Thursday, 23 October 2014
Anglicanism 1 (MDI, 2014-2015): Faith,
Practice and Spirituality: Faith and Practice
Mater Dei Institute of Education,
23 October 2014,
1.30 p.m., Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin.
Faith, Practice and Spirituality:
1: Faith and Practice:
1: Faith and Practice
Welcome to Christ Church Cathedral.
First of all, we visit the crypt, and then the main body of the cathedral, with an opportunity to hear about its history and story, from its foundation ca 1030, its continuity through the generations and down the centuries and then about its function today as a place of daily worship in the heart of the city, and as a cathedral at the heart of the Diocese of Dublin and Glendalough.
[Walking tour of Christ Church Cathedral.]
Some questions for discussion:
How we worship expresses our theology and what we believe. There is an old and wise theological maxim that declares: lex orandi, lex credendi.
You learn much about Anglican beliefs by observing Anglicans at prayer.
● What are the priorities in public worship for Anglicans as seen in this cathedral?
● What do you see that is the same?
● What do you see that is a surprise?
● What do you not see, and that makes a difference?
The Anglican way of doing theology
There are a number of classical reference points for Anglican theology.
One is the emphasis, classically articulated by Richard Hooker (1554-1600), on the three-fold relationship between:
Secondly, the classical articulations of Anglican theology are said to be found in The Book of Common Prayer and the Formularies:
1, The Book of Common Prayer;
2, The 39 Articles;
3, The Ordinal;
4, The Homilies.
Bishop Lancelot Andrewes (1555-1626) defined the boundaries of Anglican faith and practice as:
1, One canon reduced to writing by God himself;
2, Two testaments;
3, Three creeds (Nicene, Apostles’ and Athanasian);
4, Four general councils (Nicaea 325, Constantinople 381, Ephesus 431 and Chalcedon 451);
5, Five centuries, and the series of Fathers in that period – the centuries that is, before Constantine, and two after (from the Apostles to Gregory the Great).
The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral seeks to summarise the Anglican approach to theology, worship and ecclesiology and is often cited as a basic summary of the essentials of Anglican identity:
1, The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, as “containing all things necessary to salvation,” and as being the rule and ultimate standard of faith.
2, The Creeds (specifically, the Apostles’ and Nicene) as the sufficient statement of Christian faith;
3, The dominical sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion;
4, The historic episcopate locally adapted.
But, at all times, Anglicans will say that Anglican theology seeks to follow the Via Media, that it is both Catholic and Protestant.
The emphasis on balancing Scripture, Tradition and Reason was first developed in the late 16th century by Richard Hooker (1554-1600) and was so influential that it has left a lasting mark on the development of Anglicanism.
Hooker stands alongside Thomas Cranmer, who wrote and compiled The Book of Common Prayer and Matthew Parker, who was primarily responsible for The Thirty-Nine Articles, as one of the founders of Anglican theological thought, and he is considered by many as the “true father” or founding intellect and spirit of Anglicanism.
But how Scripture, Reason and Tradition are balanced, and the emphasis given to each, continues to be part and parcel of Anglican theological debate, as we saw last week when we discussed the controversies in the Church of Ireland in the 1870s after Disestablishment.
The fears of the Church of Ireland severing itself from the rest of the Anglican Communion not realised, and the compromises and accommodations reached are beautifully described in the closing phrases of the 1878 revision of The Book of Common Prayer which I quoted last week:
“And now, if some shall complain that these changes are not enough, and that we should have taken this opportunity of making this Book as perfect in all respects as they think it might be made, of if others shall say that these changes have been unnecessary or excessive, and that what was already excellent has been impaired by doing that which, in their opinion, night well have been left undone, let them, on the one side and the other, consider that men’s judgements of perfection are very various, and that what is imperfect, with peace, is often better than what is otherwise more excellent, without it.”
The practical outworking of the Via Media, of the consequences of and reasons for seeking the balance between being both Catholic and Protestant in the one church, leaves the Church of Ireland with strengths and weaknesses.
One of the strengths is that the Church of Ireland is a church within the tradition of the Reformation, yet has not broken continuity with the past.
