary founders of the church.
An early Victorian bread basket on the wall near the north door was once used to hold bread distributed to the poor of the parish after evensong in winter. The bread was paid for through a bequest from of John Snart who died in 1743. The basket was rediscovered in the attic of the Old Rectory in 1904. The loaves were last distributed in 1970.
The north porch has embattled parapets, winged cherubim and a fan-vaulted ceiling (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The north porch with its vaulted ceiling and early 17th century outer double door (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
An early 17th century double door in the outer entrance of the north porch is set in a frame with a balustered fanlight in the head, bearing the date 1637 and a shield with the heraldic arms of the Pever family.
The porch has embattled parapets, winged figures representing cherubim, and a handsome fan-vaulted ceiling.
The design and execution of the vault is almost identical to the cloister of Gloucester Cathedral. In the rear arches of the windows are some 12th century moulded stones, probably re-used from the original church.
The south porch is smaller and less elaborate than the north porch (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The south porch is smaller and less elaborate than that the north porch – it is without buttresses and has a plain parapet in place of battlements. The roof is fan-vaulted and the internal door was installed during restoration work in the 1880s.
The west doorway has an elaborate canopy and the west window has remains of 15th century glass (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The west doorway has an elaborate canopy, supported by two richly panelled cones of fan vaulting. The west window has remains of 15th century glass. At the top corners of the tower are winged figures identical to those on the north porch.
The tower has a ring of six bells that are regularly rung. The bellringers’ gallery was built as a memorial to the dead of World War II. On the south wall of the gallery hangs the old south door with musket-ball holes made by Roundhead troops in 1642.
The Uthwatt family commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris to rebuild the Old Rectory (1878-1879) beside Saint Edmund’s Church. A major, but sympathetic, restoration of the church was undertaken in 1882-1887. At the time, the Rector of Maids Moreton was the Revd Bolton Waller Johnstone (1823-1903). His parents, the Revd John Beresford Johnstone and Elizabeth Waller of Castletown Park, Co Limerick, were married in Saint Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick, and he was born in Kilkenny and educated at Trinity College Dublin.
Inside Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, looking towards the west end from the chancel (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The church was reordered in 2015 when the chancel was cleared of accumulated furnishings and a level oak floor and a kitchen and toilet were added under the bellringers’ gallery.
The North Buckingham Parish is in the Diocese of Oxford and includes the villages of Akeley, Leckhampstead, Lillingstone Dayrell, Lillingstone Lovell and Maids Moreton and their churches, as well as part of the town of Buckingham.
The Revd Hans Taling is the Rector and the Revd Cathy Pearce is the Associate Priest.
The windows, with their tracery of vertical mullions and horizontal transoms, are the most obvious feature in the Perpendicular style (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
• The Sunday services in Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton, at at 10:30, with Holy Communion on the second and fourth Sundays. Tn addition there are services at 8 am on the first and third Sundays and at 6 pm on the fourth Sunday.
The east end and chancel window of Saint Edmund’s Church, Maids Moreton (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
09 November 2025
Daily prayer in the Kingdom Season:
9, Sunday 9 November 2025,
III before Advent, Remembrance Sunday
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. In the Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Later this morning, I hope to sing with the choir at the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, and in the afternoon I plan to attend the Remembrance Sunday commemorations at the War Memorial on Horsefair Green.
Meanwhile, before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The war memorial in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Luke 20: 27-38 (NRSVA):
27 Some Sadducees, those who say there is no resurrection, came to him 28 and asked him a question, ‘Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies, leaving a wife but no children, the man shall marry the widow and raise up children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers; the first married, and died childless; 30 then the second 31 and the third married her, and so in the same way all seven died childless. 32 Finally the woman also died. 33 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.’
34 Jesus said to them, ‘Those who belong to this age marry and are given in marriage; 35 but those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 36 Indeed they cannot die any more, because they are like angels and are children of God, being children of the resurrection. 37 And the fact that the dead are raised Moses himself showed, in the story about the bush, where he speaks of the Lord as the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. 38 Now he is God not of the dead, but of the living; for to him all of them are alive.’
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Tavern at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
When I was younger, much younger, I remember leafing through the pages of the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of Ireland during what I must have then thought were boring sermons.
Did you ever do that?
What did you come across?
Some things were undoubtedly more boring than any sermon, such as the list of sermons in the ‘Second Book of Homilies,’ listed in Article 35 of the 39 Articles.
But perhaps the most unusual thing I remember finding in the ‘old’ Book of Common Prayer was the ‘Table of Kindred and Affinity.’
It seeks to list ‘whosoever are related are forbidden by the Church … to marry together.’
The table – which is not there any more – ruled, for example, that a man may not marry his mother, his sister, his daughter, or numerous other relatives, and neither may a woman marry her uncle, nephew, grandparent or grandchild. That all makes common sense.
But it goes into obsessive detail with some surprising prohibitions. For example, a man may not marry his wife’s father’s mother or his daughter’s son’s wife.
I can still recall how my mind boggled at the thought of the need for such rules. What was life like back in the 16th century if the Church felt it needed to specify such prohibitions? And how many women had the opportunity even to contemplate marrying their deceased granddaughter’s husband?
At least six of the 25 relationships that are expressly prohibited from developing into marriage involve no genetic link at all. Yet the list did not prohibit marriages between first cousins. So some of the inconsistencies are striking, to say the least.
Some of the rules make sense: when extended families were the norm, and often lived under the same roof, these rules warned against exploitative relationships within family circles. They helped to prevent secret affairs that might have continued in the hope of their eventual ratification with marriage. And they clearly delineated family structures in ways that were important when it came to inheriting land and property and keeping them within the family.
But it could all have been, and was, dealt with anyway, through legislation and law.
What was something like that doing in a prayer book, in the Book of Common Prayer, in the first place?
I think it had less to do with morality and more to do with the Church needing to bolster long-held prejudices by cloaking them in statements that were good in part but in sum amounted to bad law and bad theology.
When the men who drew up this table in the Church, and the men who handed it down to Anglicans unquestioned for centuries, were getting their minds around some very peculiar relationships, did any one of them ever think about asking a woman, ‘What do you think about these obscure and arcane rules and regulations?’
Is the Church not doing the very same today, with the way it tries to rule about who can and who cannot get married in church today?
As the Church distances itself from marriages that are actually allowed in law today, who among senior decision-makers actually takes the time to ask the women and men who are refused Church marriages, ‘Would you like to be married in Church?’
For example, when Lyra McKee was murdered in Derry in 2019 Church leaders were right to rush to condemn her brutal murder. It was so fitting that she received a dignified funeral in a Church of Ireland cathedral, Saint Anne’s Cathedral, Belfast, later that month. But had the bishops and priests who condemned her murder and were supportive of her funeral instead offered her the marriage she had looked forward to, they would have been severely disciplined by Church authorities.
And, as they were disciplined, I imagine, no-one would have asked Lyra McKee what she wanted, what she needed, what she had hoped for.
I think her plight would have been similar to the plight of the woman who is at the centre of the debate in this morning’s Gospel reading (Luke 20: 27-38).
Her plight was probably not plucked from thin air, not concocted in the narrow imaginations of the Sadducees, the prominent group of ruling priests in the Temple, who use her dilemma to try to paint Jesus into a corner.
They are not interested in her plight.
They are not interested in her dilemma.
They are not interested in the fact that a widow in that society who fails to remarry is left without financial means of support, is left in poverty, may even be forced into prostitution.
Who ever asked this woman what she would like?
Who ever asked her how she would like to end up in this life … never mind in the next life?
And just as they had no real interest in life after death for this widow, they had no interest in life before death for her.
If they had, they would have asked her how she felt not about eternal life but about her life in the here and now … how did she feel after the death of her husband and her husbands … how did she feel about being traded as a commodity to protect men’s property interests … how did they die … did they die in war …?
On Remembrance Sunday each year, I wonder how many men bothered to ask my grandmother how she felt when her husband, my grandfather, returned from Thessaloniki in the middle of World War I, suffering from malaria, malaria that would eventually take him to an early grave.
She was so distressed that the age she gave for him on his gravestone is 49 … not the age he was when he died in 1921 (which was 53), but the age he was in 1916, when he returned from the war in Greece.
Perhaps, in this very sad mistake, she was saying the war had killed her husband.
She lived as widow for another 27 years, bringing up six children, two stepchildren and the four children of her marriage. Who ever asked her what she felt about life-before-death, never mind life-after-death?
If we fail to listen to the plight of the victims of war, then war creeps up on us suddenly. And then we ask: ‘Why did no-one tell us.’
World War I was supposed to be the war to end all wars. That promise was betrayed, for my grandmother, for all the men who are named on the war memorials in our churches, for their widows, mothers, sisters, daughters, for all who loved them, for all who continue to love them and to cherish their memories.
Wars continue to be waged in Ukraine and Russia … in Israel, Gaza and Palestine … in Sudan … in central Africa …in the caves and mountains of Afghanistan.
And when the war widows and refugees arrive in Britain or Ireland, they must wonder, in some places, whether we truly believe that love is at the heart of the Christian way of life.
The Sadducees in this morning’s reading do not believe in the afterlife anyway, so any answer Jesus gives is going to be ridiculed.
This woman, unnamed, is made an object by the people who come to Jesus with their silly questions. But none among them is truly concerned about her plight.
Her only role is to meet the obscure obligations set out in the arcane interpretations of the marriage code that make her an object. She has no name, no home; her only function is to serve the needs of men, to continue the family name and line, so that the family lands and wealth are not estranged.
But instead of dealing with trifling arguments that do not matter, Jesus avoids the debate and tells us three very straight truths:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of true relationships.
Of course, we do not yet live in the fullness of God’s kingdom. People still marry, people still vote and run in elections, people still invest and spend money. When we do those things, they have most value when they reflect the values of God’s kingdom.
When they do not reflect kingdom values, they become debased and lose value, significance and meaning. It is easy to understand that in terms of the political, social and economic difficulties we face. It is more difficult to say that in terms of relationships and marriages.
How we inhabit the political and economic structures of this age can become a sign of our dwelling in God’s kingdom … if we live with those structures so that we give priority, not to our own self-interest and gain, but to the concerns and needs of the poor, the outcast and the marginalised.
If we live our committed relationships in this life with integrity and honesty and self-sacrifice, they can become signs of how we live our risen lives in the age to come.
And in the great working out of God’s great eternal plans, these are the three eternal truths that matter most:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of meaningful relationships, with God and with others.
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday):
The theme this week (9 to 15 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Hope for the Future’ (pp 54-55). This theme is introduced today with Reflections from Laura D’Henin-Ivers, Chief Executive Officer at Hope for the Future:
Read and meditate on Psalm 24.
On 10 November, COP30 begins in Brazil, marking a crucial moment in our collective journey to care for God’s creation. Climate change threatens the most vulnerable, from communities facing rising seas to farmers enduring droughts. As Christians, we are called to pray and act, advocating for justice and sustainability.
Faith calls us to action – just as prophets spoke against injustice, so must we raise our voices for the earth. Stewardship is a sacred trust. Through advocacy, sustainable living, and hope, we embody our love for God and neighbour.
At Hope for the Future, we believe in collaboration with decisionmakers for bold climate action. Faith communities hold a unique role, as trusted institutions, vital parts of local and national societal fabric, and moral guides. When we speak up for climate justice, we amplify our message, making it harder for leaders to ignore. Rooted in shared values, faith-driven advocacy builds meaningful change.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday) invites us to pray by reflecting on these words: ‘For I know that my Redeemer lives, and that at the last he will stand upon the earth’ (Job 19: 25).