Its weaknesses, in seeking to be both Catholic and Reformed, lie in being all things to all people, being neither one thing nor the other. Nor does this definition appear to leave us open to the spirituality of other traditions, such as Pentecostalism or Orthodoxy – although in practice it has worked out differently, with many Anglicans drawing from the riches of those two traditions too.
Everyone – Methodist, Catholic, Orthodox, Presbyterian – can find something they identify with in Anglicanism, in mainstream Anglicanism.
So those understandings of how we do theology – Scripture, Reason and Tradition, and the Via Media – are not necessarily helpful when it comes to realised theology, how Anglicans experience the Church, experience and live their faith as a believing community, live a life of spirituality and discipleship.
Perhaps the true test of theology is: “Come and pray with us … Lex orandi, lex credendi.”
Yes, of course, there are differences. On our opening day, I cautioned about using words that emphasise or depend on difference, such as “non-Catholic,” or even “different faiths.”
Anglicans are both Catholic and Protestant, we confess the same Creeds – the Nicene Creed and the Apostles’ Creed, as well as the Athanasian Creed. We do not see ourselves as having “broken away” from Catholicism.
As you have seen with the Celtic saints on the stained-glass window in the Baptistery, the Church of Ireland sees itself as the same Church as the Church that dates back to those early Irish saints, Patrick, Brigid, and Columba or Columcille.
But some of the noticeable primary differences that might be commented on include:
1, The Pope: Anglicanism has always acknowledged that the Pope is the Bishop of Rome and one of the five traditionally-acknowledged Patriarchs of the Church (alongside Constantinople, Antioch, Jerusalem and Alexandria). The questions arise over the scope, extent and exercise and Papal authority and over Papal infallibility, and where infallibility rests. But it must be recalled that Papal infallibility was not a claim and therefore not divisive at the Reformation, and that in terms of authority, many Anglicans today are impressed with the attitude of Pope Francis, who has been compared with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby.
2, Ecclesiology or the nature of the Church. We believe we are part of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church. But there is no one Anglican Church. There are autonomous Anglican churches (which we call provinces), which include the Church of Ireland and the Church of England. But we are also in communion with the Old Catholic Churches of Continental Europe, the Episcopal Lutheran Churches of Northern Europe, some churches that have roots in the Orthodox traditions, such as the Mar Thoma Church in India, and at times various Anglican churches have sought to be in communion with: the Orthodox; the Moravians; the Methodists.
In many ways our style of Church Government is most similar to that of the Orthodox Churches. We are synodical, with bishops presiding in synods that include the clergy and representatives of the laity.
But Anglicanism is not an end in itself and does not seek to make other churches like itself.
3, The place of Mary: You have noticed the windows with the Virgin Mary, and perhaps also the statue of the Virgin Mary with the Christ Child at the north arch in the Lady Chapel.
If you remained for Choral Evensong this evening you would hear the choir singing the canticle Magnificat, which is a traditional part of Evensong or Evening Prayer, one of the traditional Anglican daily offices.
You will, doubtlessly, come across many Church of Ireland parish churches and cathedrals named Saint Mary’s.
The calendar of the Church of Ireland also commemorate days associated with the Virgin Mary:
● The Presentation (also called the Purification): 2 February.
●The Annunciation: 25 March.
● The Visitation: 31 May.
●The Birth of Mary: 8 September.
The calendar of the Church of Ireland does not include the Assumption (15 August), nor does it include not the Immaculate Conception (8 December). They appear with different names in the Church of England’s Common Worship.
But the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception are post-Reformation definitions in the Roman Catholic Church, and were not matters for division at the Reformation. The real divisions are about “taste and cult” rather than “devotion and respect.”
4, The sacraments: We agree about Baptism. Do we disagree about the Eucharist? The reports of ARCIC-1 and ARCIC-2 would say no, not at this stage.
What is the difference?
What do we believe?
What do we mean by Real Presence?
Why do you think there is caution among Anglicans about reserving the sacrament?
Is it helpful to emphasise our few differences, or to emphasise the many things we have in common?