The prayer diary yesterday invited us to pray: Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
A wilted poppy in the mud in a field in Comberford, Staffordshire (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God of peace,
whose Son Jesus Christ proclaimed the kingdom
and restored the broken to wholeness of life:
look with compassion on the anguish of the world,
and by your healing power
make whole both people and nations;
through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Additional Collect:
God, our refuge and strength,
bring near the day when wars shall cease
and poverty and pain shall end,
that earth may know the peace of heaven
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Peeparations in Stony Stratford and Old Stratford for Remembrance Sunday (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. In the Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Later this morning, I hope to sing with the choir at the Parish Eucharist in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford, and in the afternoon I plan to attend the Remembrance Sunday commemorations at the War Memorial on Horsefair Green.
Meanwhile, before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
The war memorial in Saint Mary and Saint Giles Church, Stony Stratford (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Luke 20: 27-38 (NRSVA):
27 Some Sadducees, those who say there is no resurrection, came to him 28 and asked him a question, ‘Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies, leaving a wife but no children, the man shall marry the widow and raise up children for his brother. 29 Now there were seven brothers; the first married, and died childless; 30 then the second 31 and the third married her, and so in the same way all seven died childless. 32 Finally the woman also died. 33 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife will the woman be? For the seven had married her.’
34 Jesus said to them, ‘Those who belong to this age marry and are given in marriage; 35 but those who are considered worthy of a place in that age and in the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. 36 Indeed they cannot die any more, because they are like angels and are children of God, being children of the resurrection. 37 And the fact that the dead are raised Moses himself showed, in the story about the bush, where he speaks of the Lord as the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. 38 Now he is God not of the dead, but of the living; for to him all of them are alive.’
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Tavern at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Reflections
When I was younger, much younger, I remember leafing through the pages of the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of Ireland during what I must have then thought were boring sermons.
Did you ever do that?
What did you come across?
Some things were undoubtedly more boring than any sermon, such as the list of sermons in the ‘Second Book of Homilies,’ listed in Article 35 of the 39 Articles.
But perhaps the most unusual thing I remember finding in the ‘old’ Book of Common Prayer was the ‘Table of Kindred and Affinity.’
It seeks to list ‘whosoever are related are forbidden by the Church … to marry together.’
The table – which is not there any more – ruled, for example, that a man may not marry his mother, his sister, his daughter, or numerous other relatives, and neither may a woman marry her uncle, nephew, grandparent or grandchild. That all makes common sense.
But it goes into obsessive detail with some surprising prohibitions. For example, a man may not marry his wife’s father’s mother or his daughter’s son’s wife.
I can still recall how my mind boggled at the thought of the need for such rules. What was life like back in the 16th century if the Church felt it needed to specify such prohibitions? And how many women had the opportunity even to contemplate marrying their deceased granddaughter’s husband?
At least six of the 25 relationships that are expressly prohibited from developing into marriage involve no genetic link at all. Yet the list did not prohibit marriages between first cousins. So some of the inconsistencies are striking, to say the least.
Some of the rules make sense: when extended families were the norm, and often lived under the same roof, these rules warned against exploitative relationships within family circles. They helped to prevent secret affairs that might have continued in the hope of their eventual ratification with marriage. And they clearly delineated family structures in ways that were important when it came to inheriting land and property and keeping them within the family.
But it could all have been, and was, dealt with anyway, through legislation and law.
What was something like that doing in a prayer book, in the Book of Common Prayer, in the first place?
I think it had less to do with morality and more to do with the Church needing to bolster long-held prejudices by cloaking them in statements that were good in part but in sum amounted to bad law and bad theology.
When the men who drew up this table in the Church, and the men who handed it down to Anglicans unquestioned for centuries, were getting their minds around some very peculiar relationships, did any one of them ever think about asking a woman, ‘What do you think about these obscure and arcane rules and regulations?’
Is the Church not doing the very same today, with the way it tries to rule about who can and who cannot get married in church today?
As the Church distances itself from marriages that are actually allowed in law today, who among senior decision-makers actually takes the time to ask the women and men who are refused Church marriages, ‘Would you like to be married in Church?’
For example, when Lyra McKee was murdered in Derry in 2019 Church leaders were right to rush to condemn her brutal murder. It was so fitting that she received a dignified funeral in a Church of Ireland cathedral, Saint Anne’s Cathedral, Belfast, later that month. But had the bishops and priests who condemned her murder and were supportive of her funeral instead offered her the marriage she had looked forward to, they would have been severely disciplined by Church authorities.
And, as they were disciplined, I imagine, no-one would have asked Lyra McKee what she wanted, what she needed, what she had hoped for.
I think her plight would have been similar to the plight of the woman who is at the centre of the debate in this morning’s Gospel reading (Luke 20: 27-38).
Her plight was probably not plucked from thin air, not concocted in the narrow imaginations of the Sadducees, the prominent group of ruling priests in the Temple, who use her dilemma to try to paint Jesus into a corner.
They are not interested in her plight.
They are not interested in her dilemma.
They are not interested in the fact that a widow in that society who fails to remarry is left without financial means of support, is left in poverty, may even be forced into prostitution.
Who ever asked this woman what she would like?
Who ever asked her how she would like to end up in this life … never mind in the next life?
And just as they had no real interest in life after death for this widow, they had no interest in life before death for her.
If they had, they would have asked her how she felt not about eternal life but about her life in the here and now … how did she feel after the death of her husband and her husbands … how did she feel about being traded as a commodity to protect men’s property interests … how did they die … did they die in war …?
On Remembrance Sunday each year, I wonder how many men bothered to ask my grandmother how she felt when her husband, my grandfather, returned from Thessaloniki in the middle of World War I, suffering from malaria, malaria that would eventually take him to an early grave.
She was so distressed that the age she gave for him on his gravestone is 49 … not the age he was when he died in 1921 (which was 53), but the age he was in 1916, when he returned from the war in Greece.
Perhaps, in this very sad mistake, she was saying the war had killed her husband.
She lived as widow for another 27 years, bringing up six children, two stepchildren and the four children of her marriage. Who ever asked her what she felt about life-before-death, never mind life-after-death?
If we fail to listen to the plight of the victims of war, then war creeps up on us suddenly. And then we ask: ‘Why did no-one tell us.’
World War I was supposed to be the war to end all wars. That promise was betrayed, for my grandmother, for all the men who are named on the war memorials in our churches, for their widows, mothers, sisters, daughters, for all who loved them, for all who continue to love them and to cherish their memories.
Wars continue to be waged in Ukraine and Russia … in Israel, Gaza and Palestine … in Sudan … in central Africa …in the caves and mountains of Afghanistan.
And when the war widows and refugees arrive in Britain or Ireland, they must wonder, in some places, whether we truly believe that love is at the heart of the Christian way of life.
The Sadducees in this morning’s reading do not believe in the afterlife anyway, so any answer Jesus gives is going to be ridiculed.
This woman, unnamed, is made an object by the people who come to Jesus with their silly questions. But none among them is truly concerned about her plight.
Her only role is to meet the obscure obligations set out in the arcane interpretations of the marriage code that make her an object. She has no name, no home; her only function is to serve the needs of men, to continue the family name and line, so that the family lands and wealth are not estranged.
But instead of dealing with trifling arguments that do not matter, Jesus avoids the debate and tells us three very straight truths:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of true relationships.
Of course, we do not yet live in the fullness of God’s kingdom. People still marry, people still vote and run in elections, people still invest and spend money. When we do those things, they have most value when they reflect the values of God’s kingdom.
When they do not reflect kingdom values, they become debased and lose value, significance and meaning. It is easy to understand that in terms of the political, social and economic difficulties we face. It is more difficult to say that in terms of relationships and marriages.
How we inhabit the political and economic structures of this age can become a sign of our dwelling in God’s kingdom … if we live with those structures so that we give priority, not to our own self-interest and gain, but to the concerns and needs of the poor, the outcast and the marginalised.
If we live our committed relationships in this life with integrity and honesty and self-sacrifice, they can become signs of how we live our risen lives in the age to come.
And in the great working out of God’s great eternal plans, these are the three eternal truths that matter most:
• God is alive and loving.
• We are God’s children.
• Love is at the heart of meaningful relationships, with God and with others.
‘Now there were seven brothers’ (Luke 20: 29) … the Seven Brothers Taverna at the Harbour in Rethymnon (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday):
The theme this week (9 to 15 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘Hope for the Future’ (pp 54-55). This theme is introduced today with Reflections from Laura D’Henin-Ivers, Chief Executive Officer at Hope for the Future:
Read and meditate on Psalm 24.
On 10 November, COP30 begins in Brazil, marking a crucial moment in our collective journey to care for God’s creation. Climate change threatens the most vulnerable, from communities facing rising seas to farmers enduring droughts. As Christians, we are called to pray and act, advocating for justice and sustainability.
Faith calls us to action – just as prophets spoke against injustice, so must we raise our voices for the earth. Stewardship is a sacred trust. Through advocacy, sustainable living, and hope, we embody our love for God and neighbour.
At Hope for the Future, we believe in collaboration with decisionmakers for bold climate action. Faith communities hold a unique role, as trusted institutions, vital parts of local and national societal fabric, and moral guides. When we speak up for climate justice, we amplify our message, making it harder for leaders to ignore. Rooted in shared values, faith-driven advocacy builds meaningful change.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Sunday 9 November 2025, III Sunday before Advent, Remembrance Sunday) invites us to pray by reflecting on these words: ‘For I know that my Redeemer lives, and that at the last he will stand upon the earth’ (Job 19: 25).
The prayer diary yesterday invited us to pray: Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
A wilted poppy in the mud in a field in Comberford, Staffordshire (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
The Collect of the Day:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
The Post-Communion Prayer:
God of peace,
whose Son Jesus Christ proclaimed the kingdom
and restored the broken to wholeness of life:
look with compassion on the anguish of the world,
and by your healing power
make whole both people and nations;
through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Additional Collect:
God, our refuge and strength,
bring near the day when wars shall cease
and poverty and pain shall end,
that earth may know the peace of heaven
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Peeparations in Stony Stratford and Old Stratford for Remembrance Sunday (Photographs: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Labels:
Comberford,
Crete 2025,
Environment,
Greece 2025,
Marriage,
Mission,
Old Stratford,
Prayer,
Remembrance Day,
Rethymnon,
Saint Luke's Gospel,
Stony Stratford,
USPG,
War and peace
08 November 2025
Searching for the Old Rectory by
Swinfen Harris among the old
thatched houses in Maids Moreton
The Old Rectory in Maids Moreton, on the edges of Buckingham, was rebuilt by Edward Swinfen Harris in 1878-1879 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
As I continue my ‘field trips’ in search of buildings in this area designed by the Stony Stratford architect Edward Swinfen Harris (1841-1924), I visited the small village of Maids Moreton earlier this week.
In recent weeks, these ‘field trips’ have taken me to Roade in Northamptonshire, where Swinfen Harris designed Tylecote House (1894) for a local GP, Dr O’Ryan; Addington, outside Winslow, where he designed the Old School House (1876); and Buckingham, where the U3A (University of the Third Age) Architecture Group invited me to speak in Buckingham Library about his life and work (11 September 2025).
In Maids Moreton, the Uthwatt family commissioned Swinfen Harris to rebuild the Old Rectory (1878-1879) beside Saint Edmund’s Church, the oldest building in the village.
Corner Cottage on Duck Lane … the right-hand half is timber-framed with whitewashed plaster and brick infill and a whitewashed stone plinth, the left-hand half is of brick with rubble stone (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Maids Moreton is about a mile (1.6 km) north-east of Buckingham, on top of a plateau overlooking Buckingham, at the north end of the Vale of Aylesbury. The historic core of the village is concentrated along three principal streets: Duck Lake and Towcester Road to the north-west, Church Street to the south-east and Main Street, which runs between these two from north-west to south-east, and around Saint Edmund’s Church on Church Street, a short distance south-west of Main Street.
Modern development has made a significant impact on the setting of the village, with the growth of modern housing estates such as Manor Park, Hall Close, Church Close and Glebe Close along Main Street and Church Street. Yet, despite the expansion of Buckingham reaching the edges of the village, Maids Moreton retains its independence and a strong, separate identity.
As I strolled around Maids Moreton, I found a high concentrations of old historic buildings at the north-west and south-east ends of Main Street, with clusters of old buildings also along Duck Lake, around the junction of Duck Lake, Towcester Road and Main Street and close to Saint Edmund’s Church at the south-east end of the village.
Maids Moreton has many 17th century houses and cottages with timber frames, brick or plaster filling and thatched roofs. The Old Rectory and Maids Moreton Hall close to the church are two large 19th century buildings that are widely spaced set within substantial grounds, dating from an important period of change in the village.
The Wheatsheaf, a 17th century timber-frame public house on Main Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Archaeological evidence suggests the area around Maids Moreton was settled from at least the Iron Age. Maids Moreton itself probably began as an Anglo-Saxon settlement on the south slopes of the valley of the River Great Ouse, where the land was rich and fertile and the river provided good access to water and to transport.
The historic core of the village is found around Saint Edmund’s Church, probably the oldest part of the village and dating from the Anglo-Saxon period. The village may have assumed its current form through the coalescence of farmsteads and manors over the course of time and the gradual development of buildings along the tracks and roads interconnecting them.
At the Domesday survey in 1086, Maids Moreton is listed as ‘Mortone’. The name may mean the ‘farm on the mor or swampy ground.’ The origins of the prefix Maids is said to date back to the 15th century, and local lore says two maiden sisters of the Pever, Poevre, Poever or Peyvre family who are said to have rebuilt Saint Edmund’s Church.
The sisters are said to have been conjoined twins and that when one sister died, the other died also. Whether they are legendary or historical, the sisters are recalled in the name of Maids Morton, in a poem by the Revd J Tarver of Filgrave, and in a wall painted epitaph above the north door and brasses in Saint Edmund’s Church.
Holly Tree Cottage on Main Street, once the old off-licence, dates from the 17th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
There were several early manors within Maids Moreton. After the Norman Conquest, a manor at the south end of the village remained in the possession of an Englishman named Leofwin of Nuneham Courtney.
Maids Moreton became part of a royal hunting forest of Whittlewood, but was it was disafforested sometime before 1286. The earlier manor had fallen into disrepair by the 1290s and a new house was built in the 1300s, possibly on the site now occupied by Maids Moreton Hall. The manor became known as Greenham’s Manor, after the family that held it during the reign of Henry IV. It was held by the Crown for a time before it was granted to All Souls College, Oxford, in 1442. The home farm of this manor is confusingly called the Old Manor, and was once known as the Manor Farmhouse.
A manor along Main Street on the site of the Manor Park estate passed from the Clare family and the Stafford family who were Dukes of Buckingham to Christ Church College, Oxford. The Scott family farmed it for several generations.
Woodbine Cottage on Main Street, a 17th century house with a timber frame, whitewashed brick infill, a half-hipped thatch roof and an off-centre brick stack (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The earliest domestic buildings date from the 16th and 17th centuries. However, earlier fabric is often hidden behind later facades as for example at Yew Trees where a cruck-built core probably dating from the 15th or 16th century was recently found within a building that had previously been dated to the 17th century.
Timber was the main material used in the construction of buildings in Maids Moreton up to the18th century. Although there are examples where timber framing is hidden beneath render or later re-fronting of buildings, in the majority of cases the timber frame is visible.
The majority of surviving timber-dframe buildings were built in a simple box frame although there is also an example of a surviving cruck frame at Yewtrees on Duck Lake, although the cruck frame at Yewtrees is disguised beneath render and hidden from external view. The majority of the panels between the timber elements have been infilled with brick. Brick became a relatively common building material in Maids Morerton from the late 18th and 19th centuries. It was used in older timber framed buildings as an infill for the panels between the timber elements and was also used to refront or extend earlier buildings.
Maids Moreton Hall, built by the Burrows family in the 19th century, is now a care home (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Because Maids Moreton was so close to Buckingham, it became an attractive place to live in from the mid-19th century. A number of larger properties were built for more affluent families, including the Elms, now the Red House, on Main Street and Maids Moreton House, now Vitalograph.
Maids Moreton Hall was built by the Burrows family in the 19th century on the site of former manor. It is a large brick building with stone dressing, a complex roof form and prominent decorative chimneys. There are mullion and transom windows and some dormers.
The house became the centre of Buckinghamshire lace industry in the late 19th century under Miss MEB Burrows.
The Uthwatt family commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris to redesign and rebuild the Old Rectory in 1878-1879 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The Uthwatt family became prominent in the village in the 19th century. They commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris, who lived and worked in Stony Stratford, to redesign and rebuild the Old Rectory. At the time the Rector of Maids Moreton was the Revd Bolton Waller Johnstone (1823-1903). His parents, the Revd John Beresford Johnstone and Elizabeth Waller of Castletown Park, Co Limerick, were married in Saint Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick, and he was born in Kilkenny and educated at Trinity College Dublin.
The 2½-storey Old Rectory is built in brick, with a steeply-pitched tiled roof, a prominent chimney, and irregular fenestration with stone dressings. A stringcourse runs between the ground and first floor and on the gable end between each storey. On the gable, the stringcourse forms an arch above each window opening at the first floor level and a staggered effect below the window between the ground and first floor. This decorative effect enlivens the elevations and creates interest in the form of shadows and texture.
Due to its scale and its location close to the church, the Old Rectory is a visually prominent building that makes a strong architectural statement and a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the village.
Swinfen Harris also designed the Uthwatt’s new house, named Southfields, and he may also have designed Foscote Lodge and Foscote Rectory nearby.
The Old Rectory is a visually prominent building in Maids Moreton that makes a strong architectural statement and a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the village (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The expansion of Maids Moreton in the 20th century began when the sale of the Uthwatt’s family manor in 1928 released land for development in the village.
Maids Moreton Hall was a private residence until the time of World War II, when it became the Buckinghamshire county branch of the National Heart Hospital. Extensions were added in the 1960s, and it has been in use as an old persons home to the present day.
The village experienced a major period of growth in the 1960s when Manor Park and the new school were built. The old post office, at the junction of Main Street with the A413, closed in the mid-1990s and is now a private house.
Maids Moreton received unwanted attention in 2019 when Ben Field was jailed for the murder of a local resident Peter Farquhar in 2015. The case was the centre of the 2023 BBC drama The Sixth Commandment.
Despite its close proximity to Buckingham, Maids Moreton was once a self-sufficient community with a church, school, public houses, bakery, forge, cobblers, post office and other commercial buildings located along Main Street. Today, there are no shops surviving in the village.
The current resident population is 1,080, according to estimates, compared with 425 in 1901 and 239 in 1801. The majority of working age residents now commute from Maids Moreton to work in Buckingham, Milton Keynes, Aylesbury or even as far away as London. Today, Maids Moreton is facing how to deal with two greenfield planning applications to build 163 and 15 houses that would increasing the size of the village size by 50%.
But more about Saint Edmund’s Church tomorrow, hopefully, and about the Maids of Maids Moreton in the days to come.
The Whitney Box and Whitney Box Cottage, a pair of 17th century cottages on Church Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Patrick Comerford
As I continue my ‘field trips’ in search of buildings in this area designed by the Stony Stratford architect Edward Swinfen Harris (1841-1924), I visited the small village of Maids Moreton earlier this week.
In recent weeks, these ‘field trips’ have taken me to Roade in Northamptonshire, where Swinfen Harris designed Tylecote House (1894) for a local GP, Dr O’Ryan; Addington, outside Winslow, where he designed the Old School House (1876); and Buckingham, where the U3A (University of the Third Age) Architecture Group invited me to speak in Buckingham Library about his life and work (11 September 2025).
In Maids Moreton, the Uthwatt family commissioned Swinfen Harris to rebuild the Old Rectory (1878-1879) beside Saint Edmund’s Church, the oldest building in the village.
Corner Cottage on Duck Lane … the right-hand half is timber-framed with whitewashed plaster and brick infill and a whitewashed stone plinth, the left-hand half is of brick with rubble stone (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Maids Moreton is about a mile (1.6 km) north-east of Buckingham, on top of a plateau overlooking Buckingham, at the north end of the Vale of Aylesbury. The historic core of the village is concentrated along three principal streets: Duck Lake and Towcester Road to the north-west, Church Street to the south-east and Main Street, which runs between these two from north-west to south-east, and around Saint Edmund’s Church on Church Street, a short distance south-west of Main Street.
Modern development has made a significant impact on the setting of the village, with the growth of modern housing estates such as Manor Park, Hall Close, Church Close and Glebe Close along Main Street and Church Street. Yet, despite the expansion of Buckingham reaching the edges of the village, Maids Moreton retains its independence and a strong, separate identity.
As I strolled around Maids Moreton, I found a high concentrations of old historic buildings at the north-west and south-east ends of Main Street, with clusters of old buildings also along Duck Lake, around the junction of Duck Lake, Towcester Road and Main Street and close to Saint Edmund’s Church at the south-east end of the village.
Maids Moreton has many 17th century houses and cottages with timber frames, brick or plaster filling and thatched roofs. The Old Rectory and Maids Moreton Hall close to the church are two large 19th century buildings that are widely spaced set within substantial grounds, dating from an important period of change in the village.
The Wheatsheaf, a 17th century timber-frame public house on Main Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Archaeological evidence suggests the area around Maids Moreton was settled from at least the Iron Age. Maids Moreton itself probably began as an Anglo-Saxon settlement on the south slopes of the valley of the River Great Ouse, where the land was rich and fertile and the river provided good access to water and to transport.
The historic core of the village is found around Saint Edmund’s Church, probably the oldest part of the village and dating from the Anglo-Saxon period. The village may have assumed its current form through the coalescence of farmsteads and manors over the course of time and the gradual development of buildings along the tracks and roads interconnecting them.
At the Domesday survey in 1086, Maids Moreton is listed as ‘Mortone’. The name may mean the ‘farm on the mor or swampy ground.’ The origins of the prefix Maids is said to date back to the 15th century, and local lore says two maiden sisters of the Pever, Poevre, Poever or Peyvre family who are said to have rebuilt Saint Edmund’s Church.
The sisters are said to have been conjoined twins and that when one sister died, the other died also. Whether they are legendary or historical, the sisters are recalled in the name of Maids Morton, in a poem by the Revd J Tarver of Filgrave, and in a wall painted epitaph above the north door and brasses in Saint Edmund’s Church.
Holly Tree Cottage on Main Street, once the old off-licence, dates from the 17th century (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
There were several early manors within Maids Moreton. After the Norman Conquest, a manor at the south end of the village remained in the possession of an Englishman named Leofwin of Nuneham Courtney.
Maids Moreton became part of a royal hunting forest of Whittlewood, but was it was disafforested sometime before 1286. The earlier manor had fallen into disrepair by the 1290s and a new house was built in the 1300s, possibly on the site now occupied by Maids Moreton Hall. The manor became known as Greenham’s Manor, after the family that held it during the reign of Henry IV. It was held by the Crown for a time before it was granted to All Souls College, Oxford, in 1442. The home farm of this manor is confusingly called the Old Manor, and was once known as the Manor Farmhouse.