You would also recognise the way the other sacraments are celebrated in the Church of Ireland with the rites and similarities, the place of the other five of the seven sacraments and how they are used, celebrated and received in the Church of Ireland.
Confirmation is normally around the age of 12-14, but there are problems with it being seen as a rite of passage, and problems about when a baptised person should be admitted to receiving Holy Communion.
Penance is provided for at Morning Prayer, Evening Prayer and at the Eucharist, as a general confession, with absolution pronounced by the priest. Occasionally to, priests offer private confession and absolution.
Ordination: What do we mean by priesthood, ministry and ordination? Do we have shared understandings that allow convergence?
Is clerical celibacy or marriage a barrier?
What about the ordination of woman as priests? What about the ordination here in this cathedral a year ago [30 November 2013] of a woman, Pat Storey, as Bishop of Meath and Kildare?
What about clergy in secular employment.
The differences and difficulties arise not just the over the words and actions at ordination, but the intention, and Anglican orders were rejected by Leo XIII in 1896, not just because of the form and words used, but also because of the intention.
Some former Roman Catholic priests now serve as priests in the Church of Ireland and in other Anglican churches today, without being reordained.
But Anglicans continue to insist that clergy in other churches, including Methodists and Presbyterians, must be ordained by a bishop before exercising ministry in, say, the Church of Ireland.
Marriage is similar, although we have different discussions about divorce and remarriage, and about clerical marriage, and the same debates about same-gender marriage.
Anointing with oil is a similar practice, tough we encourage it for many other reasons beyond dying.
5, Ethical differences? We have many different approaches to questions about health care, contraception, divorce, abortion and sexuality, for example.
But many of the differences that matter in our conversations are often in our shared and collective memories and perceptions.
Consider how we have remembered hurts and divisions from the past.
● There can be perceptions of ethic difference.
● There can be perceptions of social difference.
● There may even be perceptions of political difference.
We observe the same great festivals. We celebrate Christmas, Epiphany, Ash Wednesday, the great days of Easter and Pentecost, Trinity, and All Saints’ Day all on the same days as Roman Catholics. Indeed, we still keep Ascension Day on Ascension Thursday, and have not transferred it to the following Sunday.
We insist that Christmas, Easter and Pentecost are the three Principal Holy Days.
We mark many of the same saints’ days, and the seasons are the same, including Lent and Advent.
The calendar in The Book of Common Prayer (2004) also includes the great saints’ days.
This calendar marks out the main cycle of services and public worship in the Church of Ireland.
But the calendar does not provide for events that also mark out a type of folk religion in the Church of Ireland, including:
1, Harvest Thanksgiving
2, Remembrance Day
3, Carol Services, including the Service of Nine Lessons and Carols, and the Christmas Eve Carol Service in Saint Patrick’s Cathedral.
Despite some of the obvious differences and similarities, it is going to be important to take account of them so that they do not become problems when you are teaching in schools.
What problems or divergences do you need to take account of when it comes to:
● First Communions?
● Prayer times?
Anglicans and The Book of Common Prayer
As Anglicans, we talk so often about The Book of Common Prayer yet we are not always talking about the same book.
Many elderly parishioners still speak of regretting the loss of The Book of Common Prayer when, of course, what they mean is the black-bound 1960 of The Book of Common Prayer, now piled away in vestries in parish churches across the land under moulding collections of The Alternative Prayer Book (1984).
And, when they refer to 1960 black bound edition of The Book of Common Prayer, they may even refer to it as the 1662 Book of Common Prayer.
The “Prayer Book” means different things to different people, across the generations, and across the Anglican Communion, and the prefaces alone to the 2004 Book of Common Prayer tell of editions published in 1549, 1552, 1662, 1878 and 1926. The 1662 Book of Common Prayer, with some later but minor revisions, remains the normative liturgy of the Church of England. It has been translated into over 150 languages. Its words have resonated through almost 450 years of our life and culture.