A manor along Main Street on the site of the Manor Park estate passed from the Clare family and the Stafford family who were Dukes of Buckingham to Christ Church College, Oxford. The Scott family farmed it for several generations.
Woodbine Cottage on Main Street, a 17th century house with a timber frame, whitewashed brick infill, a half-hipped thatch roof and an off-centre brick stack (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The earliest domestic buildings date from the 16th and 17th centuries. However, earlier fabric is often hidden behind later facades as for example at Yew Trees where a cruck-built core probably dating from the 15th or 16th century was recently found within a building that had previously been dated to the 17th century.
Timber was the main material used in the construction of buildings in Maids Moreton up to the18th century. Although there are examples where timber framing is hidden beneath render or later re-fronting of buildings, in the majority of cases the timber frame is visible.
The majority of surviving timber-dframe buildings were built in a simple box frame although there is also an example of a surviving cruck frame at Yewtrees on Duck Lake, although the cruck frame at Yewtrees is disguised beneath render and hidden from external view. The majority of the panels between the timber elements have been infilled with brick. Brick became a relatively common building material in Maids Morerton from the late 18th and 19th centuries. It was used in older timber framed buildings as an infill for the panels between the timber elements and was also used to refront or extend earlier buildings.
Maids Moreton Hall, built by the Burrows family in the 19th century, is now a care home (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Because Maids Moreton was so close to Buckingham, it became an attractive place to live in from the mid-19th century. A number of larger properties were built for more affluent families, including the Elms, now the Red House, on Main Street and Maids Moreton House, now Vitalograph.
Maids Moreton Hall was built by the Burrows family in the 19th century on the site of former manor. It is a large brick building with stone dressing, a complex roof form and prominent decorative chimneys. There are mullion and transom windows and some dormers.
The house became the centre of Buckinghamshire lace industry in the late 19th century under Miss MEB Burrows.
The Uthwatt family commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris to redesign and rebuild the Old Rectory in 1878-1879 (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The Uthwatt family became prominent in the village in the 19th century. They commissioned Edward Swinfen Harris, who lived and worked in Stony Stratford, to redesign and rebuild the Old Rectory. At the time the Rector of Maids Moreton was the Revd Bolton Waller Johnstone (1823-1903). His parents, the Revd John Beresford Johnstone and Elizabeth Waller of Castletown Park, Co Limerick, were married in Saint Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick, and he was born in Kilkenny and educated at Trinity College Dublin.
The 2½-storey Old Rectory is built in brick, with a steeply-pitched tiled roof, a prominent chimney, and irregular fenestration with stone dressings. A stringcourse runs between the ground and first floor and on the gable end between each storey. On the gable, the stringcourse forms an arch above each window opening at the first floor level and a staggered effect below the window between the ground and first floor. This decorative effect enlivens the elevations and creates interest in the form of shadows and texture.
Due to its scale and its location close to the church, the Old Rectory is a visually prominent building that makes a strong architectural statement and a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the village.
Swinfen Harris also designed the Uthwatt’s new house, named Southfields, and he may also have designed Foscote Lodge and Foscote Rectory nearby.
The Old Rectory is a visually prominent building in Maids Moreton that makes a strong architectural statement and a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the village (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
The expansion of Maids Moreton in the 20th century began when the sale of the Uthwatt’s family manor in 1928 released land for development in the village.
Maids Moreton Hall was a private residence until the time of World War II, when it became the Buckinghamshire county branch of the National Heart Hospital. Extensions were added in the 1960s, and it has been in use as an old persons home to the present day.
The village experienced a major period of growth in the 1960s when Manor Park and the new school were built. The old post office, at the junction of Main Street with the A413, closed in the mid-1990s and is now a private house.
Maids Moreton received unwanted attention in 2019 when Ben Field was jailed for the murder of a local resident Peter Farquhar in 2015. The case was the centre of the 2023 BBC drama The Sixth Commandment.
Despite its close proximity to Buckingham, Maids Moreton was once a self-sufficient community with a church, school, public houses, bakery, forge, cobblers, post office and other commercial buildings located along Main Street. Today, there are no shops surviving in the village.
The current resident population is 1,080, according to estimates, compared with 425 in 1901 and 239 in 1801. The majority of working age residents now commute from Maids Moreton to work in Buckingham, Milton Keynes, Aylesbury or even as far away as London. Today, Maids Moreton is facing how to deal with two greenfield planning applications to build 163 and 15 houses that would increasing the size of the village size by 50%.
But more about Saint Edmund’s Church tomorrow, hopefully, and about the Maids of Maids Moreton in the days to come.
The Whitney Box and Whitney Box Cottage, a pair of 17th century cottages on Church Street (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2025)
Daily prayer in the Kingdom Season:
8, Saturday 8 November 2025
‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much’ (Luke 16: 10) … changing old banknotes for new ones (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers the Saints and Martyrs of England and tomorrow is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes’ (Luke 16: 9) … not an ATM but street art, seen in Bray, Co Wicklow (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 16: 9-15 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 9 ‘And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes.
10 ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and whoever is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much. 11 If then you have not been faithful with the dishonest wealth, who will entrust to you the true riches? 12 And if you have not been faithful with what belongs to another, who will give you what is your own? 13 No slave can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.’
14 The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all this, and they ridiculed him. 15 So he said to them, ‘You are those who justify yourselves in the sight of others; but God knows your hearts; for what is prized by human beings is an abomination in the sight of God.’
The former Commercial Bank of Greece branch in Rethymnon is abandoned and the oranges and lemons are rotting on the trees in the garden (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s reflection:
In the Gospel reading for the Eucharist today, we read Jesus’s explanation of the parable of ‘the Unjust Steward’ or the ‘Parable of the Dishonest Manager’, which we read yesterday.
Sarah Dylan Breuer, when she produced her celebrated American blog Sarah Laughed (www.sarahlaughed.net), said most commentators agree the parable is about how the shrewd steward acts decisively, and that Jesus is describing the ‘in-breaking of the Kingdom of God, call[ing] upon us all to act decisively.’
But she also points out that forgiveness is an overarching theme throughout the Gospels. How often should I forgive? As Saint Luke reminds us in the next chapter, even if someone offends seven times a day, I should be willing to forgive them seven times (Luke 17: 1-4). Seven … the perfect number … I should be willing to forgive perfectly.
If this story is all about forgiveness, and if Sarah Dylan Breuer is correct, then we must forgive, even when we have no right to forgive, even if it does not benefit us at all. We must forgive with grand irresponsibility.
But there is another difficult point in this Gospel story. Verses 10-11 say: ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and whoever is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much. If then you have not been faithful with the dishonest wealth, who will entrust to you the true riches?’
Being faithful with what is given to me is also a familiar Gospel theme: it is found in the parable of the talents. But being faithful with dishonest wealth is a puzzling concept, even if it speaks to recent economic dilemmas in both Britain and Ireland. Is it still possible to manage goods in ways that are appropriate to, that witness to, that are signs of the Kingdom of God?
If I am responsible for the small things in life, then hopefully I can be responsible for the large things. Very few of us are asked to do huge things, such as win a by-election, finish a masterpiece, solve the banking crisis, score a winning try or goal. But we are asked to do a multitude of small things – within our family, our friends, our neighbours, our fellow students, in this community.
And: ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much.’ Yet, it is often most difficult to forgive the small things.
I heard a comedian tell of a young man, up from the provinces, starting work in a menial clerical post, living in a cramped, one-room flat in Rathmines. In the room above is another man in similar circumstances, working late shifts as a labourer.
Each night, just as he goes to sleep, the office worker is woken by his neighbour as he opens the front door, clumps-clumps up the stairs, plods into his room above, sits on his bed, and throws his two big boots on the floor above our poor, weary and demented friend, one-by-one.
Each night, our sad insurance clerk waits for same routine, knowing that he cannot get to sleep until at least he hears both boots being thumped on the floor above.
One day, being a Christian, the more timid office worker approaches his neighbour, explains the problem, and asks could he come in quietly at night, and take his shoes off gently.
Surprisingly, his neighbour is sympathetic, understanding. The next night, he turns the key quietly, tip toes upstairs, sits down quietly, takes off both shoes in one go and places them together, gently, on the floor above.
Meanwhile, his neighbour downstairs is lying in bed, waiting anxiously. He can’t get any shut eye. He’s heard his neighbour come in, go up, sit down, and has heard the one muffled thud on the floor … Only one … he waits … he tosses … he waits … he turns … And finally, he can wait no more. He screams out: ‘Would you throw down the other darn shoe and let’s all go to sleep!’
Learning to forgive the very little slights and offences is often so difficult when we live closely to one another: the muffled sounds next door when someone is up late finishing an essay; the early riser heading out for a morning jog who unintentionally wakes us; the unexpected slurps at the table; the accent that irritates me because, subconsciously, it reminds me of a particular neighbour or family member.
Sometimes, if truth is told, it is easier to forgive when it comes to the big things. Yet, our spiritual relationship with God is reflected in our social and economic relationship with others. If we can be entrusted with the small things, are ready to forgive the small things, then we can be entrusted with the biggest of all … We can be stewards of the mysteries of God.
Perhaps, like the shrewd steward, we need to be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves.
‘Who will entrust to you the true riches?’ (Luke 16: 11) … old Greek banknotes that have lost their currency and true value (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Saturday 8 November 2025):
The theme this week (2 to 8 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), has been ‘From Solitude to Connection’ (pp 52-53). This theme was introduced last Sunday with a Programme Update from Ljudmila, a Ukrainian Refugee living in Budapest, Hungary.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Saturday 8 November 2025) invites us to pray:
Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
The Collect:
God, whom the glorious company of the redeemed adore,
assembled from all times and places of your dominion:
we praise you for the saints of our own land
and for the many lamps their holiness has lit;
and we pray that we also may be numbered at last
with those who have done your will
and declared your righteousness;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
God, the source of all holiness
and giver of all good things:
may we who have shared at this table
as strangers and pilgrims here on earth
be welcomed with all your saints
to the heavenly feast on the day of your kingdom;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Collect on the Eve of the Third Sunday before Advent:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
‘Father Forgive’ and the Cross of Nails in Coventry Cathedral … it is often most difficult to forgive the small things (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers the Saints and Martyrs of England and tomorrow is the Third Sunday before Advent and Remembrance Sunday.
Before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘Make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes’ (Luke 16: 9) … not an ATM but street art, seen in Bray, Co Wicklow (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Luke 16: 9-15 (NRSVA):
[Jesus said:] 9 ‘And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes.
10 ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and whoever is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much. 11 If then you have not been faithful with the dishonest wealth, who will entrust to you the true riches? 12 And if you have not been faithful with what belongs to another, who will give you what is your own? 13 No slave can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.’
14 The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all this, and they ridiculed him. 15 So he said to them, ‘You are those who justify yourselves in the sight of others; but God knows your hearts; for what is prized by human beings is an abomination in the sight of God.’
The former Commercial Bank of Greece branch in Rethymnon is abandoned and the oranges and lemons are rotting on the trees in the garden (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s reflection:
In the Gospel reading for the Eucharist today, we read Jesus’s explanation of the parable of ‘the Unjust Steward’ or the ‘Parable of the Dishonest Manager’, which we read yesterday.
Sarah Dylan Breuer, when she produced her celebrated American blog Sarah Laughed (www.sarahlaughed.net), said most commentators agree the parable is about how the shrewd steward acts decisively, and that Jesus is describing the ‘in-breaking of the Kingdom of God, call[ing] upon us all to act decisively.’
But she also points out that forgiveness is an overarching theme throughout the Gospels. How often should I forgive? As Saint Luke reminds us in the next chapter, even if someone offends seven times a day, I should be willing to forgive them seven times (Luke 17: 1-4). Seven … the perfect number … I should be willing to forgive perfectly.
If this story is all about forgiveness, and if Sarah Dylan Breuer is correct, then we must forgive, even when we have no right to forgive, even if it does not benefit us at all. We must forgive with grand irresponsibility.
But there is another difficult point in this Gospel story. Verses 10-11 say: ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much; and whoever is dishonest in a very little is dishonest also in much. If then you have not been faithful with the dishonest wealth, who will entrust to you the true riches?’
Being faithful with what is given to me is also a familiar Gospel theme: it is found in the parable of the talents. But being faithful with dishonest wealth is a puzzling concept, even if it speaks to recent economic dilemmas in both Britain and Ireland. Is it still possible to manage goods in ways that are appropriate to, that witness to, that are signs of the Kingdom of God?
If I am responsible for the small things in life, then hopefully I can be responsible for the large things. Very few of us are asked to do huge things, such as win a by-election, finish a masterpiece, solve the banking crisis, score a winning try or goal. But we are asked to do a multitude of small things – within our family, our friends, our neighbours, our fellow students, in this community.
And: ‘Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much.’ Yet, it is often most difficult to forgive the small things.
I heard a comedian tell of a young man, up from the provinces, starting work in a menial clerical post, living in a cramped, one-room flat in Rathmines. In the room above is another man in similar circumstances, working late shifts as a labourer.
Each night, just as he goes to sleep, the office worker is woken by his neighbour as he opens the front door, clumps-clumps up the stairs, plods into his room above, sits on his bed, and throws his two big boots on the floor above our poor, weary and demented friend, one-by-one.
Each night, our sad insurance clerk waits for same routine, knowing that he cannot get to sleep until at least he hears both boots being thumped on the floor above.
One day, being a Christian, the more timid office worker approaches his neighbour, explains the problem, and asks could he come in quietly at night, and take his shoes off gently.
Surprisingly, his neighbour is sympathetic, understanding. The next night, he turns the key quietly, tip toes upstairs, sits down quietly, takes off both shoes in one go and places them together, gently, on the floor above.
Meanwhile, his neighbour downstairs is lying in bed, waiting anxiously. He can’t get any shut eye. He’s heard his neighbour come in, go up, sit down, and has heard the one muffled thud on the floor … Only one … he waits … he tosses … he waits … he turns … And finally, he can wait no more. He screams out: ‘Would you throw down the other darn shoe and let’s all go to sleep!’
Learning to forgive the very little slights and offences is often so difficult when we live closely to one another: the muffled sounds next door when someone is up late finishing an essay; the early riser heading out for a morning jog who unintentionally wakes us; the unexpected slurps at the table; the accent that irritates me because, subconsciously, it reminds me of a particular neighbour or family member.
Sometimes, if truth is told, it is easier to forgive when it comes to the big things. Yet, our spiritual relationship with God is reflected in our social and economic relationship with others. If we can be entrusted with the small things, are ready to forgive the small things, then we can be entrusted with the biggest of all … We can be stewards of the mysteries of God.
Perhaps, like the shrewd steward, we need to be as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves.
‘Who will entrust to you the true riches?’ (Luke 16: 11) … old Greek banknotes that have lost their currency and true value (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Saturday 8 November 2025):
The theme this week (2 to 8 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), has been ‘From Solitude to Connection’ (pp 52-53). This theme was introduced last Sunday with a Programme Update from Ljudmila, a Ukrainian Refugee living in Budapest, Hungary.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Saturday 8 November 2025) invites us to pray:
Lord of Peace, we pray for your peace to fill the world, healing divisions and bringing unity. May Christians everywhere commit to being prayerful, reflecting your love and sharing your peace with others.
The Collect:
God, whom the glorious company of the redeemed adore,
assembled from all times and places of your dominion:
we praise you for the saints of our own land
and for the many lamps their holiness has lit;
and we pray that we also may be numbered at last
with those who have done your will
and declared your righteousness;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
God, the source of all holiness
and giver of all good things:
may we who have shared at this table
as strangers and pilgrims here on earth
be welcomed with all your saints
to the heavenly feast on the day of your kingdom;
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Collect on the Eve of the Third Sunday before Advent:
Almighty Father,
whose will is to restore all things
in your beloved Son, the King of all:
govern the hearts and minds of those in authority,
and bring the families of the nations,
divided and torn apart by the ravages of sin,
to be subject to his just and gentle rule;
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
‘Father Forgive’ and the Cross of Nails in Coventry Cathedral … it is often most difficult to forgive the small things (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
07 November 2025
A Greek dance in a ‘comfort film’
from the 1970s is a reminder of
the destruction of Jewish Rhodes
The Seahorse Fountain in the Square of the Hebrew Martyrs remembers members of the Jewish community of Rhodes who were murdered in Auschwitz (Photograph: Nicholas Rhodes Taxi Tours)
Patrick Comerford
As winter gets colder, as the rain becomes more frequent, as the days shorten, and as holidays become dim memories, I take some comfort as the evenings close in looking back on old films and live=streaming music.
Some people can easily identify their ‘comfort foods’ – not necessarily nourishing or nutritious, but offering comfort to both the body and the soul. I sometimes turn to ‘comfort films’ and ‘comfort music’ – not always challenging, though sometimes they can be disturbing, yet certainly offering comfort to the eyes and ears, to the body and the soul in depth of winter.
We stayed up late last Friday night, marking Hallowe’en by watching Don’t Look Now (1973). It was an appropriate choice for BBC2 that night, but instead of being scared or disturbed, we ended up picking out places we know and appreciate in Venice: Salute, Saint Mark’s Square, the Hotel Gabrielli on Riva degli Schiavoni, Arsenale, a corner of the Palazzo Ducale, the Church of San Nicolo dei Mendicoli, where John Baxter (Donald Sutherland) is working, the Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo, the canals, bridges and narrow alleys, and, at the end, the Church of San Stae.
In the days that followed, I found myself was looking back on memories of some other ‘comfort films’ … Ill Met by Moonlight(1957), Never on Sunday (1960), Zorba the Greek (1964), Z (1969), Fiddler on the Roof (1971), Escape to Athena (1979), Ulysses’ Gaze or Το βλέμμα του Οδυσσέα (1995), The Weeping Meadow or Το Λιβάδι που δακρύζει (2004) … I suppose if the list of ‘comfort films’ continued, it would tell a lot about my age, my musical tastes, and my love of Greece.
Escape to Athena may, perhaps, seem an odd choice for my list. The war film was directed by George P Cosmatos and stars Roger Moore, Telly Savalas, David Niven, Stefanie Powers, Claudia Cardinale, Richard Roundtree, Sonny Bono and Elliott Gould. The music was composed by Lalo Schifrin.
The film is set in a German-occupied Greek island during World War II. It was filmed on location in Rhodes, and tells of allied prisoners in a POW camp who are forced to excavate ancient artefacts.
The Greek resistance to the Nazis is led by Zeno (Telly Savalas), a former monk, and his small band of fighters. They use the local brothel, run by his girlfriend Elena (Claudia Cardinale), as an undercover headquarters.
Aristotelis ‘Telly’ Savalas or Αριστοτέλης Σαβάλας (1922-1994), who plays Zeno. was a Greek-American actor, better known as the bald Lieutenant Theo Kojak in the 1970s crime drama series Kojak. Claudia Cardinale (1938-2025), who plays Zeno’s girlfriend Eleana, is still regarded as one of the leading figures of Italian cinema, alongside Sophia Loren and Gina Lollobrigida.
George Pan Cosmatos (1941-2005) was a Greek-Italian film director and screenwriter. He was born to a Greek family in Florence and grew up in Egypt and Cyprus. At 17, he became assistant director to Otto Preminger on Exodus (1960), based on Leon Uris’s novel about the birth of Israel.
The score in Escape to Athena is by the Argentine-American pianist, composer, arranger and conductor Lalo Schifrin (1932-2025), who died earlier this year (26 June 2025). His Jewish father, Luis Schifrin, led the second violin section of the Buenos Aires Philharmonic for three decades.
Schifrin’s best known compositions include the themes from Mission: Impossible (1966), Cool Hand Luke (1967), Bullitt (1968), The Eagle Has Landed (1976), and The Amityville Horror (1979) and he collaborated with Clint Eastwood from the 1960s to the 1980s in the Dirty Harry film series.
The Seahorse Fountain in the Square of the Jewish Martyrs in the walled city of Rhodes (Photograph: Square, Nadezhda Bogatyryova/Wikimapia)
The final scene in Escape to Athena cuts to the present day – or, rather, the late 1970s. By then, Zeno’s former headquarters have been turned into a state museum housing the treasures of Mount Athena. As the film comes to its close, Zeno leads a tsamikos or syrtos dance with Eleana around a Seahorse Fountain in a town square.
It is interesting that Schifrin decided not to compose his own dance for this closing scene but provided an instrumental arrangement of the Dodecanese traditional song Περα Στους Περα Καμπους (Pera stous pera kampous, ‘The Nun’s Dance’).
The setting of the Seahorse Fountain in a town square in Rhodes is also a reminder that this film is not a comic downplay of World War II and that the resistance to the Nazis involved resistance to their racism, antisemitism and the Holocaust.
This is the city square where the Nazis rounded up the Jews of Rhodes over 80 years ago in 1944. In the post-war years, it was renamed the Square of the Hebrew (or Jewish) Martyrs (Πλατεία Εβραίων Μαρτύρων, Plateia Martyron Evreon) and the Seahorse Fountain was erected in memory of the Jews of Rhodes who died in the Holocaust.
As I watch the closing scenes, I am reminded of the Kahal Shalom Synagogue, the last surviving, functioning synagogue on Rhodes, and the woman who gave me a tour of the synagogue one sunny afternoon 26 years ago, in June 1999.
From the Seahorse Fountain, the narrow street of Pindarou leads up into the alleyways of Dosiadou and Simiou. A pair of tall doors with two raised Stars of David open into a cobbled courtyard and the Kahal Shalom, the oldest surviving synagogue in Greece and the last remaining synagogue in the old Jewish quarter Rhodes.
The bimah or prayer desk in the Kahal Shalom synagogue in Rhodes (Photograph: Tripadvisor)
The Kahal Shalom is the last in a city that once had six synagogues. The floor inside and the courtyards outside are decorated with the graceful black and white pebble mosaic patterns or kochlaki that are distinctive throughout the Dodecanese islands. A plaque in the courtyard bears the date Kislev 5338 in the Jewish calendar, showing Kahal Shalom (‘the Holy Congregation of Plentiful Peace’) dates back to the year 1577.
But more immediate history and its horrors are recalled on a plaque in the west-side courtyard: it lists the names of 100 families wiped out in the Holocaust.
As the Italians – who captured the Dodecanese from the Ottomans in 1912 – passed increasingly repressive measures in the 1930s, the Jews of Rhodes began to leave in large numbers. By the end of the 1930s, there were still 2,000 or more Jews on the island, struggling to maintain their cultural life. A boatload of 600 Jews from Bratislava and Prague fleeing the Nazis reached Rhodes in 1939. There they were fed and quartered by the local Jewish community, and provided with fresh water for their onward journey to Palestine.