Anglican spirituality can be best understood as basically a liturgical piety, nurtured by The Book of Common Prayer in a rich and glorious tradition. Although it is a quarter of a century since Dr Gareth Bennett, in a controversial and catastrophic preface to Crockford’s Clerical Directory in 1987 claimed that “prayer books based on the English Book of Common Prayer” had fallen into “virtual disuse,” throughout the Church of Ireland, and in most other provinces or member churches of the Anglican Communion, dioceses, parishes and parishioners continue to see The Book of Common Prayer as providing their standards in both doctrine and worship.
Over the generations, Anglicanism has been sustained and nourished by, and radically depends on, the traditions that have been developed though the liturgical use of and interaction with The Book of Common Prayer.
It is inclusive Anglicanism at its best, broad and deep, Catholic and Reformed. The word ‘Protestant’ did not occur in The Book of Common Prayer, as its first edition pre-dates this term in its usual sense, until ‘The Preamble and Declaration’ (1870) was bound in with it in the Church of Ireland, and even there the word only appears once (see p. 776). But then, of course, neither does the word ‘Anglican’ appear in the book – it was not used as we use it until the late 19th century.
For countless Anglicans down through the centuries, the language of The Book of Common Prayer, the language of the King James Version of the Bible, and the language of the Coverdale version of the Psalter, have been deeply engraved on their hearts, so that for them this language is the habitual language of devotion, rich with associations; words ready to hand that come to mind and tongue in times of weariness, or sickness, or despair –a genuinely liturgical and devotional language, thoroughly biblical in its images and inspiration.
It is a language of devotion that is rich and deeply meaningful and that has shaped the spiritual vocabulary of Anglicans for generations. Here we have Anglican memory and collective recollection.
This includes redolent phrases such as:
“Dearly beloved brethren, the Scripture moveth us in sundry ways …”
“… that we should not dissemble or cloke them …”
“… an humble, lowly, penitent and obedient heart …”
“Wherefore I pray and beseech you, as many as are here present …”
“We have erred and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep …”
“We have left undone those things which we ought to have done … and there is no health in us …”
“… a godly, righteous and sober life …”
“… that we surely trusting in thy defence …”
“… we fall not into sin, neither run into any kind of danger …”
“…for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory …”
Someone I know claims to have known twin sisters called Grace and Gloria.
Or the one I was puzzled by when I first heard it as a child, without the comma being emphasised:
“… that both, our hearts …”
What? Only two hearts? Among so many?
“We do not presume …”
“Draw near with faith …”
“Prevent us, O Lord, …”
“Read, mark, learn and inwardly digest …”
Our clergy learn in pastoral visits to the elderly that – no matter how their minds or memories are slipping – they still remember whole Psalms from Coverdale’s Psalter in The Book of Common Prayer.
But they also remember many familiar prayers from The Book of Common Prayer, especially from Morning Prayer, Evening Prayer and the Holy Communion. These include, for example, the words of the General Thanksgiving:
“Almighty God, Father of all mercies, We thine unworthy servants Do give thee most humble and hearty thanks For all thy goodness and loving-kindness to us, and to all men. We bless thee for our creation, preservation and all the blessings of this life: But above all, for thine inestimable love in the redemption of the world by our Lord Jesus Christ; for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory.
“And, we beseech thee, give us that due sense of all thy mercies, That our hearts may be unfeignedly thankful, And that we show forth thy praise, Not only with our lips, but in our lives; By giving up ourselves to thy service, And by walking before thee in holiness and righteousness all our days; Through Jesus Christ our Lord, To whom with thee and the Holy Spirit Be all honour and glory, World without end. Amen” (The Book of Common Prayer (2004), p. 99).
The Book of Common Prayer is the great jewel of the Anglican reformers, particularly Thomas Cranmer. At a time when there was a variety of styles and approaches to worship, so complex and so difficult to follow that the common man and woman became mere spectators, The Book of Common Prayer once again made liturgy what the word implies it should be, not just the work of the people, but the work of the common people, in a language intelligible to the common person, or as was said at the time, “understanded of the people.”
But The Book of Common Prayer is not only a rendering in the English tongue of the Catholic faith, as that concept was officially understood in the mid-16th century, but also a lens through which we are invited to direct a tentative but sincere glance, every now and then, towards God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, to be in communion with God and in communion with one another.