But as the boat sailed out, it caught fire, and the refugees were eventually washed up on the island of Samos. They returned to Rhodes, where the local Jews helped them to buy another old boat, and this time they made their way safely to Palestine. The refugees survived, but the Jews of Rhodes who helped them escape were to perish a few years later.
As the Germans took control of Rhodes, the leaders of the Jewish community decided to hide their Torah scrolls. In secret, the Torah scrolls were given to the Turkish religious leader, the Grand Mufti of Rhodes, Seyh Suleyman Kaslioglu, for safekeeping. He hid the Torah scrolls in the pulpit in the Morad Reis mosque. Several years later, he recalled, ‘One of the greatest moments of my life was when I was able to embrace the Torah, and carry it, and put it in the pulpit of the mosque – because we knew no German would ever think that the Torahs were preserved in the pulpit of the mosque.’
On 23 July 1944, 1,673 members of the Jewish community were rounded up in Rhodes and assembled in the square in front of the old Admiralty Building and the former palace of the Latin archbishops. From there, they were shipped to Piraeus and on by train to Auschwitz. The community that had survived the Crusades and the Inquisition and prospered under both Ottomans and Italians was decimated: only 151 people survived.
The Kahal Shalom Synagogue, with the women’s gallery behind and above the tevah (Photograph: RhodesPrivateTours.com)
I visited Rhodes perhaps seven or eight times between 1996 and 2006, for work and on holidays. I often visited the Kahal Shalom synagogue or the Holy Congregation of Plentiful Peace, and still recall with fondness the welcome I received there from the late Lucia Modiano Soulam a Holocaust survivor who had been deported from Rhodes to Auschwitz and who died in 2010.
There have been Jews in Rhodes since at least the time of Herod the Great. After the Spanish Inquisition, an influx of Sephardic refugees from Spain and Portugal saw a growth in the Jewish population and a new input into Jewish culture in the Aegean. An 800-year-old Torah scroll in Buenos Aires has been dated and traced back to the Jewish community of Rhodes, probably brought there by Jewish refugees fleeing Spain and Portugal.
The Jews of Rhodes were doctors and merchants, printers and bankers, craftsmen and traders. The Ottoman Turks allowed them to live within the walls of the crusader city.
For over 200 years, 12 successive generations of the Israel family provided the Chief Rabbis of Rhodes. In the 19th century, four of the five banks on the island were in Jewish hands, and the first department store in Rhodes was owned by a Jewish family.
When the Jewish community in Rhodes was at its height in the 1920s, 4,000 or more Jews were living on the island. At the entrance to the synagogue, a stone monument lists the names of the Jewish families of Rhodes who were taken by the Nazis:
In memory of the 2,000 martyrs of the Jewish community of Rhodes and the brutal annihilation by the murderous Nazis in the concentration camps of Germany, 1944-1945. May they rest in peace.
The numbers are so overwhelming that instead of 2,000 names the plaque lists only family names. The Holocaust virtually destroyed one of the oldest Jewish communities in the east Mediterranean.
Shabbat Shalom, שבת שלום
Πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους
Πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους, πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους
πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους που είναι οι ελιές
Είν’ ένα μοναστήρι, είν’ ένα μοναστήρι
είν’ ένα μοναστήρι που παν οι κοπελιές
Πάω και γώ ο καημένος
για να λειτουργηθώ
Να κάνω το σταυρό μου
σαν κάθε χριστιανός
Βλέπω μια πάντα κι άλλη
βλέπω μια κοπελιά
Να κάνει το σταυρό της
και λάμπει η εκκλησιά
Ρωτώ, ξαναρωτώ τη
από πού ’σαι κοπελιά
Από εδώ κοντά ’μαι
κι από το μαχαλά
Μα έχω γέρον άντρα
και δυο μικρά παιδιά
κι ολημερίς με δέρνει
έχει σκληρή καρδιά
Βαρύ σταμνί μου δίνει
κι ένα κοντό σκοινί
Ν’ αργήσω να γυρίσω
για να ’βρει αφορμή
Patrick Comerford
As winter gets colder, as the rain becomes more frequent, as the days shorten, and as holidays become dim memories, I take some comfort as the evenings close in looking back on old films and live=streaming music.
Some people can easily identify their ‘comfort foods’ – not necessarily nourishing or nutritious, but offering comfort to both the body and the soul. I sometimes turn to ‘comfort films’ and ‘comfort music’ – not always challenging, though sometimes they can be disturbing, yet certainly offering comfort to the eyes and ears, to the body and the soul in depth of winter.
We stayed up late last Friday night, marking Hallowe’en by watching Don’t Look Now (1973). It was an appropriate choice for BBC2 that night, but instead of being scared or disturbed, we ended up picking out places we know and appreciate in Venice: Salute, Saint Mark’s Square, the Hotel Gabrielli on Riva degli Schiavoni, Arsenale, a corner of the Palazzo Ducale, the Church of San Nicolo dei Mendicoli, where John Baxter (Donald Sutherland) is working, the Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo, the canals, bridges and narrow alleys, and, at the end, the Church of San Stae.
In the days that followed, I found myself was looking back on memories of some other ‘comfort films’ … Ill Met by Moonlight(1957), Never on Sunday (1960), Zorba the Greek (1964), Z (1969), Fiddler on the Roof (1971), Escape to Athena (1979), Ulysses’ Gaze or Το βλέμμα του Οδυσσέα (1995), The Weeping Meadow or Το Λιβάδι που δακρύζει (2004) … I suppose if the list of ‘comfort films’ continued, it would tell a lot about my age, my musical tastes, and my love of Greece.
Escape to Athena may, perhaps, seem an odd choice for my list. The war film was directed by George P Cosmatos and stars Roger Moore, Telly Savalas, David Niven, Stefanie Powers, Claudia Cardinale, Richard Roundtree, Sonny Bono and Elliott Gould. The music was composed by Lalo Schifrin.
The film is set in a German-occupied Greek island during World War II. It was filmed on location in Rhodes, and tells of allied prisoners in a POW camp who are forced to excavate ancient artefacts.
The Greek resistance to the Nazis is led by Zeno (Telly Savalas), a former monk, and his small band of fighters. They use the local brothel, run by his girlfriend Elena (Claudia Cardinale), as an undercover headquarters.
Aristotelis ‘Telly’ Savalas or Αριστοτέλης Σαβάλας (1922-1994), who plays Zeno. was a Greek-American actor, better known as the bald Lieutenant Theo Kojak in the 1970s crime drama series Kojak. Claudia Cardinale (1938-2025), who plays Zeno’s girlfriend Eleana, is still regarded as one of the leading figures of Italian cinema, alongside Sophia Loren and Gina Lollobrigida.
George Pan Cosmatos (1941-2005) was a Greek-Italian film director and screenwriter. He was born to a Greek family in Florence and grew up in Egypt and Cyprus. At 17, he became assistant director to Otto Preminger on Exodus (1960), based on Leon Uris’s novel about the birth of Israel.
The score in Escape to Athena is by the Argentine-American pianist, composer, arranger and conductor Lalo Schifrin (1932-2025), who died earlier this year (26 June 2025). His Jewish father, Luis Schifrin, led the second violin section of the Buenos Aires Philharmonic for three decades.
Schifrin’s best known compositions include the themes from Mission: Impossible (1966), Cool Hand Luke (1967), Bullitt (1968), The Eagle Has Landed (1976), and The Amityville Horror (1979) and he collaborated with Clint Eastwood from the 1960s to the 1980s in the Dirty Harry film series.
The Seahorse Fountain in the Square of the Jewish Martyrs in the walled city of Rhodes (Photograph: Square, Nadezhda Bogatyryova/Wikimapia)
The final scene in Escape to Athena cuts to the present day – or, rather, the late 1970s. By then, Zeno’s former headquarters have been turned into a state museum housing the treasures of Mount Athena. As the film comes to its close, Zeno leads a tsamikos or syrtos dance with Eleana around a Seahorse Fountain in a town square.
It is interesting that Schifrin decided not to compose his own dance for this closing scene but provided an instrumental arrangement of the Dodecanese traditional song Περα Στους Περα Καμπους (Pera stous pera kampous, ‘The Nun’s Dance’).
The setting of the Seahorse Fountain in a town square in Rhodes is also a reminder that this film is not a comic downplay of World War II and that the resistance to the Nazis involved resistance to their racism, antisemitism and the Holocaust.
This is the city square where the Nazis rounded up the Jews of Rhodes over 80 years ago in 1944. In the post-war years, it was renamed the Square of the Hebrew (or Jewish) Martyrs (Πλατεία Εβραίων Μαρτύρων, Plateia Martyron Evreon) and the Seahorse Fountain was erected in memory of the Jews of Rhodes who died in the Holocaust.
As I watch the closing scenes, I am reminded of the Kahal Shalom Synagogue, the last surviving, functioning synagogue on Rhodes, and the woman who gave me a tour of the synagogue one sunny afternoon 26 years ago, in June 1999.
From the Seahorse Fountain, the narrow street of Pindarou leads up into the alleyways of Dosiadou and Simiou. A pair of tall doors with two raised Stars of David open into a cobbled courtyard and the Kahal Shalom, the oldest surviving synagogue in Greece and the last remaining synagogue in the old Jewish quarter Rhodes.
The bimah or prayer desk in the Kahal Shalom synagogue in Rhodes (Photograph: Tripadvisor)
The Kahal Shalom is the last in a city that once had six synagogues. The floor inside and the courtyards outside are decorated with the graceful black and white pebble mosaic patterns or kochlaki that are distinctive throughout the Dodecanese islands. A plaque in the courtyard bears the date Kislev 5338 in the Jewish calendar, showing Kahal Shalom (‘the Holy Congregation of Plentiful Peace’) dates back to the year 1577.
But more immediate history and its horrors are recalled on a plaque in the west-side courtyard: it lists the names of 100 families wiped out in the Holocaust.
As the Italians – who captured the Dodecanese from the Ottomans in 1912 – passed increasingly repressive measures in the 1930s, the Jews of Rhodes began to leave in large numbers. By the end of the 1930s, there were still 2,000 or more Jews on the island, struggling to maintain their cultural life. A boatload of 600 Jews from Bratislava and Prague fleeing the Nazis reached Rhodes in 1939. There they were fed and quartered by the local Jewish community, and provided with fresh water for their onward journey to Palestine.
But as the boat sailed out, it caught fire, and the refugees were eventually washed up on the island of Samos. They returned to Rhodes, where the local Jews helped them to buy another old boat, and this time they made their way safely to Palestine. The refugees survived, but the Jews of Rhodes who helped them escape were to perish a few years later.
As the Germans took control of Rhodes, the leaders of the Jewish community decided to hide their Torah scrolls. In secret, the Torah scrolls were given to the Turkish religious leader, the Grand Mufti of Rhodes, Seyh Suleyman Kaslioglu, for safekeeping. He hid the Torah scrolls in the pulpit in the Morad Reis mosque. Several years later, he recalled, ‘One of the greatest moments of my life was when I was able to embrace the Torah, and carry it, and put it in the pulpit of the mosque – because we knew no German would ever think that the Torahs were preserved in the pulpit of the mosque.’
On 23 July 1944, 1,673 members of the Jewish community were rounded up in Rhodes and assembled in the square in front of the old Admiralty Building and the former palace of the Latin archbishops. From there, they were shipped to Piraeus and on by train to Auschwitz. The community that had survived the Crusades and the Inquisition and prospered under both Ottomans and Italians was decimated: only 151 people survived.
The Kahal Shalom Synagogue, with the women’s gallery behind and above the tevah (Photograph: RhodesPrivateTours.com)
I visited Rhodes perhaps seven or eight times between 1996 and 2006, for work and on holidays. I often visited the Kahal Shalom synagogue or the Holy Congregation of Plentiful Peace, and still recall with fondness the welcome I received there from the late Lucia Modiano Soulam a Holocaust survivor who had been deported from Rhodes to Auschwitz and who died in 2010.
There have been Jews in Rhodes since at least the time of Herod the Great. After the Spanish Inquisition, an influx of Sephardic refugees from Spain and Portugal saw a growth in the Jewish population and a new input into Jewish culture in the Aegean. An 800-year-old Torah scroll in Buenos Aires has been dated and traced back to the Jewish community of Rhodes, probably brought there by Jewish refugees fleeing Spain and Portugal.
The Jews of Rhodes were doctors and merchants, printers and bankers, craftsmen and traders. The Ottoman Turks allowed them to live within the walls of the crusader city.
For over 200 years, 12 successive generations of the Israel family provided the Chief Rabbis of Rhodes. In the 19th century, four of the five banks on the island were in Jewish hands, and the first department store in Rhodes was owned by a Jewish family.
When the Jewish community in Rhodes was at its height in the 1920s, 4,000 or more Jews were living on the island. At the entrance to the synagogue, a stone monument lists the names of the Jewish families of Rhodes who were taken by the Nazis:
In memory of the 2,000 martyrs of the Jewish community of Rhodes and the brutal annihilation by the murderous Nazis in the concentration camps of Germany, 1944-1945. May they rest in peace.
The numbers are so overwhelming that instead of 2,000 names the plaque lists only family names. The Holocaust virtually destroyed one of the oldest Jewish communities in the east Mediterranean.
Shabbat Shalom, שבת שלום
Πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους
Πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους, πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους
πέρα στους πέρα κάμπους που είναι οι ελιές
Είν’ ένα μοναστήρι, είν’ ένα μοναστήρι
είν’ ένα μοναστήρι που παν οι κοπελιές
Πάω και γώ ο καημένος
για να λειτουργηθώ
Να κάνω το σταυρό μου
σαν κάθε χριστιανός
Βλέπω μια πάντα κι άλλη
βλέπω μια κοπελιά
Να κάνει το σταυρό της
και λάμπει η εκκλησιά
Ρωτώ, ξαναρωτώ τη
από πού ’σαι κοπελιά
Από εδώ κοντά ’μαι
κι από το μαχαλά
Μα έχω γέρον άντρα
και δυο μικρά παιδιά
κι ολημερίς με δέρνει
έχει σκληρή καρδιά
Βαρύ σταμνί μου δίνει
κι ένα κοντό σκοινί
Ν’ αργήσω να γυρίσω
για να ’βρει αφορμή
Daily prayer in the Kingdom Season:
7, Friday 7 November 2025
The Unjust Steward … part of the East Window in Saint Michael’s Church, Limerick, made in 1878 by Mayer & Co and illustrating 10 parables (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Willibrord of York (739), Bishop, Apostle of Frisia (7 November).
Before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘The Unjust Steward,’ by the Kazakhstan Artist, Nelly Bube (Bubay)
Luke 16: 1-8 (NRSVA):
1 Then Jesus said to the disciples, ‘There was a rich man who had a manager, and charges were brought to him that this man was squandering his property. 2 So he summoned him and said to him, “What is this that I hear about you? Give me an account of your management, because you cannot be my manager any longer.” 3 Then the manager said to himself, “What will I do, now that my master is taking the position away from me? I am not strong enough to dig, and I am ashamed to beg. 4 I have decided what to do so that, when I am dismissed as manager, people may welcome me into their homes.” 5 So, summoning his master’s debtors one by one, he asked the first, “How much do you owe my master?” 6 He answered, “A hundred jugs of olive oil.” He said to him, “Take your bill, sit down quickly, and make it fifty.” 7 Then he asked another, “And how much do you owe?” He replied, “A hundred containers of wheat.” He said to him, “Take your bill and make it eighty.” 8 And his master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly; for the children of this age are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light.’
A ‘Shop To Let’ sign within view of Sidney Sussex College chapel, Cambridge … can we reconcile the values of the Kingdom and the demands of commercial life? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s reflection:
In the Gospel reading for the Eucharist today, we read the parable of ‘the Unjust Steward’ or the ‘Parable of the Dishonest Manager’.
Whatever name you give it, this morning’s reading is about ignoring and exploiting the plight of the oppressed and the poor and tells us that this amounts to turning away from God and turning towards idolatry. We are called to turn around, and in turning to the needs of the poor we find that we are turning to God.
So, let me tell this morning’s Gospel story (Luke 16: 1-13) in another way. When I left school, I started training as a chartered surveyor and in estate manager. I never finished that training, but I can visualise some of the characters in this story.
A very, very rich man lives in a big city, let’s say it is Dublin. He has a luxurious lifestyle made possible by the income from the apartments, hotels and office blocks he owns in the city centre. He has been a major property developer, and a key shareholder in one of the business banks lending to developers.
He has hired an estate manager to run his property holding company, his building society, and his insurance agency while he spends most of his time in his large country house in Co Kildare or Co Meath, in the Algarve playing golf or in Marbella on his yacht.
All the work of painting, maintaining the lifts and the plumbing in his apartment blocks, working the bar and servicing the rooms in his hotels, and working at the call centres in the office blocks, is done by people who travel in and out from the rims of the city, people whose grandparents probably once lived in the small terraced houses that once stood along the docks or the canal banks but were levelled to build those apartments, office blocks and hotels.
They pay their mortgages to the bank that financed the apartment blocks and similar developments. Their overdrafts are from the same bank. Their mortgage, insurance and life assurance policies are from an agency he owns. They find themselves increasingly in debt, paying school fees and health insurance, running a car or two cars, meeting term loan payments for fridges, freezers, TVs and laptops … What they earn is never enough to pay off their mortgages, their overdrafts, their term loans.
These families are slipping further and further into debt, working harder and harder to pay what cannot be paid.
But they never meet the rich developer. The immediate face of this system, of his companies and his investments, is the face of the estate agent who manages the blocks – a man whose grandparents came from the same families as the people who now suffer under his management.
However, his parents had escaped the system, he got a good education, and then got sucked into the system.
The developer hears rumours that the estate manager, who is also his insurance agent, has been squandering the developer’s resource, and gives him his dismissal notice. Now, remember that ‘squandering’ is not necessarily a bad word here – the sower in another parable squanders seed by tossing it on roads and in bird-feeding zones, and the shepherd in one of this week’s parables potentially squanders 99 sheep by running after the lost one; the widow searching for her lost coin risks losing her other nine as she sweeps everything out.
Meanwhile, the estate agent has to work out his notice, but is no longer authorised to let, to rent, to buy, to sell, to do anything at all in the developer’s name.
He probably shares the same background only a generation or two ago with the maintenance workers, the tenants, the workers in the office blocks. But when he is out on his ear, they are not going to help him to find a place to live, or find a new job, given that up to now he has allied himself with the developer’s interests, collecting high rents, refusing to bring down rents when the reviews are due, managing the work rotas for the maintenance workers, forcing them to work longer hours rather than taking on the staff needed for the job, dealing unjustly with both tenants and workers.
He has been demanding higher rents and premiums, and longer working hours, yet providing fewer and fewer services – doing what certain economists have advised him to do: increasing profit margins and productivity and cutting costs and outlays at one and the same time.
He may be shrewd, but that is why he is called ‘the dishonest manager’ (verse 8).
The agent then does something that is extraordinarily clever.
He gathers all the tenants and workers who owe him money, and he declares that their debts have been written down, more than the courts could ever write them down, to something that might be repaid, freeing families from heartbreaking choices. He has been upping their rents and their premiums; now he brings them all back to a payable rate. And in doing this, he manages to wipe out the arrears that have been mounting up.
The smart agent manages not to tell the tenants or the workers that he has been sacked. Nor does he tell them that the developer has not authorised any of his largesse. But the tenants and the workers now think the developer, their landlord, is more generous than anyone else in his position could be. The developer is now a hero in their eyes – and, by extension, the agent is too.
The developer comes back for his quarterly or annual visit to pick up the income the agent has collected for him, and he gets a surprise that is exhilarating and challenging. The people are delighted to see him. Workers shake his hands, tenants lean out of the balconies to wave at him, children want to have ‘selfies’ taken with him.
Then, as he inspects the books in the small office the agent has worked from in the complex, he finds out what the agent has done in telling the tenants and the workers that the developer has forgiven their debts.
He has a choice to make.
He can go and tell them that it was all a terrible mistake, that the agent’s ‘stroke’ amounted not to generosity but to theft, or at least to dishonesty, and has no legal basis – he can tell them they are still responsible for the unpaid rent, for the overdrawn loans.
The warm welcome could quickly turn to nasty protests.
Or, the developer can go outside, bask in the unexpected welcome he has received, and take credit for the agent’s actions. At least he has cash in his hand where once he might have had nothing because of defaulting tenants and clients. That would save him going to court, but has he to take the agent back to work for him?
What would you do?
Picture yourself in this dilemma, both as the agent and as the developer.
From the agent’s point of view, does it matter any more what the developer decides to do? Whatever decision the developer makes, his future is safe – either he gets his job back, or his own people are going to look after him.
But here is the big problem: what the agent did is clearly dishonest. He has taken the landlord’s property and squandered it – even after he was sacked and had no right to do anything in the developer’s name.
What is it that the agent has done, without permission? Who has he deceived?
The agent forgives. He forgives things that he had no right to forgive. He forgives for all the wrong reasons, for personal gain and to compensate for his past misconduct. But that decisive action that he undertakes redeems him from a position to which it seems he could not be reconciled, to the developer any more than to the tenants and workers.
So what is the moral of the story?
This story is unique to Saint Luke’s Gospel, and for him there is a significance that is important throughout the third gospel: Forgive. Forgive it all. Forgive it now. Forgive it for any reason you want. Forgive for the right reason. Forgive for the wrong reason. Forgive for no reason at all. Just forgive.
Remember, Saint Luke’s version of the Lord’s Prayer includes the helpful confusion: καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν, καὶ γὰρ αὐτοὶ ἀφίομεν παντὶ ὀφείλοντι ἡμῖν: καὶ μὴ εἰσενέγκῃς ἡμᾶς εἰς πειρασμόν (‘and forgive us our sins for indeed we ourselves are forgiving everyone who is [monetarily] indebted to us’) (Luke 11: 4) – the monetary indebtedness is obvious in the original Greek.
We pray it, but do we put it into practice?
The arrival of the Kingdom of God is no occasion for score-keeping of any kind, whether monetary or moral.
Why should I forgive someone who has sinned against me, or against my sense of what is obviously right? I don’t have to do it out of love for the other person.
I could forgive the other person because of what I pray in the Lord’s Prayer every Sunday if not every morning.
I could forgive because I know I would like to be forgiven myself.
I could forgive because I know what it is like to be me when I am unforgiving.
I could forgive because I am, or I want to be, deeply in touch with a sense of Christ’s power to forgive and free someone just like me.
Or I could forgive because I think it will improve my life and sense of well-being.
It boils down to the same thing: deluded or sane, selfish or unselfish, there is no bad reason to forgive.
Extending the kind of grace God shows me in every possible arena – financial and moral – can only put me more deeply in touch with God’s grace.
If a crafty agent, a dishonest manager, an unjust steward, the sort of person we meet in this Gospel reading, can forgive to save his job or give himself a safety net when he is sacked, then those of us who have the experience of real grace, we who have been invited to the Heavenly Banquet, have a better reason than most people to forgive.