1, It is an authentic yet reformed expression of the historic Western liturgy that has nourished millions across the generations.
2, It is an authentic expression of the devotional experience in the English-speaking world, a rooted, embodied, inherited tradition that has been embraced and passed on by a diverse group over the centuries, not something just dreamed up by a few members of the ‘worship group’ in a few snatched moments at the end of last week.
3, It is an authentic but reformed balancing of Western liturgical norms with Scripture and the theological and spiritual practices of the Early Church.
Most people do not go to church on Sunday morning to experience the rector’s latest exciting innovation. They go to church because they hope to experience God and to get a concrete sense of what it means to live out the love of God and love of neighbour, to be in communion with God and in communion with the Church. Using The Book of Common Prayer does not guarantee any of this, but it is a step in the right direction…
On the other hand, The Book of Common Prayer is not just a book for Sunday services. It also offers a full, integrated spiritual system that is intended as much for the laity as the clergy and which is founded in a lay spirituality that arose in the mediaeval period. It offers a programme for Christian growth built around liturgical spirituality.
The liturgical round is made up of three components:
1, The liturgical calendar reflects on the central mysteries of the faith through the lenses of the seasons of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ and in his continuing witness in the lives of the saints.
2, The Daily Office leads us through each day, month and year through the Scriptures and Psalms.
3, The Holy Communion or the Eucharist gathers us on Holy Days to most perfectly embody the Body of Christ and to receive the graces that the sacraments afford.
Cranmer’s original plan in The Book of Common Prayer was to mark every Sunday with the Litany and the celebration of the Holy Communion and to mark every day with Matins and Evensong.
“All priests and deacons are to say daily the Morning and Evening Prayer, either privately or openly, not being let by sickness, or some other urgent cause. And the curate that ministereth in every parish-church or chapel, being at home, and not being otherwise reasonably hindered, shall say the same in the parish-church or chapel where he ministereth, and shall cause a bell to be tolled thereunto a convenient time before he begin, that the people may come to hear God’s word, and to pray with him.”
This design was largely unimplemented for most of 400 years as clergy settled for Matins and Evensong on Sundays and Holy Communion no more than once a month or even once a quarter.
Today, it is said, Evensong is the best-loved part of The Book of Common Prayer, largely untouched by the liturgical reforms of recent decades. It continues to inspire and support great musical endeavours, and it provides a firm peg on which to hang deeply personal reflections and memories.
The Book of Common Prayer includes an elaborate system for the marking of time, gathering the elements of the mediaeval year into a compact form that has largely survived. It reinforced the basic pattern, while simplifying some aspects of the annual round, using traditional prayers and readings to mark its contours.
This system of corporate time-keeping affects all life, not just religious observance. It has given us “Mothering Sunday” because the reading traditionally provided for that particular Sunday was from that part of the Letter to the Galatians telling us that Jerusalem above is mother of us all. The British tax year begins on 6 April because under the traditional Julian calendar that day was the Feast of the Annunciation, 25 March. This day marked the first revelation of the Incarnation that was to be celebrated nine months later. Lent, Hilary, Trinity, Michaelmas, the names if not the observance, remain firmly ensconced in legal, academic and public life.
Within the Christian year, The Book of Common Prayer shaped the day by boiling down the seven mediaeval monastic daily offices into two simplified observances, Matins and Evensong. These were to be said daily by the clergy, who were to ring the church bell as a public sign that the day was being observed, as well as an invitation to any parishioners to join them.
In cathedral and collegiate foundations, these offices have been the mainstay of Anglican choral music, inspiring thousands of short compositions for the versicles and response, the lesser litany, the psalms and the canticles in every century, including Herbert Howells, Benjamin Britten and Michael Tippett.
Over 300,000 listeners a week tune into what is usually a Book of Common Prayer Choral Evensong on BBC Radio 3. Live cathedral attendances have grown in a sustained way over the past 20 years or so, and they continue to do so.
All evensong marks is the passing of another day. So what is it about evensong? The whole rich emotional hinterland of its observance is reflected at various points in popular culture, from the singing of ‘Abide with me’ at football matches to a lingering taste at some funerals for the same hymn, and ‘The Day thou gavest, Lord, is ended.’
Yet, The Book of Common Prayer is about more than prayer. It includes one whole book of the Bible – the Psalms (see pp 591-765) – which takes up over one-fifth of the full book.
It includes prefaces to the 1549, 1552, 1662, 1878, 1926 and 2004 editions (pp 7-17), Calendars (pp 18-23), the Table of Readings (pp 24-74), General Directions for Public Worship (pp 75-77), and Sentences of Scripture (pp 78-82), and we get to p. 84 before we even begin to pray!
And if you were to begin from the back, there is an index of seven pages (pp 793-799), two pages of acknowledgments (pp 790-791), the 39 Articles (pp 778-789), the Preamble and Declaration (pp 776-77), the Athanasian Creed or Quicunque Vult, which is neither a creed nor the work of Saint Athanasius, which is full of anathemas but without any instructions for its use or indications of its authority, and the Catechism (pp 766-770). And all that before we thumb back to the Psalter (pp 591-765).
But The Book of Common Prayer was always so. The previous edition, last updated in 1960, also included a “Note on the Golden Number,” three pages of tables to find Easter Day, a two-page Table of Moveable Feasts, and “A Table of kindred and affinity, wherein whosoever are related are forbidden by the ecclesiastical law of the Church of Ireland to marry together’ (p. 345). Pre-teenage boys could often wonder what connects the Golden Number with Easter – perhaps the answer was the Golden Ticket and chocolate – or why any man might have considered marrying his “mother’s father’s wife.”
There too were not only the Preamble and Declaration and but also the Canons ecclesiastical (pp 346-356), and the full hymnal too of almost 300 pages.
And if there is more to what is within The Book of Common Prayer than prayer, then there is more to The Book of Common Prayer beyond its use for the public prayer of the Church.
The Book of Common Prayer guards against reducing spirituality to the vocalisation of prayer (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Let me identify ten distinct reasons why The Book of Common Prayer is such a valuable resource for Anglican spirituality.
1, It presents a Biblically- infused faith. It provides a complete menu of the Bible over the year through the tables of readings, taking us through the great stories and narrative of salvation history.
2, Beyond this, the book is infused with the Bible, from the versicles and responses, to the collects, the canticles, and the psalms. It challenges people to sing in a Biblical way – the songs are biblical, when we read the psalms and most of the canticles – rather than reducing singing to what makes me feel good.
3, The Book of Common Prayer is a living out of the theological maxim, Lex orandi, lex credendi. What we pray reveals what we believe, what we believe should be infused through all our prayer.
4, The Book of Common Prayer is infused with a spirituality shaped by memory and by learned ways of living the Gospel. Without the tradition of liturgy, other expressions of Church fall back on their own devices, shaping worship according to their own will and mind, emphasising those parts they like and forgotten those that are too challenging. We cannot make God in our own image and likeness. The Christian story is worked through in the course of the liturgical year.
5, In The Book of Common Prayer, personal and communal spirituality are intertwined. There is a place for my own repentance, forgiveness, prayer and communion, but these are individual never atomised; they are individual, but always within the context of the communal.
6, The Book of Common Prayer provides worship that has a balanced agenda. It invites people look in and to look out, to pray for their own needs and the needs of the world. Look at the versicles and responses, for example (pp 96, 113), when everything is prayed for: for mercy for ourselves, for our rulers, for those in sacred and secular ministries, for all people, for peace, and once again for our own spiritual wellbeing. The Litany is all-embracing, and even more so (pp 169-178).
7, The Book of Common Prayer allows the people to lament together and to rejoice together.
8, The Book of Common Prayer is true to the traditions of the past, but at each revision has been open to the insights of the present. In 1933, Compline was added in an appendix, although it had been rejected by the Church of England in 1928. A Late Evening Office was introduced in the Alternative Prayer Book (1984). The most recent revision has introduced ‘A Service of the Word’ (pp 165-168) and has taken on board the insights of the liturgical movement, liturgical reforms and developments and innovations in other Churches and traditions.