Where is the place for Christian values in today’s world of finance and debt? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 7 November 2025):
The theme this week (2 to 8 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘From Solitude to Connection’ (pp 52-53). This theme was introduced on Sunday with a Programme Update from Ljudmila, a Ukrainian Refugee living in Budapest, Hungary.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 7 November 2025) invites us to pray:
Father, we pray for the ministry of Saint Margaret’s Church as they seek to be a light for you in Budapest. Thank you for the way your love is modelled through the church’s open doors.
The Collect:
God, the Saviour of all,
you sent your bishop Willibrord from this land
to proclaim the good news to many peoples
and confirm them in their faith:
help us also to witness to your steadfast love
by word and deed
so that your Church may increase
and grow strong in holiness;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
Holy Father,
who gathered us here around the table of your Son
to share this meal with the whole household of God:
in that new world where you reveal
the fullness of your peace,
gather people of every race and language
to share with Willibrord and all your saints
in the eternal banquet of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Property developments and financial growth on the banks of the River Liffey in Dublin (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Patrick Comerford
We are in the Kingdom Season, the time between All Saints and Advent. The Calendar of the Church of England in Common Worship today remembers Saint Willibrord of York (739), Bishop, Apostle of Frisia (7 November).
Before today begins, before having breakfast, I am taking some quiet time early this morning to give thanks, and for reflection, prayer and reading in these ways:
1, today’s Gospel reading;
2, a short reflection;
3, a prayer from the USPG prayer diary;
4, the Collects and Post-Communion prayer of the day.
‘The Unjust Steward,’ by the Kazakhstan Artist, Nelly Bube (Bubay)
Luke 16: 1-8 (NRSVA):
1 Then Jesus said to the disciples, ‘There was a rich man who had a manager, and charges were brought to him that this man was squandering his property. 2 So he summoned him and said to him, “What is this that I hear about you? Give me an account of your management, because you cannot be my manager any longer.” 3 Then the manager said to himself, “What will I do, now that my master is taking the position away from me? I am not strong enough to dig, and I am ashamed to beg. 4 I have decided what to do so that, when I am dismissed as manager, people may welcome me into their homes.” 5 So, summoning his master’s debtors one by one, he asked the first, “How much do you owe my master?” 6 He answered, “A hundred jugs of olive oil.” He said to him, “Take your bill, sit down quickly, and make it fifty.” 7 Then he asked another, “And how much do you owe?” He replied, “A hundred containers of wheat.” He said to him, “Take your bill and make it eighty.” 8 And his master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly; for the children of this age are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light.’
A ‘Shop To Let’ sign within view of Sidney Sussex College chapel, Cambridge … can we reconcile the values of the Kingdom and the demands of commercial life? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s reflection:
In the Gospel reading for the Eucharist today, we read the parable of ‘the Unjust Steward’ or the ‘Parable of the Dishonest Manager’.
Whatever name you give it, this morning’s reading is about ignoring and exploiting the plight of the oppressed and the poor and tells us that this amounts to turning away from God and turning towards idolatry. We are called to turn around, and in turning to the needs of the poor we find that we are turning to God.
So, let me tell this morning’s Gospel story (Luke 16: 1-13) in another way. When I left school, I started training as a chartered surveyor and in estate manager. I never finished that training, but I can visualise some of the characters in this story.
A very, very rich man lives in a big city, let’s say it is Dublin. He has a luxurious lifestyle made possible by the income from the apartments, hotels and office blocks he owns in the city centre. He has been a major property developer, and a key shareholder in one of the business banks lending to developers.
He has hired an estate manager to run his property holding company, his building society, and his insurance agency while he spends most of his time in his large country house in Co Kildare or Co Meath, in the Algarve playing golf or in Marbella on his yacht.
All the work of painting, maintaining the lifts and the plumbing in his apartment blocks, working the bar and servicing the rooms in his hotels, and working at the call centres in the office blocks, is done by people who travel in and out from the rims of the city, people whose grandparents probably once lived in the small terraced houses that once stood along the docks or the canal banks but were levelled to build those apartments, office blocks and hotels.
They pay their mortgages to the bank that financed the apartment blocks and similar developments. Their overdrafts are from the same bank. Their mortgage, insurance and life assurance policies are from an agency he owns. They find themselves increasingly in debt, paying school fees and health insurance, running a car or two cars, meeting term loan payments for fridges, freezers, TVs and laptops … What they earn is never enough to pay off their mortgages, their overdrafts, their term loans.
These families are slipping further and further into debt, working harder and harder to pay what cannot be paid.
But they never meet the rich developer. The immediate face of this system, of his companies and his investments, is the face of the estate agent who manages the blocks – a man whose grandparents came from the same families as the people who now suffer under his management.
However, his parents had escaped the system, he got a good education, and then got sucked into the system.
The developer hears rumours that the estate manager, who is also his insurance agent, has been squandering the developer’s resource, and gives him his dismissal notice. Now, remember that ‘squandering’ is not necessarily a bad word here – the sower in another parable squanders seed by tossing it on roads and in bird-feeding zones, and the shepherd in one of this week’s parables potentially squanders 99 sheep by running after the lost one; the widow searching for her lost coin risks losing her other nine as she sweeps everything out.
Meanwhile, the estate agent has to work out his notice, but is no longer authorised to let, to rent, to buy, to sell, to do anything at all in the developer’s name.
He probably shares the same background only a generation or two ago with the maintenance workers, the tenants, the workers in the office blocks. But when he is out on his ear, they are not going to help him to find a place to live, or find a new job, given that up to now he has allied himself with the developer’s interests, collecting high rents, refusing to bring down rents when the reviews are due, managing the work rotas for the maintenance workers, forcing them to work longer hours rather than taking on the staff needed for the job, dealing unjustly with both tenants and workers.
He has been demanding higher rents and premiums, and longer working hours, yet providing fewer and fewer services – doing what certain economists have advised him to do: increasing profit margins and productivity and cutting costs and outlays at one and the same time.
He may be shrewd, but that is why he is called ‘the dishonest manager’ (verse 8).
The agent then does something that is extraordinarily clever.
He gathers all the tenants and workers who owe him money, and he declares that their debts have been written down, more than the courts could ever write them down, to something that might be repaid, freeing families from heartbreaking choices. He has been upping their rents and their premiums; now he brings them all back to a payable rate. And in doing this, he manages to wipe out the arrears that have been mounting up.
The smart agent manages not to tell the tenants or the workers that he has been sacked. Nor does he tell them that the developer has not authorised any of his largesse. But the tenants and the workers now think the developer, their landlord, is more generous than anyone else in his position could be. The developer is now a hero in their eyes – and, by extension, the agent is too.
The developer comes back for his quarterly or annual visit to pick up the income the agent has collected for him, and he gets a surprise that is exhilarating and challenging. The people are delighted to see him. Workers shake his hands, tenants lean out of the balconies to wave at him, children want to have ‘selfies’ taken with him.
Then, as he inspects the books in the small office the agent has worked from in the complex, he finds out what the agent has done in telling the tenants and the workers that the developer has forgiven their debts.
He has a choice to make.
He can go and tell them that it was all a terrible mistake, that the agent’s ‘stroke’ amounted not to generosity but to theft, or at least to dishonesty, and has no legal basis – he can tell them they are still responsible for the unpaid rent, for the overdrawn loans.
The warm welcome could quickly turn to nasty protests.
Or, the developer can go outside, bask in the unexpected welcome he has received, and take credit for the agent’s actions. At least he has cash in his hand where once he might have had nothing because of defaulting tenants and clients. That would save him going to court, but has he to take the agent back to work for him?
What would you do?
Picture yourself in this dilemma, both as the agent and as the developer.
From the agent’s point of view, does it matter any more what the developer decides to do? Whatever decision the developer makes, his future is safe – either he gets his job back, or his own people are going to look after him.
But here is the big problem: what the agent did is clearly dishonest. He has taken the landlord’s property and squandered it – even after he was sacked and had no right to do anything in the developer’s name.
What is it that the agent has done, without permission? Who has he deceived?
The agent forgives. He forgives things that he had no right to forgive. He forgives for all the wrong reasons, for personal gain and to compensate for his past misconduct. But that decisive action that he undertakes redeems him from a position to which it seems he could not be reconciled, to the developer any more than to the tenants and workers.
So what is the moral of the story?
This story is unique to Saint Luke’s Gospel, and for him there is a significance that is important throughout the third gospel: Forgive. Forgive it all. Forgive it now. Forgive it for any reason you want. Forgive for the right reason. Forgive for the wrong reason. Forgive for no reason at all. Just forgive.
Remember, Saint Luke’s version of the Lord’s Prayer includes the helpful confusion: καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν, καὶ γὰρ αὐτοὶ ἀφίομεν παντὶ ὀφείλοντι ἡμῖν: καὶ μὴ εἰσενέγκῃς ἡμᾶς εἰς πειρασμόν (‘and forgive us our sins for indeed we ourselves are forgiving everyone who is [monetarily] indebted to us’) (Luke 11: 4) – the monetary indebtedness is obvious in the original Greek.
We pray it, but do we put it into practice?
The arrival of the Kingdom of God is no occasion for score-keeping of any kind, whether monetary or moral.
Why should I forgive someone who has sinned against me, or against my sense of what is obviously right? I don’t have to do it out of love for the other person.
I could forgive the other person because of what I pray in the Lord’s Prayer every Sunday if not every morning.
I could forgive because I know I would like to be forgiven myself.
I could forgive because I know what it is like to be me when I am unforgiving.
I could forgive because I am, or I want to be, deeply in touch with a sense of Christ’s power to forgive and free someone just like me.
Or I could forgive because I think it will improve my life and sense of well-being.
It boils down to the same thing: deluded or sane, selfish or unselfish, there is no bad reason to forgive.
Extending the kind of grace God shows me in every possible arena – financial and moral – can only put me more deeply in touch with God’s grace.
If a crafty agent, a dishonest manager, an unjust steward, the sort of person we meet in this Gospel reading, can forgive to save his job or give himself a safety net when he is sacked, then those of us who have the experience of real grace, we who have been invited to the Heavenly Banquet, have a better reason than most people to forgive.
Where is the place for Christian values in today’s world of finance and debt? (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Today’s Prayers (Friday 7 November 2025):
The theme this week (2 to 8 November) in Pray with the World Church, the prayer diary of the Anglican mission agency USPG (United Society Partners in the Gospel), is ‘From Solitude to Connection’ (pp 52-53). This theme was introduced on Sunday with a Programme Update from Ljudmila, a Ukrainian Refugee living in Budapest, Hungary.
The USPG Prayer Diary today (Friday 7 November 2025) invites us to pray:
Father, we pray for the ministry of Saint Margaret’s Church as they seek to be a light for you in Budapest. Thank you for the way your love is modelled through the church’s open doors.
The Collect:
God, the Saviour of all,
you sent your bishop Willibrord from this land
to proclaim the good news to many peoples
and confirm them in their faith:
help us also to witness to your steadfast love
by word and deed
so that your Church may increase
and grow strong in holiness;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
Post Communion Prayer:
Holy Father,
who gathered us here around the table of your Son
to share this meal with the whole household of God:
in that new world where you reveal
the fullness of your peace,
gather people of every race and language
to share with Willibrord and all your saints
in the eternal banquet of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Yesterday’s Reflections
Continued Tomorrow
Property developments and financial growth on the banks of the River Liffey in Dublin (Photograph: Patrick Comerford, 2024)
Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicised Edition copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. http://nrsvbibles.org
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


