The Book of Common Prayer is not stuck with a world view from the 16th century. In 1662, it took account of the turmoils of the English Civil War and provided for the Baptism of adults who had not been baptised. More recently, Anglicans have incorporated the use of inclusive language.
9, The Book of Common Prayer offers a balanced ecclesiology. It defines the Church by word and sacrament, the whole company of those who confess God’s holy name, hear his word and receive the sacraments. The Book of Common Prayer defines and shapes Anglicanism as a liturgical church. Worship is not entertainment for religious zealots and their God, nor is it or therapy, nor a mighty engine to promote public cheerfulness.
According to the Act of Uniformity, to which The Book of Common Prayer was a schedule, anyone who took part in its liturgy, however minimally, was a member of the Church. So, unusually for a Reformed church, what Anglicanism stands for is defined by liturgical statements far more than dogmatic formularies.
10, Like the old and gone News of the World, it could be said that “all human life is here,” from the cradle to the grave, from the womb to the tomb, from birth, through marriage, to death, including the prayers of Preparation for Death (pp 454-456).
Cranmer required that baptism be administered freely or “indiscriminately” to babies, so that Anglican clergy are forbidden to discriminate against whom to baptise.
The solemnisation of matrimony is probably the best-loved and best-known of what are called the occasional offices in The Book of Common Prayer. It recapitulates, in terms reminiscent of Chaucer’s Parson’s Tale, mediaeval traditions of ring, joined hands and vows. Looking forward, it brings these into the church from the porch, where couples had gathered to get married. Matrimony in The Book of Common Prayer gathers the dearly beloved in the sight of God and in the face of this congregation. Marriage is a public reality, a communal event, to be recorded in the parish registers.
Promises are exchanged and a ring given. Right hands are joined, and the priest declares: “Those whom God hath joined together, let no man put asunder.” The consents having been given and received, the promises made, the hands joined, and a ring given and received, the couple are pronounced to be man and wife.
The integrity of Anglicanism has been sustained and nourished by the traditions around the Book of Common Prayer (Photograph: Patrick Comerford)
Cherishing the tradition
The integrity of Anglicanism, as a distinctive form of Christian life and witness, has been sustained and nourished by, and radically depends upon, the tradition that has been developed through not only our liturgical use of but also our interaction with The Book of Common Prayer.
Most Anglicans have a deep sense of the worth of our traditional liturgy as spiritual nourishment in an increasingly secular world. The Book of Common Prayer is not conceived as a kind of resource-book for worship, from which one may choose elements according to one’s tastes or inclinations, or have them chosen for one by the clergy or by some “worship and praise committee.”
The Book of Common Prayer is a spiritual system, biblical, traditional, and logical, that includes, but at the same time transcends and corrects, the subjective inclinations of the worshipper or that “worship and praise committee.” It is the common prayer of priest and people, and corporate in a way in which the self-conscious “gathering of the community” can never be.
For more than 450 years, the Book of Common Prayer has contained and conveyed the essence of Anglican spirituality (Photo collage: Patrick Comerford)
Influences on language and literature
There was no uniform liturgy before the 16th century. Everything was a variation on a theme. Cranmer based his text largely on the traditional ‘use’ of Sarum, supplemented extensively by Cardinal Quiñones’ Breviary, Coverdale’s quirky yet rich and fluent translation of the psalter, insights from the Patristic writers (so many of us think of the Prayer of Saint John Chrysostom as being quintessentially Anglican) and additions from the new missal of Archbishop Hermann von Wied of Cologne, the whole edited and served up as one compilation.
The vocabulary is simple and direct, the flow is channelled and layered carefully according the principles of classical rhetoric. The Book of Common Prayer was very much a product of its age, put together as modern English was being standardised, so that it has a vibrancy and resonance like those found in Shakespeare, Marlowe or Webster.
At a time when people spoke different regional dialects, the prayer book set out a new form of official English for daily use in every community. The BCP made the same contribution to standardising English from 1549 on that the growth of the BBC in the 1920s played in developing BBC English as a standard.
As history unfolded, The Book of Common Prayer, within the setting of Anglican styles of architecture, has given the Anglicanism a distinctive religious heritage closely associated with church buildings. The poet Philip Larkin has articulated it in his poem ‘Church Going,’ in which he speaks of ‘frowsty barns’ that are, for all their smell of damp hassocks, serious places on serious earth where anyone’s longings can rise and be recognised.
The poet TS Eliot said that not just the Church, but the whole of English-speaking civilisation, was indebted to Thomas Cranmer, Richard Hooker and Lancelot Andrewes. He maintained that The Book of Common Prayer could teach a man of genius or ‘a man of first-rate ability short of genius, all that he needs in order to write English well.” Phrases from The Book of Common Prayer appear throughout his poems, and rates Cranmer’s collects among the classics of English literature.
The final title for the first section of The Waste Land is ‘The Burial of the Dead,’ the name of the funeral service in The Book of Common Prayer. The Waste Land has been read by some scholars recently as a commentary on Eliot’s own preparation for Baptism, Ash Wednesday actually draws on the Good Friday liturgy, while among his plays Murder in the Cathedral uses Cranmer’s own liturgical words rather than the mediaeval liturgies, and The Cocktail Party is read by some as a commentary on the Holy Communion.
Jeremy Taylor, the saintly 17th century bishop who was deprived of his benefice and three times imprisoned during the Commonwealth period, wrote when The Book of Common Prayer was suppressed:
“This excellent book hath had the fate to be cut in pieces with a pen-knife and thrown into the fire, but it is not consumed. At first, it was Sown in tears, and now is watered with tears; yet never was any holy thing drowned or extinguished with tears ... Indeed, the greatest danger that ever the Common Prayer Book had, was the indifferency and indevotion of them that used it as but a common blessing. But when excellent things go away, and then look back upon us, as our blessed Saviour did upon St. Peter, we are more moved then by the nearer embraces of a full and actual possession. I pray God that it may be so in our case, and that we may be not too willing to be discouraged: at least that we may not cease to love and to desire what is not publicly permitted to our practice and profession.”
[Jeremy Taylor, preface to An Apology for Authorised and Set Forms of Liturgy, reprinted in PE Hore and FL Cross (eds), Anglicanism (London, 1935), pp 177-178.]
What divides us, what unites us?
The Book of Common Prayer (Dublin: Columba Press for the Church of Ireland, 1910).
The Book of Common Prayer (Dublin: APCK for the Church of Ireland, 1960).
The Book of Common Prayer (Church Hymnal Corporation and Seabury Press, 1977).
The Book of Common Prayer (Dublin: Columba Press for the Church of Ireland, 2004).
Hefling, Charles, and Shattuck, Cynthia (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer (Oxford: OUP, 2006).
Marshall, William, Scripture, Tradition and Reason (Dublin: Columba Press, 2010).
Miller, Harold, The Desire of Our Soul (Dublin: Columba Press, 2004).
Platten, Stephen (ed), Anglicanism and the Western Christian Tradition (Norwich: Canterbury Press, 2003).
Procter, Francis, and Frere, Walter Howard, The Book of Common Prayer (London: Macmillan, 1965).
Rowell, Geoffrey, The English religious tradition and the genius of Anglicanism (Wantage: Ikon, 1993).
Spurr, Barry, ‘Anglo-Catholic in Religion’ – TS Eliot and Christianity (Cambridge: Lutterworth, 2010).
Wilson, Alan, eight-part series, ‘The Book of Common Prayer,’ parts 1-8, The Guardian, 23 August 2010, 30 August 2010, 6 September 2010, 13 September 2010, 20 September 2010, 27 September 2010, 4 October 2010, 11 October 2010.
Canon Patrick Comerford is Lecturer in Anglicanism, Liturgy and Church History, the Church of Ireland Theological Institute, and an Adjunct Assistant Professor, Trinity College, Dublin. This lecture was delivered on a course at the Mater Dei Institute of Education (MDI), Dublin, on 23 October 2014, in Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin. MDI is a College of Dublin City University (DCU).